Topic: Stake vs Fixed bounty allocation - page 12. (Read 7193 times)
It depend how much token alocation and how many bounty partisipant. We must look at other factors. If token alocation quite big but bounty partsipant also more than expectation it will also decrease our payment. We must more detail about it.
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
With a system stake, if there are few participants, there will be a lot of reward for bounty hunters. Unlike fixed allocation, if a participant in a bounty campaign, it will not affect the acquisition of tokens because it has been determined by the bounty manager. I think both systems are good as long as the project is running and has value in the market
That defends on your rank but like me which is a legendary rank, I would prefer on stake basis as I know I have bigger share compared to members with lower ranks.
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
I do with you on the fixed token allocation, it gives more clarity about what you are going into and no matter what happens you sure to get your token but on the stakes allocation no matter how good the project is, issues must surely come up
Fixed allocation very profitable if the project to be followed has a very large number of participants because you will still get the token that has been agreed before. But on the contrary, allocations remain unsuitable for projects that do not have many participants, when participants are slightly better off using stake-based allocations. And fixed allocation is more suitable for bounties that have a small amount of allocation or they pay with stable coins.
Means you are following a wrong project or a bad project. So far, as long as I follow the bounty, they always give bonuses when their projects reach hardcap. In fact, most projects only reach softcaps that cut the token allocation.
If hardcap reached any campaign, stake will be good reward. Fixed allocation bounty reward could minimize if hardcap can't touch any project.
Many projects have been successful. Hardcap has reached its goal. But stake bounty has been cut, I don't understand why they did it. They cut the bounty budget and have no good reason. And some projects only get softcap but they still don't cut bounty. Participating in bounty now is really crazyMeans you are following a wrong project or a bad project. So far, as long as I follow the bounty, they always give bonuses when their projects reach hardcap. In fact, most projects only reach softcaps that cut the token allocation.
Stake all the way,better at rewarding than fixed allocation but fixed allocation bounties always makes more sense than most stake bounties and scammers love using the stakes
It doesnt matter if its stake or fixed allocation what matters is the project itself,if its good enough i won't mind promoting the project either staked or fixed
If only the BM can stay true to their words stake is good. Although, youe chances of gettinh high reward depends on your followers and quality of your work. Some Project managers tends to look for means of cutting the pool sometimes.
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
I think it is not too different from stake. But I really like to be stakes more because it depends on how hard you work.Those who do more will be rewarded with more tokens. It seems more fair and motivating for bounty hunters.
I prefer stakes allocation because you can have more reward with your extra efforts on doing the task. So you are right, it keeps bounty hunters to do more and feel motivated. Actually, fixed or stakes allocation it won't guarantee the payment. Some bounty campaigns are scam and we have nothing to do about it. Just do what to do and everything will be paid off one day.
I agrer with you. Fixed bounty allocations has a good advantage that you would know how much would you receive in the end of the bounty campaign, unlike stake bounty campaign, you wouldn't know how much you receive and you also dont know if all of the allocated tokens are distributed.
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
Fixed allocation is beneficial for bounty hunters if bounty campaigns are followed by many people. But in my opinion the two methods are good and I think the bounty manager has his own consideration when determining reward distribution based on stake or fixed.
Actually, both stakes or fixed amount of the bounty rewards will depend on each bounty and rank of the accounts.
1. Stakes will be very worthy of the participants are limited, only a few accounts that have higher ranks, high token allocations for each bounty campaign, and also time for bounty period
2. A fixed amount will be worthy if we are in low rank, there are many participants that are joining, limited token allocations, and also certain period.
1. Stakes will be very worthy of the participants are limited, only a few accounts that have higher ranks, high token allocations for each bounty campaign, and also time for bounty period
2. A fixed amount will be worthy if we are in low rank, there are many participants that are joining, limited token allocations, and also certain period.
I think most of the project stack is unclear, and most participants do not know the exact amount they will receive, unlike fixed bounty allocations, you can decide if you participate or not from the 1st day, and easy to know amount you will receive.
I feel that if the project allocates enough tokens then stakes would be more beneficial as in case of translations, the communities that are more active benefit the translators and they get maximum number of stakes unlike the cases with fixed bounty allocation where no matter how much recognition you bring in for a project, you get the same reward as another user who hasn't done much to promote the project. If they have a fixed allocation, it's better to give in BTC/ETH rewards then.
I do prefer fixed bounty allocations over staked based bounties. My reason is that with that everyone is assured of what to get rather than having to think of what will come out after the stake calculation. Most BM shortchange hunters with the stake based stuff cos some hunters do not know how the stakes are calculated.
I prefer fixed bounty allocation because you know how much you earn and for how much work. A lot uf us working a lot for few cents while we avoid bounty campaigns where we can earn atleast 20USD per week.
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
When it comes on assurance on getting paid then it doesnt really depend if the said bounty do give out stake or fix basis.It will always depend on the projects legitimacy on the first place for its hunters to be get paid in the end of the bounty.The difference with fix is that you do already know the amount you would potentially recieve since its fixed then it cant be changed no matter on what would be the price of the said token in the market.When it comes to stakes,you can receive more but due to hundreds of participants you would receive less.
I also like to work in those programs where there is a fixed payment. This allows you to know exactly how much your work is estimated and how much, according to the conditions, you can get. Also, fixed payment is much safer than steaks or a percentage allocated from sales. Unfortunately, not every bounty offers a fixed payment, and this is a bit distressing.
Stakes is far better of than fixed reward. With stakes, you earn as much unique and hardwork you put to your tasks than others, which implies that depending on your hardwork, you either earn more or less compare to others
I would prefer the stake to fixed allocation. A lot of projects i participated that was fixed end up to be shitty work and bm tends to just allocate the payment based on fixed allocation.
Jump to: