Topic: ⭐⚽⚽ Sportsbet's EURO 2024 Last Man Standing - 0.1 BTC minimum reward ⚽⚽⭐ - page 4. (Read 9760 times)

Then I so hope bu-Waitress end up as the winner 



I'm not even checking the spreadsheet at all, I already know where my fate lies, especially with my answers to the pre tournament questions, I sure will do after we have our winner to know how close I got.

As someone who also survived the same way, I think I only have myself to blame if I get eliminated by having the second lowest points. Last Man Standing competitions are usually very brutal, I personally like a format where contestants drop like flies but that's just me I guess


There's no problem, rebuys are always there, if I get eliminated but want in, I pay the buy-in, no problem =)

The objective for me, is to encourage a bigger prize pot contribution in the beginning. I've played many similar formats, you still will end up seeing many participants after early rounds as most will buy in anyway at the beginning.

Again, just a suggestion, one that probably puts me at a disadvantage given my style. But this isn't my competition =D Glad to see one snake sort of agree but we need more sampling and BSFL seems a perfect population...

They split the prize and become Last Men Standing.
If one of the winners is a woman, she will be disqualified.

Oh yeah now this make alot more sense as this means everyone needs to carefully answer the questions as well rather than only simply submitting it without having to care about their points especially when they already have no chance to win the competition

I love these two. Current top two is taking all the time they have to prepare the best answer for the final round huh

Generally speaking current top 10 all has the chance to win but these top two might have the best shot and I checked their pre-tournament points, Dittoup has slightly better advantage in those


It will be equally shared

Do you still need to tag anyone 

Those who have a chance of winning are sure not going to miss this 

Maybe they can actually forget to submit and allowed we the mid table dweller grab it...


-----------------


What happens if there are more than one user with the same points at the end of the day ?

Yeah, agreed. We didn't really know how many people we would have and we had the shittiest of luck with 1 or 2 laggards in each round.
I did think the final stage would be reached by 10 or so, so I miscalculated it. We'll try it like this in first BSFL season, it's 15 rounds after all and that should help to reduce the number of finalists.
If it will be the same we'll implement some sort of method for next season that kicks more people out per round

This was one of the options we were considering, I like it to be honest:


_______________________________


This was a fuckup TBH, freebets were supposed to be shared by people surviving the final round, not getting to the finals. Not sure how it ended up written like this, but once it was written - no way back.
Surely we wouldn't do it like this again.


No, EURO is played on way lesser goals on average so we can't give contributions for 60 minutes. He has to play 90 and have a clean sheet for the contribution to be valid, or he can play 2 minutes if he scores or assists in that period - then his clean sheet is irrelevant.
You can use VAR before the deadline and change your answer if you want to.

_______________________________

Last Man Standing was maybe a bad name for the competition, but it was intended to be won by the guy with most points. We might test the 'real' Last Man Standing that will reward only the 1 guy that survives it all. Let us think about it a bit and see what we come up with - but the current rules are better for the competition because more people have a chance of winning.
For the sponsors it's really shitty if after 30% of the competition you have 70% of people disqualified, the competition then loses broad interest and it's hard to negotiate for the next one.

I know it might sound funny but it matters how much we discuss in the threads. That's why nobody really has any interest of sponsoring Superbru anymore and we have big budgets for BSFL 3-4 times per year.

_______________________________

I'm tagging those that did not submit yet:

Damn somehow I missed to submit early!! I actually really liked my performance in past 2 rounds, sending early, the highest scores I had in 2 rounds was sending without thinking.

And now I must hope for Spain to win to get extra pretournament points, there's nothing else I got there so sad.

Whatever the adjustments maybe this cannot improve really further unless in the last man standing concept they put the points needed to pass a round which would make this a huge one.Since I agree as I am also one of the people reaching the final because of other people failure it means that some radical changes are needed and the first one is to put a point limit for each round and this will make sure that very few persons can make it to the final.Also the concept of last man standing can be a bit better if they share the prize for the top 3 or top 5 so more people are interested,these are the changes I think can make the tournament better next time and I invite anyone to tell their views so we can improve this further.

Too many survived by the skin of their peckers and reached the end, and that's the main problem.

So many people reaching the final stage makes it less exciting and kinda goes against this "last man standing" concept. But since this was the first attempt, it was hard to predict the outcome so I hope that there will be some adjustments in the future.

As someone who survived in the early stages by the skin of pecker, I dont really agree with the suggestion :/

I feel addressed with that rule... come on, what's the problem... if that people survive, that's also good... overall, passing the round doesn't come out of their pockets, in fact, I paid a re-buyin,   and if Mathematically I had a chance, I would have paid another one +,ah! but in that next round, if I get two points, and I'm the last one, out. But! if another player gets 1, 0, he's the one out... there are always people who see the glass half empty...

What is the objective here then...win more point, and/or the last one is out. It is easy... simple mathematics   

So the free bet will be distributed after the final or before the final to waste it on the final.I am happy to have made it so far and let me put my answers to the final game questions although I don't play for nothing,am about 11 points below and I also have not put my predictions for the pre-tournament so 0 points coming my way from there while at the top the difference there can make an impact.I am very happy that I have made it to the final as my expectations when I joined were to be happy if I made it to the quarter finals yet here I am in the final.

This time I will make sure to not throw away on bad teams like Brazil the free bet.

Answers submitted, good luck to everyone still in contention for the big price especially you guys in the top 10.

I expect a great match of football on Sunday, lots of stars on show and hopefully a not so cautious final.

- Jay -

Good luck to all those still in the race to win the big prize. It’s an achievement just to make it to the final.

Have a great weekend and enjoy the final.

Yeah, I quite agree with most of the suggestions above, because it does at the end feel like the best man with the most points rather than the last man standing. It’s a new model competition so it’s understandable there will be a lot of tweaks down the stretch and my suggestion is that maybe if we have multiple elimination ladder for each round it will make more sense.

You're right, this way you close the gap between teams like igebotz, who is currently more than 10 points behind the guy who is currently second on the table, who will still share the same $30 freebets with me at the end of the tournament. I could choose not to enter my final answers and still receive the same benefits as everyone else. It's a new model, but I feel that over time, the loopholes will be closed and incentives will be given depending on efforts/ranks.

Yeah this would ensure alot more people got kicked out thus making the competition alot more extreme.

Something along the line like minimum point to survive on each round. Could start on 0 on 1-2 early rounds then increase it to 2-4. This would also increase the free bets amount for the final because most people would get knocked out probably leaving less than 15 players for the finals

but still this is good enough for the 1st lms

I would like clarification regarding the last question, regarding calculating the defenders’ contribution, is it really 90 minutes, meaning if the player changes in the 89th minute and comes out with a clean sheet, does it count or not?
Because when I answered this question, I thought it would count as what is known in fantasy

Sent my answers. Too few questions to make the gap, or if I do, it will be with 10 people. So good luck to everyone, but please submit late or forget so we can forget about you.

New suggestion for next LMS: elimination is lowest points above 0 (meaning to say the 2 lowest scores). Or possibly, if you get 2nd lowest score twice, you're also out. Or at least implement it in early stages. That would require people to get more than just 1 correct. Knee-jerk suggestion on one LMS sample, so could be a bad suggestion. Maybe if we did this again, results would be different a second time around.