I dont think its as commonly known, but Baccarat is a safer and faster way to increase your wager. Placing a bet only on Player and House will result in a draw a large majority of the time and funds lost are significantly lower than the 1.0102 dice strat.
There may be less variance, but unless my math is off, you'll lose more betting both sides of baccarat. Here's my math:
Lets say we're going to do 10,000 2 unit wagers on dice and 10,000 1 + 1 unit wagers on Baccarat both sides:
1.0102x dice:
98% (9,800 bets) of the time will return 2.024 units for a total of 19,835.2 units
2% (200 bets) of the time will return 0 units
Total bet: 20,000
Total won: 19,835.2
Result: -164.8
Baccarat, 1 unit on Player and 1 unit on Banker:
Player Wins 44.62% (4,462 bets) of the time will return 2 units each time: 8924 units
Tie 9.53% (953 bets) will return 2 units each time: 1906 units
Banker 45.85% (4585 bets) will return 1.95 units each time: 8940.75 units
Total bet: 20,000
Total won: 19,770.75
Result: -229.25
That's very well presented and quite interesting. now i guess the question would be, which is faster?
