It's definitely cuda 9.2 with 399.24 drivers (cuda 10 is experimental and slower).
yeah, I've also tried cuda 10 with 400 drivers and h\r was a blit slower with gtx1070\1080(ti), so I rolled back to 399.24
Topic: T-Rex 0.26.8 ETHW, ETC (+dual mining) GPU miner - page 78. (Read 174976 times)
yeah, I've also tried cuda 10 with 400 drivers and h\r was a blit slower with gtx1070\1080(ti), so I rolled back to 399.24
@trexminer It would be great if you create a version for AMD cards.. Majority of the miners are using AMD because of the efficiency of the card for mining alts.. Looking forward for this thread for the development. Thanks
Which cuda version is good for nvdia gpu on x16r algorithm ?
It's obvious, Latest driver with cuda 10Which cuda version is good for nvdia gpu on x16r algorithm ?
It's obvious, Latest driver with cuda 10
Which cuda version is good for nvdia gpu on x16r algorithm ?
Is it possible to solomine SUQA with this miner, thanks in advance.
Solo mining is not supported there. But you can use https://bsod.pw/ - it supports solo mode. How to add failover pool, like Claymore epools.txt?
Look on batch file BCD failover in the path of miner, it's example of failover usage here
Is it possible to solomine SUQA with this miner, thanks in advance.
my t-rex miner freeze when dev fee pops up and its only happening to one of my rigs.
Any ideas?
Any ideas?
How to add failover pool, like Claymore epools.txt?
20181030 14:42:47 GPU #0: GTX 1070 - 6522.81 kH/s, [T:61C, P:96W, F:80%, E:64kH/W]
20181030 14:42:47 GPU #1: GTX 1070 - 6512.73 kH/s, [T:60C, P:98W, F:80%, E:60kH/W]
20181030 14:42:47 GPU #2: GTX 1070 - 6538.71 kH/s, [T:59C, P:115W, F:80%, E:61kH/W]
20181030 14:42:47 GPU #3: GTX 1070 - 6525.83 kH/s, [T:60C, P:109W, F:80%, E:68kH/W]
20181030 14:42:47 GPU #4: GTX 1070 - 6519.38 kH/s, [T:63C, P:109W, F:80%, E:65kH/W]
20181030 14:42:47 GPU #5: GTX 1070 - 6554.82 kH/s, [T:61C, P:102W, F:80%, E:61kH/W]
all GTX 1070 founders edition.
Afterburner settings
Power limit 75 %
Core Clock + 220
Memory Clock + 407
stable for the past 6 hours.
20181030 14:42:47 GPU #1: GTX 1070 - 6512.73 kH/s, [T:60C, P:98W, F:80%, E:60kH/W]
20181030 14:42:47 GPU #2: GTX 1070 - 6538.71 kH/s, [T:59C, P:115W, F:80%, E:61kH/W]
20181030 14:42:47 GPU #3: GTX 1070 - 6525.83 kH/s, [T:60C, P:109W, F:80%, E:68kH/W]
20181030 14:42:47 GPU #4: GTX 1070 - 6519.38 kH/s, [T:63C, P:109W, F:80%, E:65kH/W]
20181030 14:42:47 GPU #5: GTX 1070 - 6554.82 kH/s, [T:61C, P:102W, F:80%, E:61kH/W]
all GTX 1070 founders edition.
Afterburner settings
Power limit 75 %
Core Clock + 220
Memory Clock + 407
stable for the past 6 hours.
Why there's not http/socks proxy support in this miner?
Anyone can explain this?
Bsod pool x16r algo ravencoin
Insane performance on X22i, getting 40% more compared to zjazz on 1070ti
yea) 1080ti - 12mh
t-rex brominer))))) Im seeing a large H/S from client side ans server side this this miner...my one rig says 93mh and the pool side says 45mh..anyone else see this?
It's possible if you are not using manual diff. With various difficulty you can see jumps lower or higher of your console hashrate by 50-60%Hi,
Does the t-rex miner and the x16r algorithm need to overclock the nvidia card?
Power 70% Memory up/or down? Core up/or zero?
Or maybe set default settings and try intensity of the miner?
1080 ti evga 24~39mh
1070 evga 13~21mh
75 tdp
Core +140
Mem 0
Intensity default 20
Hope this help someone
x16r is all core. Im running 1070s OC core: +125 mem: -500
Im seeing a large H/S from client side ans server side this this miner...my one rig says 93mh and the pool side says 45mh..anyone else see this?
It's possible if you are not using manual diff. With various difficulty you can see jumps lower or higher of your console hashrate by 50-60%Hi,
Does the t-rex miner and the x16r algorithm need to overclock the nvidia card?
Power 70% Memory up/or down? Core up/or zero?
Or maybe set default settings and try intensity of the miner?
Insane performance on X22i, getting 40% more compared to zjazz on 1070ti
Is it better to set a manual diff?
As far as I can see on a pool - yes. It would be more stable and you will not lose some time when pool sends high diff and rig can't solve it.
skunk 1060 3g=19 Mh/s
Jump to: