you clearly know nothing about marketing and your readiness to state the obvious is indeed astounding, if not a tad immaturely astounding.
dogie has several review threads, and IMHO - they should all be within manufacturer child boards. I'm not butt-hurt about the fact that dogie seems to get a free unit from every manufacturer and i'm not complaining about his review threads.
you sound like an angry child.
I did point this out in the thread before it started, that all should be posted in one place. There is already the ST thread, an unofficial SP20 thread and my SP20 thread. That's fine, its 2 1/2 for one product. But adding another 10.... no other product or company would be allowed to do that. And unfortunately ck has been put in a compromised position by receiving one (outside the competition). If he moves or consolidates them then he will seem ungrateful, if he doesn't he will seem biased.
Lets take for example the Antminer S3. There have likely been 6 figures of S3s sold into the world, yet they only have 2 1/2 threads [S3 tech, mine and for a bit Sushi's]. If Bitmain threw out 10 to the community to make 10 threads, they'd be immediately locked / moved / banned because its spam / pay to spam. Unless of course the SP20 is being used to set an admin precedence.... and which point now every other company is free to spam review threads. 10 'review' threads for each of Bitmain's products, that's no different right?
Ps this thread should head over to meta once its got a bit more of a soak here.
Lets take for example the Antminer S3. There have likely been 6 figures of S3s sold into the world, yet they only have 2 1/2 threads [S3 tech, mine and for a bit Sushi's]. If Bitmain threw out 10 to the community to make 10 threads, they'd be immediately locked / moved / banned because its spam / pay to spam. Unless of course the SP20 is being used to set an admin precedence.... and which point now every other company is free to spam review threads. 10 'review' threads for each of Bitmain's products, that's no different right?
Ps this thread should head over to meta once its got a bit more of a soak here.
I, in turn, made a proposal in Meta that each manufacturer should have their own child boards.. so - if the SP-Tech reviews are getting such attention to be always at the top of the boards they are in, it's not Spondoolies fault, is it? it's clearly a fault of the forum structure.
note: i made this proposal before any of those reviews went up. I think Dogie is just a little too precious about his own review threads (which should be within manufacturer child boards in the first place)
It is Spondoolies fault it was in my view their primary goal when hosting the giveaway/competition. By giving away a unit to 10 different people that are seen as valued and knowledgable in this community they have got them advertising the miners and with 10 reviews they knew that when they asked everyone reviewer to post in the main sub forum of the biggest resource for bitcoin mining and information that they would clog up the front page. With the front page clogged any new person who comes and looks at miners will instantly see the Sp20 being praised by high rank people on the forum that are part of an "elite" group (hence the requirement for Legendary users only) and this will increase sales for the Sp20. Spondoolies giving away 10 miners to secure the backing of 10 high ranked members and more then likely securing 100's of Sp20 and future model sales is a smart tactic.
So don't be mistaken this is what spondoolies want as it is an ideal form of advertising for them and i think they have pulled it off well.
"clogged up"
none of this forum is clogged up. Please point me to a forum board which takes too long to load, or fails in any way.
) 
