Hmm calculation time on your picture
Elapsed = 96511s
Accepted = 7963136 1diff shares
Rejected = 166912 1diff shares
Hardware errors = 657472 1diff nonces
So Accepted hash rate is 2^32 * Accepted / Elapsed
354.4GH/s
Full hash rate (Accepted + Rejected) is 2^32 * (Accepted + Rejected) / Elapsed
361.8GH/s
Only one minor comment on those - you can only count the Rejected in the device GH/s if KnC hasn't fucked with the submit_nonce() code and also you can verify that by seeing why the shares were Rejected.
As far as I know there's been no sign of the GPL3 code as should have been given to anyone with a KnC who asks for it ... and it must have all versions of the code asked for.
Gee ... I wonder if I'll have another Kano vs GitSyncom ... what'll it be called this time ... Kano vs KFC
Nom nom.
Anyway, now for the fun numbers there ...
Hardware % = Hardware / (Accepted + Rejected + Hardware)
7.48%
which, BTW, is 29.3GH/s of hardware errors
Well at least it's less than the original 16% when they were boasting about how good it was ... lolololol
Now ... what are these things supposed to be doing?
I'm sure I saw them boasting in that video how they were doing 500GH ... how did it that boasting go ... ?
"... Back in May we promised you 250 ... well it's not 250
Then we upped it to 300 ... it's not 300
In June we said 350. We published that on the web site ... it's not 350 (tears paper in half)
In August we said 400 ... well it's not 400 (screws up the page and throws it on the floor)
We have a 500 machine here for you today and as evidence of the 500 machine we have a laptop in front of us running a full copy of cgminer.
We can see here that we are actually achieving, on average, over 500
In fact the theoretical limit is 576+
576 gigahashes a second and it's fully working and we start shipping today ..."Interesting definition of "fully working" ...
So do you feel like telling them to go fuck themselves about the red comments for your hardware?
I will add they failed to see that it wasn't even showing 500GH/s on the screen as I pointed out here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3276727But of course the most important point being firstly that they seem to think that cgminer showing that on the screen is all the proof they needed.
Yay cgminer
Pity they wrote the driver and fucked up cgminer's reputation ... well ... we didn't have anything to do with their driver code.
To add something more informative: order numbers don't play a role, payment dates do.
