Topic: Stake vs Fixed bounty allocation - page 11. (Read 7193 times)
Stake based bounties are preferable to me, cause a fixed amount won't inspire me. But, in stake, probably I can get higher rewards than the fixed one depending on the task, participant limits, etc. But yes, nowadays, there is a high chance of getting fewer tokens due to overwhelming participation in all bounties.
if the payment every week uses a token it must have a very long bounty duration because we can get a lot of tokens, if the duration of the bounty is brief and the participant joins a little then it will be very detrimental to the participant because a lot of the remaining tokens will be wasted if left out token?
I prefer calculation using stake because all tokens will be divided evenly depending on the rank of the account
I prefer calculation using stake because all tokens will be divided evenly depending on the rank of the account
I believe stake and fixed bounty allocation are remain the same. But it's also depends on how much is the total participants of the bounty program. I prefer stake allocation rather than fixed allocation, because if the bounty funds are running out, the fixed allocation bounty will be stopped.
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
I am doing bounty also for a long time but i didn't think that fixed prize better than stakes. Yes you know that how much you'll earn end of the week but in my little experience that wasn't worth it. example, in stakes way you can earn weekly from a twitter campaign 60$ if that project is really good but in fixed campaign's project it's too much for them. because they have to advertisement there project smoothly with this fixed prize.
Stakes are more risky but more profitable potentially. Fixed allocation is more predictable but often less profitable. Both types of bounty are good, it's up to you, which one to take part in.
If we are talking about a signature campaign I always prefer stake allocation, as a high-rank member it's advantageous and profitable for me there are not many signature participants compare to other bounty campaigns where the participants can number thousands of participants because everybody can participate, they can include as many campaigns as possible.
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
I choose stake allocation, coin that doesn't have a market price yet look more attractive to me than a fixed allocation coin or token.
I also prefer fixed allocation of tokens instead of stakes. Bounty hunters can calculate how many tokens they can earn at the end when there is a fixed pool of tokens for bounty campaigns. There are some problems in stakes like bounty pools may be reduced under various pretexts, and you cannot know how many tokens you can get at the end.
I understand you sentiment, we high rank really benefit more if the stake is followed.
It's the same effort and yet high rank get's higher reward, and I think that would not change because high rank also has a wider and bigger signature display.
indeed this seems unfair to some people, but i think it's legitimate. It's the same effort and yet high rank get's higher reward, and I think that would not change because high rank also has a wider and bigger signature display.
as you say high ranking has a pretty large signature display and it will make investors more quickly see the project being promoted.
that is why allocations for high rankings such as Legendary and hero rank are greater than below their rank.
I very rarely participated in projects with a fixed payment depending on the rank of BTT. Usually, a staky. But the main thing is to pay on time, which is now a rarity.
I prefer fixed allocation to stakes system because at the beginning of the bounty, you know the exact amount you can get. In the stakes system, those with higher ranks normally cheat those with lower stakes.
that's of course. People with higher rankings will get more stake than those with lower rankings. That is the difference between the members in bitcointalk. And you only know the exact amount you received when you received it I prefer fixed allocation to stakes system because at the beginning of the bounty, you know the exact amount you can get. In the stakes system, those with higher ranks normally cheat those with lower stakes.
I understand you sentiment, we high rank really benefit more if the stake is followed. It's the same effort and yet high rank get's higher reward, and I think that would not change because high rank also has a wider and bigger signature display.
yeah very frustrating atimes to see what the high rank members are getting in comparison to low rank accounts, but as a low rank you have to accept it since that is how it is, they are like old staffs in a company that will earn more than new intakes
, fixed allocation makes it more just for both high and low ranks, you will get what you deserve no calculation needed. 
I prefer fixed allocation to stakes system because at the beginning of the bounty, you know the exact amount you can get. In the stakes system, those with higher ranks normally cheat those with lower stakes.
I understand you sentiment, we high rank really benefit more if the stake is followed. It's the same effort and yet high rank get's higher reward, and I think that would not change because high rank also has a wider and bigger signature display.
I prefer fixed allocation to stakes system because at the beginning of the bounty, you know the exact amount you can get. In the stakes system, those with higher ranks normally cheat those with lower stakes.
Well, actually both have different advantages. But personally, I prefer to choose fixed bounty rewards, moreover, we can get it is fixed amount and sent weekly or monthly so that we will not feel worried not getting the coin or token.
Fixed bounty reward is very profitable especially for the members that have lower accounts (especially for the signature campaign). And we can also count in what amounts we will get in a certain period.
Fixed bounty reward is very profitable especially for the members that have lower accounts (especially for the signature campaign). And we can also count in what amounts we will get in a certain period.
now it seems like the bounty manager and developer don't really appreciate the bounty hunter. there are no restrictions on participants and they at will limit the participants who can join. and allocation cuts, or other rules changes are very reasonable.
If that's the case, then stop supporting the project they like you to promote. They can't cut the reward or change the rules when it's already part of the contract in the beginning, that would one sided and not fair for bounty participants. There are other bounties that has a statement "the manager reserves the right to change the rules anytime", you should not join that kind of bounty.
Well there's pros and cons
With Stake allocation, your pay will be vary and it could be much higher than initial or lower than what you expected
With Fixed allocation, your pay will be consistent and you will get what you see
Well i prefer Fixed allocation as it seems better here
With Stake allocation, your pay will be vary and it could be much higher than initial or lower than what you expected
With Fixed allocation, your pay will be consistent and you will get what you see
Well i prefer Fixed allocation as it seems better here
now it seems like the bounty manager and developer don't really appreciate the bounty hunter. there are no restrictions on participants and they at will limit the participants who can join. and allocation cuts, or other rules changes are very reasonable.
The both are good,this doesnt mean the project will do better if stake or fixed reward are been used,meaning it has no impact on the project itself,why can't we focus on how good the project is?i think that's all that matters?
It doesnt matter if its stake or fixed allocation what matters is the project itself,if its good enough i won't mind promoting the project either staked or fixed
Indeed. I think stakes or fixed is not really big problem,it depend on how great project it self. Its quite difficult to find project with great plan. Its not 2017 or 2016, we all know so many project failed. If we choose fixed alocation sometimes they limited partisipant also. It better we join on stakes based but they limited partisipant. Jump to: