Guess next week we should see the monthly bonus again, it’s tiiiiiime!
To AHOYBRAUSE and Other Platform Defenders:
Your own words expose the conflict of interest:
Please note that it is intended as a summary of the accusations against gambling platforms that have ANN and representative on this forum. As it is intended to be a summary, it will be very much appreciated if discussion, debate, or any other things related to a case pointed out on this thread to be carried out on their respective thread to keep this one clean and tidy. [...]
besides, I've already put his latest complaint on the list,
[talkimg is currently, at the time this post is made, busy, so this will serve as a placeholder for the snipped part on my list where his threads is on the list]
Now, for me helping the user... unfortunately that's something that I can't do. He's one of three [I think it's actually only two, so just him and someone else] user that I have to put on ignore.
[this is a placeholder for "ignore image"]
Reason? I helped his case once, and next time I heard from him [for other case, though still with Stake], I apparently twisted his words.
So yeah, to be sure that I will not accidentally perceived [in any way] as twisting his words, I am removing myself from all of his present and future cases, with a belief that other overseer will be more capable than me to cater his needs.
We can rest assured that I am still fulfilling my obligation of keeping the status of his cases on my list updated, though, as I frequently click the show/hide his posts to see if there anything that worth changing the status of the cases.
- holydarkness and Similar Actors:
- Claims "neutrality" while showing clear bias
- Selectively ignores evidence of wrongdoing
- Maintains relationships with multiple gambling platforms
- Uses "oversight" position to discredit valid complaints
- Strategic "ignoring" of users exposing problems
Pattern of Coordinated Defense:
- 1. Discredit the Messenger
- Claiming "twisted words"
- Strategic "ignoring" of whistleblowers
- Personal attacks instead of addressing evidence - 2. Deflect from Evidence
- Ignoring documented illegal activities
- Dismissing multiple user testimonials
- Avoiding discussion of frozen accounts - 3. Protect Platform Interests
- Defending while receiving benefits
- Coordinated response to criticism
- Systematic undermining of valid complaints
Your Credibility is Compromised:
- You cannot claim objectivity while:
- Receiving platform benefits
- Wearing promotional signatures
- Farming post counts for rewards
- Defending documented illegal activities - You actively harm users by:
- Misleading about legal status
- Undermining valid complaints
- Protecting platforms over users
- Concealing known risks
To the Community:
These users have demonstrated they are:
- 1. Compromised by financial relationships with platforms
- 2. Willing to dismiss evidence of illegal activities
- 3. Actively working against user interests
- 4. Using forum positions to protect platform interests
Warning:
Your attempts to discredit evidence while receiving platform benefits makes you complicit in:
- Promotion of illegal activities
- User financial losses
- Regulatory violations
- Systematic user exploitation
The community sees through these tactics. Your conflicts of interest are now publicly documented.