If any team member can't update about the progress of the project then there is almost no chance to be a successful one. The team should co-operate with the investors.
Yes you are right, good feedback makes it easier to understand each other. But it seems to me that they will not break anything if they inform us about development once a quarter. Although, they could do it, given the current situation. And for this, there is some impression that the team values its community is not very high. 
Topic: TaaS — Tokenized Closed-End Fund - page 18. (Read 277294 times)
If any team member can't update about the progress of the project then there is almost no chance to be a successful one. The team should co-operate with the investors.
I was ready to buy now, because the price seems to be much too low compared to the funds they should have.
Well, but how to trust ?
If you can't trust on anything then you cant buy/hold that. To buy/hold/use anything you should have faith in that. And also you know on crypto there is almost no way to buy/hold anything without trust.Well, but how to trust ?
Never, here, there is no absolute confidence in the cloudless development of the project. Everyone must decide for himself whether there are many reasons, for trust here. I think this team can work so that the holders are happy. In a perspectiv, of course.
I was ready to buy now, because the price seems to be much too low compared to the funds they should have.
Well, but how to trust ?
If you can't trust on anything then you cant buy/hold that. To buy/hold/use anything you should have faith in that. And also you know on crypto there is almost no way to buy/hold anything without trust. Well, but how to trust ?
well did anyone see where and when team discussed or communicate with ppl?!? investors? not good at all
They are almost not communicating with the people who are the investors, supporters, the community of TaaS which is not a good way for crypto.
Now, when there have been no dividends for a long time, holders feel a lack of attention. Why? Because there was born doubts about whether or not to stay in this community. And the answers are needed now.
But the joke is that no one knows this. We are only betting, here.
You are right, many projects are losing faith from the investors based on the bad communication from the team. If the team is giving a proper update about their plans when the market situation cannot be estimated. Communication is the major one to get updated from the team.
I was ready to buy now, because the price seems to be much too low compared to the funds they should have.
Well, but how to trust ?
It seems to me that as long as the market does not change the trend, we have nothing to expect from this project. Is it possible to buy now, in order to get a good result in the future, it is not clear. At least, I have not dumped, what I have. It probably, means, that I believe. Well, but how to trust ?
I was ready to buy now, because the price seems to be much too low compared to the funds they should have.
Well, but how to trust ?
Well, but how to trust ?
well did anyone see where and when team discussed or communicate with ppl?!? investors? not good at all
They are almost not communicating with the people who are the investors, supporters, the community of TaaS which is not a good way for crypto. Now, when there has been no dividends for a long time, holders feel a lack of attention. Why? Because, there was born doubts about whether or not to stay in this community. And the answers are needed now.
But the joke is that no one knows this. We are only betting, here.
well did anyone see where and when team discussed or communicate with ppl?!? investors? not good at all
They are almost not communicating with the people who are the investors, supporters, the community of TaaS which is not a good way for crypto. Now, when there has been no dividends for a long time, holders feel a lack of attention. Why? Because, there was born doubts about whether or not to stay in this community. And the answers are needed now.
But the joke is that no one knows this. We are only betting, here.
well did anyone see where and when team discussed or communicate with ppl?!? investors? not good at all
They are almost not communicating with the people who are the investors, supporters, the community of TaaS which is not a good way for crypto. 
well did anyone see where and when team discussed or communicate with ppl?!? investors? not good at all
I hope that the team takes the necessary measures for a positive trend. It is clear that this heavy bear did a good hook for everyone. But one way or another, changes cannot be avoided.
It would be cool if the team communicated more often with us, not only once a Q.
It would be cool if the team communicated more often with us, not only once a Q.
team taas come on you can doit like a PRO
don't get into history of crypto projects
i invested a lot
The team should do it. Not only you but also a lot of investors invested in here that's why they have been able to take too much money. Now, the only team can save investment of the investors. don't get into history of crypto projects
i invested a lot
In the last quarterly report, they did not abandon their obligations. They talked about what holders would have to go through KYC, so that they could to pretend for dividends. Based on this, I assume that they intend to pay.
But with regard to transparency and the lack of proper information about the team’s activities, the management of the project and its development, here I agree, there is not enough information. I would say that there is an information deficit.
Okay, as they already asked to go through their KYC I think they want to pay dividends but as there is a miscommunication of team it will not bear good result. It will be better if the team of the project can be transparent and keep good communication.But with regard to transparency and the lack of proper information about the team’s activities, the management of the project and its development, here I agree, there is not enough information. I would say that there is an information deficit.
As far as they keep updating the community will help them to keep faith in them, but the ultimate answer from them is without market recovery it is impossible to pay the dividends because now the price of TaaS coin went very low in the market. The ICO price of TaaS is nearly 0.90 USD.
team taas come on you can doit like a PRO
don't get into history of crypto projects
i invested a lot
My question is after completion of more than a year and why they are asking for KYC now? For more than a year they didn't paid any dividends to the people who are holding the coin and nearly we lost more value due to this market downtrend.
We can get the answer once the team active here, but as I can see they are not active here. Though it is not right or enough fair it could be good if they did so. But they have just promised not yet done. And anyone not knows either they will do it or not. In the last quarterly report, they did not abandon their obligations. They talked about what holders would have to go through KYC, so that they could to pretend for dividends. Based on this, I assume that they intend to pay.
But with regard to transparency and the lack of proper information about the team’s activities, the management of the project and its development, here I agree, there is not enough information. I would say that there is an information deficit.
Okay, as they already asked to go through their KYC I think they want to pay dividends but as there is a miscommunication of team it will not bear good result. It will be better if the team of the project can be transparent and keep good communication.But with regard to transparency and the lack of proper information about the team’s activities, the management of the project and its development, here I agree, there is not enough information. I would say that there is an information deficit.
Thanks
My question is after completion of more than a year and why they are asking for KYC now? For more than a year they didn't paid any dividends to the people who are holding the coin and nearly we lost more value due to this market downtrend.
It's easy to answer, regulations that require every project through KYC there is no other choice they have to follow it
Try to follow the procedure, maybe you will get your rights
Where can I follow this procedure? The team did not provide any forms for this.
In the last quarterly report, they mentioned that they were planning to do this.
I do not think this is bad. In my opinion, this means that they plan to work further, but taking into account some requirements of regulators.
In the last quarterly report, they did not abandon their obligations. They talked about what holders would have to go through KYC, so that they could to pretend for dividends. Based on this, I assume that they intend to pay.
But with regard to transparency and the lack of proper information about the team’s activities, the management of the project and its development, here I agree, there is not enough information. I would say that there is an information deficit.
Okay, as they already asked to go through their KYC I think they want to pay dividends but as there is a miscommunication of team it will not bear good result. It will be better if the team of the project can be transparent and keep good communication.But with regard to transparency and the lack of proper information about the team’s activities, the management of the project and its development, here I agree, there is not enough information. I would say that there is an information deficit.
Thanks
My question is after completion of more than a year and why they are asking for KYC now? For more than a year they didn't paid any dividends to the people who are holding the coin and nearly we lost more value due to this market downtrend.
It's easy to answer, regulations that require every project through KYC there is no other choice they have to follow it
Try to follow the procedure, maybe you will get your rights
In the last quarterly report, they did not abandon their obligations. They talked about what holders would have to go through KYC, so that they could to pretend for dividends. Based on this, I assume that they intend to pay.
But with regard to transparency and the lack of proper information about the team’s activities, the management of the project and its development, here I agree, there is not enough information. I would say that there is an information deficit.
Okay, as they already asked to go through their KYC I think they want to pay dividends but as there is a miscommunication of team it will not bear good result. It will be better if the team of the project can be transparent and keep good communication.But with regard to transparency and the lack of proper information about the team’s activities, the management of the project and its development, here I agree, there is not enough information. I would say that there is an information deficit.
Thanks
My question is after completion of more than a year and why they are asking for KYC now? For more than a year they didn't paid any dividends to the people who are holding the coin and nearly we lost more value due to this market downtrend.
In the last quarterly report, they did not abandon their obligations. They talked about what holders would have to go through KYC, so that they could to pretend for dividends. Based on this, I assume that they intend to pay.
But with regard to transparency and the lack of proper information about the team’s activities, the management of the project and its development, here I agree, there is not enough information. I would say that there is an information deficit.
Okay, as they already asked to go through their KYC I think they want to pay dividends but as there is a miscommunication of team it will not bear good result. It will be better if the team of the project can be transparent and keep good communication.But with regard to transparency and the lack of proper information about the team’s activities, the management of the project and its development, here I agree, there is not enough information. I would say that there is an information deficit.
Thanks
In the last quarterly report, they did not abandon their obligations. They talked about what holders would have to go through KYC, so that they could to pretend for dividends. Based on this, I assume that they intend to pay.
But with regard to transparency and the lack of proper information about the team’s activities, the management of the project and its development, here I agree, there is not enough information. I would say that there is an information deficit.
Okay, as they already asked to go through their KYC I think they want to pay dividends but as there is a miscommunication of team it will not bear good result. It will be better if the team of the project can be transparent and keep good communication.But with regard to transparency and the lack of proper information about the team’s activities, the management of the project and its development, here I agree, there is not enough information. I would say that there is an information deficit.
As far as they keep updating the community will help them to keep faith in them, but the ultimate answer from them is without market recovery it is impossible to pay the dividends because now the price of TaaS coin went very low in the market. The ICO price of TaaS is nearly 0.90 USD.
Jump to: