Topic: Stop Blaming Bounty Hunter! - page 4. (Read 9219 times)
I agree with you giving a lot of bonuses means you must be prepared to experience a dump, because investors will sell it cheaply, all is not the fault of the bounty hunter, we here only receive 1% and are distributed to many participants, and all bounty hunters will not sell at the same time because some will hold tokens that get
On the off chance that developers aren't secure with how great their undertaking is they shouldn't present bounties for bounty hunters so they wont need to face issues of value dump when bounty hunters dump tokens. Developers should know better and be completely prepared to handle any issue that can cause their token to lose value
full member
Activity: 882
Merit: 102
PayAccept - Worldwide payments accepted in seconds
They will realize the power of bounty hunters when nobody will want to do it.
They think that we are earning millions of dollars for nothing. But always they can buy an advertisement, so why they do not do it?
They think that we are earning millions of dollars for nothing. But always they can buy an advertisement, so why they do not do it?
Until when this statement stops.
That Never blame anyone when the price dumps. Just believe, if the project is good and has a good strategy in everything that is done by the project team. I am sure the price will follow in the future. If the token has entered the market, it is only 2 choices Dump or Pump. So, don't blame the bounty hunter for what happened in the market.
That Never blame anyone when the price dumps. Just believe, if the project is good and has a good strategy in everything that is done by the project team. I am sure the price will follow in the future. If the token has entered the market, it is only 2 choices Dump or Pump. So, don't blame the bounty hunter for what happened in the market.
Agree with you!!!
Some bad, greedy person just want more token just make hunters's reputation worse, but hunters seem to be very badly treated, from ICO managers.
The latest one they paid token, sometimes don;t even paid enough as they promised.
Some bad, greedy person just want more token just make hunters's reputation worse, but hunters seem to be very badly treated, from ICO managers.
The latest one they paid token, sometimes don;t even paid enough as they promised.
I do not see the point in blaming hunters as well. Every investor should blame team members if there was no buyback process, because such a simple thing solves all the problems. Hunters are happy, token price is not falling below the ICO price.
Doing a buy back is not necessary, and if there's a buy back, investors should be prioritize, not bounty participants. The team is incharge in developing the project so they are the one who can decide on the best thing to do for the benefit of all, of course they can send the bounty reward but delaying the listing to avoid dump is also a good idea, at least a win-win for all and they should just launch at the right timing.
I do not see the point in blaming hunters as well. Every investor should blame team members if there was no buyback process, because such a simple thing solves all the problems. Hunters are happy, token price is not falling below the ICO price.
Not all bounty hunters do dumpers during distribution, now investors do it. they get lower prices at the beginning of the sale. I, as a bounty hunter, would definitely want the coins that I get can pump instead of dump. all depends on the quality of the project.
I wonder why bounty and project managers keep blaming bounty hunter for dumping? Why blame bounty hunters when you offer great deals to your early investors and when they start dumping, you begin to blame bounty hunters. Most projects locks bounty rewards for a specific time and yet still in the times of the locking, the token is being dumped, who is dumping? Its high time project manager recognize this and stop blaming hunters.
In general, it makes sense to blame someone for a fall in price. If a team starts to play a dishonest game, it immediately sees the community and tries to get rid of these tokens as soon as possible. No one will sell chicken laying golden eggs.
I agree they give too many discounts for investors. Some even offer a discount of almost 30%. We must defend ourselves. Even worse, they cut the allocation they have promised. But they still blame the bounty hunter.
Well the truth is, both the bounty hunters and the team can be involved in this saga. Depending on the number of allocated tokens on a bounty we can easily find out who manipulated the price.
This is very correct, private investors buy as cheap as possible with a whole lot of token but bounty hunters are just given a very small percentage of the total Supply, and when the token dumps you see them blaming hunters that got almost nothing, it beats my imagination.
If the team was clever enough they should be distributing bounty tokens to the bounty hunters first so that when they choose to dump the tokens the same team can buy them back cheap and pump price to what restores prices to a better market for their investors.
Blaming bounty hunters is a cheap excuse if you ask me.
Blaming bounty hunters is a cheap excuse if you ask me.
This is not true and should not blame to bounty hunters because bounty hunter did not the receive bounty reward early after the token sale and many months later, so this depends on investors and buyers and seller.
Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
These was the sad truth and they keep doing this all the time or as an alibis for their own lapses. the best example was the recently listed Xcrypt Exchange (XCT) token they change the rule after the bounty was already finish and locked the tokens for a month. But the results was boomerang to them the XCT token price was dump on its first day after listing and it was a proof that they were wrong about accusing the Bounty hunters of dumping the token price. I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
This has always be my point that hunters are not the one dumping the price but investors , at least I had seen lots of project in this bear market that for 6mo the bounty hunters are yet to receive their reward and the token dumped 90+% , so who dumped them if not those that invest in it with huge bonus with aim of not lossing , because their funds is back to them and they still have bonus token left for future reference and here you are just claiming hunters are the cause but you also refuse to pay them for hard work by banning so many of them after a little question , I think this crypto space need some kind of rules to regulate its affairs.
I absolutely agree with the opinions expressed. Bounty hunters with their 1% tokens can in no way influence the prices of the market. It is simply not possible with such a volume. Blaming the bounty hunters for a dump is just plain stupid.
Most of the campaign project they always took the blame for bounty hunters when the price value of their token is dumping.
So most of them they are locking the token for the bounty participants after their main token sales. But this is very unjust honestly speaking.
Indeed, this blame is a tradition of almost all projects when their token is dumped after it is listed, they always think bounty hunters are the reason for this failure and ignore the explanation while the clear explanation for this story is the major investors in the ICO or IEO process, they accumulate and receive too many tokens at good prices, selling as soon as they are profitable is what they can do. Bounty hunters have no chance to do that, even they are just unlucky people, token is always locked and delays distribution, they can only sell when the price is too low So most of them they are locking the token for the bounty participants after their main token sales. But this is very unjust honestly speaking.
This is for me a very poor and shallow excuse by the projects themselves. Bounty hunters cannot cripple a project if the project has a legitimate goal, marketing, investors, partnerships, economy, and so on and so forth. How could a very small portion of the entire coin supply cause a project to collapse? It is really an alibi that is only raised by mediocre and shit projects. Any good project could very easily move forward even if the entire bounty hunter community dumps their coins.
And also, bounty hunters are not plain fools for dumping promising coins. If the largest portion of the bounty hunter community dumps their coin, that means it is never a good coin to hodl.
And also, bounty hunters are not plain fools for dumping promising coins. If the largest portion of the bounty hunter community dumps their coin, that means it is never a good coin to hodl.
Jump to: