ICYMI
We released a brand new exclusive game with Gamomat! Play Monkey Mania today on Stake before anywhere else!
https://twitter.com/Stake/status/1384670241792282624
Topic: Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Alfa Romeo F1 Team - page 569. (Read 269947 times)
April 20, 2021, 07:06:11 PM
How did you guys like our Playtech Level-Up promotion??
ICYMI
We released a brand new exclusive game with Gamomat! Play Monkey Mania today on Stake before anywhere else!
https://twitter.com/Stake/status/1384670241792282624
ICYMI
We released a brand new exclusive game with Gamomat! Play Monkey Mania today on Stake before anywhere else!
https://twitter.com/Stake/status/1384670241792282624
April 20, 2021, 04:25:27 PM
Sure a 40x win is a lot, that could be considered big, but this guy wagered around 5k+ just for this bet, not like he wagered 5 dollars and won this, he wagered over five thousand dollars!
First time? I've seen alot of people wager that crazy amount in a single wager. Thats probably a bonus buy worth around 0.1 BTC.
Can we check his wagering history please?
Whats the point?
This is a bit more "some rich guy came in and gambled here" image to me, not "look at how big someone won"
In fact this classybeef guy is a streamer and if he wants to attract viewers to his stream then those high wagers is one of the way to do that. You can check his videos HERE.
but I believe he is not in profit as this image makes him out to be
It doesnt matter does it. Why does this bother you so much? He is a streamer and his job is to provide entertainment for the viewers. Losing is not part of the entertainment so even if he doesnt get any profit in this win, he fulfilled his job as a streamers which is to provide entertainment . Everybody loves to see a huge win
April 20, 2021, 11:26:38 AM
Not a bad day's work @ClassyBeef 
I am sure you have to share things that they tell you to share, you do not really pick what you should share, but can we be serious for a second here? Sure a 40x win is a lot, that could be considered big, but this guy wagered around 5k+ just for this bet, not like he wagered 5 dollars and won this, he wagered over five thousand dollars! that is a lot of money as it is, and yes he won 200k+ as well, but how many times did he gamble? Can we check his wagering history please?I am pretty sure that dude didn't wagered just once and won this, he has wagered a lot of money and eventually got this in the end as well, not saying he didn't profit, maybe he profited (or maybe even with this he is still at a loss) but I believe he is not in profit as this image makes him out to be. This is a bit more "some rich guy came in and gambled here" image to me, not "look at how big someone won"
April 20, 2021, 09:33:55 AM
-snip-
If you think the outcome of the bet was manipulated by stake all you need to do is post the bet id and server/player seed + nonce and they won't get away with it.If you just post a losing graph that proves nothing you'll only look like another riggy crying about losing.
I started to think that he is trying to make people think that Stake is not a good site to trust.
Starting from his complain for the fee of BTC withdrawal (he did it twice).
Then he tried something similar to above case but he did it with the plinko game.
Now he did the same thing with the limbo, so what next?
I think he will do more similar thing like this one to make Stake looks bad for bitcointalk members.
April 20, 2021, 01:13:46 AM
Another provably fair stake original, limbo.
Its not about the money as I obviously did almost bet nothing, just wanted to find out if this is a fair game.
Those numbers/results don't add up here.
Target multiplier 200x, win chance 0.495% . So at every 210 spins or something there should be a win.
Result, 1181 spins, 2 wins. Thats a win ratio of 0.1693% .Almost 3 times smaller than should it should be.
https://imgur.com/a/4r5EDkj
By the way those 2 wins came within 3 spins. First 600 spins no win, then 2 wins and next 578 spins no win.
Very fair numbers here yet again.
Its not about the money as I obviously did almost bet nothing, just wanted to find out if this is a fair game.
Those numbers/results don't add up here.
Target multiplier 200x, win chance 0.495% . So at every 210 spins or something there should be a win.
Result, 1181 spins, 2 wins. Thats a win ratio of 0.1693% .Almost 3 times smaller than should it should be.
https://imgur.com/a/4r5EDkj
By the way those 2 wins came within 3 spins. First 600 spins no win, then 2 wins and next 578 spins no win.
Very fair numbers here yet again.
They call this "not getting lucky". Really, this is a totally expected possible outcome. And because the game is provably fair, you can check for yourself to see if the game is fair or not. Your losing sessions have nothing to do with this.
Yes I agree the screenshot cannot prove whether it is fair or not but I know Limbo is a high-risk game because it offers a multiplier x1,000,000 even the highest multiplier of any game, right? I just tried it the same way, Wins : 2 Losses :351 https://imgur.com/XQizZG8 So the conclusion is about luck
LOL you did 800 spins less then me u clown.
And I did not go for max multiplier, only for 200x with a 0,5% chance.
And yes, orginals plinko is the exact same rippoff. All stake originals are rigged as fuck. Thats why even this guy in the stream on Saturdays doesn't play them, even if he uses "fake money". Keep dreaming about fairness on this site/these site games .
If you think the outcome of the bet was manipulated by stake all you need to do is post the bet id and server/player seed + nonce and they won't get away with it.
If you just post a losing graph that proves nothing you'll only look like another riggy crying about losing.
April 20, 2021, 12:02:18 AM
Another provably fair stake original, limbo.
Its not about the money as I obviously did almost bet nothing, just wanted to find out if this is a fair game.
Those numbers/results don't add up here.
Target multiplier 200x, win chance 0.495% . So at every 210 spins or something there should be a win.
Result, 1181 spins, 2 wins. Thats a win ratio of 0.1693% .Almost 3 times smaller than should it should be.
https://imgur.com/a/4r5EDkj
By the way those 2 wins came within 3 spins. First 600 spins no win, then 2 wins and next 578 spins no win.
Very fair numbers here yet again.
Its not about the money as I obviously did almost bet nothing, just wanted to find out if this is a fair game.
Those numbers/results don't add up here.
Target multiplier 200x, win chance 0.495% . So at every 210 spins or something there should be a win.
Result, 1181 spins, 2 wins. Thats a win ratio of 0.1693% .Almost 3 times smaller than should it should be.
https://imgur.com/a/4r5EDkj
By the way those 2 wins came within 3 spins. First 600 spins no win, then 2 wins and next 578 spins no win.
Very fair numbers here yet again.
They call this "not getting lucky". Really, this is a totally expected possible outcome. And because the game is provably fair, you can check for yourself to see if the game is fair or not. Your losing sessions have nothing to do with this.
Yes I agree the screenshot cannot prove whether it is fair or not but I know Limbo is a high-risk game because it offers a multiplier x1,000,000 even the highest multiplier of any game, right? I just tried it the same way, Wins : 2 Losses :351 https://imgur.com/XQizZG8 So the conclusion is about luck
LOL you did 800 spins less then me u clown.
And I did not go for max multiplier, only for 200x with a 0,5% chance.
And yes, orginals plinko is the exact same rippoff. All stake originals are rigged as fuck. Thats why even this guy in the stream on Saturdays doesn't play them, even if he uses "fake money". Keep dreaming about fairness on this site/these site games .
April 19, 2021, 11:35:34 PM
..........
They call this "not getting lucky". Really, this is a totally expected possible outcome. And because the game is provably fair, you can check for yourself to see if the game is fair or not. Your losing sessions have nothing to do with this.
Yes I agree the screenshot cannot prove whether it is fair or not but I know Limbo is a high-risk game because it offers a multiplier x1,000,000 even the highest multiplier of any game, right? I just tried it the same way, Wins : 2 Losses :351 https://imgur.com/XQizZG8 So the conclusion is about luck
AFAIK it is not the right way to prove the fairness of the game. I'm not really sure why Maadamer tries to prove the fairness by using such winning ratio. It does not make senses when he said there should be a win of 200x for every 210 spins/bet. Previously he tried with plinko and now he try limbo. I'm curious what is his main purpose of this, if he wants to check the fairness then he should use the provably fair system.
Anyway, limbo max multiplier is not the highest one. Mines has more than 5million max multiplier and Slide has more than 4billion max multiplier.
April 19, 2021, 10:33:05 PM
Another provably fair stake original, limbo.
Its not about the money as I obviously did almost bet nothing, just wanted to find out if this is a fair game.
Those numbers/results don't add up here.
Target multiplier 200x, win chance 0.495% . So at every 210 spins or something there should be a win.
Result, 1181 spins, 2 wins. Thats a win ratio of 0.1693% .Almost 3 times smaller than should it should be.
https://imgur.com/a/4r5EDkj
By the way those 2 wins came within 3 spins. First 600 spins no win, then 2 wins and next 578 spins no win.
Very fair numbers here yet again.
Its not about the money as I obviously did almost bet nothing, just wanted to find out if this is a fair game.
Those numbers/results don't add up here.
Target multiplier 200x, win chance 0.495% . So at every 210 spins or something there should be a win.
Result, 1181 spins, 2 wins. Thats a win ratio of 0.1693% .Almost 3 times smaller than should it should be.
https://imgur.com/a/4r5EDkj
By the way those 2 wins came within 3 spins. First 600 spins no win, then 2 wins and next 578 spins no win.
Very fair numbers here yet again.
They call this "not getting lucky". Really, this is a totally expected possible outcome. And because the game is provably fair, you can check for yourself to see if the game is fair or not. Your losing sessions have nothing to do with this.
Yes I agree the screenshot cannot prove whether it is fair or not but I know Limbo is a high-risk game because it offers a multiplier x1,000,000 even the highest multiplier of any game, right? I just tried it the same way, Wins : 2 Losses :351 https://imgur.com/XQizZG8 So the conclusion is about luck
April 19, 2021, 10:15:13 PM
Another provably fair stake original, limbo.
Its not about the money as I obviously did almost bet nothing, just wanted to find out if this is a fair game.
Those numbers/results don't add up here.
Target multiplier 200x, win chance 0.495% . So at every 210 spins or something there should be a win.
Result, 1181 spins, 2 wins. Thats a win ratio of 0.1693% .Almost 3 times smaller than should it should be.
https://imgur.com/a/4r5EDkj
By the way those 2 wins came within 3 spins. First 600 spins no win, then 2 wins and next 578 spins no win.
Very fair numbers here yet again.
Its not about the money as I obviously did almost bet nothing, just wanted to find out if this is a fair game.
Those numbers/results don't add up here.
Target multiplier 200x, win chance 0.495% . So at every 210 spins or something there should be a win.
Result, 1181 spins, 2 wins. Thats a win ratio of 0.1693% .Almost 3 times smaller than should it should be.
https://imgur.com/a/4r5EDkj
By the way those 2 wins came within 3 spins. First 600 spins no win, then 2 wins and next 578 spins no win.
Very fair numbers here yet again.
They call this "not getting lucky". Really, this is a totally expected possible outcome. And because the game is provably fair, you can check for yourself to see if the game is fair or not. Your losing sessions have nothing to do with this.
April 19, 2021, 10:10:04 PM
Another provably fair stake original, limbo.
Its not about the money as I obviously did almost bet nothing, just wanted to find out if this is a fair game.
Those numbers/results don't add up here.
Target multiplier 200x, win chance 0.495% . So at every 210 spins or something there should be a win.
Result, 1181 spins, 2 wins. Thats a win ratio of 0.1693% .Almost 3 times smaller than should it should be.
https://imgur.com/a/4r5EDkj
By the way those 2 wins came within 3 spins. First 600 spins no win, then 2 wins and next 578 spins no win.
Very fair numbers here yet again.
Its not about the money as I obviously did almost bet nothing, just wanted to find out if this is a fair game.
Those numbers/results don't add up here.
Target multiplier 200x, win chance 0.495% . So at every 210 spins or something there should be a win.
Result, 1181 spins, 2 wins. Thats a win ratio of 0.1693% .Almost 3 times smaller than should it should be.
https://imgur.com/a/4r5EDkj
By the way those 2 wins came within 3 spins. First 600 spins no win, then 2 wins and next 578 spins no win.
Very fair numbers here yet again.
You have only done 1,181 bets. What you have seen is just expected variance on the game; go through 10 million+ bets then post the stats that would provide a better picture.
April 19, 2021, 07:53:32 PM
That's also the reason I didn't focus on the tournament this time 
It's not that hard to make a $ 5000 wager you just have to find a strategy even with just $100 you can make wager over $5000, but I didn't do it that way because I only bet on sports.
I wagged a couple of heavy favorites thinking they were easy picks and ended up busting good amounts, so if the strategy revolves around making a bet to increase the wager amount it does have its risk and never place bets on matches you have no clue even if they are heavy favorites you will bust and i have busted enough with that strategy. If there is is another else i would like to hear It's not that hard to make a $ 5000 wager you just have to find a strategy even with just $100 you can make wager over $5000, but I didn't do it that way because I only bet on sports.
. 
April 19, 2021, 07:39:42 PM
They are multiple times richer then me, this is not new news to me but I've done multiple bets previously on different account on different sites and it came in useful because you can hedge against yourself. Also years ago Ive used it to transfer money, its especially relevant in these difficult times that because of the fees to move money manually you may find arbitrage is a cheaper way to realize profits in just one account. In my case it was all separate companies so fine as far as I know, I dont know it causes a problem in any situation but obviously best to check. Theres most often a spread cost to that, its not a free idea really just 'in extremis'
Funny thing is I was reading about a blockchain recently that cleverly avoids transfer costs by utilizing purposeful burn proof as an alternative to proof of work, literally they put this into a protocol as a more efficient process which is not something I've read of before in an automated way, anyhow crypto is always interesting to be part of
Funny thing is I was reading about a blockchain recently that cleverly avoids transfer costs by utilizing purposeful burn proof as an alternative to proof of work, literally they put this into a protocol as a more efficient process which is not something I've read of before in an automated way, anyhow crypto is always interesting to be part of
April 19, 2021, 07:21:58 PM
Yeah, he is the one who has 2 more accounts specially created for the million-dollar race Just check the race page and there is more than 1 ClassyBeef, I have no idea if the alt account is allowed or not but it is obvious that the Staff let him do so. Good luck all hunters on race
There is no rules on stake to not allow their user to create multiple accounts on their ToS. But it stated Stake has the right, anytime they want, to ask KYC if needed. So as long as you didn't cheat or doing something illegal with your main account or alt acc, you should be fine Just check the race page and there is more than 1 ClassyBeef, I have no idea if the alt account is allowed or not but it is obvious that the Staff let him do so. Good luck all hunters on race Best not to use multiple account since its kinda suspicious activity, since why would a user create to acccount while he can play on 1 he created? For creating two and makes it active well a sort of abuse is happening so expect that stake or other casino will doubt and verify your account for that case. So I suggest better stick to 1 account only to avoid any problem.
April 19, 2021, 07:08:22 PM
Best not to use multiple account since its kinda suspicious activity, since why would a user create to acccount while he can play on 1 he created? For creating two and makes it active well a sort of abuse is happening so expect that stake or other casino will doubt and verify your account for that case. So I suggest better stick to 1 account only to avoid any problem.
Creating multiple accounts isn't always an issue to be honest. You should be fine as long as you inform their customer care service and proceed as long as they have no issues.Multiple accounts are especially useful when your family members or friends are accessing the site through the same wifi network or broadband connection.
Crypto gambling sites need to come up with Netflix style profile system where multiple people can access the same account. This could lead to a drop in multiple accounts basically.
April 19, 2021, 07:04:32 PM
Yeah, he is the one who has 2 more accounts specially created for the million-dollar race Just check the race page and there is more than 1 ClassyBeef, I have no idea if the alt account is allowed or not but it is obvious that the Staff let him do so. Good luck all hunters on race
Just check the race page and there is more than 1 ClassyBeef, I have no idea if the alt account is allowed or not but it is obvious that the Staff let him do so. Good luck all hunters on race It's a streamer group, they've been using the two accounts for a long time now.
And, unless they manage to take first and another top prize, nobody at the top of the leaderboard is benefiting from the using multiple accounts in the race, despite everyone complaining about it. Just do the math.
April 19, 2021, 07:02:13 PM
Yeah, he is the one who has 2 more accounts specially created for the million-dollar race Just check the race page and there is more than 1 ClassyBeef, I have no idea if the alt account is allowed or not but it is obvious that the Staff let him do so. Good luck all hunters on race
There is no rules on stake to not allow their user to create multiple accounts on their ToS. But it stated Stake has the right, anytime they want, to ask KYC if needed. So as long as you didn't cheat or doing something illegal with your main account or alt acc, you should be fine Just check the race page and there is more than 1 ClassyBeef, I have no idea if the alt account is allowed or not but it is obvious that the Staff let him do so. Good luck all hunters on race Best not to use multiple account since its kinda suspicious activity, since why would a user create to acccount while he can play on 1 he created? For creating two and makes it active well a sort of abuse is happening so expect that stake or other casino will doubt and verify your account for that case. So I suggest better stick to 1 account only to avoid any problem.
April 19, 2021, 06:52:35 PM
Yeah, he is the one who has 2 more accounts specially created for the million-dollar race Just check the race page and there is more than 1 ClassyBeef, I have no idea if the alt account is allowed or not but it is obvious that the Staff let him do so. Good luck all hunters on race
There is no rules on stake to not allow their user to create multiple accounts on their ToS. But it stated Stake has the right, anytime they want, to ask KYC if needed. So as long as you didn't cheat or doing something illegal with your main account or alt acc, you should be fine Just check the race page and there is more than 1 ClassyBeef, I have no idea if the alt account is allowed or not but it is obvious that the Staff let him do so. Good luck all hunters on race April 19, 2021, 06:50:40 PM
with different dice scripts I can wager around $200-$350 per dollar
Best you can average with a 1% house edge is $100 per $1.
April 19, 2021, 05:59:27 PM
Not a bad day's work @ClassyBeef
It is a big day for him. Congrats @ClassyBeef. Stake is so popular to give big wins, and this is an example. During the start of the million dollar wagering contest he was there in the top list. He's one of the highrollers of Stake. Winning such a big amount is a true surprise, but what he had placed as bet value is simply big and an impossible fund for a common gambler.Yeah, he is the one who has 2 more accounts specially created for the million-dollar race
Just check the race page and there is more than 1 ClassyBeef, I have no idea if the alt account is allowed or not but it is obvious that the Staff let him do so. Good luck all hunters on race <<>>
4001-5000: $10
If you don't target the prize that's ok do it in the best way
4001-5000: $10
If you don't target the prize that's ok do it in the best way
What? Just $10 for those coming in 4000-5000 winners? I'm out. It is not worth it to wager thousands of dollars for just $10, if I could place myself on top may be then it is worth for me hehe. I am not discouraging any player here because players will play no matter what I say, so I wish them all good luck who are running behind prizes.
@BitcoinHunt3r, I salute you that you have wagered 5k but still your rank is over 11k. I think I will not be able to wager even $2k during this whole month.
That's also the reason I didn't focus on the tournament this time
It's not that hard to make a $ 5000 wager you just have to find a strategy even with just $100 you can make wager over $5000, but I didn't do it that way because I only bet on sports.
April 19, 2021, 05:42:53 PM
Not a bad day's work @ClassyBeef
It is a big day for him. Congrats @ClassyBeef. Stake is so popular to give big wins, and this is an example. During the start of the million dollar wagering contest he was there in the top list. He's one of the highrollers of Stake. Winning such a big amount is a true surprise, but what he had placed as bet value is simply big and an impossible fund for a common gambler. Jump to: