Topic: Stake flags for ponzi schemes here (Read 1747 times)

I also believe his heart is in the right place (meaning on the left side of his chest  ) but the problem here is not his heart but his mind. His mind is not at the right place and this can't be fixed. Or, at least, not so easy.

I've had this same thought many times during the past few years. He won't improve.

I think so too, but that's not enough. He sees conspiracies everywhere.

Well, maybe you have a point there. It wouldn't be the first time I've put my faith in people and ended up feeling let down, and I have a sneaky suspicion it won't be the last either...

Nevertheless, I must admit, even though he can be stubborn at times, I do believe his heart is generally in the right place (well, most of the time, at least). But hey, we all have our stubborn moments, right?

This probably looks pointless now, since the damage was undone, but I salute the decision taken by 3 more DT1 users to distrust or to no longer trust TimeLord:



As I expected, the rat keeps hiding and has no guts to show up like a real man. This only shows even more about his disgusting character. Throws a ton of shit on someone's head then runs away.


I think you already did it?


Dear FatFork, I am sorry to say that, but I am doing it for you to not get disappointed later: he will never do it.

I must admit that I wasn't aware of this case before, as I'm not a regular on the Lending board. However, after reviewing the evidence presented, I couldn't find enough convincing proof to support the claim that these are alt accounts of the same user. Therefore, I don't believe that the flag against these users is justified. In my opinion, it's important to give users the benefit of the doubt unless there is substantial proof indicating otherwise. False accusations can harm individuals and their reputation, so it's crucial to exercise caution when making judgments.

While I opposed the flags, I don't want to lose trust in Timelord2067 just yet. I truly appreciate his dedication to the forum and his efforts in combating fraudulent activities, and I believe that he will ultimately do what is right and consider removing the negative trust.

ah really?
I've reached a point in life where nothing surprises me anymore

a few days ago received slaps from a person to whom I directly did a lot of good (here in the forum of course) for no real reason

no wonder he doesn't understand the difference between wallet and exchange
but i don't care either
everyone is the architect of his own destiny and if he prefers so well, his problems

what I always say is `not your keys, not your coins`

If I may offer any consolation, since he's no longer on DT, be it DT1 or DT2, his feedback will not appear on your profile or anyone looking at your profile, unless for those who put him on their trust list. As you can see on the screenshots below, for the public and most members' eyes, his feedback is "hidden" by the "untrusted feedback" button and your trust score only reflect those on current DT system.

I added him to my distrust list.
I really tried to give him space to think and still make a rational decision, but he decided on the strangest move, adding another neutral feedback, while leaving controversial negatives. Obviously not understanding the trust system, or knowingly violating it.
As such, he cannot be selected in DT.

Sup again holydarkness  


Lucky me




Damn, I only remembered the nym Freddy! It happens to forget when you have so many names...


This is true, saxydev, shitcoincollector10 and Rizzrack (the lattest being paid by the forum to protect scammers) have a broad imagination for finding new names for me  


Don't worry, holydarkness, you are with the White Side of the Force. This is also how we met, right? Nevertheless, your advice is very good!

---

Same as he still does not know what Marketplace Trust system is supposed to be (with accent on "Marketplace"). Or the Flag system.

---

3 more DT1 users distrusted or no longer trust the baboon.



Thank you all!

I still encourage TwitchySeal, Igebots, KTChampions, YOSHIE, FatFork, Stalker22 and all other DT2 users (which are eligible to be part of DT1) to do the same, for normality



And this should be enough reason for anybody to distrust TimeLord:



The village idiot just makes blunder after blunder, showing again and again he has no idea about the correct use of Marketplace Trust system. He wrote 2 identical feedbacks, one negative and one neutral (so for him same accusation is to be considered once as a negative thing and once as a neutral thing)!!! And he did the same for 2 different users!

There is no reason in the world for this idiot to be part of DT! Nor DT1, nor DT2!

Is there needed any stronger reason to distrust him? With those feedbacks it seems that he is not even capable to make a decision even for himself about how he sees a user's action -- he does not know if he should consider it neutral or negative, lol! So excepting the fact that the feedbacks themselves are pure imbecilities, the lunatic is also unable to decide what he thinks! So he makes an accusation and uses a negative feedback, then repeats the accusation, but using a neutral feedback. And does it twice!

Thank you Loycev, and thanks again to other forum members.

Make that DT2 Strength -5. I try to be conservative with Trust exclusions (and negative feedback), but this guy has shown to be unfit to be on DefaultTrust far too often. He's built a forum carreer linking alt accounts, and it turned out he doesn't understand the difference between an exchange and a wallet. Unbelievable!

Don't worry about it. This is exactly how the Trust system is supposed to work: users who leave incorrect feedback have no business being on DT. Exclude him and move on. This shows how little Untrusted feedback matters.

Yes, he was downgraded. But he left red trust on my feedback (why?) and added another trust (neutral, accusing me again).
This is a bad, bad thing.

Its not "wasted" IMO. If nobody took the time to dissect his b.s. there'd be a lot more forum members walking around with unfair negs on their heads. Its not the first time this has happened by any means. I've had this relationship with him for significantly longer than you've been here. But to rehash it all would be the true waste of time. The appropriate measures have been taken (for now), time to move on.

Lol. So, I've just seen the locked thread in question and what I think is: how much time wasted and how much energy in dismantling a conspiracy that only he believed, right? I see you took your time in dismantling his arguments very rationally, which I see commendable. I don't have so much patience for that. That's why some time ago I used the wonderful ignore button.

So Timelord was downgraded to DT Strength -4, quadrupled down on his wrongness with a second rating to the (wrongly) accused, and locked his thread, but not before deleting more posts and proclaiming that everyone telling him he's wrong is simply part of an "echo chamber," lol.


 

What about 10 people saying you're wrong?

Another strange part about this whole thing is that the thread is still in Lending -- its definitely a Reputation matter. I attempted to post a somewhat similar thread in Lending - but with actual evidence of scams - and it was moved elsewhere. WTF. Suppose it doesn't matter so much now that its locked but still.

Ladies and gentleman, I present to you, the perv Timelord:

Hmm... Can't promise you that, I find myself particularly fond of the stuffed pig part, LOL. Somehow an image of a squishy fluffy pink pig plushie with cherry-red dots on each cheek grinning widely kept appearing on my mind.


[gasp] why, Mr. Almeida, why? Why did you forget your alias?

OK, much that I love this banter, I think we'll get kicked out for derailing the thread if we kept on with it, LOL.

---

I am not saying this with any negative tone: why would it matter? The pace of the other thread where timelord got distrusted in matter of minutes and the amount of opposition for the flag raised against you showed that people are mostly see his feedback as invalid and see you for who you really are.

I can understand that you get offended by his feedbacks or how you have the need to post something else as rebuttal of his claim, but wouldn't it better to just leave it and ignore it? Or even put him on ignore list, if you deemed it necessary? Less stress that way. There are a lot of users --DTs, especially-- who got negative or neutral retaliatory feedbacks from people who got annoyed by them and the things they exposed, they mostly treat those feedback either like a bug or a battle scar.

I mean, for instance, look at GazetaBitcoin Stuffed Pig Plushie, he got a lot of name calling. If I'm not mistaken, he also once or twice called tabloid other than newspaper [still laughing at this creativity by our beloved ----dev] and he take it lightly. Deeply keeping the grudge, I believe --remind me to never cross path with you, dear plushie-- but he never let it ruin his day.

Timelord posts another trust (this time neutral) in addition to the red trust posted on may 31. And he continue to delete posts with proof. Also admin moved my post here but left his post in lending board.
He continue to offend my honor and my reputation.
This is not a good thing for me.

Sup holydarkness 


Loooooooooooool! I hope I won't receive such nice compliments from you though 


But who is Mr. Almeida?

I'm here exclusively and solely to quote this for my personal future reference, shelved next to Newspaper and Mr. Almeida.