Topic: Study: Everyone hates environmentalists and feminists - page 4. (Read 80480 times)

Are you analogizing self defense to fascism?

Violence is rarely an answer. Mace and tasers are used in self defense, most of the time by women...

3rd wave feminism is fascism.

That is a very fascist thing to say.

Would you want to live in a society where maces and tasers are used to "fix" everything?

Environmentalists are the ones that really piss me off sometimes; it seems that some of them will prefer that we lived in a Stone Age rather than to live in the modern world.

I agree, women anyway have too much power by default, biologically. Not to mention after they got voting power, divorce welfare (steal 50% of your wealth + monthly subsidy) , and they can falsly accuse people of rape and male people innocently go to prison.

Even in the middle ages when they were treated badly, they have an inherent power of charming and seducing all men. What else they want?

No male has power to control women, but a good looking women has power to control all men.

It is an abomination my friend.


Dont be so sure, they are very clever and organized, and they will break the spirit of man with their seducing one way or another unfortunately.

They are taking their insanity so far that they are beginning to look like hyperbole satire of themselves. With any luck it will backfire.

Shit's getting crazy at a very fast rate.  It's one of those times when I really have to wonder if this is some kind of a joke, but it's not April Fool's day.

From: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/389862/school-told-call-kids-purple-penguins-because-boys-and-girls-not-inclusive

'purple penguins'?!?  WTactualF!

I got this off FreeRadioRevolution where JeffC has been doing a great deal of work on the LGBT thing recently.  One can get a peek this 'vice chancellor for diversity' who made this recommendation (if one wants to puke) at around 26:30 of this fairly long winded but entertaining vid.

LOL A feminist stands 0.0% chance of forwarding an agenda where I live.

Feminism goes hand in hand with Liberalism. They are both mental illnesses. Nothing that mace and tasers can't fix.

I like enviromentalists, but not if they are too pushy, for example they should focus curbing the big polluter corporations, and not to push more fucking green taxes on me.

Feminists are on the other hand really bad, it is a marxist/hegelian agenda of divide and conquer, and make males submissive and obedient to women.

People Actually Upset That Kermit the Frog’s New ‘Girlfriend’ Is Thin





How anti-feminist of him!

Kermit the Frog has announced that, despite yesterday’s rumors, a pig puppet named Denise is actually not his new girlfriend.

Unfortunately, his announcement didn’t come soon enough — people had already started freaking out about how sick and anti-feminist it was that Denise was thinner and younger than his ex Miss Piggy.

“Well, apparently Kermit can’t get enough of women like his ex – as long as they’re younger and thinner than her and less successful than him (but still work at ABC, so he can rub her in Miss Piggy’s face),” Megan Carpentier, the U.S. opinion editor for The Guardian, wrote in a piece titled “Kermit the Frog’s New Girlfriend Is Younger, Thinner — and Blander.”


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/423437/kermit-the-frog-new-girlfriend-denise-thin-miss-piggy

That is actually a very attractive woman to me.  More so than almost any of the dolled-up women posted on the 'let's talk about how hot asian women are' thread.  I don't think it is her decorations one way or another as much as that she is just physically attractive.

What I have found is that no matter who looks like what, one gets used to it after a short time and simply does not notice.  I imagine that if I were living with this woman I would not even notice the face tattoos after a few weeks.

I guess I would say 'roll your own' as much as possible.  I (a straight male) personally am turned off by a noticeable amount of makeup when I see it, but that is just me.

I myself have mild rosacea.  A tiny amount of a very general antibiotic applied topically solves the problem completely.  When I ran out of my stockpile a year after I quite work I waited about 4 months for a doctor's appointment to get a prescription then to my horror I found that they wanted $300/mo for the stuff.  In subsequent research I found that most antibiotics are (or were) available as 'fish meds' ostensibly to clean fish tanks.  They are in fact the exact same pills with the exact same lot numbers as what one gets in a pharmacy.  I now make my own face cream for about $3.00/mo or 100x less than I would pay to the Rx.  I'm pretty sure it's an insider thing and probably how most doctors and pharmacists source medicine for their own use.  One $40 purchase on e-bay has gotten me enough metronidozole in powdered form to last a lifetime and the cream base is generic.  Most shelf-lives for antibotics seem to be total bullshit and many of them seem to work after 10 years of storage.  I figure I'm pretty much set for life with what I have on-hand.

If I were a female who felt a need to have at least a little bit of makeup from time to time (which I probably would) I would research the various old formularies and the ingredients they call for and make my own.  In this way I would have a higher confidence that some agenda-21 driven eugenicists and medical/industrial complex scumbags were not poisoning me and would probably save a bundle of money to boot.

Safe and green....

 

This was in fact quite funny. But then again, what alternative is there for women? Not use cosmetics at all, or rely on the ones that claim to be biological?

If I were a woman I'd be happy if waste of time were the biggest issue here.  Here's another apropos (and amusing) vid from Melton.  Enjoy:

  ◦*˚Ultimate Super Rad Glam Makeup Tutorial!˚*◦

The Fact that Most Women Wear Makeup Is Now Being Called a Sexist ‘Makeup Tax’






Another very serious problem.

The fact that most women spend more time and money on beauty products than men do isn’t just a reflection of the two sexes’ different priorities — it’s now being called a “makeup tax” and “another form of pay inequality.

” The discussion began when Facebook staffer Libby Brittain asked about it during Hillary Clinton’s July 20 Facebook Q&A:

Every morning, as my boyfriend zips out the door and I spend 30+ minutes getting ready, I wonder about how the ‘hair-and-makeup tax’ affects other women — especially ones I admire in high-pressure, public-facing jobs.

Clinton attempted to look really cool in her reply (it literally began with “Amen, sister!”) but she didn’t actually answer the question about whether or not she considered it a “tax.

” Since then, however, there have been think pieces aplenty about the subject, with some women going even further than Brittain in characterizing how harmful makeup might be.

For example, one piece titled “Women’s health is taxed by makeup, too,” in a liberal blog called Treehugger, explains that the burden goes beyond time and money.

“There’s another way that women pay the makeup tax, one that’s much harder to quantify,” the author, Margaret Badore, continues. “I’m taking (sic) about the price women pay with their health in the pursuit of looking ‘put together.

’” She then lists off a bunch of chemicals that are in makeup that are harmful or something, but concedes that it is “difficult to say how bad for our health many cosmetics really are, because most of the exposure involves very small amounts over long periods of time.

” Sure, the fact that it takes me longer to get ready than a dude is annoying. But, like with many of these types of activist issues, I have to ask: What solution are you proposing, exactly?


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/422466/women-makeup-sexist-makeup-tax

About This Campaign »
New ozone regulations being proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are so restrictive, even some of our country’s most iconic National Parks will be considered non-compliant, or in nonattainment. Out of compliance on ozone means less development, fewer jobs and the potential for significant and long-term damage to our economy. If these pristine national treasures can’t meet the new standard, how can any community be expected to comply? 

The truth is that current ozone levels are down nearly 20% over the last decade, and the current standard that was set in 2008 has not been fully implemented. But now the Administration wants to throw that one out and reset the targets – before many states have even had a chance to comply with it.

Tell President Obama: We can’t afford a new ozone standard— instruct EPA to let states and businesses implement the one we have first.


http://www.nam.org/ozone/



‘The most expensive regulation ever’
Obama rolls out a major EPA rule.

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/epa-ozone-standard-113183.html

Male Feminist: ‘I Hate That I Love to Grill’ Because It’s ‘So Conventionally Masculine’






A self-identified male “feminist” wrote a more than 1,000-word piece about how much he hates that he loves to grill because he is “uncomfortable with the pleasure [he takes] in something so conventionally masculine.”

“I take food prep a little too seriously, curtly brushing others out of the way when I step up to the kitchen counter,” Jacob Brogan writes in a piece for Slate. “Am I shoving others out of the way because it makes me feel like a man? Have I become some sort of monster?”

Yes — he’s worried his enthusiasm for grilling may make him a “monster.”

Lest you think Brogan is overreacting, he offers a lot of reasons for why he’s so concerned about liking to do something so totally normal. One of them: Advertisers portray grilling as a form of male bonding, or, as he puts it, “enable what scholars call homosocial contact, a kind of same-sex intimacy that deflects the supposed danger of sexual contact between men but allows them to confirm their masculinity by excluding women.”

“Grilling, in other words, allows these characters to cozy up to one another while still maintaining their understanding of themselves as truly manly men,” he continues.



http://www.nationalreview.com/article/421647/male-feminist-hate-grill-conventionally-masculine

"Air Conditioning is Another Big, Sexist Plot"








Petula Dvorak, writing for the Washington Post, believes that she has discovered another sexist plot by men: cold air conditioning. In her over 30-paragraph article titled "Frigid offices, freezing women, oblivious men: An air-conditioning investigation," Dvorak argues that men put air conditioning at cold temperatures, completely uncaring of whether women are cold.

At no point does Dvorak consider that women could actually wear clothes that would make them warm in the office. Instead, the emphasis is on the faults of men.

Dvorak writes that women "actually dress for the season — linens, sundresses, flowy silk shirts, short-sleeve tops — changing their wardrobes to fit the sweltering temperatures around them. And then there are the men," she complains, "stalwart in their business armor, manipulating their environment for their own comfort, heaven forbid they make any adjustments in what they wear."

Instead of a compromise between men and women, Dvorak wonders why men don't simply kowtow to the wishes of their female coworkers.

"Air conditioning is another big, sexist plot," she explains, continuing, "Setting the temperature to suit men is wrong in ways that go far beyond summer fashion."

Men need to take a chance and change. "Come on, men, be bold," she writes.

Dvorak concludes, "I’m talking short suits. They’re adorable! Plus, we’d all love to see your knees, guys."


http://www.thesocialmemo.org/2015/07/washington-post-writer-claims-air.html