Topic: Stop Blaming Bounty Hunter! - page 2. (Read 9219 times)
all tokens or coins that have been held by bounty hunters or investors already have the freedom to sell or hold, so if anyone blames the bounty hunter is wrong, bounty hunters are very meritorious in the bounty program because they work very hard to promote the campaign. so it's natural that all people do need money so stop don't blame each other
The value of a coin or token after the ICO ends practically does not depend on bounty hunters. Almost 100 percent of the time it all depends on the integrity of the creators of the project.
Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
I had no idea that the first investors buy tokens so cheaply. Ordinary investors are probably shocked by how much they overpaid money. I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
If the project team can't secure the normal price of their coin and stop it falling, then it's a bad team. Bounty hunters do have very little influence, so it's pointless to blame them.
Thanks for pointing out some important things. I used to do bounty hunting a long time ago, now I start it again! From that time to now, dome people just love to blame bounty hunters and they absolutely wring and they even know it. A lot of projects tanked even before bounty token release! So, people should stop blaming others!
All right. As a rule, investors who own a much larger number of coins than bounty hunters destroy the price. However, they cannot blame themselves,
which is why they blame the bounty hunters who, if they wish, can bring down the price only if the coin is extremely low on the market since the start of sales.
which is why they blame the bounty hunters who, if they wish, can bring down the price only if the coin is extremely low on the market since the start of sales.
Bounty hunters and airdrop participants are usually the scape goat when project developers seek to blame a set of people for their failure. All because they believe that Bounty hunters are not investors and a larger majority of hunters with inferiority complex take themselves for granted and that is why they are not respected as they should but rather blamed for every dump
All right. As a rule, investors who own a much larger number of coins than bounty hunters destroy the price. However, they cannot blame themselves,
which is why they blame the bounty hunters who, if they wish, can bring down the price only if the coin is extremely low on the market since the start of sales.
which is why they blame the bounty hunters who, if they wish, can bring down the price only if the coin is extremely low on the market since the start of sales.
I think every bad project want give us Millon coin but this is not to be fare with my mind, I suggest you don't joined lot of bounty pool Project try to your hard work a small amount with a good popular exchange.
I wonder why people can't stop blaming bounty hunters and give them space to think about something important in their lives. Why blame bounty hunters as a project manager or as a bounty manager when token are been dump whiles you know how evidently you gave out huge bonuses to early investor forgetting these same investors will be the ones to dump. Hunters, investors and team all dump so why single hunters alone? People should ignore blaming hunters for no reason.
for now many projects are slowing distribution and of course they (investors / team projects) cannot blame the bounty hunter anymore and many I observe projects that do delays, but the price of their tokens is broken.
I have just come to a realization that most project and bounty managers are just ungrateful and unappreciative for the good works of bounty hunters and immediately start blaming hunters whenever there is a dump of their coins meanwhile forgetting the early bonus they always give to early investors. It is due time project managers put an end to hunters blaming.
The huge percentage of the dumping is from the bounty hunters,
I don't think like that. If you know BCNEX, bounty tokens has not distribution yet, but the price of their token drops from $0.4 to $0.1. why it happen if dumping price because bounty hunters? It just an example, many project dumped before bounty tokens distributed.
I wonder why bounty mangers, project managers and their advisors keep blaming bounty hunters for dumping. How much of a projects funds are mostly dedicated to bounty campaign, apparently less than 10% whiles team and investors keeps the rest and why blame bounty hunters for dumping whiles both team and investors too dump.
The huge percentage of the dumping is from the bounty hunters, the unnecessary tokens are not burned, these tokens are airdropped to the bounty hunters. Investors blame the team why they distributed the 4% of the bounty allocation to the bounty hunters and they are able to dump. The unanswered questions are there and I doubt no one will answer these questions in the future. The bounty hunters deceived and they acknowledge why the bounty hunting becomes stressful step by step. New projects also reduce the bounty rewards used for dumping. The main idea is to decrease the dumping pressure with the distributed bounty coins among the hundreds of the bounty participants.
I wonder why bounty mangers, project managers and their advisors keep blaming bounty hunters for dumping. How much of a projects funds are mostly dedicated to bounty campaign, apparently less than 10% whiles team and investors keeps the rest and why blame bounty hunters for dumping whiles both team and investors too dump.
indeed there are some people who think that bounty hunters cause price reductions, but in my opinion this is not entirely correct,
the allocation given to bounty hunters is not large so it may not be the cause of price reductions when coins are listed in the market
the allocation given to bounty hunters is not large so it may not be the cause of price reductions when coins are listed in the market
Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
Great point! That's the truth. The people who hold the most tokens are Private investors and the team, which cause dumping when that token listed on exchanges if the project doesn't have a vesting schedule. Bounty hunters just received a few dollars for their works, and cannot effect to the token price. I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
Now, bounty hunters have understood the need to hold promising coins for long term. Part of the bounty hunters population are also investors hence the frequent blame on hunters for dumping must stop. The small allocation for bounty program as compared to the entire supply of the token cannot dump the coin.
It's totally not on bounty hunters fault that prices of newly listed coins dropped. The allocated tokens are very low so it does not affect the price of the coin in the market. What I see are investors who got more bonuses that dumped their coins in the early phase of coins listing that's affecting the price in the market.
They should just stop this harassment on the bounty hunters and face those investors which get the project token at 50% discount. When such token is listed, the investor dump immediately. Beside, bounty allocation in most cases is just 2-5% of the token distribution.
The very system of selling tokens to early investors with a discount of 40 - 50 percent helps them to buy these tokens and immediately sell them on the exchange. So why blame the bounty hunter token price drop?In order for tokens not to fall in price, you need a completely different approach. We need to stimulate the continued retention of tokens, and not worry only about the sale of tokens. The best thing in this case is to provide passive income.
They should just stop this harassment on the bounty hunters and face those investors which get the project token at 50% discount. When such token is listed, the investor dump immediately. Beside, bounty allocation in most cases is just 2-5% of the token distribution.
The very system of selling tokens to early investors with a discount of 40 - 50 percent helps them to buy these tokens and immediately sell them on the exchange. So why blame the bounty hunter token price drop?In order for tokens not to fall in price, you need a completely different approach. We need to stimulate the continued retention of tokens, and not worry only about the sale of tokens. The best thing in this case is to provide passive income.
Some bounty hunters dump because the token price is reasonable on the dumped price. The team should be more active after the ICO or IEO is finished. If the team become less productive after it, it could really affect the price without some development of the promised project even it was stated on its roadmap. The most we could really blame is the team and not their early bird bonuses, dumping holders, bear market, FUD, etc. It was on the team's fault on why their altcoin's price is up or down. So in conclusion, bounty hunters are just a small part on why the price is going low.
I agree and believe that teams should act much better, because they are just relaxing after raising several million dollars and do not care about the price in general. The easiest way is to blame hunters for a massive dump, but it is just not true.
Jump to: