Topic: SummerCoinV2 Foundation - *SUM2 Fund* - page 2. (Read 10774 times)

WOW... What a wonderful amazing combination....
Now with this change of name is not even the need to fix the source of the wallet.

Apart from the joke, with Navajo Coin, it would still be the problem of "EG I want to buy from you 10 Navajos".

I find it an excellent initiative, both as to the manner in which it is done, ie an open discussion, and the merit itself of the matter and  its motivations.

Obviously I'm in favor of the name change.
In this way at least you will save yours scalp.

Regarding the name, I think BigBlind has the merit of having given an alternative (CodeCoin -> CODE) on this Forum.
This name not being very widespread, would have the advantage that in a Google search produces relatively few results.
So this coin would be easier to find for a person interested or just curious.

Sure, CODE is not really the best abbreviation we can choose, especially in the IT field, but it is still better than CDC.
IMHO, If you could find something else might be better.

A small note, if I'm not mistaken around February had come out a wallet called CodeCoin-QT, but I think it
concerned a coin other with another name.

It could be better as Najavo Coin as the coin and CODE as denomination.

What about Navajo Code as a coin name and CODE as denomination?

My proposition is N-Code, because I think the name should cointain something with Navajo. Two other names can cause a different emotions, not necessarily positive. A small single detail can change a lot, think about it.

                                       Discussion

     We have been thinking of changing the denominations of Navajo Coin from Nav to Code. The reason is that is not very politically correct and might offend some people. E.G. I want to buy from you 10 Navajos.. We would rather change it into codes and keep the coin name as Navajo. It might not be intuitive and may confuse some at the beginning but we believe it is not such a big problem and that the former problem (Navajo denominations) is much bigger.

Please let us know what you think

Best Regards,

SUM2Devs

Hello Mate,

1)Thank you very much for your kind review , at first the Drop Down list was the one in my mind but having one will only contain the users to a set of Nodes which they can feel unsecure about , since I have made drastic changes to the aspect of Decentralized Anonymity the users will have the liberty of choosing their own node despite all

2) Yes the users will have access to a similar feature in the new client , you will be able to see updates on the next set of sneak peaks.

PS: With the new changes it should be 100% Decentralized Anonymity.

Warm Regards,
~SoopY~

Watching sneak peek 2 I noticed some things, and since you're in the development stage, I have a couple of suggestions:

1) How GreedyJohn has already noticed in the first preview, but it went unnoticed by everyone else, the references
to the total coin, the balance and unit of coin to spend still refers to the units (CODE), I think it comes from the
previous wallet from which you are making the fork. Obviously it's just an oversight and should be corrected.

2) I saw that the field used to select the node on which route the Navajo transition, appears to be a simple Text Area.
IMHO, it could be much more user friendly to use a Drop-down List filled automatically with the Navajo active nodes,
or (a little more complex) a list of selectable nodes from which the wallet might choose randomly.
On my proposal maybe there are downsides that I am not able to consider, as I have not much information on the function
of these nodes, for example, on what basis should we choose one or another.
So you consider whether it is right to change the TextArea into a Drop-down List or not.

3) I noticed that in the picture there is no field for the "Transaction Comment."
This feature was not present in the original SUM wallet, but as you know has been included in V. 1.0.7.
In the current version of the SUM2 wallet this function is newly gone, I guess to avoid confusion during
the operation of SWAP.
Now the swap is terminated, and personally I think it is a useful feature, re-include it would be a sign of constant evolution,
and it would now be usable by users as a simple reminder to the transaction, and in the future it may also lead to the
development of other functions, such as the integration with external applications.
The lack of Transaction Comment in the new wallet, it's just an oversight or is a precise design choice?


PS:
If I have correctly understood the info-graphics/dataflow, the system will be decentralized to 33%, and 66% monopolized.
But I may have misunderstood.

Wow, good stuff guys.....ya'll are ballers!!

The system is now 100% decentralized!

new sneak peek just announced if someone is not aware yet

Donation Wallet status - update:

0.2 BTC from the BTC donation wallet was sent as an advance to the official Navajo Coin website coder.
We will inform the community about all donation wallets transactions

Official Announcement

SummerCoinV2 (SUM2) added to http://bitscoinshop.com.br/en/ as a payment option!
You can now buy & sell goods at this website using Your SUM2.
Happy trading! 

Yes

CODECOIN?

This is awesome! Guys be active on reddit under http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/new/

First look into Navajo

You can see here the first screenshots of the new Navajo client. We will give the Community more updates in incoming days, including the Anonymous Technology.
You can expect more sneak peeks every 2 days.
Stay tuned!  

IMHO, a better approach would be:
We need to evaluate every critics and move on.

But it's just the way I see it.

Of course, not all ideas and critics are reasonable or practicable,
but if we limit ourselves to ignore and forget all the critics, I think,
we could fall into mistakes that others have seen, or make our project
very mediocre.
(Besides creating disaffection in the group)

I repeat, this is' just the way I see things, and applicable in any field.


Apart from that, about the main point of the question that I had done, it
seems that there has been no response. So it must be a No.

I think it's a pity, if it was handled really well from the beginning, it could
become an opportunity.

In any case, a man warned is half saved...
and his scalp too.  

LOL No, thank you.
It would be like shooting to the Red Cross. 

The fact that I referred to is that most of the examples cited is referring to things and activities
in other fields, while in the case of NAV is practically the same field.

But as I said this was just a minor point, the least important.

(Sorry for the late response)

+100