@suchmoon could you provide info on this - page 2.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2371

Quote from: actmyname on March 07, 2019, 02:16:21 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on March 07, 2019, 02:10:50 AM

I don’t think it is *proven* the PM is fake

Never said that the PM has been faked. Just that there is insufficient evidence to back up the claim and hence we can dismiss it in typical pragmatic systems of belief.

I don't think suchmoon is guilty of what is claimed in the OP, and would give zero weight to the accusation, and would give zero weight to this accusation if a similar claim was made in the future *with similar amounts of evidence*. I would give more credence to this accusation if there is a substantiated claim that suchmoon did something similar

[...]

Quote from: actmyname on March 07, 2019, 02:16:21 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on March 07, 2019, 02:10:50 AM

It somewhat reminds me of how she claimed to have nothing against redsn0w, yet had three 5 year old examples of plagiarism the day it was made public that he was banned.

Once you know what you're looking for in a ban, then it's far easier to find evidence thereof.

Given that they didn't bring up the evidence prior to your dissenting remark, I'm inclined to believe that suchmoon scrounged up the evidence subsequently.

redsn0w has over 10k posts, and as such, I would dispute that it is easy to find plagiarism within that many posts even if you know there is plagiarism within his posts.

Quote from: actmyname on March 07, 2019, 02:16:21 AM

If they really did have something against redsn0w, I don't see why they wouldn't report the instances of plagiarism before sn0w was banned.

someone clearly reported him for plagiarism, as this is how he was banned. Based on the fact suchmoon had three examples of his plagiarism, I would believe she was the one who reported redsn0w

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

I would also like to point at the nice find of Veleor

He was right about the senders nick volodia2 and instantly linked it to his another (first) dummy account volodia.
When checking that account you can see posts about GAW miners.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/volodia-433143

GAW miners ,suchmoon ? Nice coincident isn't it?

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: Quickseller on March 07, 2019, 02:10:50 AM

I don’t think it is *proven* the PM is fake

Never said that the PM has been faked. Just that there is insufficient evidence to back up the claim and hence we can dismiss it in typical pragmatic systems of belief.

Quote from: Quickseller on March 07, 2019, 02:10:50 AM

I would also point out that I think this post is horribly dishonest. It appears suchmoon is trying to entice the OP into breaking forum rules that she would presumably complain about if he posted the alleged picture.

Considering the (what I perceive to be sarcastic) remarks were placed after the request to move dox to the Investigations board, I don't see suchmoon trying to get Thule to break the rules.

Quote from: Quickseller on March 07, 2019, 02:10:50 AM

It somewhat reminds me of how she claimed to have nothing against redsn0w, yet had three 5 year old examples of plagiarism the day it was made public that he was banned.

Once you know what you're looking for in a ban, then it's far easier to find evidence thereof.

Given that they didn't bring up the evidence prior to your dissenting remark, I'm inclined to believe that suchmoon scrounged up the evidence subsequently.

If they really did have something against redsn0w, I don't see why they wouldn't report the instances of plagiarism before sn0w was banned.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2371

Quote from: actmyname on March 06, 2019, 07:13:14 PM

How is this thread still on-going?

Here are the facts, objectively.

We are looking at a case of hearsay.
Thule may or may not be lying: that is not the issue at-hand.

If Thule is lying, then the evidence is clearly false. Assume that Thule is not lying.
We then have another user that has PM'd Thule a screenshot of a PM.

Text can be doctored easily and we have no way of verifying the message.

Any proof that Thule provides is pointless because this is still hearsay. Thule's received PM can be legitimate, but the screenshot provided thereof may be illegitimate.
The only way to prove the screenshots are legitimate are for the original sender to verify them. Since they apparently do not want to, there is insufficient evidence regarding this case.

Thus, this fails to disprove the null hypothesis. We can pragmatically claim that the private messages to the unknown party are fake.

I don’t think it is *proven* the PM is fake, although the evidence being presented is certainly insufficient. The OP is offering evidence that doesn’t back up the claim that such moon scammed anyone.

Frankly, if the PM in the OP is real, this person should go to the police. If suchmoon retaliates with a negative rating, she may get charged with witnesses intimidation.

I would also point out that I think this post is horribly dishonest. It appears suchmoon is trying to entice the OP into breaking forum rules that she would presumably complain about if he posted the alleged picture.

It somewhat reminds me of how she claimed to have nothing against redsn0w, yet had three 5 year old examples of plagiarism the day it was made public that he was banned.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: khaled0111 on March 06, 2019, 08:25:37 PM

He refused to reveal his identity because he was afraid of retaliation. But now there is nothing to be afraid of after being red tagged as he claimed!?

It's questionable to think that someone would be afraid of red trust from a member who would be ousted were the information true.

Quite dubious indeed.

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: khaled0111 on March 06, 2019, 08:25:37 PM

Any one who was following this thread from the beginning can conclude that who PMed Thule is a liar.

He refused to reveal his identity because he was afraid of retaliation. But now there is nothing to be afraid of after being red tagged as he claimed!?

Well, not everyone. ito-marketing and Thule seem to believe volodia2.

khaled0111

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 3045

Top Crypto Casino

Any one who was following this thread from the beginning can conclude that who PMed Thule is a liar.

He refused to reveal his identity because he was afraid of retaliation. But now there is nothing to be afraid of after being red tagged as he claimed!?

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

How is this thread still on-going?

Here are the facts, objectively.

We are looking at a case of hearsay.
Thule may or may not be lying: that is not the issue at-hand.

If Thule is lying, then the evidence is clearly false. Assume that Thule is not lying.
We then have another user that has PM'd Thule a screenshot of a PM.

Text can be doctored easily and we have no way of verifying the message.

Any proof that Thule provides is pointless because this is still hearsay. Thule's received PM can be legitimate, but the screenshot provided thereof may be illegitimate.
The only way to prove the screenshots are legitimate are for the original sender to verify them. Since they apparently do not want to, there is insufficient evidence regarding this case.

Thus, this fails to disprove the null hypothesis. We can pragmatically claim that the private messages to the unknown party are fake.

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: Thule on March 06, 2019, 03:43:30 AM

archived

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

I will ask some buddies arround maybe someone is going to post that link from their newbie account.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Thule on March 05, 2019, 06:02:32 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on March 05, 2019, 05:56:05 PM

Quote from: Thule on March 05, 2019, 05:38:14 PM

Funny i the so called scammer obey the forum rules where you abuse them.

Quote from: Thule on March 05, 2019, 05:52:52 PM

I just checked my local laws and i can't be held responsible for the content of a website where i link.

Now the question is would it be against forum rules ?

So... you obey the rules but you don't know the rules? Also evidenced by your multiposting above.

I know the rules perfectly and i know for a fact it wouldn't break any forum rule.
The question is more directed to DT members who have their own to public unknown rules they always claim to execute.

Which is it?

You're so red that you certainly have nothing to worry about regarding DT.

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

Quote from: suchmoon on March 05, 2019, 05:56:05 PM

Quote from: Thule on March 05, 2019, 05:38:14 PM

Funny i the so called scammer obey the forum rules where you abuse them.

Quote from: Thule on March 05, 2019, 05:52:52 PM

I just checked my local laws and i can't be held responsible for the content of a website where i link.

Now the question is would it be against forum rules ?

So... you obey the rules but you don't know the rules? Also evidenced by your multiposting above.

I know the rules perfectly and i know for a fact it wouldn't break any forum rule.
The question is more directed to DT members who have their own to public unknown rules they always claim to execute.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Thule on March 05, 2019, 05:38:14 PM

Funny i the so called scammer obey the forum rules where you abuse them.

Quote from: Thule on March 05, 2019, 05:52:52 PM

I just checked my local laws and i can't be held responsible for the content of a website where i link.

Now the question is would it be against forum rules ?

So... you obey the rules but you don't know the rules? Also evidenced by your multiposting above.

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

I just checked my local laws and i can't be held responsible for the content of a website where i link.

Now the question is would it be against forum rules ?

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Thule on March 05, 2019, 05:38:14 PM

I guess we both know why you said no......don't we ?

I said "no" because you're an utter moron. I'm happy to hear that we agree on that.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Would be posting an URL where a picture is publicly hosted be against forum rules ?
I guess not since i don't publish private information but just a link to an existing website.

Am i wrong with that assumption ?

LOL. Once again...

Quote from: suchmoon on March 05, 2019, 04:12:43 PM

But I do like your insistence on proving time and time again that my feedback for you was very much on point. You're a fucking lunatic and no one should engage in any deals with you. Seeing what you're doing here it's not hard to imagine the damage you'd be able to inflict with someone's real info.

Quote from: suchmoon on March 05, 2019, 04:29:46 PM

There is literally nothing I can do to stop you, only hope that you're actually dumb enough to do it. Make my day, asshole.

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

I guess we both know why you said no......don't we ?

Funny i the so called scammer obey the forum rules where you abuse them.

A nice find i just made

Quote

Doctored screenshots sent by your sockpuppets don't count.

So now i'm the sockpuppet of cryptohunter who doctored screenshots?

You are lucky theymos denied else you were long time banned from this forum.

Would be posting an URL where a picture is publicly hosted be against forum rules ?
I guess not since i don't publish private information but just a link to an existing website.

Am i wrong with that assumption ?

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Thule on March 05, 2019, 04:46:07 PM

Quote

Make sure to add pictures of my house, extra bonus if you can post my kids and the dog too.

Does it mean i have your permission to post the picture ?
Please provide a clear yes or no

No.

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

Quote

Make sure to add pictures of my house, extra bonus if you can post my kids and the dog too.

Does it mean i have your permission to post the picture ?
Please provide a clear yes or no

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: mikeywith on March 05, 2019, 04:35:56 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on March 05, 2019, 04:29:46 PM

extra bonus if you can post my kids and the dog too.

The dog is going to be the most difficult part.

I'm sure there are pictures of some random people with dogs on the internet. Wink

It's not like we're aiming for accuracy here with the scarlet idiot who is either dumb enough to believe random PMs or dumb enough to doctor PMs thinking others will believe it.

Topic: @suchmoon could you provide info on this - page 2. (Read 3357 times)