Topic: Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Alfa Romeo F1 Team - page 23. (Read 283027 times)

Finally, I manage to win again another huge win to break my bad luck on slot game. This time I managed to scoop x3510 multiplier using 30$ bonus buy on few tries.

An insane 672$ profit to end my game earlier just to secure this profit. Such a good Monday it is. 

New Week, more Giveaways!

https://stakecommunity.com/board/30-promotions/

One would assume that's coming sooner or later, or if you win big enough.

Usually policy changes that need ton of work require a transition period and this is probably one of these cases.

Regulations have just changed, and they could even change back soon if there's enough political pressure behind deregulators. So i am thinking that casinos are demanding as long as possible transition phase, to work out how to suddenly kyc insane amount of old users. And during that they probably hope that there will be policy changes for less regulations.

And it just makes sense for both regulators and casinos, that they would start this complying by kyc:ing just new registrants first.

I don't think they do. I have a review platform and Stake is one of the business we promote there. They have not asked for KYC yet however this account is old. As far as I know the old accounts did not require KYC.

Adding the percentage of the win by the bettor I find it difficult feature to do in Stake as most people there keep a hidden profile and therefore we only can believe what Stake tell us about them as there is no other way to know. Still if they manage to break down the segmentation like that level I described it would be great and not that time consuming activity anymore. Their slot machines are killer money for people like you and me and I see that all the time people complaining there, no they are not people who can't take the heat, they can very well though based on those complaints and my personal statistics I totally quit Stake slots and use only the copy bet feature because of the ease to do so and not taking my time to kill my brain cells to build bets  .

This is a nice suggestion. It’s some kind of filter to easily find your desired bet type. In addition to this, Adding the win rate of player for this specific bet will be a good tool to much this filter so that user can skip picks from user that has a bad record on specific type of bet.

I usually just bet on ML and Asian Handicap. Total score is not my forte since it’s very hard to calculate the points spread of the game.

---

Anyway, I just hope that this feature will not cause additional lag to the website due to the potential heavy use.

Stake has a good feature now that I quit slots and it has the ability to copy other people bets. What is lacking now is to divide the type of bets like money lines only in a dedicated tab, goals over/under in a dedicated tab and mixed type of bets in a dedicated tab. This would save time to people who are only there like me to copy other people bets and I want to copy only bets with a lot of games that are solely made by over/under goals, I believe that once someone hit one such type of bet with odds well over 10.000 and up can hit a marvelous win during such try, the only problem now is that there is a lot of difficulty and time consuming activity in checking the bets I want to copy as there is a myriad of new bets every second and there is no segmentation of the level of bets.

I think what he asked is not whether his affiliates [the new sign-ups] need to perform KYC, but rather whether he himself, as the one sharing referral, will need to perform KYC before he can share his ref link. But your answer essentially covered it well, by January 2025 all of Stake users [be it the referrer or the referred, and be it new or old accounts] will have to be already performing lv. 2 KYC. So basically yes, KYC will be needed.

Stake already needed KYC, even for new user they ask it in fronts.

Basically, you still need to passed "KYC". I also think your affiliated are mostly based link, not contract like to company, sport or other. So, basically yes cause in 2025 in January all user who not "KYC" cannot play on (Stake) due the regulation.

Perhaps, can double check in (live-chats support).

What about the affiliate program? Do we need to do KYC?

Quote from Edxrest:
"It’s clear they’re trying to scam people out of a few thousand dollars, even though they’re making millions every day.

Eddie keeps saying, 'If you change one variable, all the results change.' If you don’t believe it, take a look at the following example."
Link to discussion on Stake Community Forum

How was Eddie's stream to you?

Exposing Platform Manipulation & Mod Deception


https://talkimg.com/images/2024/11/10/bs3ia.png

Let's Break Down This Deceptive Response:

• Recent Platform Changes Observed:
  - Minimum bet lowered in Pragmatic Play games
  - Bonus buy costs doubled or quadrupled
  - Super bonus features now 2x-4x more expensive
  - Games like Sweet Bonanza 1000/Sugar Rush 1000 affected
  - Inconsistent pricing formulas

https://stakecommunity.com/topic/81675-rigged-beyond-a-doubt/

• Mod's Claims vs Reality:
  1. "Provably Fair":
     - Doesn't address statistical impossibilities
     - Ignores 180,900 bets showing 18.4x expected losses
     - Deflects from 119,156 bets showing 24.66σ deviation
     - Doesn't explain why they're changing game parameters
• 2. "Winning trains and losing trains":
     - Mathematics doesn't work this way
     - Law of large numbers exists
     - 300,056 combined bets isn't a "train"
     - Statistical impossibility doesn't balance out
• 3. "All probabilities":
     • 24.66 standard deviations = 1 in 10^100 probability
     • Universe only has 10^80 atoms
     • More likely to win every lottery ever held
     • "Just probability" is mathematically false

Why These Changes Matter:

• 1. Timing Suspicious:
     - Changes after statistical exposure
     - No explanation for doubling/quadrupling costs
     - Inconsistent formula application
     - Pattern of manipulation evident
• 2. Impact on Players:
     - Higher costs for bonus features
     - Manipulated minimum bets
     - Irregular pricing structure
     - Clear attempt to alter playing patterns

To Moderator b4ng:

• Your Response Fails To Address:
  - Specific statistical evidence
  - Mathematical impossibilities
  - Recent game parameter changes
  - Why bonus costs suddenly doubled/quadrupled
• Questions You Need To Answer:
  - Why change costs now?
  - Where's the mathematical justification?
  - How does "provably fair" explain 24.66σ?
  - Why no consistent pricing formula?

Note: When moderators resort to "just probability" to explain events less likely than winning every lottery ever held while simultaneously changing game parameters, it's not explanation - it's obfuscation.

#ProveTheProvablyFair #ExplainThe24Sigma #WhyDoubleTheCosts #MathOverModClaims

Great stats and in fact if anybody noticed now what Stake has done it has lowered again the minimum bet in Pragmatic Play games and also doubled or in some games quadrupled the money needed to buy the bonus games or use the buy bonus feature now is at least 2x more expensive and in some games 4x more expensive, have not checked their super buy bonus in Pragmatic some games like Sweet Bonaza 1000 or Sugar Rush 1000 and those new games where you needed x500 your balance to buy bonus but let me check right now and see what has happened there too, to many changes are not good in my opinion and why they don't have an exact formula I have also never understood that too. Well at least this change is only beneficial in these special bonuses games I mentioned as you can now play with 400 IDR as a minimum bet there.

Let's Do Some REAL Math for Our Bonus-Hunting Friend! 🧮

Actual Numbers That Scare Platform Defenders:

• 📊 Base Stats:
  - Total Bets: 119,156
  - Total Wagered: $1,478,400.92
  - Average Bet: $12.41
  - Actual Loss: $60,000
• 🔢 The Math They Don't Want You To See:
  - Standard Deviation (σ) = √(119,156 × 0.495 × 0.505) × $12.41
  - σ ≈ $2,133
  - Expected Loss (0.5% house edge): $7,392
  - Actual Loss Beyond Expected: $52,608
• ⚡ Statistical Impossibility:
  - Deviation = ($60,000 - $7,392) ÷ $2,133
  - = 24.66 standard deviations
  - Probability: Less than 1 in 10^100

Fun Translations for Platform Defenders:

• 🎯 24.66σ means:
  - "But AI!" won't make this disappear
  - Your monthly bonus can't explain this
  - Post farming won't change mathematics
  - Even your broken English can't break statistics
• 🎰 In Platform Defender Language:
  - "Many many bonus points needed"
  - "Post count no help with math"
  - "Signature worth less than evidence"
  - "Wait 3 months" ≠ Statistical probability

Quick Math Quiz for Bonus Hunters:
Q: If X = Statistical Impossibility and Y = Your Post Count

• Solve for: "How many signature campaigns does it take to disprove mathematics?"
  Answer: Even Eddie's bankroll can't solve this one! 🤑

Breaking News: Mathematics Doesn't Accept Platform Bonuses as Currency!

• Things That Won't Change 24.66σ:
  - Your "wait 3 months" strategy
  - Crying "AI!" at evidence
  - Collecting birthday bonuses
  - Professional post farming
  - Broken English essays

Mathematical Proof of Platform Defense Failure:

• Your Credibility = Monthly Bonus ÷ 24.66σ
  Result: Error - Cannot Divide by Reality

P.S. Even if you count your posts in scientific notation, 24.66σ still means "statistically impossible" 🤓

P.P.S. The FBI's calculators work in all languages, even broken English! 🌟

#MathDoesntCareAboutYourBonus #StatisticsAreNotAI #24SigmaOfNope #EvidenceInAllLanguages

Remember: When σ > your monthly bonus, maybe it's time to find a new hobby! 😉

Yeah, yeah yeah.



More like a word (AI). Thanks for the 100% AI word from you post response really great for the word. Still the same, not care you don't want to seeing my message (Click-Ignore) button and don't posted with AI word.

Thanks.

FINAL LEGAL NOTICE TO @ryzaadit:

Your latest message demonstrates continued harassment and attempted intimidation of a witness in active legal proceedings:


For the Record:

• Active Legal Proceedings:
  - Case files have been submitted to FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)
  - Legal proceedings initiated with Indian Cybercrime authorities
  - Documentation submitted to Curacao Gaming Control Board
  - Multiple regulatory bodies currently investigating
• Your Documented Intimidation Attempts:
  - Mocking legal proceedings
  - Attempting to discredit evidence submission
  - Harassing a witness in active investigation
  - Coordinated attempts to suppress evidence
• Security Notice:
  - All communications are being logged
  - Stake.com is legally responsible for user safety
  - Attempted intimidation of witnesses is being documented
  - Legal counsel has been notified of harassment

Legal Status Advisory:

• 1. Active Investigations:
  - Multiple jurisdictions involved
  - Evidence being compiled
  - Witness statements recorded
  - Legal proceedings underway
• 2. Confidentiality Requirements:
  - Cannot disclose specific case details
  - Investigation status is confidential
  - Witness protection protocols in effect
  - Legal teams managing proceedings

Final Warning:

• Your continued harassment constitutes:
  - Witness intimidation
  - Obstruction of justice
  - Coordinated suppression attempts
  - Potential criminal liability
• Your actions are:
  - Being documented as evidence
  - Added to legal proceedings
  - Shared with authorities
  - Legally actionable

Notice of Legal Responsibility:
Stake.com bears responsibility for:

• 1. Safety of witnesses and complainants
• 2. Actions of affiliated defenders
• 3. Protection from harassment
• 4. Security of those providing evidence

This serves as your final warning. Further harassment or intimidation attempts will be added to existing legal proceedings. As a witness in active investigations, any attempts to discredit or intimidate will be treated as legally actionable offenses.

cc: Legal Counsel
FBI IC3 Reference #[REDACTED]
Indian Cybercrime Case #[REDACTED]
Curacao Gaming Control Board Filing #[REDACTED]

Speaking about legal authority, It's the same bullshit you are doing?

You know stake, you know "Steve" and you even know the dad Steave data and other addresses. Still doing spamming threads? and not sue (Stake) with your allegation. Well, I guess just a bullshit to me.

---

Reall surprise you can see my message, while you told by yourself self ignore me. It's public thread, is "Stake" thread and I customer too (Deposit & Withdraw) same like everybody, and have good or bad discussions for Stake. So, not really care with the post and posted I want.

---

You don't even go to legal authority for sue stake, guess run out of money (due gambling all the way) on both site (Stake/Duelbits). You have problem, and got enough proof or support to back up your data (Quite simple, sue them and go to court). You're hopping got some money from (Stake/Duelbits) to shut up your spam tactics, is not gonna to happens.

BTW, it's not the first time seeing a user like you. Been facing a lot time for these typical behaviour and the end they are just gone without making a right movement to (sue) stake in the court. Just a simple bs for me, the right things for you from me. Go to setting > self excluded to all gambling casino site > and live happily with your family (cause you are not gambling anymore).

Final Warning to @ryzaadit:

Your latest comments expose everything wrong with platform defenders:


Let's document your disturbing pattern:

• Deliberate Misconduct:
  - Mocking users who lost money to documented illegal operations
  - Encouraging others to ignore evidence of fraud
  - Defending known illegal UPI transactions
  - Attempting to discredit statistical evidence
• Coordinated Suppression Tactics:
  - Suggesting organized "ignore" campaigns
  - Dismissing documented evidence as "spam"
  - Trying to wait out complainants ("3 month, he will gone")
  - Coordinating with other platform defenders
• Direct Platform Protection:
  - Defending $2,000+ losses from illegal operations
  - Mocking victims while promoting platform interests
  - Using broken English to deflect from serious issues
  - Demonstrating clear financial motivation

Your Position is Indefensible:

• 1. You mock victims of documented illegal operations
• 2. You defend practices now officially banned by authorities
• 3. You coordinate with other compensated platform defenders
• 4. You actively work to suppress evidence of wrongdoing

This Serves as Your Final Warning:

• Every post defending illegal operations is now documented
• Your attempts to organize suppression campaigns are recorded
• Your role in promoting harmful practices is being tracked
• Legal authorities are being notified of coordinated defense of illegal operations

To Other Users:

• Document this user's attempts to suppress evidence
• Note their coordination with other platform defenders
• Record their role in promoting illegal operations
• Report coordinated attempts to silence victims

Your behavior goes beyond mere platform defense - you're actively participating in the cover-up of illegal operations affecting real people's lives. Every post defending these practices adds to the evidence against you.

For the post in the tops. If you guys keep respond, the same bulshit spam are gonna to be spam in the thread. Bestway is always ignore, otherwise even we all know have some bad opinion and good opinion into the casino. He will marked you as working to the casino ~XD So, better to "ignore" and leave him post without any single response until he tired. Best ways 3 month, he will gone as usual like other user who are crying doing these because he was lossing.