Topic: Stake vs Fixed bounty allocation - page 13. (Read 7193 times)
for stake, most do offer good rewards, but remember that bounty using stake usually has certain rules, for example they allocate bounties based on sales results, but usually no more than 2-5% and if sales are obtained, the minimum reward offered is also small, different from fixed allocation they offer usually from the total supply / circulating supply but of course the allocation is not as much as the payment of stakes but this is safer in my opinion and I prefer fixed allocations for no
There is no significant difference. It is an advantage to hunters while it is disadvantage to dev when using stake instead of fixed token. This is because for a stake allocation, the token allocated is fixed. Meaning, if anyone do not fulfill the weekly report and do not have the stake, it will be an advantage to hunters but if the token is fixed, it is not. Irrespective of the two, if the token is doing great and the project has solid background with great token sales. Everyone will smile
Fixed bounty allocations is much more advantageous than staked bounty allocation. First , your rewards are not in anyway tied to the activities of other users, you get to know before hand what to expect and are in much more control over what you earn. The longer the campaign, the more the reward- unlike stakes that can be extended without corresponding increase in the budget.
I think both options are good. Fixed distribution guarantees fair pay, but it will always be small. While the stake system pushes you to work more to get more tokens. That is why I like both of these options.
Recently, I have noticed a very popular trend, when Bounty companies do not comply with the terms of the transaction. After completing a bounty company, participants always receive a lot less reward than promised from the start. As an example, companies like ADAB, MenaPay, Dabbling and many others can be cited. 
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
well, that your choice , actually,i have no problem about how allocation seted.
both of them for me still have a same value.
i can joined all of them,but if u talking about signature, of course i will choose stake system.
I think each type has a different interest. A default we know in advance what we will get and one must wait, it is also fun. And I like you, I like to fix, know what I will get and decide to join or not
Personally i have earned better with stakes based bounty, obviously if they have allocated good enough reward for bounty campaigns while fixed tokens campaigns are usually not much rewarding as they pay certain amount of tokens per week which is fixed and i have not yet seen some good reward fixed bounty yet so i prefer stake based campaigns.
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
Stake allocation is much better even though the result of our token will depend on the development progress of the ico itself. as you can see that the fixed allocation gives less payment to the participants and what will you do when there was a platform that offers you a small fixed allocation amount? With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
Stake bounties are more predictable and hence you know from the start how much you could expect to get paid. But with most of the ICOs unable to achieve the hard cap nowadays, even the fixed stake campaign are not providing tokens to the bounty participants.
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
i will choose a bounty campaign depends from the project itself, if the project look good and have a lot of potential
i will joined their campaign, whatever the paying methode, so for me stake based and fixed rewards is same mate
Personally, I also prefer the fixed allocation of a bounty, but I also see the price of coins from the bounty, if the price is cheap and the participants are large, I will not join the bounty, and it's different if the price is expensive, because everyone is sure will like it.
Both will end up the same. Even it says that fixed bounty allocation, the rewards still depending on the number of participants and the stakes you've received every week.
If we'll want more rewards, then it has to choose a fixed number of participants or having its maximum numbers.
If we'll want more rewards, then it has to choose a fixed number of participants or having its maximum numbers.
Stakes base bounty allocation and Fix bounty allocation is just the same! you know why because if the campaign was not controlled its participants its just the same ending earning with a few tokens at the end of the campaign. But if the fix allocation bounty campaign was only limited in participation thats good after the campaign was end im sure it will be more tokens will be collected.
I prefer stake bounty allocation. Earning opportunity is more if there aren't many participants, Also depends on the project. If project is good I'll even participate in fixed bounty allocation.
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
I prefer systems based on stake because if you work harder, you will get more tokens. I think bounty with fixed stake will be suitable for projects paid by BTC, ETH or liquidated token.
Fixed allocations are rare, at least in my experience. I have not participated in many campaigns that had a fixed bounty pool. Most users seem to prefer the staked bounties but I prefer the fixed allocation bounties. That way I know how much I can expect to earn in the end and there arent too many surprises.
The stake based bounties are unpredictable and you never know how popular it will become and how many participants you will have to share your earnings with.
The stake based bounties are unpredictable and you never know how popular it will become and how many participants you will have to share your earnings with.
With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?
I notice rewards that stake allocation are more profitable than fixed allocation, I only joined one campaign that offers fix allocation, it is more profitable when you join as a signature bounty hunter than a social media bounty hunter, and besides it's seldom can we see a campaign that offers fix allocation.
From my experience stakes based bounty programmes are giving more tokens at the end. But it also depends on fixed rewards. There are bounties that are giving 20 dollars for a signature campaign and 60 dollars for facebook and twitter reports. Generally it all depends on the campaign budget and fixed token rewards.
full member
Activity: 882
Merit: 102
PayAccept - Worldwide payments accepted in seconds
It depends on total token allocation and number of participants, if there are a lot of participants and only few tokens reserved for bounty, then stake bounty campaign is not profitable.
I do preffer to join into campaign that payment is based on stake. Usually it can give more token in the last calculation, stake make me want to earn it more and because of this people not be lazzy to get it.
Sometimes fixed allocation in the end of payment, its not all of the allocation are distributed, because some slots are empty, its make bounty allocation not fully distribute.
Sometimes fixed allocation in the end of payment, its not all of the allocation are distributed, because some slots are empty, its make bounty allocation not fully distribute.
Jump to: