Topic: Talkcoin*Taken over by community*new features*open source*fair*transparent (Read 8252 times)
September 11, 2014, 10:06:45 AM
talkcoin,and next whatever coin?okbitcoin= OBC?
September 09, 2014, 12:19:29 PM
(how many talkcoin thread is there around ? 
)
New movie: The TAC job(s)
Just went through the excell spreadsheet of the famous dev fee address
here what I have found, between the 29th of May and 2nd of June, all block generated were generated with a dev fee of 15.46tac.
15121 blocks were generated on that period, giving an amount of ~2337706tac
This amount were removed from that address the 3rd of june
Same story between the 27th of june and 1st of july with a 3tac dev fee:
15119 blocks generated for an amount of 45357tac (less impressive sure but still a robbery) removed from this address 4th of July (for the holyday ?)
So in total it is 279127.6tac from which I remove the standard 0.5tac/block fee we get 264007.66tac which were stolen from the community by greedy dev.
Actually dev should have get only 15k tac instead of that 279k tac...
I don't remember what was the price on the exchange at that time but it was a lot more than it is
)New movie: The TAC job(s)
Just went through the excell spreadsheet of the famous dev fee address
here what I have found, between the 29th of May and 2nd of June, all block generated were generated with a dev fee of 15.46tac.
15121 blocks were generated on that period, giving an amount of ~2337706tac
This amount were removed from that address the 3rd of june
Same story between the 27th of june and 1st of july with a 3tac dev fee:
15119 blocks generated for an amount of 45357tac (less impressive sure but still a robbery) removed from this address 4th of July (for the holyday ?
)So in total it is 279127.6tac from which I remove the standard 0.5tac/block fee we get 264007.66tac which were stolen from the community by greedy dev.
Actually dev should have get only 15k tac instead of that 279k tac...
I don't remember what was the price on the exchange at that time but it was a lot more than it is
September 08, 2014, 11:39:10 PM
New team has retracted V2 wallet.
it's quite right. September 08, 2014, 01:17:28 AM
ALERT!!!!!!!!
Original TAC Dev, CATCHCOIN AND K-MEISTER are all shameless thieves and scamers.
Original TAC Dev, CATCHCOIN AND K-MEISTER are all shameless thieves and scamers.
September 08, 2014, 12:50:29 AM
New team has retracted V2 wallet.
September 07, 2014, 02:25:33 PM
Chat net hashrate is low,so is my cpu.
I'll mine some with my cpu.
I'll mine some with my cpu.
September 07, 2014, 02:19:06 PM
"networkhashps" : 6387600325,
net hashrate looks pretty good for talkcoin v2 wallet.
net hashrate looks pretty good for talkcoin v2 wallet.
September 07, 2014, 11:18:03 AM
我们为什么要支持chatcoin而不是talkcoin。请大家先仔细考虑：
虚拟货币的核心价值在哪儿？
这一点我想大家都明白：去中心化，规则确定，无人可以操控产量。
而这一点恰恰是talkcoin所不具有的，为什么这么说呢我的分析如下：
首先看talkcoin的特点：
1，投票时每个人都可以通过发送一定的币到某个地址而控制每个区块的产量。
2，投票时每个人都可以通过发送一定的币到某个地址而控制作者每个区块的奖励数。
3，这个地址的私钥显然只有作者有。虽然作者说某一天会把投票的币发到一个没有私钥的地址。而一个地址有没有私钥是不能被证明的（如果能够轻易证明一个地址没有私钥那就意味着你可以很容易的计算出任何地址的私钥，因为由私钥可以推导地址而反过来去不可以）
通过这两点可以得到这样的结果：
1，如果作者想增加产量的时候无论币价格多么高，也无论投票数目由多少作者都有足够的货币投票。很显然作者的币是可以无限制循环使用在投票上的。
2，如果作者想增加自己获得的份额也可以使用投票决定。（作者很阴险，从来没有公开过talkcoin的作者捐献规则）。这已经被证实了作者在某些区块将自己获得的份额提高的了40%
显然
这样的一个币，是不适合长期投资的
如果你坚信这样的一个币你必须承担道德危机.
请注意一点：人性是贪婪的！
所以请支持chatcoin
by @zhiwufy from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=675803.320
虚拟货币的核心价值在哪儿？
这一点我想大家都明白：去中心化，规则确定，无人可以操控产量。
而这一点恰恰是talkcoin所不具有的，为什么这么说呢我的分析如下：
首先看talkcoin的特点：
1，投票时每个人都可以通过发送一定的币到某个地址而控制每个区块的产量。
2，投票时每个人都可以通过发送一定的币到某个地址而控制作者每个区块的奖励数。
3，这个地址的私钥显然只有作者有。虽然作者说某一天会把投票的币发到一个没有私钥的地址。而一个地址有没有私钥是不能被证明的（如果能够轻易证明一个地址没有私钥那就意味着你可以很容易的计算出任何地址的私钥，因为由私钥可以推导地址而反过来去不可以）
通过这两点可以得到这样的结果：
1，如果作者想增加产量的时候无论币价格多么高，也无论投票数目由多少作者都有足够的货币投票。很显然作者的币是可以无限制循环使用在投票上的。
2，如果作者想增加自己获得的份额也可以使用投票决定。（作者很阴险，从来没有公开过talkcoin的作者捐献规则）。这已经被证实了作者在某些区块将自己获得的份额提高的了40%
显然
这样的一个币，是不适合长期投资的
如果你坚信这样的一个币你必须承担道德危机.
请注意一点：人性是贪婪的！
所以请支持chatcoin
by @zhiwufy from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=675803.320
September 07, 2014, 10:55:42 AM
CHAT has no voting system (of course no stolen money) and fair mining (32 chat per block chain currently)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annchatcoinnist5chat-in-walletno-preminep2p-private-chatno-vote-675803
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annchatcoinnist5chat-in-walletno-preminep2p-private-chatno-vote-675803
September 07, 2014, 10:20:01 AM
tac IS DEAD,CHAT WILL BE ALIVE FOR LONG.
This is the CHAT OP on bitcointalk: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annchatcoinnist5chat-in-walletno-preminep2p-private-chatno-vote-675803
This is the CHAT OP on bitcointalk: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annchatcoinnist5chat-in-walletno-preminep2p-private-chatno-vote-675803
September 07, 2014, 07:16:29 AM
blabllaaaaa
you together with the original dev are such pathetic liars!
September 07, 2014, 07:12:29 AM
@PresidentLee
you must be the son of the djm34!
September 07, 2014, 06:01:09 AM
@catchcoin,
you are SON OF BITCH!!
Could you tell us how many stolen money the Dev gave you and stop your fucking stupid 5 block reward scam?
you are SON OF BITCH!!
Could you tell us how many stolen money the Dev gave you and stop your fucking stupid 5 block reward scam?
September 07, 2014, 05:25:54 AM
stop fucking and auguing ,let tac old or v2 die please!!
September 07, 2014, 03:14:09 AM
Taken over by community,not djm34 and his "take over team",in fact ,it's just a scam team with a group of thieves.they decided all about the new wallet.without any support from the community.djm34, can you offer a proof of that you guys have got the supports from the community?
CatchScam you are the cancer of crypto mate.
Dev was caught stealing, dev has had no development updates for 2 months, the community pleaded with the dev to get rid of the stupid block reward voting...
Well guess what, the existing team of developers (they are not new) were your best chance of success for this [Suspicious link removed]d luck running this coin without them, it seems people want to be scammed, it seems people want an inactive dev.
LoL
September 06, 2014, 08:18:29 PM
Taken over by community,not djm34 and his "take over team",in fact ,it's just a scam team with a group of thieves.they decided all about the new wallet.without any support from the community.djm34, can you offer a proof of that you guys have got the supports from the community?
CatchScam you are the cancer of crypto mate.
Dev was caught stealing, dev has had no development updates for 2 months, the community pleaded with the dev to get rid of the stupid block reward voting...
Well guess what, the existing team of developers (they are not new) were your best chance of success for this coin.
Good luck running this coin without them, it seems people want to be scammed, it seems people want an inactive dev.
LoL
September 06, 2014, 12:06:16 PM
Taken over by community,not djm34 and his "take over team",in fact ,it's just a scam team with a group of thieves.they decided all about the new wallet.without any support from the community.djm34, can you offer a proof of that you guys have got the supports from the community?
Both of the teams are shit and will be abandoned by investors. btw:5 tac per block is more shitty.
September 06, 2014, 11:51:40 AM
For those who have doubt that dev stole a lot of TAC, here a screen copy of the block explorer with the votedev address.
around 500k tac were sent to that address and worst 400k tac were spent.
Meaning old dev dumped on us all all the time.
I am sorry to say that (as an early supporter of the coin), but that guy is a massive asshole.
The blockexplorer is located in china and is rather slow from europe: http://talk.cryptocoinunion.com/address.asp?address=TgD7ERrggBPezx6JPP2bpWjAFQW1rafzCn
Supporting old dev is just making you part of the scam and if you still think that our takeover is hostile and not justified, sorry you need a new brain
That's why I made a screen copy:
I knew this long long ago,but then nobody believe me . around 500k tac were sent to that address and worst 400k tac were spent.
Meaning old dev dumped on us all all the time.
I am sorry to say that (as an early supporter of the coin), but that guy is a massive asshole.
The blockexplorer is located in china and is rather slow from europe: http://talk.cryptocoinunion.com/address.asp?address=TgD7ERrggBPezx6JPP2bpWjAFQW1rafzCn
Supporting old dev is just making you part of the scam and if you still think that our takeover is hostile and not justified, sorry you need a new brain
That's why I made a screen copy:
September 06, 2014, 10:49:13 AM
Taken over by community,not djm34 and his "take over team",in fact ,it's just a scam team with a group of thieves.they decided all about the new wallet.without any support from the community.djm34, can you offer a proof of that you guys have got the supports from the community?
September 06, 2014, 08:13:37 AM
For those who have doubt that dev stole a lot of TAC, here a screen copy of the block explorer with the votedev address.
around 500k tac were sent to that address and worst 400k tac were spent.
Meaning old dev dumped on us all all the time.
I am sorry to say that (as an early supporter of the coin), but that guy is a massive asshole.
The blockexplorer is located in china and is rather slow from europe: http://talk.cryptocoinunion.com/address.asp?address=TgD7ERrggBPezx6JPP2bpWjAFQW1rafzCn
Supporting old dev is just making you part of the scam and if you still think that our takeover is hostile and not justified, sorry you need a new brain
That's why I made a screen copy:
around 500k tac were sent to that address and worst 400k tac were spent.
Meaning old dev dumped on us all all the time.
I am sorry to say that (as an early supporter of the coin), but that guy is a massive asshole.
The blockexplorer is located in china and is rather slow from europe: http://talk.cryptocoinunion.com/address.asp?address=TgD7ERrggBPezx6JPP2bpWjAFQW1rafzCn
Supporting old dev is just making you part of the scam and if you still think that our takeover is hostile and not justified, sorry you need a new brain
That's why I made a screen copy:
New blockexplorer is up and will be full synced in a few hours. This explorer uses Talkcoin V2
http://blockexperts.com/tac
Jump to: