Topic: Stake.com Signature Campaign - A new kind of future - page 3. (Read 2173 times)

actually, i still don't know what the criteria he made to choose the current member?
because of the active member and the most member receive rewards from HQ POST from the contest still got removed,
can @SteveStake share what the criteria for him to choose the current member? is it because the current member made a less post from the other?

Good improvement for the rules, hopefully this will minimize the spam problem in the forum.

I can say that it's the most generous pay for the lower rank, and also hopefully this lower ranks will be inspired to make good post as this opportunity is not present all the time, good posts can also help them as they might be awarded with merits which would help them to rank up. It's a win-win.

Seems like Steve will be more strict in monitoring the participants performance in this campaign.

Yeah... let's make good posts for the good for the forum.

You are suggesting  0.01 BTC per participating member yet according to last week's total payment for all members, it was just roughly 0.07 BTC 

If their budget is within the range of 0.07 to 0.1 BTC as total pay out per week, then they will have to only accept very few participants(between 7 and 10 chaps) which we all know won't be fair to them and other people looking to join their campaign including you 

If you prefer quality, then why are you suggesting him to put a minimum amount of posts per week? 40/week is a pretty big number for many people, and this will only incentive them to spam up to the minimum so they can get paid.

Each campaign get to make their decisions on what they want to pay and it's up to users to join if they find it good enough, not all campaigns can afford what other big campaigns pay, I was in a campaign as a Member ranked users and earned 0.006 BTC on a weekly basis, meanwhile there are other several campaigns that doesn't even pay Legendary members that much.

---

The only feedback I can give as well would be that there should be some differences between the pay rates across ranks, and there should be a minimum number of post required weekly so that you don't keep inactive users in the campaign.

This is a really good move of Stephen in this campaign, I admit that, and for sure many members of this forum will agree on this too.

I was part of this campaign since the first-day of June so I am 2 weeks in the signature campaign. It maybe sounded like early judgment but working with dose ( Stephen's assistant in the campaign ) and Stephen is a real deal to me.
When it comes in payment Stephen always gives us information about it, when to claim it and if we have a problem in it just contact him. For the past 2 weeks, I didn't see any complaints about it. Kudos to this campaign manager.
When it comes in posting I take it seriously, joining in their contests made me feel like I am helping the forum to grow more. I am not that so good poster but I believe I am not spamming the forum in the past 2 weeks or even when I am just starting to post in this forum. I just feel to say this to all of you with all my respect. I'm glad that I became part of this campaign and I would love to be a part of this campaign continuously.
I know it will take a time for other members of this forum to trust the campaign due to some spammers but I will continuously give all my best to prove myself that I am not a spammer of this forum, I just feel today that all of the posts that I did in the last 2 weeks were not valuable due to that fact that I am no longer in the campaign.

I just want y'all to know that I believe I deserve to be part of this campaign again, not just to make benefit from it but also to prove that I am not one of those spammers and to continuously provide information that I know for those who need.

Good day to all of you.  

This is not correct section. It will be better if you ask this question in your signature campaign thread, there you will find answers from those users who might interested in joining your campaign. (users can suggest you this on while applying).
Many people may find this as clickbait promotion.

You should add this spreadsheet in your signature thread. New applicants can check how previous weeks were gone.
I saw only one member earned 0.005BTC+ with 105 posts and he is Hero member. There are many other campaigns which pays more than 0.01BTC for 30 Min post to Hero member.

---

It seems you focus on Quantity rather than Quality. You may think more posts can get you more users. This is not like that, if posts quality are good then it attracts more users towards the post and it provides attention to your signatures.


My suggestions (I prefer Quality)
Mini & Maximum paid post: 40 to 60
Weekly payment: 0.01 BTC for all member ( I am not against higher member, just because of merit all members are trying to post quality posts, so if posts of higher and lower members are having same quality then why we should pay less to lower member and high member) (Yeah, sometime HM are more useful)
Minimum Character: 70


I would like to join your camp but I am not eligible one, soon I will get my rank up.

I am glad you are making some positive changes to your campaign. Provided you can monitor your participants, your campaign shouldn’t generate too much spam (and harm to the forum).

I will withdraw my request to have your signatures banned. Although I will continue to allow anyone to continue posting in the thread for now.

This is nice move Steve  

I have just seen the new changes and everything seems Okay now. People won't have to over post in order to get more sats like it was before. The much more improved pay rate will be a good motivation to reduce spam among the participants.

As, for the equal pay on all participants... I think it's actually cool. Most people here think that lower ranked members are always shit posters but i have seen higher ranked members post garbage too. And the higher pay rate for low ranked members means that they will be encouraged to make even much better posts if they want to stay in the campaign.

The main issue was spamming and not pay rate, Those who feel that their higher ranked accounts can not get the same pay rates as lower rank Members could just opt out of the campaign. I mean it optional to participate or leave. Just do your thing  

So why are you commenting about it ? lol

It's so fuckin impossible to keep everyone happy at the same time. First, spam was the problem and now everyone is whining about the pay-rates. No one is forcing you to join the campaign if you don't like the rates or the rules move on. I like the new rules but the 100 minimum count should probably go away as that is not a clear indication of a good post.

From my knowledge most participants were kicked.

Not sure if you are one from them,you can ask about this in their signature campaign thread and hope there will be a reply.

It's good move that you finally decided to clean-up campaign. I just want to add my 2 satoshis about your payment rates. I can't say that people now are complaining about higher payment rates, they just find it unusual that rates are same for every rank. My opinion why rates should be different for every rank:
Hero/Legendary members been here much longer than Jr. Members and it's likely that they have better knowledge about crypto and can make better posts. Offcourse, there are many lower ranked members who can make great posts and deserves to get paid well.
Hero/Legendary signatures are more effective than Jr. Member or Member. It's bigger, colourful and more visible. I have no doubts that these signatures gives much better results for advertiser and high ranked users are more beneficial for yur website.
But offcourse, you're the boss here and you decide what is best for your website. If I recall correctly, your campaign isn't first with same rates for all members. For example, Bitmixer campaign paid 0.0007 BTC per post for every rank. Only difference that they only accepted high ranked members starting with Sr. Mmember. Probably there was more campaigns, but I can't remember their names now.

Thanks for being part of this campaing for some weeks and for replying attentively all my questions during this time, I also extend this gratitude to other members who were in contact at some point.
With that said, I don't understand what is the reason behind the exclusion of so many campaign members: if posts quality was taken in consideration it makes no sense, as there are members who were kept on the campaign and have the same posts quality (or lower) than others who were removed.

The campaign manager has the right to remove anyone he wants or to follow the orders to remove from who he wants, but I have to point this observation, otherwise the few who were kept will be considered the excellent posters, while all the rest will be put on the same garbage can as junk, what isn't true and isn't fair.

I think the proper butthurt way of dealing with being fired from a campaign is to launch a frivolous scam accusation against the campaign manager. Let's hope Steve didn't move two similar Bitcoin amounts within the same month because that would be "proof" of something.

/s because I don't have one in my sig anymore.

The rates are OK now but I've noticed the contest bonus has been removed and still there are section limitations which make it difficult for users. Rest, it is a lot better than earlier terms but same pay for all users makes it unfair for Legendary members and more beneficial for member ranks as there is no limit on the number of participants that join. There would be many junior ranks joining this campaign due to the higher pay rate.

As per the spreadsheet, the number of participants has reduced from 132 to 28 which is a very good sign. Good luck!

Edit: Hope there is no payment link rule now as it's better to directly deposit the money in the users' account rather than make them claim it. Many time members may not be aware to claim the money. Had already notified you about the same but kindly consider it.

Waah, waah. I'm entitled to my signature campaign peanuts!

You can be removed from a campaign for any reason. There's no "contract"... unless you think that Steve deserves a flag for violating it?

Yes, I know. It hurts my eye-balls. I was just fucking with you bud.

This is the avatar that is added back when animated avatar is permitted. After that regulations came stating no more animated avatars allowed other than the one that were in use.

Much convincing now,but make sure that how many total participants in your campaign or there any opening slots to be filled yet because I saw still people were applying on the signature campaign thread.

IDK, but can you please re-upload your avatar, it looks messed up or something.