Edit 2: Tennis question will not be counted this week, it is still not perfectly worded, and I see nobody has yet posted in right format. This one was a bit too demanding it seems, we will try to keep it more simple in the future. Maximum number of points for this week is 9. Tennis question is void. I belive that is the most fair solution. For those of you that did not submit your answers yet, you can skip this one or submit just for fun. Sorry for confusion.
I think the problem was not so much the question, but how the information was available.
That is, it is not easy to go to the official website and see which games will generate the next games until reaching the semifinals. So it's complicated to realize that 4 players can get there. Of course, researching deeper, you could get an idea, but it wasn't easy.
But, it was certainly possible to learn how to do better in the next round of questions.
I agree that it's literally fair to not count the Tennis question for this round, but finally it was actually understandable for me, I believe!
After the question I asked and the final wordings I read by with question before I submitted my predictions was interpreted to my understanding as, picking the four semifinalists i.e. two semi final fixtures, then the two players to make it to the finals and finally the player to win the tournament. However, it took me a whole lot of time to study the draws and get the semi final fixture combinations that are possible, since it started from round 1/128, so narrowing it down to the semi finals was quite a task, to be honest, and would have been worth it, if only the question counts, but I understand the fairness. Even if it worded correctly, I'm pretty sure a number of users that are familiar with Tennis would definitely input some semifinals fixtures combination that are practically impossible to occur.