✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆 - page 2.

AHOYBRAUSE

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 828

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: iv4n on April 15, 2023, 09:32:18 AM

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 12, 2023, 10:20:01 PM

Hmmmmm.

The 2 "winning" accounts are both baby seals nobody ever really saw playing before. Basically new accounts with almost no history.

SWC users in the chat are having a bad taste in the mouth about this and I can totally understand. This will be a topic in the chat for while now, I just checked it in and they were still talking.
Would not be surprised if we never saw these 2 accounts again on the site, I wonder why. Roll Eyes

Well, sounds a little suspicious, to be honest. I understand why it's a topic in the chat, it takes a lot of luck for this to happen to someone who is just starting... but it's not impossible. It's gambling after all. And Poker especially has those crazy twists, like in this "BadBeat" hand, aces vs kings, and crazy flop for both.

By the way, there's just an image on Twitter... it seems to me that we could see the replay of that hand before, or I mixed something up. It would be nice to see the replay.

You are right, everything could happen at any moment.

Though regulars playing for years and 2 total newbie accounts are both involved in the deciding hand, these odds are quite small to be honest. I mean both!

Let's see if they will ever be seen again or both just disappear.

About the replay, all I see is a screenshot on twitter, didn't see a video of it, now or in the past.

iv4n

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1179

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 12, 2023, 10:20:01 PM

Hmmmmm.

The 2 "winning" accounts are both baby seals nobody ever really saw playing before. Basically new accounts with almost no history.

SWC users in the chat are having a bad taste in the mouth about this and I can totally understand. This will be a topic in the chat for while now, I just checked it in and they were still talking.
Would not be surprised if we never saw these 2 accounts again on the site, I wonder why. Roll Eyes

Well, sounds a little suspicious, to be honest. I understand why it's a topic in the chat, it takes a lot of luck for this to happen to someone who is just starting... but it's not impossible. It's gambling after all. And Poker especially has those crazy twists, like in this "BadBeat" hand, aces vs kings, and crazy flop for both.

By the way, there's just an image on Twitter... it seems to me that we could see the replay of that hand before, or I mixed something up. It would be nice to see the replay.

AHOYBRAUSE

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 828

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Hmmmmm.

The 2 "winning" accounts are both baby seals nobody ever really saw playing before. Basically new accounts with almost no history.

SWC users in the chat are having a bad taste in the mouth about this and I can totally understand. This will be a topic in the chat for while now, I just checked it in and they were still talking.
Would not be surprised if we never saw these 2 accounts again on the site, I wonder why. Roll Eyes

PS: @ pawel

It's called being the bigger man and end things, guess you never heard about that.
Well, you know about class, 2 direct insults in 1 post.

You can play me HU 5 card OMAHA or BigO if you really want to "bet" on something. Bet on your skills. Anyway, you insults are ignored now, if you want to setup a game write on TG, if not, I couldn't care less.

Enjoy your life. Will not address you in this thread any further since all you want to do is argue and fight. We both have better things to do, at least I do. Ignored.

SwC_Poker

full member

Activity: 817

Merit: 140

Official SwC Poker Bitcointalk

RECORD 6.45 BTC BAD BEAT JACKPOT HIT!

The Bad Beat Jackpot was hit on SwC Poker for over 6,450,000 chips! Congratulations to the winners!

halonoob lost the hand with Aces Full of Kings and won 2,258,194 chips (2.258194 BTC) from the jackpot!

wtfjusthapnd won the pot with Quad Kings and collected 1,290,396 chips from the jackpot.

The other players dealt into the hand won a table share of 161,299 chips each.

WINNERS:

halonoob 2,258,194
wtfjusthapnd 1,290,396
GGsqual 161,299
Marwyn 161,299
jjjjjj 161,299
Transparent 161,299
Maldoror13 161,299
Tassie279 161,299

Jackpot has been reseeded and is currently over 1,310,000

https://twitter.com/SwCPoker/status/1645631752214392834

pawel7777

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1561

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 11, 2023, 03:09:42 AM

OK, you are talking nonsense again, no need to reply to you again. Like I ever said the jackpot belongs to me. I even wrote that I NEVER played these tables.

You did say "They jackpot is not their money because it's 100% funded by the players". I couldn't care less what tables you play (if any), but you implied that if you had played jackpot tables - you would be (co)owner of the jackpot pool. This is 100% false.
You want to end the discussion? Just admit that you were wrong, rather than waffling around the subject. The pool is owned by SwC, not the players. Period.

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 11, 2023, 03:09:42 AM

Also if they shut down the site they are basically stealing a 100% funded by players jackpot. They didn't add 1 cent like any other site does. You don't think it's strange that the jackpot isn't hit in over 2 years? Just wow.

The only way they'd be stealing is if they didn't pay out to the jackpot winners. Got evidence of that? Bring it on and post it. Otherwise, they can't steal from themselves. You just can't comprehend reality and keep thinking that the rake paid by the players is somehow theirs. Having a special purpose rake doesn't mean the ownership is somehow shifted to players. SwC is still the owner and they can change the rules and requirements. Again, that's why you DID ask THEM (not the players) to change the requirements.

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 11, 2023, 03:09:42 AM

I didn't ask for anything,

What's this then?:

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 04, 2023, 09:53:28 PM

Question to SWC, is there a play to change the bad beat jackpot requirements anytime soon?

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 11, 2023, 03:09:42 AM

You have for sure never played at SWC

Care to put your money when your mouth is? A little wager on that statement? You're not just a whiny faggot talking out of your ass, are you?

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 11, 2023, 03:09:42 AM

Wish you a great week and much success in whatever you do.

Don't try to fake being classy. Your "wish" is as dishonest as anything else you wrote. Stop talking shit, it's not going to work well for you.

AHOYBRAUSE

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 828

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 11, 2023, 02:22:47 AM

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 10, 2023, 04:18:12 AM

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 10, 2023, 04:10:18 AM

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 07, 2023, 10:15:43 PM

Actually you are a little bit wrong.
They jackpot is not their money because it's 100% funded by the players. There are special jackpot tables where you pay more rake which goes into the jackpot.
On every other table other than these special tables this promotion doesn't count if you lose AAAKK or higher.

Lol, on the same token you could say the site belongs to the players because it's funded by the rake paid by players.
Or that any business belongs to "the people" because it's their money that makes the profits of the business.

Playing jackpot tables means you have a chance to win the Jackpot and nothing more.

And if you think SwC does not own the Jackpot pool, then how do you expect them to change any Jackpot distribution or rules? Shouldn't you be appealing to the players instead? Come on.

LOL. If you don't know the facts you should not comment here.

"Playing jackpot tables means you have a chance to win the Jackpot and nothing more.
", did you even ever play at SWC? Seems like you didn't.
Jackpot tables are taking more rake than normal tables.

For over 2 years people sit at these tables paying extra rake, and it never hits. And even if it hits only 70% paid out and the rest kept by the site, lol.

So next time please inform yourself before even trying to come at me.

What are you even talking about?

Extra rake is completely irrelevant. Paying rake (extra or not) does not make you an owner of the jackpot or any other site's funds. That's just not how things work. The pool belongs to SwC, not to you. That's why you're asking SwC (not players) to change the Jackpot rules and distribution, aren't you?

OK, you are talking nonsense again, no need to reply to you again. Like I ever said the jackpot belongs to me. I even wrote that I NEVER played these tables.
I didn't ask for anything, I just critisized the rules and pointed out that they are making it extremely difficult to hit the jackpot (which benefits them). Also if they shut down the site they are basically stealing a 100% funded by players jackpot. They didn't add 1 cent like any other site does. You don't think it's strange that the jackpot isn't hit in over 2 years? Just wow.
You have for sure never played at SWC, so I don't bother anymore to explain things to you. You didn't even know about the rake, that shows that you have no idea how this site works.

Lets leave it that way.
Wish you a great week and much success in whatever you do. Good bye

pawel7777

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1561

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 10, 2023, 04:18:12 AM

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 10, 2023, 04:10:18 AM

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 07, 2023, 10:15:43 PM

Actually you are a little bit wrong.
They jackpot is not their money because it's 100% funded by the players. There are special jackpot tables where you pay more rake which goes into the jackpot.
On every other table other than these special tables this promotion doesn't count if you lose AAAKK or higher.

Lol, on the same token you could say the site belongs to the players because it's funded by the rake paid by players.
Or that any business belongs to "the people" because it's their money that makes the profits of the business.

Playing jackpot tables means you have a chance to win the Jackpot and nothing more.

And if you think SwC does not own the Jackpot pool, then how do you expect them to change any Jackpot distribution or rules? Shouldn't you be appealing to the players instead? Come on.

LOL. If you don't know the facts you should not comment here.

"Playing jackpot tables means you have a chance to win the Jackpot and nothing more.
", did you even ever play at SWC? Seems like you didn't.
Jackpot tables are taking more rake than normal tables.

For over 2 years people sit at these tables paying extra rake, and it never hits. And even if it hits only 70% paid out and the rest kept by the site, lol.

So next time please inform yourself before even trying to come at me.

What are you even talking about?

Extra rake is completely irrelevant. Paying rake (extra or not) does not make you an owner of the jackpot or any other site's funds. That's just not how things work. The pool belongs to SwC, not to you. That's why you're asking SwC (not players) to change the Jackpot rules and distribution, aren't you?

AHOYBRAUSE

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 828

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 10, 2023, 04:10:18 AM

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 07, 2023, 10:15:43 PM

Actually you are a little bit wrong.
They jackpot is not their money because it's 100% funded by the players. There are special jackpot tables where you pay more rake which goes into the jackpot.
On every other table other than these special tables this promotion doesn't count if you lose AAAKK or higher.

Lol, on the same token you could say the site belongs to the players because it's funded by the rake paid by players.
Or that any business belongs to "the people" because it's their money that makes the profits of the business.

Playing jackpot tables means you have a chance to win the Jackpot and nothing more.

And if you think SwC does not own the Jackpot pool, then how do you expect them to change any Jackpot distribution or rules? Shouldn't you be appealing to the players instead? Come on.

LOL. If you don't know the facts you should not comment here.

"Playing jackpot tables means you have a chance to win the Jackpot and nothing more.
", did you even ever play at SWC? Seems like you didn't.
Jackpot tables are taking more rake than normal tables.

For over 2 years people sit at these tables paying extra rake, and it never hits. And even if it hits only 70% paid out and the rest kept by the site, lol.

So next time please inform yourself before even trying to come at me.

pawel7777

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1561

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 07, 2023, 10:15:43 PM

Actually you are a little bit wrong.
They jackpot is not their money because it's 100% funded by the players. There are special jackpot tables where you pay more rake which goes into the jackpot.
On every other table other than these special tables this promotion doesn't count if you lose AAAKK or higher.

Lol, on the same token you could say the site belongs to the players because it's funded by the rake paid by players.
Or that any business belongs to "the people" because it's their money that makes the profits of the business.

Playing jackpot tables means you have a chance to win the Jackpot and nothing more.

And if you think SwC does not own the Jackpot pool, then how do you expect them to change any Jackpot distribution or rules? Shouldn't you be appealing to the players instead? Come on.

tusandii

hero member

Activity: 1652

Merit: 521

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 07, 2023, 10:15:43 PM

Actually you are a little bit wrong.
They jackpot is not their money because it's 100% funded by the players. There are special jackpot tables where you pay more rake which goes into the jackpot.
On every other table other than these special tables this promotion doesn't count if you lose AAAKK or higher.

I know there is always some distribution, that's on any other site as well. But keeping 10% for absolutely no reason and then another 20% for the next jackpot is nonsense.

Anyway, it is what it is.

True, my friends agree with you and however the jackpot is the result of a pool of money that is given by players every time they play a game and at any casino, of course their jackpot system will have something in common, namely collecting money from players to fund the jackpot.
Regarding saving 10% for no reason and another 20% for the next jackpot is not the right thing because the jackpot is collected from player funds so whatever the nominal is, it must be clear about the details and the reasons for its use.
If we think about it, maybe the casino gives a distribution for a reason, but that reason must be clear and really said so that everything looks fair.
Not all gamblers can get the jackpot, but if there are gamblers who get the jackpot but the distribution is not clear, it will cause disappointment for the players.

AHOYBRAUSE

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 828

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 07, 2023, 02:19:38 PM

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 06, 2023, 04:17:36 AM

Yeah that makes it even less likely, even if it's just a little bit.

Some people in the swc chat already accused swc of not paying it on purpose saying whenever they choose to close the site it's convenient to take then jackpot with them, 6.4 btc for a site with such a small player base is a good extra.

That doesn't make much sense to be honest. They could just discontinue the jackpot offer now, take that BTC6.4 and share that among themselves, without closing the site. At the end of the day it's their bitcoins and they can do whatever they want with them. Same goes for the jackpot distribution model, you may not like it, but that's not your money and not your decision.
Jackpot surely has some marketing effect, but it's not like anyone is playing there solely for the purpose of winning it. And if someone was to win it but didn't get paid - we would almost certainly see some shitstorm (scam accusation, negative trust ratings etc), which doesn't seem to be the case.

I would agree that it can be seen as a bit misleading, as one could get the impression that you would be paid a full 6.4 if you lose with AAAKK, but I think it's pretty standard to have some more complex distribution structure (i.e. the jackpot pool should never get completely depleted).

10% house fee is definitely bad optics, especially since they could just slightly reduce the amount of rake that goes into the jackpot, effectively taking the house fee automatically. It would indeed be good to have that taken out.

Actually you are a little bit wrong.
They jackpot is not their money because it's 100% funded by the players. There are special jackpot tables where you pay more rake which goes into the jackpot.
On every other table other than these special tables this promotion doesn't count if you lose AAAKK or higher.

I know there is always some distribution, that's on any other site as well. But keeping 10% for absolutely no reason and then another 20% for the next jackpot is nonsense.

Anyway, it is what it is.

pawel7777

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1561

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 06, 2023, 04:17:36 AM

Yeah that makes it even less likely, even if it's just a little bit.

Some people in the swc chat already accused swc of not paying it on purpose saying whenever they choose to close the site it's convenient to take then jackpot with them, 6.4 btc for a site with such a small player base is a good extra.

That doesn't make much sense to be honest. They could just discontinue the jackpot offer now, take that BTC6.4 and share that among themselves, without closing the site. At the end of the day it's their bitcoins and they can do whatever they want with them. Same goes for the jackpot distribution model, you may not like it, but that's not your money and not your decision.
Jackpot surely has some marketing effect, but it's not like anyone is playing there solely for the purpose of winning it. And if someone was to win it but didn't get paid - we would almost certainly see some shitstorm (scam accusation, negative trust ratings etc), which doesn't seem to be the case.

I would agree that it can be seen as a bit misleading, as one could get the impression that you would be paid a full 6.4 if you lose with AAAKK, but I think it's pretty standard to have some more complex distribution structure (i.e. the jackpot pool should never get completely depleted).

10% house fee is definitely bad optics, especially since they could just slightly reduce the amount of rake that goes into the jackpot, effectively taking the house fee automatically. It would indeed be good to have that taken out.

AHOYBRAUSE

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 828

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 05, 2023, 04:59:15 PM

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 04, 2023, 09:53:28 PM

Question to SWC, is there a play to change the bad beat jackpot requirements anytime soon? The pot is now 6.3 BTC and hasn't been hit in over 2 years, that's a little bit odd. Min requirement to lose with AAAKK is a tough task and can only be beat by quads or straight flushes.

On top of that, at least 4 players have to be dealt into the hand. Maybe removing (or reducing) that requirement would help.

ps. are the jackpot winnings auto-credited to players' balances or do they have to get in touch and claim it?

Yeah that makes it even less likely, even if it's just a little bit.

Some people in the swc chat already accused swc of not paying it on purpose saying whenever they choose to close the site it's convenient to take then jackpot with them, 6.4 btc for a site with such a small player base is a good extra.

I just checked the payout conditions again and they are also more than ridiculous, that's why I never wasted a minute playing those table.

Payouts:

"35% to the loser of the hand, with other words to the person with the AAAKK
20% to the winner of the hand
15% shared between all other players dealt into the hand
10% house fee

The remainder, the 20%, is used to seed the next jackpot. The initial jackpot was seeded with 100,000 chips. The current jackpot amount is shown at the top of the client, as well as on jackpot tables."

So basically only 70% get paid out, swc keeps 10% for no reason and keeps another 20% for the next jackpot. So they ALWAYS keep 30% if the jackpot promo does not stop doesn't make any sense.

SwC_Poker

full member

Activity: 817

Merit: 140

Official SwC Poker Bitcointalk

MARCH MADNESS SERIES RECAP

Congratulations to all of the 2023 March Madness Series champions!

Thank you to our great players for making this our biggest and best series yet, awarding over 4.3 BTC in prizes!

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 04, 2023, 09:53:28 PM

Quote from: CantPauseMom on April 04, 2023, 05:13:25 PM

I heard that this site have HU SNG.
So is it true and if yes does it have any action in HU SNG?

It's true that they have HU sng's but if you find one running then you can consider yourself lucky.

SNG's in general are not really popular there, only some people play coin flip HU's from time to time, but obviously that's not poker and just a gamble on 1 hand.

Question to SWC, is there a play to change the bad beat jackpot requirements anytime soon? The pot is now 6.3 BTC and hasn't been hit in over 2 years, that's a little bit odd. Min requirement to lose with AAAKK is a tough task and can only be beat by quads or straight flushes.

There are no plans currently to make adjustments to the jackpot while it is active. Previous changes have taken place as the jackpot re-seeds. We welcome feedback and suggestions from players for any changes they would like to see.

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 05, 2023, 04:59:15 PM

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 04, 2023, 09:53:28 PM

Question to SWC, is there a play to change the bad beat jackpot requirements anytime soon? The pot is now 6.3 BTC and hasn't been hit in over 2 years, that's a little bit odd. Min requirement to lose with AAAKK is a tough task and can only be beat by quads or straight flushes.

On top of that, at least 4 players have to be dealt into the hand. Maybe removing (or reducing) that requirement would help.

ps. are the jackpot winnings auto-credited to players' balances or do they have to get in touch and claim it?

Jackpot winnings are automatically credited to players when a qualifying hand is completed.

pawel7777

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1561

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on April 04, 2023, 09:53:28 PM

Question to SWC, is there a play to change the bad beat jackpot requirements anytime soon? The pot is now 6.3 BTC and hasn't been hit in over 2 years, that's a little bit odd. Min requirement to lose with AAAKK is a tough task and can only be beat by quads or straight flushes.

On top of that, at least 4 players have to be dealt into the hand. Maybe removing (or reducing) that requirement would help.

ps. are the jackpot winnings auto-credited to players' balances or do they have to get in touch and claim it?

AHOYBRAUSE

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 828

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: CantPauseMom on April 04, 2023, 05:13:25 PM

I heard that this site have HU SNG.
So is it true and if yes does it have any action in HU SNG?

It's true that they have HU sng's but if you find one running then you can consider yourself lucky.

SNG's in general are not really popular there, only some people play coin flip HU's from time to time, but obviously that's not poker and just a gamble on 1 hand.

Question to SWC, is there a play to change the bad beat jackpot requirements anytime soon? The pot is now 6.3 BTC and hasn't been hit in over 2 years, that's a little bit odd. Min requirement to lose with AAAKK is a tough task and can only be beat by quads or straight flushes.

CantPauseMom

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

I heard that this site have HU SNG.
So is it true and if yes does it have any action in HU SNG?

SwC_Poker

full member

Activity: 817

Merit: 140

Official SwC Poker Bitcointalk

MARCH MADNESS MAIN EVENT CHAMPION

FINAL LEADERBOARD STANDINGS

RECENT EVENT WINNERS

Event 59: 500 The Little BTC 25k GTD

Incognito

Entries: 81
Prizepool: 38,070
1st Place Prize: 10,469.25

Event 60: 2k The Medium BTC 100k GTD

shacKKleton

Entries: 82
Prizepool: 154,160
1st Place Prize: 42,394

Event 61: 5k March Madness Main Event 300k GTD

Stoopers597

Entries: 80
Prizepool: 376,000
1st Place Prize: 103,400

Event 62: 2k The Closer Turbo Doublestack 75k GTD

jbobz

Entries: 37
Prizepool: 75,000
1st Place Prize: 25,500

THE BIG DANCE FREEROLL

April 3rd at 9pm ET / 6pm PT

Top 64 players on the leaderboard qualify for The Big Dance.
Play ends when 16 players remain and resumes as the Sweet 16 Heads Up Shootout on April 4th.

SwC_Poker

full member

Activity: 817

Merit: 140

Official SwC Poker Bitcointalk

MARCH MADNESS SERIES FINAL DAY

CURRENT LEADERBOARD STANDINGS

https://twitter.com/SwCPoker/status/1642393966699073536

RECENT EVENT WINNERS

Event 55: 500 NL Hold'em Turbo 20k GTD

noSugardaddy

Entries: 51
Prizepool: 23,970
1st Place Prize: 7,670.40

Event 56: 1.5k Saturday Special 50k GTD

BigRanch

Entries: 48
Prizepool: 67,680
1st Place Prize: 21,657.60

Event 57: 2k 8-Game Mix 30k GTD

dahlen123

Entries: 19
Prizepool: 35,720
1st Place Prize: 15,002.40

Event 58: 2k NL Hold'em PKO 60k GTD

jordynm1995

Entries: 38
Prizepool: 73,720
1st Place Prize: 9,287.20 + 18,000

SwC_Poker

full member

Activity: 817

Merit: 140

Official SwC Poker Bitcointalk

TODAY'S MARCH MADNESS SERIES EVENTS

CURRENT LEADERBOARD STANDINGS

2 DAYS REMAINING!

https://twitter.com/SwCPoker/status/1642030389102346241

RECENT EVENT WINNERS

Event 51: 500 NL Hold'em Turbo 20k GTD

BigRanch

Entries: 47
Prizepool: 22,090
1st Place Prize: 7,510.60

Event 52: 1k NL Hold'em Turbo 40k GTD

dahlen123

Entries: 43
Prizepool: 40,420
1st Place Prize: 13,742.80

Event 53: 10k NLH High Roller 150k GTD

MissMon

Entries: 25
Prizepool: 235,000
1st Place Prize: 89,300

Event 54: 500 3-Point Contest Rebuy 33.33k GTD

testeree123

Entries: 33
Prizepool: 33,333
1st Place Prize: 12,666.54

Topic: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆 - page 2. (Read 87388 times)