So, if there be any user wearing stake signature and calling that a scam thread that has not be resolved be closed, then that very wrong, allow stake to handle the issue and provide a solution, you are only hired to promoting the service, not hired to defend their wrong doing.
You have perfectly said. To lock any thread by the paid member is not desired hence the participant of the campaign should try to solve the case so that there is not accusation. But if without solving the problem insist on locking the thread then it will not be for the site itself. 
Topic: Stake phishing (Read 1432 times)
So my question is why paid members of stake wants to frame me and lock this. Why are you so concern about locking and title if u r just normal forum members.
Peace
Peace
This is exaggerated behavior on the part of some members who believe that they must always defend the service that they promote in their signatures or in any other way. This can be seen in many cases, especially when they are published in the official announcement of the casino or in topics that discuss complaints about the service or even direct accusations of attempted scams.
It would have been better for their position not to be biased in any way and to be aware that critical evaluations are important for every service that wants to maintain a good reputation.
So my question is why paid members of stake wants to frame me and lock this. Why are you so concern about locking and title if u r just normal forum members.
Peace
I don't think anyone should say to lock the thread until there is a solution to the accusation. But if the accusation is closed right now should lock the thread as there is no more complain. Also, I don't think any paid member should be too much concern about it. We should be aware and keep the side of the person who lost the fund especially to the right person.Peace
And this is because, in the end, if such service goes down due to such scam activity or what ever it be, then the promoter of that service will all lose their job and it may take some time for them to find another.
So, if there be any user wearing stake signature and calling that a scam thread that has not be resolved be closed, then that very wrong, allow stake to handle the issue and provide a solution, you are only hired to promoting the service, not hired to defend their wrong doing.
So my question is why paid members of stake wants to frame me and lock this. Why are you so concern about locking and title if u r just normal forum members.
Peace
I don't think anyone should say to lock the thread until there is a solution to the accusation. But if the accusation is closed right now should lock the thread as there is no more complain. Also, I don't think any paid member should be too much concern about it. We should be aware and keep the side of the person who lost the fund especially to the right person. Peace
Why would anyone want to lock this specially of it is learning curve. I learned my mistake. Went to giving and angry phase for loosing 10k. Now it is for educational purpose so other people don't have to go through this and stake wont give a flying F if you do.
I am not broke broke but 10k to scam definetly hurts unless you are multi millionaire or have daddys money
So my question is why paid members of stake wants to frame me and lock this. Why are you so concern about locking and title if u r just normal forum members.
Peace
I don`t sure, that the problem is in paid members. The problem is that unknown member argue with the named bookie. In this situation the bookie will be right because he is well-known. I am not broke broke but 10k to scam definetly hurts unless you are multi millionaire or have daddys money
So my question is why paid members of stake wants to frame me and lock this. Why are you so concern about locking and title if u r just normal forum members.
Peace
I learned such a lesson several years ago. Today i don`t have more than $1000 in any casino.
And to all stake fans . Unlocking my account was more hassle. I had to provide older transactions to stake as a proof which was 1 requirement out of 9 or 10. Even though I provided hash and transaction ID stake support was not ready to believe it was sent to stake. I had to highline stake deposit from their sight and my transaction to prove it was indeed sent to stake.
Guy argued me for whole day on this so you can see how user friendly they are.
You can check out the transaction id from the account where you have sent it out easily. If you take from others then you may ask them or you may just find out all the receipts of the address that is on your stake profile. But if you cant login into the account then you can't get this help. Guy argued me for whole day on this so you can see how user friendly they are.
And to all stake fans . Unlocking my account was more hassle. I had to provide older transactions to stake as a proof which was 1 requirement out of 9 or 10. Even though I provided hash and transaction ID stake support was not ready to believe it was sent to stake. I had to highline stake deposit from their sight and my transaction to prove it was indeed sent to stake.
Guy argued me for whole day on this so you can see how user friendly they are.
Guy argued me for whole day on this so you can see how user friendly they are.
Why would anyone want to lock this specially of it is learning curve. I learned my mistake. Went to giving and angry phase for loosing 10k. Now it is for educational purpose so other people don't have to go through this and stake wont give a flying F if you do.
I am not broke broke but 10k to scam definetly hurts unless you are multi millionaire or have daddys money
So my question is why paid members of stake wants to frame me and lock this. Why are you so concern about locking and title if u r just normal forum members.
Peace
I am not broke broke but 10k to scam definetly hurts unless you are multi millionaire or have daddys money
So my question is why paid members of stake wants to frame me and lock this. Why are you so concern about locking and title if u r just normal forum members.
Peace
Op was online on the 23rd of October, which is a day before yesterday, I am pretty sure that he or she must have visited this thread but still did not find it plausible to say anything, this makes me believe that his accusation of being phished on stake was nothing but a big sham, lie.
Such act of disloyalty and falsehood is what have me not paying any much attention to threads such as this one that seeks to build a one-sided accusation and without any backup evidence to support the claims because judging from what has happened and the discussions here in the thread, ops may have already given up in his attempt to blackmail or frame up things around here at some point just to prove nothing much.
Sometimes those who come up with such accusations, if asked to provide evidence will simply just walk away and never return to the thread, but then we believe the thread will be locked at some point by the moderator.
Personal caution is what OP failed to take in his or her own case. So why then blaming the casino and yet can not provide any evidence pointing to the casino as having a great deal in it.
I don't consider the title of this OP IDEAL! The reason why I said this borders around the ills of the digital space. The concept of phishing link is not in anyway connected to the stake site. Stake site is just one of the sites they decided to take advantage of. There are phishing links for even myetherwallet site.
Generally, we should be careful of phishing links and ensure to avoid clicking links or verify the url of those links when we see them on our devices. I make no mistake about checking the url in my devices before I click, that is if I have to.
Generally, we should be careful of phishing links and ensure to avoid clicking links or verify the url of those links when we see them on our devices. I make no mistake about checking the url in my devices before I click, that is if I have to.
Since it seems that you are moving away from online gambling and you will begin to do so in real life instead then it could be a good idea to learn as well of all the scams that exist and that could come your way as you move to physical casinos and gamble there.
Maybe gamblers who are victims will come to this forum and immediately enter the gambling section to express what they are experiencing and even really ask for solutions or suggestions so that what has happened can be resolved.
Almost any gambling site that does not have high trust rating and good reputation will have high chance of being shady casino so we as gamblers should avoid such types of casinos.
Even though it is difficult to differentiate there are number of large casinos that are popular and certainly have good reputation.
My advice is to use a casino like this rather than using a small casino that has not been proven to be reliable.
Exactly the point, because even if a platform has very good security but the account bearer jokes with their account security information, they would definitely help hackers gain access to their account, and in such a situation, the casino, or whatever platform it is, would not take blame for it. How can one receive a phishing email and go ahead to click on the link attached to the email? It's never right to click links without properly verifying if the link or the email is from the right source. I hope that OP can practice always verifying a link to see if it's right or not before he can open it. Sometimes, once a link is inserted inside a word or sentence, unless you copy it out, you can tell if it's the correct link, so it's not wise to even click a link directly from the source and cross-check if it's correct.
The better option is to bookmark the URL of the site and open the link from the bookmark so there won't be a risk to go another site and by then there will be no chance to be phishing by the mistake of that user. As a result, the user can make physhing free of himself/herself. 
Op was online on the 23rd of October, which is a day before yesterday, I am pretty sure that he or she must have visited this thread but still did not find it plausible to say anything, this makes me believe that his accusation of being phished on stake was nothing but a big sham, lie.
Such act of disloyalty and falsehood is what have me not paying any much attention to threads such as this one that seeks to build a one-sided accusation and without any backup evidence to support the claims because judging from what has happened and the discussions here in the thread, ops may have already given up in his attempt to blackmail or frame up things around here at some point just to prove nothing much.
Sometimes those who come up with such accusations, if asked to provide evidence will simply just walk away and never return to the thread, but then we believe the thread will be locked at some point by the moderator.
Honestly, I have no argument to discuss the OP's credibility since he's been inactive for over a month which raises different hypotheses. The topic title is very misleading and should have been changed before leaving, or the stake platform representative should have asked one of the admins to change it if it is not possible to close the topic currently, since the discussion is still ongoing in it, as it appears. As for the last 4-5 pages, I'm sure it's definitely spam, and the most plausible hypothesis is that the OP doesn't know how to lock the thread.
Op was online on the 23rd of October, which is a day before yesterday, i am pretty sure that he or she must have visited this thread but still did not find it plausible to say anything, this makes me believe that his accusation of being phished on stake was nothing but a big sham, lie.And secondly, if indeed he or she does not know how to lock a thread, then let him or her here and I believe every user who knows how to will be more than willing to tell him how, or better still, he or she can just search on google, "How to lock thread on bitcointalk".
And again, Stake representatives don't have to actually do anything, if we users feel the thread should no longer be open for discussions, we can simply report it to the mods, and with time, the mods will lock it, this is not impossible or hard to do.
I have reported the topic and I hope that moderators will take into consideration the reputation of stake's platform.
complaints that been raised then credibility of such platform would really be that in verge on getting that be tainted but since this community cant really be just that easily to believe then it is really
that not much effective most of the time on trying out to take down a certain site and since we are talking with phishing on here then it is really just that safe to presume that this is really
that on users fault. Once other people do have access into your site just because you have just get phished then its really that whole discetion on what happened and not on the platform
itself. It is really just that showing on how reckless you are and now you are putting up some blame to the platform? It doesnt make sense.
Honestly, I have no argument to discuss the OP's credibility since he's been inactive for over a month which raises different hypotheses. The topic title is very misleading and should have been changed before leaving, or the stake platform representative should have asked one of the admins to change it if it is not possible to close the topic currently, since the discussion is still ongoing in it, as it appears. As for the last 4-5 pages, I'm sure it's definitely spam, and the most plausible hypothesis is that the OP doesn't know how to lock the thread.
Op was online on the 23rd of October, which is a day before yesterday, i am pretty sure that he or she must have visited this thread but still did not find it plausible to say anything, this makes me believe that his accusation of being phished on stake was nothing but a big sham, lie.And secondly, if indeed he or she does not know how to lock a thread, then let him or her here and I believe every user who knows how to will be more than willing to tell him how, or better still, he or she can just search on google, "How to lock thread on bitcointalk".
And again, Stake representatives don't have to actually do anything, if we users feel the thread should no longer be open for discussions, we can simply report it to the mods, and with time, the mods will lock it, this is not impossible or hard to do.
I have reported the topic and I hope that moderators will take into consideration the reputation of stake's platform.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 538
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Just to reiterate though and not defending anyone, it's not the gambling platform's fault if you have been phished or something. For sure majority of them have good security, but if you have been phished and you click some links so that blame is on you.
Exactly the point, because even if a platform has very good security but the account bearer jokes with their account security information, they would definitely help hackers gain access to their account, and in such a situation, the casino, or whatever platform it is, would not take blame for it. How can one receive a phishing email and go ahead to click on the link attached to the email? It's never right to click links without properly verifying if the link or the email is from the right source. I hope that OP can practice always verifying a link to see if it's right or not before he can open it. Sometimes, once a link is inserted inside a word or sentence, unless you copy it out, you can tell if it's the correct link, so it's not wise to even click a link directly from the source and cross-check if it's correct.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1083
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Honestly, I have no argument to discuss the OP's credibility since he's been inactive for over a month which raises different hypotheses. The topic title is very misleading and should have been changed before leaving, or the stake platform representative should have asked one of the admins to change it if it is not possible to close the topic currently, since the discussion is still ongoing in it, as it appears. As for the last 4-5 pages, I'm sure it's definitely spam, and the most plausible hypothesis is that the OP doesn't know how to lock the thread.
Op was online on the 23rd of October, which is a day before yesterday, i am pretty sure that he or she must have visited this thread but still did not find it plausible to say anything, this makes me believe that his accusation of being phished on stake was nothing but a big sham, lie.And secondly, if indeed he or she does not know how to lock a thread, then let him or her here and I believe every user who knows how to will be more than willing to tell him how, or better still, he or she can just search on google, "How to lock thread on bitcointalk".
And again, Stake representatives don't have to actually do anything, if we users feel the thread should no longer be open for discussions, we can simply report it to the mods, and with time, the mods will lock it, this is not impossible or hard to do.
I believe you are going to concentrate more on committing your time to something more realistic even though you may have to work extra hours to cover up which is a great thing also at sometimes, but then I advise you to stay off gambling for a while and in as much as it goes gambling whether you like it or not, you must ensure loses at some point that may make you want to keep chasing it, that is the reason why we say gambling is not a good means of earning and rather gambling should be done just for the fun of it.
prone on such risks.
In overall, If you arent that rich then spending money on gambling is never been that ideal and since op is already that aware of those things that could happen then its good to know
but its just that normal that experience and real time scenarions could really be giving out that kind of learning on which it do makes us aware on next time.
I believe you are going to concentrate more on committing your time to something more realistic even though you may have to work extra hours to cover up which is a great thing also at sometimes, but then I advise you to stay off gambling for a while and in as much as it goes gambling whether you like it or not, you must ensure loses at some point that may make you want to keep chasing it, that is the reason why we say gambling is not a good means of earning and rather gambling should be done just for the fun of it.
Honestly, I have no argument to discuss the OP's credibility since he's been inactive for over a month which raises different hypotheses. The topic title is very misleading and should have been changed before leaving, or the stake platform representative should have asked one of the admins to change it if it is not possible to close the topic currently, since the discussion is still ongoing in it, as it appears. As for the last 4-5 pages, I'm sure it's definitely spam, and the most plausible hypothesis is that the OP doesn't know how to lock the thread.
Jump to: