Author

Topic: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com - page 1939. (Read 3049501 times)

legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
People, stay on topic and kindly keep your personal banter to PMs. It's getting tedious receiving new post notifications and opening a topic only to find a completely irrelevant post with some personal insult thrown in someone's direction. Now, where was that Ignore button, I might need to use it more often.

In a way, KnC were right in not releasing too much info. Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

Wasn't the original device supposed to be water-cooled? Would that make a difference?

I think they always showed air-cooled schematics on their web site.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Wasn't the original device supposed to be water-cooled? Would that make a difference?
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 504
rangedriver: Please stay in the music industry. Don't buy a KnC miner.

You know what guys.. I think you're right.

Moment of revelation. I'm outta.

End.
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
rangedriver: Please stay in the music industry. Don't buy a KnC miner.
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1027
The  number of dies is irrelevant, that's just a cost cutting measure to save having to make another type of wafer. What's relevant is the 12 year old PAC611 package could handle a TDP higher than the total KNCminer system is expected to draw, so it's not venturing into the unknown like you are trying to make out with your armchair FUD effort.

Wrong, the PAC611 package cannot handle 260W. (This theoretical number is merely published because Hondo has 2 dies that could in theory draw 130W each.) In practice, Intel had to throttle the dies so that Hondo never draws more than 170W total:

The challenge was to design a dual Madison (Itanium 2) processor module that would use no more then a single madison/power pod reference design provided by Intel (ie, 170W).

The mx2 module is designed to run each processor so that it consumes about 65 percent of the max power that it could theoretically draw.
erk
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
GPUs have power constraints, look at server grade processors if you want to what's possible. eg. The Intel Itanium (Hondo) CPU is 260watts TDP, a Sun SPARC T4 240watts,  and KNCminer are quoting 250watts for the complete Mercury system not just the CPU.

Exactly, you need to be Intel or Oracle (or AMD or Nvidia) to be able to design such a high TDP chip, especially in such a short timeframe. By the way Hondo has 2 dies, not 1; not even Intel could manage 260 watt on a single die...

There is a reason neither Intel nor Oracle continued to sell such high TDP chips. They have to bin the top 5% of their CPUs from the foundry, to find the ones that are stable despite the heat, and it's just too expensive and complex to design systems able to power and cool such chips.

And in Mercury, at least 80% of the power will be consumed by the chip alone. 20% will be lost to AC/DC and DC/DC power conversion steps, and maybe 1% in ancillary support components.
The  number of dies is irrelevant, that's just a cost cutting measure to save having to make another type of wafer. What's relevant is the 12 year old PAC611 package could handle a TDP higher than the total KNCminer system is expected to draw, so it's not venturing into the unknown like you are trying to make out with your armchair FUD effort.

hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I too was looking at the simulation.. Looks more like 125 than 150 but yea, still way too high.

KnC =BFL_ng  Grin
Armchair experts again.
I am quite sure the foundry and chip makers will tell KNCminer what is too hot based on the properties of the materials they are using.
my armchair expertise is indeed expecting some bad news from chip makers Grin

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2766019
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1027
GPUs have power constraints, look at server grade processors if you want to what's possible. eg. The Intel Itanium (Hondo) CPU is 260watts TDP, a Sun SPARC T4 240watts,  and KNCminer are quoting 250watts for the complete Mercury system not just the CPU.

Exactly, you need to be Intel or Oracle (or AMD or Nvidia) to be able to design such a high TDP chip, especially in such a short timeframe. By the way Hondo has 2 dies, not 1; not even Intel could manage 260 watt on a single die...

There is a reason neither Intel nor Oracle continued to sell such high TDP chips. They have to bin the top 5% of their CPUs from the foundry, to find the ones that are stable despite the heat, and it's just too expensive and complex to design systems able to power and cool such chips.

And in Mercury, at least 80% of the power will be consumed by the chip alone. 20% will be lost to AC/DC and DC/DC power conversion steps, and maybe 1% in ancillary support components.
erk
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
I too was looking at the simulation.. Looks more like 125 than 150 but yea, still way too high.

KnC =BFL_ng  Grin

Armchair experts again.

I am quite sure the foundry and chip makers will tell KNCminer what is too hot based on the properties of the materials they are using.

erk
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500


Exactly.  Even companies like AMD or Nvidia, with the best thermal engineers and ASIC designers on the planet, barely manage to approach 200-250W consumed by the GPU ASIC chip only (even then, a good 50W+ is consumed by the rest of the card, so the GPU ASIC itself is closer to 200W, not 250W).

KnCMiner is so ridiculously underestimating the complexity of their technical choices... There is absolutely no way they will ship a ~250W 100Gh/s chip (their claims) in October 2013. Mark my words.

It is mind-boggling to see the number of people who accept KnCMiner's claims of feasibility without blinking an eye.

KnCMiner will either spectacularly fail to deliver anything. Or they will have to underclock their chips and increase the number of chips per device to match their performance numbers per device (like BFL did with the Single SC).


GPUs have power constraints, look at server grade processors if you want to what's possible. eg. The Intel Itanium (Hondo) CPU is 260watts TDP, a Sun SPARC T4 240watts,  and KNCminer are quoting 250watts for the complete Mercury system not just the CPU.


hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I too was looking at the simulation.. Looks more like 125 than 150 but yea, still way too high.

KnC =BFL_ng  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
No they have yours too
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1027
They have *your* money, not mine  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
Lol well they have our money, if it was a scam they'd be gone by now. Only thing I can think of is disinformation ;-)
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1027
Next to an ac?

There is no house A/C that blows air at 25F.
Do you realize how cold 25F is? It turns water into ice!
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
Next to an ac?
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 504
Cold fan air at -4C??
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
Maybe it's cold fan air?

I think
223 isnt Centigrade are Fahrenheit . 

   223F are 106C.

Nope. It is centigrade. Note the temperature of the input air: 25C, which is average room temperature. Who on earth would run a consumer device simulation with ambient temps of 25F/-4C ?!

If it was fahrenheit, KnCMiner would be telling us their device requires below zero ambient temperature Smiley

legendary
Activity: 804
Merit: 1002
*note disclaimer, I own no hardware (other than temporary stock), have no preorders and no affiliation*

Something is wrong here with this simulation. Its a side view of the board at the bottom, with package and chip slightly above, with a 4 heatpipe heatsink. The left, blue side is showing an ambient intake of 25C, exhausting at ~50C.

Now, look at the chip area; its deep oranges at best. Their own simulation is telling us the chip's heatspreader [not even the chip itself] is somewhere between 125-150C. I don't know a consumer grade chip that gets even close to these temps, nor materials creating using conventional techniques that would withstand 24/7 at these temperates.

Its hard to tell without a larger image but it looks like an auto scaled legend, so its reporting a spot temperature somewhere on the chip of 223C. I am not aware of the limitations of the exact simulations they ran, but if mine came back and showed that I would be weeing myself.

tldr: Either that simulation is made up, fake, wrong, set up horrifically - or the chips are running @150C+.

I think
223 isnt Centigrade are Fahrenheit .  

   223F are 106C.

^What he said. But seriously, It's a 28nm Chip, they run pretty low temperature-wise. AND you can pretty much figure it's Fahrenheit since max. temp. is at over 200 degree; at that point the soldering would melt in Celsius...
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1027
I think
223 isnt Centigrade are Fahrenheit .  

   223F are 106C.

Nope. It is centigrade. Note the temperature of the input air: 25C, which is average room temperature. Who on earth would run a consumer device simulation with ambient temps of 25F/-4C ?!

If it was fahrenheit, KnCMiner would be telling us their device requires below zero ambient temperature Smiley
Jump to: