Topic: Syrian "refugee" attempts to rape 8-year old Danish girl - page 2. (Read 5498 times)
Rape, on the other hand, is not based on skin color, is it?
Muslim is not a race, but it is heavily linked with niggers ok let's say black people for here, which is one. There IS a correlation between the Muslims and this illness. However, there is White Muslims, which have nothing to do with those beasts.
The data deals with newborn babies. For example, in 2013 a total of 279,903 new-borns had at least one parent from Arab, Black, Turkish and Indian origins. The total number of births were 783,964. This is the actual count. Obviously, people with reduced mental ability such as mainpmf can't distinguish between real population count and sample surveys conducted on 1,000 or 2,000 people.
And regarding white Muslims, there are quite a lot of them in France. May be 200,000 or 300,000. But still, they constitute just around 2% of the total French Muslim population. Also, most of these "white Muslims" marry non-whites, and produce non-white children. So their numbers doesn't matter much.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/241086816/bilan-activite-2013-p62-pdf
All the White Muslims that I know only married with other White Muslims or with common Frenchmen/women.
you are totally wrong ... muslims can only mary with muslims .. it doesnt matter your skin color .. it is really matter your religion to marry with a muslim..
Muslim is not a race, but it is heavily linked with niggers ok let's say black people for here, which is one. There IS a correlation between the Muslims and this illness. However, there is White Muslims, which have nothing to do with those beasts.
The data deals with newborn babies. For example, in 2013 a total of 279,903 new-borns had at least one parent from Arab, Black, Turkish and Indian origins. The total number of births were 783,964. This is the actual count. Obviously, people with reduced mental ability such as mainpmf can't distinguish between real population count and sample surveys conducted on 1,000 or 2,000 people.
And regarding white Muslims, there are quite a lot of them in France. May be 200,000 or 300,000. But still, they constitute just around 2% of the total French Muslim population. Also, most of these "white Muslims" marry non-whites, and produce non-white children. So their numbers doesn't matter much.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/241086816/bilan-activite-2013-p62-pdf
All the White Muslims that I know only married with other White Muslims or with common Frenchmen/women.
Muslim is not a race, but it is heavily linked with niggers ok let's say black people for here, which is one. There IS a correlation between the Muslims and this illness. However, there is White Muslims, which have nothing to do with those beasts.
The data deals with newborn babies. For example, in 2013 a total of 279,903 new-borns had at least one parent from Arab, Black, Turkish and Indian origins. The total number of births were 783,964. This is the actual count. Obviously, people with reduced mental ability such as mainpmf can't distinguish between real population count and sample surveys conducted on 1,000 or 2,000 people.
And regarding white Muslims, there are quite a lot of them in France. May be 200,000 or 300,000. But still, they constitute just around 2% of the total French Muslim population. Also, most of these "white Muslims" marry non-whites, and produce non-white children. So their numbers doesn't matter much.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/241086816/bilan-activite-2013-p62-pdf
No it is not. You have no source to prove your word for a very simple reason, it's total bulshit. Find me just ONE study talking about 15% muslim, just ONE.
Cause I can give you as much as you want claiming the 5% are still reliable.
Cause I can give you as much as you want claiming the 5% are still reliable.
You will not be able to give any "reliable" proof to backup your claims, because racial and religious statistics are banned in France. No matter how many sources you cite, all of them will be just assumptions rather than real population count.
There has been only one population count according to racial origin in France during the last 100 years. It was a study conducted by the French medical association, on the prevalence of sickle-cell anemia. This particular disease affects only people having Arab, Black, Turkish and Indian descent. So the medical association tabled data on births, where at least one of the parent is from these backgrounds.
This is what they found: 34.44% of newborns in France in 2012 were non-White.
Data from 2013: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EhD4yaZnnN8/VEVCZ22G3fI/AAAAAAAAAF8/Zng9za4gdFk/s1600/National%2BScreening%2BTests%2Bon%2BSickle%2BCell%2BDeasease%2Bin%2BNewborns%2C%2BFrance%2B2005-13.jpg
Data from 2014: https://bloodyshovel.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/73akbau.png?w=630
Damn you're really tiring...
First it's not about race but religion.
Second religion stats are allowed in France, they're just not done by the government, the National census is not taking it into account that's all.
Third What I provided are not just "assumptions" they're studies that have been proceeded by asking people. Of course it's not 100% reliable as it's a poll, but when ALL the polls that have been made give you the same result it's pretty logical to assume this result might be the good one.
Fourth your study was conducted on a selected kind of children not on all the population.
Fifth even if your study was correct you're talking about non white I was talking about Muslims. France being a former colonial power it seems rather logical to have a strong portion of the population being black, doesn't mean they're Muslims.
Sixth you still never provided ANY kind of source or proof to back your words. You're just giving me figures coming directly from your ass...
Muslim is not a race, but it is heavily linked with
Nothing to dooooooooooooooooo!
I don't see what you're doing with this...
No it is not. You have no source to prove your word for a very simple reason, it's total bulshit. Find me just ONE study talking about 15% muslim, just ONE.
Cause I can give you as much as you want claiming the 5% are still reliable.
Cause I can give you as much as you want claiming the 5% are still reliable.
You will not be able to give any "reliable" proof to backup your claims, because racial and religious statistics are banned in France. No matter how many sources you cite, all of them will be just assumptions rather than real population count.
There has been only one population count according to racial origin in France during the last 100 years. It was a study conducted by the French medical association, on the prevalence of sickle-cell anemia. This particular disease affects only people having Arab, Black, Turkish and Indian descent. So the medical association tabled data on births, where at least one of the parent is from these backgrounds.
This is what they found: 34.44% of newborns in France in 2012 were non-White.
Data from 2013: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EhD4yaZnnN8/VEVCZ22G3fI/AAAAAAAAAF8/Zng9za4gdFk/s1600/National%2BScreening%2BTests%2Bon%2BSickle%2BCell%2BDeasease%2Bin%2BNewborns%2C%2BFrance%2B2005-13.jpg
Data from 2014: https://bloodyshovel.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/73akbau.png?w=630
Damn you're really tiring...
First it's not about race but religion.
Second religion stats are allowed in France, they're just not done by the government, the National census is not taking it into account that's all.
Third What I provided are not just "assumptions" they're studies that have been proceeded by asking people. Of course it's not 100% reliable as it's a poll, but when ALL the polls that have been made give you the same result it's pretty logical to assume this result might be the good one.
Fourth your study was conducted on a selected kind of children not on all the population.
Fifth even if your study was correct you're talking about non white I was talking about Muslims. France being a former colonial power it seems rather logical to have a strong portion of the population being black, doesn't mean they're Muslims.
Sixth you still never provided ANY kind of source or proof to back your words. You're just giving me figures coming directly from your ass...
Muslim is not a race, but it is heavily linked with
I read somewhere that the Nazis were quite fond of the Arabs, here's a wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relations_between_Nazi_Germany_and_the_Arab_world
Back then, the logic was "the enemy of my enemy is a friend". There were no Arabs in Europe, and the major targets were Jews and the Roma. The Nazis were quite isolated, but found allies among the Japanese and the Arabs, who shared the same ideology of racial superiority and anti-Jewish hatred. It is claimed that Shitler gassed the six million Jews, because the Arabs opposed his plan to deport all of them to Palestine.
Small doses of neo-nazism could be considered as cure for this case.
Nope. That is the tactic used by the pro-immigration left wing loonies. For them everyone who oppose the mass immigration of Muslims to the European continent is a Nazi. For example, in Sweden the left-wingers have labelled the center-right Sweden Democrat party as "neo-Nazi", although its ideology is more similar to the Republican Party of the USA.
Yeah that's for sure. Well of course the neo nazis would rape you then, but no longer the migrants.
What? Did you think that the police of a dictatorship wouldn't do illegal things? xD
Oh yeah well the forum is a bit of a battle ground between 2 points of view that's true ^^
The topic here is the rape of an eight-year old girl in Denmark, by subhumans invited by Angela Merkel. It is true that the posters here are divided in to two camps. The first camp condemns the rape, and demands that Merkel takes back her immigrants from the other European nations. The second camp is in favor of the rapist, and threatens anyone who opposes them and believes that their rivals are all Nazis.
PFFFFFF...
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/black-or-white
Cause you can't condemn the rape without thinking imigrants are at fault...
Oh yeah well the forum is a bit of a battle ground between 2 points of view that's true ^^
The topic here is the rape of an eight-year old girl in Denmark, by subhumans invited by Angela Merkel. It is true that the posters here are divided in to two camps. The first camp condemns the rape, and demands that Merkel takes back her immigrants from the other European nations. The second camp is in favor of the rapist, and threatens anyone who opposes them and believes that their rivals are all Nazis.
Google shows that the meaning is politically incorrect, not sure though if it's right. I assume, it's just plain Politics.
Oh yeah well the forum is a bit of a battle ground between 2 points of view that's true ^^
Google shows that the meaning is politically incorrect, not sure though if it's right. I assume, it's just plain Politics.
"politics and society" forum reminded me of this picture, seeing the posts:
I don't really understand, what does the /pol/ mean? Am I the only one who doesn't care for the dude nationality, but who's shocked by the sentence?
I mean.... NINE MONTHS?
NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINE?
Wtf is this shit? Attempted rape on a 8 year old child and he gets only 9 months of prison?
Where are the 20 years at least this monster deserves???
I mean.... NINE MONTHS?
NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINE?Wtf is this shit? Attempted rape on a 8 year old child and he gets only 9 months of prison?
Where are the 20 years at least this monster deserves???
Agreed!
Well the fact that he's a refugee doesn't surprise me. But you don't even get a full year of jail for trying to rape a little girl? What kind of justice is that?
He'll spend maybe 5 months in jail before being released!
But don't worry next time he'll be more careful, he won't get caught...
Apparently the justice system fails and has lots of flaws.
IF that was in the US its pretty much prison for life and maybe a lesser year sentence if probation is even given.
Yeah but that's not really a good example cause the USA probably have one of the worst carcéral and justice system in the civilized world ^^
Am I the only one who doesn't care for the dude nationality, but who's shocked by the sentence?
I mean.... NINE MONTHS? NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINE?
Wtf is this shit? Attempted rape on a 8 year old child and he gets only 9 months of prison?
Where are the 20 years at least this monster deserves???
I mean.... NINE MONTHS?
NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINE?Wtf is this shit? Attempted rape on a 8 year old child and he gets only 9 months of prison?
Where are the 20 years at least this monster deserves???
Agreed!
Well the fact that he's a refugee doesn't surprise me. But you don't even get a full year of jail for trying to rape a little girl? What kind of justice is that?
He'll spend maybe 5 months in jail before being released!
But don't worry next time he'll be more careful, he won't get caught...
Apparently the justice system fails and has lots of flaws.
IF that was in the US its pretty much prison for life and maybe a lesser year sentence if probation is even given.
"politics and society" forum reminded me of this picture, seeing the posts:
obama+islam + isis +amerdogan+nato 
perfect definition of evil forces .. congrats.. but erdogan is the worst of all..
Lol, yeah the "evil"... A bit what Bush wanted to fight by killing dozens of thousands of people to seek the USA oil...
obama+islam + isis +amerdogan+nato
perfect definition of evil forces .. congrats.. but erdogan is the worst of all..
No it is not. You have no source to prove your word for a very simple reason, it's total bulshit. Find me just ONE study talking about 15% muslim, just ONE.
Cause I can give you as much as you want claiming the 5% are still reliable.
Cause I can give you as much as you want claiming the 5% are still reliable.
You will not be able to give any "reliable" proof to backup your claims, because racial and religious statistics are banned in France. No matter how many sources you cite, all of them will be just assumptions rather than real population count.
There has been only one population count according to racial origin in France during the last 100 years. It was a study conducted by the French medical association, on the prevalence of sickle-cell anemia. This particular disease affects only people having Arab, Black, Turkish and Indian descent. So the medical association tabled data on births, where at least one of the parent is from these backgrounds.
This is what they found: 34.44% of newborns in France in 2012 were non-White.
Data from 2013: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EhD4yaZnnN8/VEVCZ22G3fI/AAAAAAAAAF8/Zng9za4gdFk/s1600/National%2BScreening%2BTests%2Bon%2BSickle%2BCell%2BDeasease%2Bin%2BNewborns%2C%2BFrance%2B2005-13.jpg
Data from 2014: https://bloodyshovel.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/73akbau.png?w=630
Damn you're really tiring...
First it's not about race but religion.
Second religion stats are allowed in France, they're just not done by the government, the National census is not taking it into account that's all.
Third What I provided are not just "assumptions" they're studies that have been proceeded by asking people. Of course it's not 100% reliable as it's a poll, but when ALL the polls that have been made give you the same result it's pretty logical to assume this result might be the good one.
Fourth your study was conducted on a selected kind of children not on all the population.
Fifth even if your study was correct you're talking about non white I was talking about Muslims. France being a former colonial power it seems rather logical to have a strong portion of the population being black, doesn't mean they're Muslims.
Sixth you still never provided ANY kind of source or proof to back your words. You're just giving me figures coming directly from your ass...
No it is not. You have no source to prove your word for a very simple reason, it's total bulshit. Find me just ONE study talking about 15% muslim, just ONE.
Cause I can give you as much as you want claiming the 5% are still reliable.
Cause I can give you as much as you want claiming the 5% are still reliable.
You will not be able to give any "reliable" proof to backup your claims, because racial and religious statistics are banned in France. No matter how many sources you cite, all of them will be just assumptions rather than real population count.
There has been only one population count according to racial origin in France during the last 100 years. It was a study conducted by the French medical association, on the prevalence of sickle-cell anemia. This particular disease affects only people having Arab, Black, Turkish and Indian descent. So the medical association tabled data on births, where at least one of the parent is from these backgrounds.
This is what they found: 34.44% of newborns in France in 2012 were non-White.
Data from 2013: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EhD4yaZnnN8/VEVCZ22G3fI/AAAAAAAAAF8/Zng9za4gdFk/s1600/National%2BScreening%2BTests%2Bon%2BSickle%2BCell%2BDeasease%2Bin%2BNewborns%2C%2BFrance%2B2005-13.jpg
Data from 2014: https://bloodyshovel.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/73akbau.png?w=630
The study was testing newborns who they think have prevalence of sickle cell anemia.
One smart indian we have here
Jump to: