Topic: Study: Everyone hates environmentalists and feminists - page 14. (Read 80480 times)

Everyone (=100%) hates feminists(=50%+) and environmentalists (>0%), leads to the only conclusion possible, this study is a scam! Would you have been clement on Goebbels&co, me not.

xoxo

"This is what I was wearing, tell me I was asking for it, I dare you"

The guy being discriminated against for his shirt should have said that

Always pin down those double standards

----------------------------------------------------
Third wave feminists are good for business. Who knew!

It was and was a great thing until...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-wave_feminism

Now everything is game for an attack from them, even that shirt made by a female designer (very talented woman I must say, that shirt is pretty cool).

It is not about equality anymore.








This is the twitter account of the friend who made that shirt for him as a birthday present... That is her on that picture.








This is her blog and her thoughts about that controversy.

http://ellyprizemanupdate.blogspot.com/2014/11/decisions-and-comments.html


That new feminism wave should use their brain before judging people as talented as Elly Prizeman

It's all about changing the meanings of the words, newspeak

It was, but it has been hijacked by matriarchs, I refuse to call women like these feminists because they're an insult to actual feminists who care about equal rights.

I thought feminism was about civil liberties for women, NOT female dominance

You do not have to be a believer to read the Bible. For some the Bible could be a handbook of how mankind works, some parts of it could be a sociology study on human societies constructed like a fractal image: no matter the point in time humans have been behaving and will be behaving the same over and over unless... THEN the Bible brings its solution, that you can believe or not.

Even if you include all the technologies that have been developed in the past 2000 years human behaviors have been the same, and everything, from the most selfish, from the most evil to the most noble, to the most kind, has been done, over and over by somebody somewhere.

Wait until society figures out why women are now, as of fairly recently, smarter than men.  'Social justice' is a bitch (so to speak.)

Being a hard-core atheist I've never been much of a bible-thumper, but if my hypothesis (which I'll keep to myself for now) pans out I'll have to wonder if whoever wrote those Old Testimate warnings might have been on to something.

edit: slight

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/11/15/Brilliant-anti-feminist-spoof-claims-space-scientist-s-shirt-is-sexist

1 small shirt for a man, 1 giant leap backward for women


Better not to land a spaceship on a comet than let men wear sexist clothing.


So how are things going for feminism? Well, last week, some feminists took one of the great achievements of human history — landing a probe from Earth on a comet hundreds of millions of miles away — and made it all about the clothes.

Yes, that's right. After years of effort, the European Space Agency's lander Philaelanded on a comet 300 million miles away. At first, people were excited. Then some women noticed that one of the space scientists, Matt Taylor, was wearing a shirt, made for him by a female "close pal," featuring comic-book depictions of semi-naked women. And suddenly, the triumph of the comet landing was drowned out by shouts of feminist outrage about ... what people were wearing. It was one small shirt for a man, one giant leap backward for womankind.

The Atlantic's Rose Eveleth tweeted, "No no women are toooootally welcome in our community, just ask the dude in this shirt." Astrophysicist Katie Mack commented: "I don't care what scientists wear. But a shirt featuring women in lingerie isn't appropriate for a broadcast if you care about women in STEM." And from there, the online feminist lynch mob took off until Taylor was forced to deliver a tearful apology on camera.

It seems to me that if you care about women in STEM, maybe you shouldn't want to communicate the notion that they're so delicate that they can't handle pictures of comic-book women. Will we stock our Mars spacecraft with fainting couches?

Not everyone was so censorious. As one female space professional wrote: "Don't these women and their male cohorts understand that *they* are doing the damage to what/whom they claim to defend!?"

No, they don't. Or, if they do, their reservations are overcome by the desire to feel important and powerful at others' expense. Thus, what should have been the greatest day in a man's life — accomplishing something never before done in the history of humanity — was instead derailed by people with their own axes to grind. As Chloe Price observed: "Imagine the ... storm if the scientist had been a woman and everyone focused solely on her clothes and not her achievements."

Yes, feminists have been telling us for years that women can wear whatever they want, and for men to comment in any way is sexism. But that's obviously a double standard, since they evidently feel no compunction whatsoever in criticizing what men wear. News flash: Geeks don't dress like Don Draper.

Meanwhile, Time magazine last week ran an online poll of words that should be retired from the English language. The winner — by an enormous margin — was "feminist." That's fitting. With this sort of behavior in mind, it's no surprise that so many people feel that feminism has passed its sell-by date.

Only 23% of American women and only 20% of Americans overall identify as feminists, even though most are in favor of gender equality. Feminists, who like to say that feminism isgender equality, are unhappy with this, but I think the poll captures a truth. Whatever feminists say, their true priorities are revealed in what they do, and what they do is, mostly, man-bashing and special pleading.

When you act like what pioneer feminist Betty Friedan once called "female chauvinist boors," you shouldn't be surprised to lose popularity.

"Mean girls" online mobbing may be fun for some, but it's not likely to appeal for long. If self-proclaimed feminists have nothing more to offer than that sort of bullying, then their obsolescence is well deserved.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/11/15/shirt-comet-girls-feminism-column/19083607/

5 Reasons “feminists” can’t complain about comet scientist’s “sexist” shirt







http://legalinsurrection.com/2014/11/5-reasons-feminists-cant-complain-about-comet-scientists-shirt/


------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe one of the scientist was a hardcore feminist and let the battery of Philae die in purpose to punish men wearing too sexy shirts...?

Yes it is. But it is good males were discriminated against. For one it is showing the true ugly face of that movement. Also It will force males supporting that third wave feminism to abort themselves, as a concept, and move on to other more meaningful battles.

Actually, it's discrimination against males

Male discrimination. Hair is hair.

This is old news


Some educational institution was offering students extra credit for not shaving their armpits, except that the credit was offered to women only.

Feminists Want To Stop Shaving In The Name Of “Gender Equality”…


Women at George Washington University (GW) should stop shaving during the month of November in the name of gender equality one student said last week.

In a column in The Hatchet, Jonah Lewis urged GW women to start a new movement that would parallel Movember by ceasing to shave in order to raise money for women’s health issues. The student argued that the women’s campaign could “one day rival what men raise during Movember.”

“If women at GW decided not to shave for the entirety of this month to raise money for women’s health issues and promote body positivity, the initiative could grow into a movement matching Movember,” Lewis wrote. “It would open up conversations about how our culture expects women to treat their bodies and their body hair.”

“For women, growing out hair is an unexpected and daring risk. That makes not shaving an exercise in body positivity and self love for most women,” Lewis continued

[...]
For decades many feminists have argued that the pressure for women to remove body hair is a consequence of patriarchal dominance.

“Body hair, weight, Barbie, domestic violence, violence against women, male gaze, street harassment, to me it all feels connected,” a New York feminist said in February, according to Salon.

“To me, hair removal is a kind of violence against women. Just one that we’re tricked into doing and paying for ourselves,” she continued.



http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=6064

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe this to be a great idea but should not be constrained to just one month. Everyone needs to have an easy visual clue to how to pinpoint a third wave feminist anytime, yearlong. This could be a good start...

Their police vehicles look sooo comfortable

Yes... We know...










http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-inside-norway-luxurious-halden-jail/20110729.htm#12

I think it's humane to lock up ANY human in a cage at all. Norway doesn't have prisons, they have correctional facilities.