I think I can predict what myrkul is going to answer:
Bin Laden did not fly any plane.
Topic: Stefan Molyneux: Lymphoma - page 5. (Read 5070 times)
he put airplanes into buildings.
But was he aggressing?
he put airplanes into buildings.
But was he aggressing? I understand the NAP, its inconsistent, and i disagree with it. The use of force is useful in some situations, whatever you like it or not.
and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
Hey, fun fact: the NAP does allow the use of force, even lethal force, under some circumstances. and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
I understand the NAP, its inconsistent, and i disagree with it. The use of force is useful in some situations, whatever you like it or not.
and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
Hey, fun fact: the NAP does allow the use of force, even lethal force, under some circumstances. and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
I understand the NAP, its inconsistent, and i disagree with it. The use of force is useful in some situations, whatever you like it or not.
and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
Hey, fun fact: the NAP does allow the use of force, even lethal force, under some circumstances. and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
I understand the NAP, its inconsistent, and i disagree with it. The use of force is useful in some situations, whatever you like it or not.
and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
Hey, fun fact: the NAP does allow the use of force, even lethal force, under some circumstances. and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
I understand the NAP, its inconsistent, and i disagree with it. The use of force is useful in some situations, whatever you like it or not.
and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
Hey, fun fact: the NAP does allow the use of force, even lethal force, under some circumstances. and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
I understand the NAP, its inconsistent, and i disagree with it. The use of force is useful in some situations, whatever you like it or not.
and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
Hey, fun fact: the NAP does allow the use of force, even lethal force, under some circumstances. and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
For all we know, Bin Laden was just the PR agent. A trial would have revealed that.
may i ask how?So, back to our little empathy exercise. Don't you think that would kinda suck? At least a little? Wouldn't you have preferred to be arrested and brought to trial instead of being summarily executed?
Killing bad persons is not bad. Satisfied?I understand the NAP, its inconsistent, and i disagree with it. The use of force is useful in some situations, whatever you like it or not.
and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
For all we know, Bin Laden was just the PR agent. A trial would have revealed that.
may i ask how?So, back to our little empathy exercise. Don't you think that would kinda suck? At least a little? Wouldn't you have preferred to be arrested and brought to trial instead of being summarily executed?
Killing bad persons is not bad. Satisfied?For all we know, Bin Laden was just the PR agent. A trial would have revealed that.
may i ask how?So, back to our little empathy exercise. Don't you think that would kinda suck? At least a little? Wouldn't you have preferred to be arrested and brought to trial instead of being summarily executed?
Killing bad persons is not bad. Satisfied?For all we know, Bin Laden was just the PR agent. A trial would have revealed that.
may i ask how?So, back to our little empathy exercise. Don't you think that would kinda suck? At least a little? Wouldn't you have preferred to be arrested and brought to trial instead of being summarily executed?
Killing bad persons is not bad. Satisfied?This is the last time I forget to select "Self moderated topic" when I create a thread in this section of the forum.
please explain... are you saying that you wants to limit other peoples free speech? 
This is the last time I forget to select "Self moderated topic" when I create a thread in this section of the forum.
For all we know, Bin Laden was just the PR agent. A trial would have revealed that.
may i ask how?So, back to our little empathy exercise. Don't you think that would kinda suck? At least a little? Wouldn't you have preferred to be arrested and brought to trial instead of being summarily executed?
Killing bad persons is not bad. Satisfied?(no, i will not bite!)
Is there anything that does deserve that kind of treatment?
The dude had some people fly air plains into buildings...For all we know, Bin Laden was just the PR agent. A trial would have revealed that.
So, back to our little empathy exercise. Don't you think that would kinda suck? At least a little? Wouldn't you have preferred to be arrested and brought to trial instead of being summarily executed?
Is there anything that does deserve that kind of treatment?
The dude had some people fly air plains into buildings... That would kinda suck, wouldn't it? Be a bad day at the Kokjo household?
What did i do to deserve that? 
You keep interpreting my condolences as 'glee', and yet you consider yourself an authority on empathy? Interesting...
You have yet to express condolences. No. I can understand why he is happy with SM to be ill. I just simply don't care. People was happy and celebrated when bin laden was killed too, you know.
Sad, isn't it? That people could actually celebrate a man being gunned down in his home, without a trial?Imagine, if you will, you're sitting on the couch, dick in your hand, watching a porno.
Suddenly, you hear a crash as your apartment door is kicked down. If you have a dog, it's barking is silenced with a shot. You turn around, and see several men, dressed in black from head to toe, rush in. One raises his weapon, and the last thing you see is a muzzle flash.
That would kinda suck, wouldn't it? Be a bad day at the Kokjo household?
Jump to: