Pages:
Author

Topic: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆 - page 30. (Read 87391 times)

legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1179
The 4.9 BBJ that was just won was entirely funded by SwC.

I saw the hand on Twitter, I think the hand deserves to be shared here too! Great hand, when both people get sets on the flop you know it will be a crazy hand! That ace on turn and that crazy jack on river would make any player to go all in!


Well didn't have luck to be there, I can only hope I will not miss it next time! BBJ is already over 1 btc, so what else to say than see you at the tables people!
legendary
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1189
I'm a newly player of the SwC Poker I would like to know are all players if all the players are real or there are some bots? actually i'm new to poker sites like this mostly I play a video poker on online casinos.

This is what the site prides itself in (see screenshot below).
Source to this, is here, then got o FAQ.




Swc is a well known and reputable poker casino, and has been around for many years now. Should you decide to play on there I think it probbaly is safer than any other random poker sites.
full member
Activity: 817
Merit: 140
Official SwC Poker Bitcointalk
full member
Activity: 817
Merit: 140
Official SwC Poker Bitcointalk
SWC has raised the rake on the BBJ tables without notifying the players once again.  Not notifying the players didn't go over too well last time.



Why are you raking more when tables are 2 and 3 handed at the BBJ tables when you can't qualify for the jackpot unless there are 4 or more players at the table?  Players who start Bad Beat Jackpot tables are now subsidizing the Bad Beat Jackpot prize pool with absolutely 0 benefits. If the software is not advanced enough to have it rake 3% when 2 or 3 handed, you should lower the cap substantially when 2 and 3 handed to compensate for the 20% increase.



If you are already raking an additional 20% from the Bad Beat Jackpot tables and solely funding the jackpot with this 20%, why are you charging a fee every time the jackpot hits? You are double raking the jackpot. So the 3.75% is actually 3.75 x 1.1 = 4.125%
 
You are also false advertising. You claim that the rake is 20% higher at the BBJ tables. If the rake is 3% at the BBJ tables, an additional 20% would be 3.6% not the 3.75% you are charging. Where is this .15% going.  Are you using pMath?


The BBJ drop changes just took effect. The website was updated and a tweet has gone out.  The change was that the promotion SwC had created where they were paying for the entire Bad Beat Jackpot has ended. The 4.9 BBJ that was just won was entirely funded by SwC.  Now a BBJ drop will be added to the regular rake.

Your point about 2 and 3 handed BBJ tables is what SwC intended, in that no extra drop should be taken, the website has been updated to reflect that the rake % at 2 or 3 handed will not be increased for the BBJ.  Also, SwC will contribute 20% of the rake when 2 or 3 players are dealt in at BBJ tables to go towards the BBJ, so in that way it is an added benefit to the players starting up games, albeit not directly.

When 4+ players are dealt in at BBJ tables, 20% of the drop will go towards the BBJ.  Thank you for catching the error we made in wording, as % increases does increase up to 25%.

For example, at 25/50 reg tables the rake % is 3% no matter how many players are dealt in, and the max rake taken 4+ handed is 220 chips. At the 25/50 BBJ tables the rake is 3% when 2 or 3 players are dealt in with the same caps as reg tables, and the rake + BBJ drop is 3.75%(a 25% increase) with a cap of 275(a 25% increase) when 4+ players are dealt in at a BBJ table.  The extra drop now represents 20% of the total rake and drop(extra drop of 55 chips with a total of 275 chips). Those 55 chips will go directly into the BBJ.

For 200/400 and higher, the drop % increase is slightly lower, but the max rake and drop taken increases the same 25%, from 280 to 350. And 20% of the drop, 70 chips in a max raked/dropped pot, will go directly to the BBJ.

So, no matter what limit BBJ you are playing, or how many players are dealt in, 20% of any drop will go directly into the BBJ.

The BBJ is not double raked, as 100% of the increase chips dropped for the BBJ go into the BBJ, and once it hits SwC does take a 10% administration fee.  So the correct formula for figuring out the rake for the 25/50 BBJ table would be (3 x 1) + (0.75 x 0.1) = 3.075%

Rake is defined by what a cardroom makes, and since 90% of the BBJ goes to the players, that 90% is not considered rake. And since 100% of the drop for the BBJ goes into the BBJ, it is only raked one time for 10%, when the BBJ is hit.

If you have any questions, let us know. SwC appreciates the time you took to make your post and wishes you the best of luck!

member
Activity: 171
Merit: 17
When it cancels, it unregisters all players and therefore shows 0 registered. It needed 9 players to start and only got 8.

When is the big announcement coming? I'm giddy!
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1363
www.gosubetting.com
Not a singled registered player for Big BTC?! Yeah, we have all read about player numbers declining (for whatever reason...) but this? Did the Big BTC really not take place due to not a single player registered?
hero member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 711
Telegram @tokensfund
Anyone know whatever happened to AAB?

He/she/it is not regular anymore like many others. Sometimes aab pops up out of nowhere.
member
Activity: 171
Merit: 17


Just because I know you're listening to him, I wanted to clarify that this is not the reason the 5ks aren't running anymore or overlay.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
I'm a newly player of the SwC Poker I would like to know are all players if all the players are real or there are some bots? actually i'm new to poker sites like this mostly I play a video poker on online casinos.

I think their might be bots on the heads up tables, but in tournaments and normal cash I doubt they are
MI6
hero member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 504
Betking.io - Best Bitcoin Casino
I'm a newly player of the SwC Poker I would like to know are all players if all the players are real or there are some bots? actually i'm new to poker sites like this mostly I play a video poker on online casinos.
member
Activity: 171
Merit: 17
A bit more constructive advice from what I've seen lately:

I understand the intention of spreading the MSBOP into different timezones, but I believe they should start closer to each other. Instead of trying to please everyone, I would consider what market you're trying to saturate/attract and then schedule the tournaments around that. There could still be 2 hour gaps in between, but that way you could play all of them if you really wanted and maintain somewhat of a sleep schedule.

The goal then is to make the tournaments so attractive that people of other timezones wake up or stay awake for them.

Aaand another thing that I have advocated for a long time for are SNG/tournaments on demand. Quick refresher: Who here remembers that PokerStars had the 180man SNGs that people used to fill their schedules with?

Well, numbers eventually dwindled after Black Friday and games died but they figured out that they could get way more games to run, but with similar entrance numbers, if they made them on-demand.



These start with with 12-18 players on Stars, but you could start them with 4 players (and lower guarantees) on SWC. Honestly, this should be the highest priority project when it comes to MTTs. No need to fine tune a schedule for different time zones if players can decide when they wanna start a game. It also fixed the embarassment of cancelled tournaments and de-clutters the actual scheduled tournaments. Basically fixes all your problems.

Good luck.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Why don't you post some screen shots of the things you have said to me? Let's get to the meat and potatoes.

And carrots.

member
Activity: 171
Merit: 17
This will be my last Bitcoin Talk response

lol.

Anyways, I still don't care about the chat thing. I was wondering if now that leadership has apparently pivoted in their approach, if new games are still in development? Specifically shortdeck, NL27SD, 6 card PLO etc. are sorely missing. This would also enable some more interesting (bigger) mixes.
full member
Activity: 817
Merit: 140
Official SwC Poker Bitcointalk
TONIGHT'S SCHEDULE



BAD BEAT JACKPOT OVER 4.1 BTC

newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0

But, what about HigherHighs? They do not speak for SWC?

 Also, at one point ETF had the same green text as HH.

No. We have attempted to make this as clear as possible. Higherhighs, nor any other player, represents or speaks for SwC. If they have given you that impression it was either a misinterpretation or a misrepresentation on their part. The only official messages from SwC will come from clearly identified SwC accounts.

There are a few players that have green chat text but it is not an indication of any official position or authority. There are also other players that chose a custom chat color when that option was available for a limited time. If they have not changed their color since that time it will remain. For this reason chat colors alone are not used as a method to signify anything. Official accounts will be clearly identified as such; for example, SwC_Support is an official account used by support in chat.

That just isn't true though. I rubbed HH wrong and they said they were going to ban me, then I was banned from chat. If that is true, then why do you continually let HH act like they represent you in the chat. It has gotten to the point where people have issues and are asking if HH is there and talking to them about it. You could go in the chat right now and ask if anyone thinks HH is part of the SWC team and you will get a large I'm out of responses of people saying yes.

If HH is fraudulently representing themselves in the chat why wouldn't you ban them so they wouldn't continue to do so?


"HH is part of the SWC team" that type of statement can be interpreted many different ways. By definition a team is:
verb
1.
come together as a team to achieve a common goal.
"he teamed up with the band to produce the album"
Similar:
join (up)
join forces
collaborate
get together
come together

So just in the example given by the definition, a person teams up with a band to create an album.......but that doesn't make the person part of the band.

As I have said since the beginning of this, I volunteered to SwC to help them enforce their new rules they put in place months before I started helping out with anything, rules that were ignored and fought back against by some players.  They did give me green chat to show their support for the perspective I was bringing to the chat box, and show their support for me.

I am unpaid. I am not given any other compensation or benefits or incentives. I have no access to anything, and no authority on anything. I am just anti-abuse and was happy to help make a difference any way I can in what I perceived as the biggest problem holding SwC back from growth.

I also notice that those who are disgruntled here, decide to share their stories with newbie accounts and without mentioning their screennames, so that their abusive actions for getting muted can remain a mystery to those reading.  While seeking to attempt to push SwC back to a place where there is no accountability for actions.

I am proud of SwC for making the drastic steps and changes necessary to evolve the past toxic chat culture of years into a completely new and much more positive environment in a relatively short amount of time. I am proud of them for standing up to bullies and abusers.  I think the decisions they are making are going to promote long term growth, and that any short term blowback is primariily coming from a very small number of brutally abusive players/chatters.  And it would not surprise me if 1 person is behind multiple accounts on this thread.

I don't expect to be volunteering my efforts for that much longer, and look forward to just playing poker again, but until then, I am happy to 'team up' with SwC to promote a healthier chat culture and offer my help in any way I can.

full member
Activity: 817
Merit: 140
Official SwC Poker Bitcointalk
UPDATED DAILY SCHEDULE




EVENT 3 STARTS IN 2 HOURS!

♣️ MBSOP EVENT #3 ♣️
Lowball Mix
500 chip buyin, 10k guaranteed
jr. member
Activity: 51
Merit: 3

No. We have attempted to make this as clear as possible. Higherhighs, nor any other player, represents or speaks for SwC. If they have given you that impression it was either a misinterpretation or a misrepresentation on their part. The only official messages from SwC will come from clearly identified SwC accounts.

From the viewpoint of most players, Higherhighs does represent SwC in chat. Higherhighs is implementing chat policy changes dictated by SwC.  Higherhighs is asking players about improvements to the site they would like to see. Higherhighs is making announcements for SwC. Higherhighs has a direct line of communication with SwC.  SwC's actions and inactions create a public perception and this matters. Just saying that "Higherhighs,nor any other player, represents or speaks for SwC" does not make it so.
full member
Activity: 817
Merit: 140
Official SwC Poker Bitcointalk
THE MBSOP BEGINS TODAY!


THURSDAY DOUBLES RECAP




The player with the best combined finish was RileyReid with 1st and 11th place finishes.

Congratulations to RileyReid for winning this week's bonus of 6,000 chips!

Next week's progressive bonus for winning both tournaments will now be 42,400 chips!


BAD BEAT JACKPOT OVER 4.06 BTC!


full member
Activity: 817
Merit: 140
Official SwC Poker Bitcointalk
Higherhighs, along with any other player, is free to send in screenshots of chat that they feel violates the rules posted. The decisions regarding whether this will result in a mute is then made by SwC management.

As we do not currently have a chat moderator present there have been a number of players that have assisted with this, and with relaying player feedback. But as always we invite all players to directly give us that feedback or message if they choose.

If any player has made comments with the intention of representing themselves as a part of the SwC team we would ask you to email support with a screenshot because this is not true and would not be allowed.
Pages:
Jump to: