Topic: [SYNX] Syndicate | Business Management Platform | NEW BETA v1.0.1.7 RELEASED! | - page 100. (Read 235781 times)
August 14, 2016, 05:39:25 PM
When will synx be added on bittrex?
August 14, 2016, 04:16:07 PM
So Synx team can't even afford 3 BTC to get listed on Bittrex?
Thta's a flawed assumption. It's the SYNX coinholders who want this just as much, if not more than the devs. I for one, will be sending 0.5 BTC shortly. The devs are doing their part as it is.
Every coin holders want their coin to be listed on polo and trex, this one is also not different. It feels like the team doesn't want it to get more attentions by paying just 3 BTC.
If you want this coin listed on a new exchange, then why don't you contribute?
I think everyone wants this coin on bittrex, then contribute as much as you can. If each send 10% of invested in SYNX, I think that we will collect 3 BTC very quickly, and it will pay off very good.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
I'm just an outsider and even don't have this coin. However, this is the first time I heard a coin that needs a crowdfund to get listed on Bittrex.
It's strange to me that the team can't even pay 3 BTC. If this coin really has potential, why not?
You must be new here.
Bittrex additions have been crowd funded many times.
I appreciate you opinion, but you seem to just be fudding.
August 14, 2016, 04:10:03 PM
I can understand paying 3 BTC to get listed on Bittrex, it's what most coins on there have done, but paying 2.4 to get listed on C-Cex is a waste of money, in my opinion. C-Cex offers nothing that Bittrex cannot do better. You might as well pay 0.1 BTC to get it listed on Yobit, if your gunna waste the money on C-Cex. Yobit has far more daily volume than C-Cex and sometimes more than Bittrex.
Someone has already paid for yobit, but they still don't listed SYNX.
August 14, 2016, 04:01:34 PM
I can understand paying 3 BTC to get listed on Bittrex, it's what most coins on there have done, but paying 2.4 to get listed on C-Cex is a waste of money, in my opinion. C-Cex offers nothing that Bittrex cannot do better. You might as well pay 0.1 BTC to get it listed on Yobit, if your gunna waste the money on C-Cex. Yobit has far more daily volume than C-Cex and sometimes more than Bittrex.
August 14, 2016, 04:01:06 PM
So Synx team can't even afford 3 BTC to get listed on Bittrex?
Thta's a flawed assumption. It's the SYNX coinholders who want this just as much, if not more than the devs. I for one, will be sending 0.5 BTC shortly. The devs are doing their part as it is.
Every coin holders want their coin to be listed on polo and trex, this one is also not different. It feels like the team doesn't want it to get more attentions by paying just 3 BTC.
If you want this coin listed on a new exchange, then why don't you contribute?
I think everyone wants this coin on bittrex, then contribute as much as you can. If each send 10% of invested in SYNX, I think that we will collect 3 BTC very quickly, and it will pay off very good.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
I'm just an outsider and even don't have this coin. However, this is the first time I heard a coin that needs a crowdfund to get listed on Bittrex.
It's strange to me that the team can't even pay 3 BTC. If this coin really has potential, why not?
Seems the team is idiot and paid BTC2.4 for c-cex already.
It wasn't the team. It was the community. And the only idiot here is you because at least we are contributing something to the betterment of Syndicate.
August 14, 2016, 03:18:39 PM
So Synx team can't even afford 3 BTC to get listed on Bittrex?
Thta's a flawed assumption. It's the SYNX coinholders who want this just as much, if not more than the devs. I for one, will be sending 0.5 BTC shortly. The devs are doing their part as it is.
Every coin holders want their coin to be listed on polo and trex, this one is also not different. It feels like the team doesn't want it to get more attentions by paying just 3 BTC.
If you want this coin listed on a new exchange, then why don't you contribute?
I think everyone wants this coin on bittrex, then contribute as much as you can. If each send 10% of invested in SYNX, I think that we will collect 3 BTC very quickly, and it will pay off very good.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
I'm just an outsider and even don't have this coin. However, this is the first time I heard a coin that needs a crowdfund to get listed on Bittrex.
It's strange to me that the team can't even pay 3 BTC. If this coin really has potential, why not?
Seems the team is idiot and paid BTC2.4 for c-cex already.
August 14, 2016, 03:17:16 PM
So Synx team can't even afford 3 BTC to get listed on Bittrex?
Thta's a flawed assumption. It's the SYNX coinholders who want this just as much, if not more than the devs. I for one, will be sending 0.5 BTC shortly. The devs are doing their part as it is.
Every coin holders want their coin to be listed on polo and trex, this one is also not different. It feels like the team doesn't want it to get more attentions by paying just 3 BTC.
If you want this coin listed on a new exchange, then why don't you contribute?
I think everyone wants this coin on bittrex, then contribute as much as you can. If each send 10% of invested in SYNX, I think that we will collect 3 BTC very quickly, and it will pay off very good.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
I'm just an outsider and even don't have this coin. However, this is the first time I heard a coin that needs a crowdfund to get listed on Bittrex.
It's strange to me that the team can't even pay 3 BTC. If this coin really has potential, why not?
why should the dev team pay around 1700$ to get listed to a more popular exchange?this coin is doing good at coinex..if other "better" exchanges would see the potencial of the coin they would list it for free!so no sense to pay for..if u really want to dump ur coins than just pay the 3btc! Cuz u guys want it on trex!everyone want to dump on popular exchange cuz of better price but nobody wants to pay for it!dev team should focus on development not to get listed on an exchange!
August 14, 2016, 03:11:06 PM
So Synx team can't even afford 3 BTC to get listed on Bittrex?
Thta's a flawed assumption. It's the SYNX coinholders who want this just as much, if not more than the devs. I for one, will be sending 0.5 BTC shortly. The devs are doing their part as it is.
Every coin holders want their coin to be listed on polo and trex, this one is also not different. It feels like the team doesn't want it to get more attentions by paying just 3 BTC.
If you want this coin listed on a new exchange, then why don't you contribute?
I think everyone wants this coin on bittrex, then contribute as much as you can. If each send 10% of invested in SYNX, I think that we will collect 3 BTC very quickly, and it will pay off very good.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
I'm just an outsider and even don't have this coin. However, this is the first time I heard a coin that needs a crowdfund to get listed on Bittrex.
It's strange to me that the team can't even pay 3 BTC. If this coin really has potential, why not?
August 14, 2016, 03:02:19 PM
If Gladimor is legit, this is a no-brainer.
Donate some of your BTC and when it hits Bittrexx it will pump for sure. So dump the pump, make your profit, cover you donation amout, then buy back cheaper..
Let's get the ball rolling you cheap pussies.
Donate some of your BTC and when it hits Bittrexx it will pump for sure. So dump the pump, make your profit, cover you donation amout, then buy back cheaper..
Let's get the ball rolling you cheap pussies.
August 14, 2016, 02:51:13 PM
I think everyone wants this coin on bittrex, then contribute as much as you can. If each send 10% of invested in SYNX, I think that we will collect 3 BTC very quickly, and it will pay off very good.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
HOLD ON a second...........
Where is the wallet address these "donations" are going to. For all we know you guys could be shillers.
I would consider donating, but it would have to be crystal clear and involve a 3rd party who allows funds to be paid to Bittrex.
Where is the bitcoin going to? Price is moving up again, sell walls also moving up, good signs. IF and its a BIG if, SYNX hit Trex, x2 in price is given, just for starters.
I am in possession of the private keys of the donation address. Once it reaches 3 BTC, I'll be sending the funds to the address Ryan will provide me with (he still hasn't gotten back to my ticket, but I've spoken with Bill on Slack).
August 14, 2016, 02:37:16 PM
I think everyone wants this coin on bittrex, then contribute as much as you can. If each send 10% of invested in SYNX, I think that we will collect 3 BTC very quickly, and it will pay off very good.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
HOLD ON a second...........
Where is the wallet address these "donations" are going to. For all we know you guys could be shillers.
I would consider donating, but it would have to be crystal clear and involve a 3rd party who allows funds to be paid to Bittrex.
Where is the bitcoin going to? Price is moving up again, sell walls also moving up, good signs. IF and its a BIG if, SYNX hit Trex, x2 in price is given, just for starters.
August 14, 2016, 11:38:28 AM
I think everyone wants this coin on bittrex, then contribute as much as you can. If each send 10% of invested in SYNX, I think that we will collect 3 BTC very quickly, and it will pay off very good.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.
August 14, 2016, 11:18:08 AM
So Synx team can't even afford 3 BTC to get listed on Bittrex?
Thta's a flawed assumption. It's the SYNX coinholders who want this just as much, if not more than the devs. I for one, will be sending 0.5 BTC shortly. The devs are doing their part as it is.
Every coin holders want their coin to be listed on polo and trex, this one is also not different. It feels like the team doesn't want it to get more attentions by paying just 3 BTC.
If you want this coin listed on a new exchange, then why don't you contribute?
August 14, 2016, 10:34:15 AM
So Synx team can't even afford 3 BTC to get listed on Bittrex?
Thta's a flawed assumption. It's the SYNX coinholders who want this just as much, if not more than the devs. I for one, will be sending 0.5 BTC shortly. The devs are doing their part as it is.
Every coin holders want their coin to be listed on polo and trex, this one is also not different. It feels like the team doesn't want it to get more attentions by paying just 3 BTC.
August 14, 2016, 09:53:20 AM
Probably coin won vote but they add Mudra...
August 14, 2016, 09:16:56 AM
0.5 BTC Sent. PM'ing the TXID right now.
August 14, 2016, 08:58:11 AM
And guys, don't be so cheap. Please help out the community.
Contributed around .2 BTC to c-cex and .25 BTC to the bittrex fund. I guess Im safe from the "cheap" list
August 14, 2016, 08:48:25 AM
And guys, don't be so cheap. Please help out the community.
August 14, 2016, 08:39:56 AM
I can't seem to sync my wallet. Added the config on the main page. Any help?
1.0.0.7 should work without any config.
If you previously ran an older version, you need to download the blockchain again after removing everything but your wallet.dat/peers.dat from your appdata/roaming/syndicate folder.
You can try using this peers.dat.
http://www.filedropper.com/peers
That did the trick. Thank you very much
August 14, 2016, 08:25:46 AM
So Synx team can't even afford 3 BTC to get listed on Bittrex?
Thta's a flawed assumption. It's the SYNX coinholders who want this just as much, if not more than the devs. I for one, will be sending 0.5 BTC shortly. The devs are doing their part as it is.
Jump to: