Oh no doubt about that and I guess I implied this by saying that I stopped watching for quite a bit because I thought there is no way it is going to end with two goals only. Even my hope was gone that it will end with 3 goals. A funny coincidence was that when I started watching again right in that moment the one goal was scored but not given. Definitely a lucky ending when those two teams are on the pitch and it is 1-1 after 38 minutes. I guess in 90% - 95% of such games at least a third goal is scored.
But it was inspired selection before the game started as I described before. I didn't expect City to go for three or four goals if they score the first one.
Edit: as @buywaytress also said, there is less incentive to select an outcome that is against the mainstream expectation. I was sure that not too many would choose under 2.5 and at the same time thought there is a realistic chance for that outcome. Apart from the fact that it was literally over after the first half, selecting outcomes that can make the difference is also a bit of a strategic element.