I've read few articles that sounds promising about eating canabinoid oil to cure/prevent this kind of health issue..
Just to mention !
Topic: Stefan Molyneux: Lymphoma (Read 5070 times)
I think I recognize this guy, is he the one that put up that youtube video with just him saying social security is worse than a ponzi scheme?
ive never known stef to be one to put up a short video about anything. what ever you saw was probably edited out of context.
I think I recognize this guy, is he the one that put up that youtube video with just him saying social security is worse than a ponzi scheme?
How did it go from "Stefan Molyneux has Lymphoma" to this?
The troll twins, blablahblah and kokjo.
How did it go from "Stefan Molyneux has Lymphoma" to this?
The troll twins, blablahblah and kokjo. 
How did it go from "Stefan Molyneux has Lymphoma" to this?
Then how can you support the state, given how likely it is that "bad" people will gain positions of power, and oppress the "good" minority?
democracy.
So now you're part of the "good" majority. Since most people are "good," and the odds of winning a fight are equal between the "good" and "bad," What problem do you have with arming everyone?
Since bad people are going to be armed, anyway, don't you think the good guys should be, too?
Then how can you support the state, given how likely it is that "bad" people will gain positions of power, and oppress the "good" minority?
democracy.So now you're part of the "good" majority. Since most people are "good," and the odds of winning a fight are equal between the "good" and "bad," What problem do you have with arming everyone?
Then how can you support the state, given how likely it is that "bad" people will gain positions of power, and oppress the "good" minority?
democracy.So now you're part of the "good" majority. Since most people are "good," and the odds of winning a fight are equal between the "good" and "bad," What problem do you have with arming everyone?
Then how can you support the state, given how likely it is that "bad" people will gain positions of power, and oppress the "good" minority?
democracy.Then how can you support the state, given how likely it is that "bad" people will gain positions of power, and oppress the "good" minority?
democracy.Then how can you support the state, given how likely it is that "bad" people will gain positions of power, and oppress the "good" minority?
democracy.Then how can you support the state, given how likely it is that "bad" people will gain positions of power, and oppress the "good" minority?
democracy.good too, but in the movies its always the good guys that wins. in reality i would say that its 50/50, which sucks.
OK, let's take that assumption. In an armed conflict, the good guys win half the time, the bad guys win the other half. Do you think that there are more bad guys, or good?
good too, but in the movies its always the good guys that wins. in reality i would say that its 50/50, which sucks.
OK, let's take that assumption. In an armed conflict, the good guys win half the time, the bad guys win the other half. Do you think that there are more bad guys, or good?
good too, but in the movies its always the good guys that wins. in reality i would say that its 50/50, which sucks.
OK, let's take that assumption. In an armed conflict, the good guys win half the time, the bad guys win the other half. Do you think that there are more bad guys, or good?
good too, but in the movies its always the good guys that wins. in reality i would say that its 50/50, which sucks.
OK, let's take that assumption. In an armed conflict, the good guys win half the time, the bad guys win the other half. Do you think that there are more bad guys, or good?
good too, but in the movies its always the good guys that wins. in reality i would say that its 50/50, which sucks.
OK, let's take that assumption. In an armed conflict, the good guys win half the time, the bad guys win the other half. Do you think that there are more bad guys, or good?
good too, but in the movies its always the good guys that wins. in reality i would say that its 50/50, which sucks.
OK, let's take that assumption. In an armed conflict, the good guys win half the time, the bad guys win the other half. Do you think that there are more bad guys, or good?
Jump to: