Pages:
Author

Topic: Talking about Atheism... - page 5. (Read 17479 times)

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
April 20, 2017, 09:20:05 PM

The Bible record is eye witness accounts, and is way more accurate.


@Puddleduck.......

When Jesus was in the desert for forty days (Matthew 4) or praying in the Garden at Gethsemane (Mark 14), He was by Himself. How did anyone know what He said or did, since there were no eyewitnesses to what happened?

Kind of wrecks your eyewitness account buddy.

Keep trying.

You're kinda off topic, aren't you? Where is the atheism in the things that you say?

John 8:13-17:
Quote
13 The Pharisees challenged him, “Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your testimony is not valid.”

14 Jesus answered, “Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going. 15 You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one. 16 But if I do judge, my decisions are right, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me. 17 In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid. 18 I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me.”

The point? Atheism doesn't really exist. It almost does, as a religion, in those who love to maintain fiction as reality.

Cool

Come now Puddleduck, you know very well that a discussion is a 2 way communication. You stated a fact, I disproved.

By disproving your basis of the bible is disproving your religion and proving my Atheist stance.

I figured an "intelligent" person like yourself would understand that principle.

As for your bible quote..... that only works for those who believe in the Bible.

"The world is not in your books and maps, it’s out there"Gandalf "The Hobbit"

Keep trying buddy!

You haven't really thought this through. Here's what I mean.

If someone has a religion that he thinks is true, and he doesn't have contradictions to that religion that are logical and right, then he has a religion of the thing that he says.

For you, however, atheism isn't a religion. Your real religion is your attempt to maintain atheism as a religion... not the atheism itself. Why? Because you know for a fact that you don't know that God doesn't exist... which is another way of saying that you know that God might exist. Since you know that God might exist, atheism isn't the thing you believe, and atheism isn't your religion. Attempted atheism is your religion.

All your blabber about other religions is simply off topic, designed by you to help avoid realizing any more than absolutely necessary that atheism isn't anything but babble for you. I mean, how else can you participate in a thread that reminds you that you aren't really an atheist, and that you don't really believe in atheism? You are doing what you can do to create nonsense to take the focus of the ridiculousness of the atheism idea.

Why are you doing this? My guess is that since you can't disprove God, you want to take over, and push yourself up to the position of godhood above God. Well, you just aren't good enough for that. Why not just recognize God, Who has been proven to exist, and then find His salvation, so that you can live?

Cool

Your god has never been proven to exist, so how can anyone disprove that?

For all your blabber you don't keep to your single stance.

Why do you do this? My guess is because you are so scared of doing something wrong, that you want to blame it on something else. You are trying to avoid the single aspect of your life which is that you will ultimately fail. You want to blame all of your failure's on others.

God has been scientifically proven to exist. But for you it works like this.

Imagine that big bang theory were proven to be factual. Then, suppose that you read the proof, which included all the math in the theory. Do you understand the math of big bang theory? Maybe. But if you don't, big bang has not been proven for you.

The fact that you suggest that there is no proof for the existence of God, simply shows how mentally inept you are. If you had said, "I don't understand the proof, therefore there isn't any proof for me," you would be showing yourself to be honest, maybe. At least you would be a lot closer to honesty than the way you are treating the situation.

But if you say, "I understand the so-called proof, and have found it to NOT be truth..." But where is your rebuttal? You haven't shown any. In this case you are found out to be a simple liar.

What are you so afraid of? The truth of acknowledging the existence of God doesn't hurt anyone. Just the opposite. It helps all people. Are you a paid troll? Even a troll should acknowledge God. Have you been hurt by finally seeing that God exists? A little pain is far better than running around in ignorance.

At least you are a bit closer to talking about atheism with your post, as the tread suggests.

Cool

Once again Puddleduck, you keep swimming in your pond oblivious to the world around you.

Stop trying to assume you know what I think and what I believe and instead concentrate on proving what you can.

You have not proven your gods existence so there is nothing to disprove.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
April 18, 2017, 08:22:59 AM
Thanks, again, for helping to solidify the fact that atheism doesn't really exist,
by saying that you were talking about atheism in your post,
but by not showing much, if any, atheism in your post at all.

Cool

Oh Puddleduck...... you silly sausage.

Don't you see that you have not provided any evidence showing your God?

If you did, others would be using your evidence.

I guess they see you as the fool you are.

Did you ever think about taking a science night class, just so that you can learn enough about science law to see that you can't contradict it?

I don't expect that you would admit that science proves that God exists, even if you learned how to understand science. But at least you would know.

As for atheism, even you easily understand that it doesn't exist. How do you know this? Because you haven't checked out all the places on earth or in the universe just to see that God doesn't exist in one of them.

What you have is something that is like atheism, but isn't atheism. Probably what you have is just ignorance, or else it is downright lies. I like to give the benefit of the doubt wherever possible. But you express the things you express, so often that I think we all understand that you are simply a liar.

Cool

Your ignorance is unbelievable.  You talk about science and insist that Earth is 6000-7000 years old.

Science clearly showed that Earth is much, much older. So admit your Bible got it wrong.  Science got it right, again.

Counting tree rings or dark and light layers in ice cores is not rocket science.  You can count past 7000 can you?  Unless you think Bible forbids counting past 7000 I don't know what can possibly stop you.  Maybe you are not allowing this evidence because this would mean another thing is wrong in the Bible.

Truth is truth. It does not matter what the holy books say.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 20, 2017, 04:39:18 PM

The Bible record is eye witness accounts, and is way more accurate.


@Puddleduck.......

When Jesus was in the desert for forty days (Matthew 4) or praying in the Garden at Gethsemane (Mark 14), He was by Himself. How did anyone know what He said or did, since there were no eyewitnesses to what happened?

Kind of wrecks your eyewitness account buddy.

Keep trying.

You're kinda off topic, aren't you? Where is the atheism in the things that you say?

John 8:13-17:
Quote
13 The Pharisees challenged him, “Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your testimony is not valid.”

14 Jesus answered, “Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going. 15 You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one. 16 But if I do judge, my decisions are right, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me. 17 In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid. 18 I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me.”

The point? Atheism doesn't really exist. It almost does, as a religion, in those who love to maintain fiction as reality.

Cool

Come now Puddleduck, you know very well that a discussion is a 2 way communication. You stated a fact, I disproved.

By disproving your basis of the bible is disproving your religion and proving my Atheist stance.

I figured an "intelligent" person like yourself would understand that principle.

As for your bible quote..... that only works for those who believe in the Bible.

"The world is not in your books and maps, it’s out there"Gandalf "The Hobbit"

Keep trying buddy!

You haven't really thought this through. Here's what I mean.

If someone has a religion that he thinks is true, and he doesn't have contradictions to that religion that are logical and right, then he has a religion of the thing that he says.

For you, however, atheism isn't a religion. Your real religion is your attempt to maintain atheism as a religion... not the atheism itself. Why? Because you know for a fact that you don't know that God doesn't exist... which is another way of saying that you know that God might exist. Since you know that God might exist, atheism isn't the thing you believe, and atheism isn't your religion. Attempted atheism is your religion.

All your blabber about other religions is simply off topic, designed by you to help avoid realizing any more than absolutely necessary that atheism isn't anything but babble for you. I mean, how else can you participate in a thread that reminds you that you aren't really an atheist, and that you don't really believe in atheism? You are doing what you can do to create nonsense to take the focus of the ridiculousness of the atheism idea.

Why are you doing this? My guess is that since you can't disprove God, you want to take over, and push yourself up to the position of godhood above God. Well, you just aren't good enough for that. Why not just recognize God, Who has been proven to exist, and then find His salvation, so that you can live?

Cool

Your god has never been proven to exist, so how can anyone disprove that?

For all your blabber you don't keep to your single stance.

Why do you do this? My guess is because you are so scared of doing something wrong, that you want to blame it on something else. You are trying to avoid the single aspect of your life which is that you will ultimately fail. You want to blame all of your failure's on others.

God has been scientifically proven to exist. But for you it works like this.

Imagine that big bang theory were proven to be factual. Then, suppose that you read the proof, which included all the math in the theory. Do you understand the math of big bang theory? Maybe. But if you don't, big bang has not been proven for you.

The fact that you suggest that there is no proof for the existence of God, simply shows how mentally inept you are. If you had said, "I don't understand the proof, therefore there isn't any proof for me," you would be showing yourself to be honest, maybe. At least you would be a lot closer to honesty than the way you are treating the situation.

But if you say, "I understand the so-called proof, and have found it to NOT be truth..." But where is your rebuttal? You haven't shown any. In this case you are found out to be a simple liar.

What are you so afraid of? The truth of acknowledging the existence of God doesn't hurt anyone. Just the opposite. It helps all people. Are you a paid troll? Even a troll should acknowledge God. Have you been hurt by finally seeing that God exists? A little pain is far better than running around in ignorance.

At least you are a bit closer to talking about atheism with your post, as the tread suggests.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
April 20, 2017, 11:43:30 AM

The Bible record is eye witness accounts, and is way more accurate.


@Puddleduck.......

When Jesus was in the desert for forty days (Matthew 4) or praying in the Garden at Gethsemane (Mark 14), He was by Himself. How did anyone know what He said or did, since there were no eyewitnesses to what happened?

Kind of wrecks your eyewitness account buddy.

Keep trying.

You're kinda off topic, aren't you? Where is the atheism in the things that you say?

John 8:13-17:
Quote
13 The Pharisees challenged him, “Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your testimony is not valid.”

14 Jesus answered, “Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going. 15 You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one. 16 But if I do judge, my decisions are right, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me. 17 In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid. 18 I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me.”

The point? Atheism doesn't really exist. It almost does, as a religion, in those who love to maintain fiction as reality.

Cool

Come now Puddleduck, you know very well that a discussion is a 2 way communication. You stated a fact, I disproved.

By disproving your basis of the bible is disproving your religion and proving my Atheist stance.

I figured an "intelligent" person like yourself would understand that principle.

As for your bible quote..... that only works for those who believe in the Bible.

"The world is not in your books and maps, it’s out there"Gandalf "The Hobbit"

Keep trying buddy!

You haven't really thought this through. Here's what I mean.

If someone has a religion that he thinks is true, and he doesn't have contradictions to that religion that are logical and right, then he has a religion of the thing that he says.

For you, however, atheism isn't a religion. Your real religion is your attempt to maintain atheism as a religion... not the atheism itself. Why? Because you know for a fact that you don't know that God doesn't exist... which is another way of saying that you know that God might exist. Since you know that God might exist, atheism isn't the thing you believe, and atheism isn't your religion. Attempted atheism is your religion.

All your blabber about other religions is simply off topic, designed by you to help avoid realizing any more than absolutely necessary that atheism isn't anything but babble for you. I mean, how else can you participate in a thread that reminds you that you aren't really an atheist, and that you don't really believe in atheism? You are doing what you can do to create nonsense to take the focus of the ridiculousness of the atheism idea.

Why are you doing this? My guess is that since you can't disprove God, you want to take over, and push yourself up to the position of godhood above God. Well, you just aren't good enough for that. Why not just recognize God, Who has been proven to exist, and then find His salvation, so that you can live?

Cool

Your god has never been proven to exist, so how can anyone disprove that?

For all your blabber you don't keep to your single stance.

Why do you do this? My guess is because you are so scared of doing something wrong, that you want to blame it on something else. You are trying to avoid the single aspect of your life which is that you will ultimately fail. You want to blame all of your failure's on others.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 20, 2017, 11:14:40 AM

The Bible record is eye witness accounts, and is way more accurate.


@Puddleduck.......

When Jesus was in the desert for forty days (Matthew 4) or praying in the Garden at Gethsemane (Mark 14), He was by Himself. How did anyone know what He said or did, since there were no eyewitnesses to what happened?

Kind of wrecks your eyewitness account buddy.

Keep trying.

You're kinda off topic, aren't you? Where is the atheism in the things that you say?

John 8:13-17:
Quote
13 The Pharisees challenged him, “Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your testimony is not valid.”

14 Jesus answered, “Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going. 15 You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one. 16 But if I do judge, my decisions are right, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me. 17 In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid. 18 I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me.”

The point? Atheism doesn't really exist. It almost does, as a religion, in those who love to maintain fiction as reality.

Cool

Come now Puddleduck, you know very well that a discussion is a 2 way communication. You stated a fact, I disproved.

By disproving your basis of the bible is disproving your religion and proving my Atheist stance.

I figured an "intelligent" person like yourself would understand that principle.

As for your bible quote..... that only works for those who believe in the Bible.

"The world is not in your books and maps, it’s out there"Gandalf "The Hobbit"

Keep trying buddy!

You haven't really thought this through. Here's what I mean.

If someone has a religion that he thinks is true, and he doesn't have contradictions to that religion that are logical and right, then he has a religion of the thing that he says.

For you, however, atheism isn't a religion. Your real religion is your attempt to maintain atheism as a religion... not the atheism itself. Why? Because you know for a fact that you don't know that God doesn't exist... which is another way of saying that you know that God might exist. Since you know that God might exist, atheism isn't the thing you believe, and atheism isn't your religion. Attempted atheism is your religion.

All your blabber about other religions is simply off topic, designed by you to help avoid realizing any more than absolutely necessary that atheism isn't anything but babble for you. I mean, how else can you participate in a thread that reminds you that you aren't really an atheist, and that you don't really believe in atheism? You are doing what you can do to create nonsense to take the focus of the ridiculousness of the atheism idea.

Why are you doing this? My guess is that since you can't disprove God, you want to take over, and push yourself up to the position of godhood above God. Well, you just aren't good enough for that. Why not just recognize God, Who has been proven to exist, and then find His salvation, so that you can live?

Cool
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
April 20, 2017, 05:55:37 AM
I suggest not to be etheis, there was life before the world and there is life after death, when we are in the world we don't know the content, don't just swagger logic, a lot of things outside of logic.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
April 20, 2017, 05:20:10 AM

The Bible record is eye witness accounts, and is way more accurate.


@Puddleduck.......

When Jesus was in the desert for forty days (Matthew 4) or praying in the Garden at Gethsemane (Mark 14), He was by Himself. How did anyone know what He said or did, since there were no eyewitnesses to what happened?

Kind of wrecks your eyewitness account buddy.

Keep trying.

You're kinda off topic, aren't you? Where is the atheism in the things that you say?

John 8:13-17:
Quote
13 The Pharisees challenged him, “Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your testimony is not valid.”

14 Jesus answered, “Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going. 15 You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one. 16 But if I do judge, my decisions are right, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me. 17 In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid. 18 I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me.”

The point? Atheism doesn't really exist. It almost does, as a religion, in those who love to maintain fiction as reality.

Cool

Come now Puddleduck, you know very well that a discussion is a 2 way communication. You stated a fact, I disproved.

By disproving your basis of the bible is disproving your religion and proving my Atheist stance.

I figured an "intelligent" person like yourself would understand that principle.

As for your bible quote..... that only works for those who believe in the Bible.

"The world is not in your books and maps, it’s out there"Gandalf "The Hobbit"

Keep trying buddy!
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 19, 2017, 09:38:06 PM

The Bible record is eye witness accounts, and is way more accurate.


@Puddleduck.......

When Jesus was in the desert for forty days (Matthew 4) or praying in the Garden at Gethsemane (Mark 14), He was by Himself. How did anyone know what He said or did, since there were no eyewitnesses to what happened?

Kind of wrecks your eyewitness account buddy.

Keep trying.

You're kinda off topic, aren't you? Where is the atheism in the things that you say?

John 8:13-17:
Quote
13 The Pharisees challenged him, “Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your testimony is not valid.”

14 Jesus answered, “Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going. 15 You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one. 16 But if I do judge, my decisions are right, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me. 17 In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid. 18 I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me.”

The point? Atheism doesn't really exist. It almost does, as a religion, in those who love to maintain fiction as reality.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 19, 2017, 09:29:38 PM

The Bible record is eye witness accounts, and is way more accurate.


@Puddleduck.......

When Jesus was in the desert for forty days (Matthew 4) or praying in the Garden at Gethsemane (Mark 14), He was by Himself. How did anyone know what He said or did, since there were no eyewitnesses to what happened?

Kind of wrecks your eyewitness account buddy.

Keep trying.

The guy complains about "assumptions in science" LOL

How about the Genesis creation account?  I'm guessing it was done by a chief goat herder who went to a cave for 40 days to pray and asked God for permission to travel back in time (only 5000 years back to the time the world was created) to see the creation and write about it.  God in his wisdom, granted the request since the guy was wacking off for 40 days straight, so God took pity on him.

Then he bought a winged horse (those were available back then because of Entropy), packed few stone tablets, an iron chisel and a hammer he picked up raiding the local village.  For oxygen storage he packed 72 pig's bladders, he put a mask made from mud and olive oil, you know to protect him from the cosmic rays.

Anyways, the lad traveled few thousand years back in time to a corner in the universe where Entropy was still high so that he could observe how the God made the universe.  He did not have to drink or eat for 6 days because Entropy allowed him to slow down his metabolic rate to minimum, yet still allowing him to chisel out the story on his tablets.

Then he traveled back in time and sold his eyewitness account to the highest bidder.  He sold his winged horse to some Arab merchant.
The horse that carried Muhammad to heaven was bred from that stock.  Everybody knows that.

Bible is a true eyewitness account.  It is written record of how the world was created by the almighty God.

Without Bible we would be lost.  All scientists check with Bible eyewitness records every day, some do that five times a day, while facing the Jerusalem.  Everybody (in my church) knows that.


It's beginning to become apparent that you don't believe in atheism at all! Seems like every religious thing you talk about has a basis in some kind of theistic religion.

You poor, miserable, mixed up guy. You really need to get yourself over to a psychiatrist before you go off the deep end.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
April 19, 2017, 01:26:30 PM
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
April 19, 2017, 05:01:38 AM

The Bible record is eye witness accounts, and is way more accurate.


@Puddleduck.......

When Jesus was in the desert for forty days (Matthew 4) or praying in the Garden at Gethsemane (Mark 14), He was by Himself. How did anyone know what He said or did, since there were no eyewitnesses to what happened?

Kind of wrecks your eyewitness account buddy.

Keep trying.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
April 15, 2017, 05:53:27 PM
Do you still hold the view that atheism is a religion? But this is absurd. How can you believe in what, how, does not exist?

That is the big part of the point. Does God exist or not?

People believe in all kinds of things. Some of them seem absurd to other people. But where is the proof, either way?

Since the atheist knows that he knows that he doesn't have proof that God doesn't exist, that is...

... Since the atheist doesn't have any proof that God doesn't exist on Jupiter, how can the atheist KNOW that God doesn't exist on the planet Jupiter? The atheist realizes that he doesn't know. So, since he knows that he doesn't know, he is aware that God MIGHT exist on the planet Jupiter. Since he knows that God might exist on Jupiter, what is all this atheism talk about?

Atheism has to do with the BELIEF that God doesn't exist. That is what religion and cults are all about... belief.

If the atheist said that God might exist somewhere that he is unaware of, and that he simply doesn't know, the atheist would be right, and he also wouldn't be an atheist. Since the atheist tries to hide the whole idea that God might exist somewhere that he doesn't know about, what, really, is atheism to this kind of atheist? All adamant, forceful, determined atheists are like this.

Atheism is a blunt, disease, religion. At least the other religions admit that they don't have proof that their religion is the way it is, if they don't have proof.

Cool

If you care about the truth, you should not be believing in something for which there is no evidence

The most honest position is to say: "I don't know.  There is no evidence.  Next question."

Not to say: "I don't know how I know, but I'm going to believe it anyway because I feel like it (or because someone wrote it in a book).  Despite the fact that there is no evidence."



Why then do you ever argue and spoil your nerves? Why should I, for example, have something to prove or discuss something about my faith. This is absurd. Faith is a state of mind, and not an exact science following the example of an axiom.

Because you make extraordinary claims.  Your faith is absurd.  Complete nonsense.  That is why if you want to talk about religion you better have something to back up your ridiculous views.

You sound like someone who says: "I am Napoleon.  I do not need to prove it.  It is absurd why someone would ask me to prove it."

We are talking about zombies in the sky or winged horses. You need to explain yourself, otherwise, stop talking about your religions, and stop having children.

If you want us to treat you as a sane person, you need to provide the proof for your extraordinary claims. 


legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 18, 2017, 01:06:02 PM
Thanks, again, for helping to solidify the fact that atheism doesn't really exist,
by saying that you were talking about atheism in your post,
but by not showing much, if any, atheism in your post at all.

Cool

Oh Puddleduck...... you silly sausage.

Don't you see that you have not provided any evidence showing your God?

If you did, others would be using your evidence.

I guess they see you as the fool you are.

Did you ever think about taking a science night class, just so that you can learn enough about science law to see that you can't contradict it?

I don't expect that you would admit that science proves that God exists, even if you learned how to understand science. But at least you would know.

As for atheism, even you easily understand that it doesn't exist. How do you know this? Because you haven't checked out all the places on earth or in the universe just to see that God doesn't exist in one of them.

What you have is something that is like atheism, but isn't atheism. Probably what you have is just ignorance, or else it is downright lies. I like to give the benefit of the doubt wherever possible. But you express the things you express, so often that I think we all understand that you are simply a liar.

Cool

Your ignorance is unbelievable.  You talk about science and insist that Earth is 6000-7000 years old.
EVERY SCIENCE THING that explains how old the earth is, is theory. It is not known to be factual.

The Bible record is eye witness accounts, and is way more accurate.



Science clearly showed that Earth is much, much older. So admit your Bible got it wrong.  Science got it right, again.
EVERY SCIENCE THING that explains how old the earth is, is theory. It is not known to be factual.

The Bible record is eye witness accounts, and is way more accurate.



Counting tree rings or dark and light layers in ice cores is not rocket science.  
The point about counting tree rings is that nobody knows if tree rings remained one ring per year every year into the past, and how far back. Tree rings might have happened multiple times a year for reasons as yet unknown.


You can count past 7000 can you?  Unless you think Bible forbids counting past 7000 I don't know what can possibly stop you.  Maybe you are not allowing this evidence because this would mean another thing is wrong in the Bible.

Truth is truth. It does not matter what the holy books say.

The truth is that science that suggests the age of the earth beyond the 4,500 to 5,000 years that we can measure by examining pottery and buildings, is flawed science. Why? Because there are too many assumptions in that science. And most of the assumptions are, essentially, wild guesses.

Consider mitochondria and the age of the earth - http://creation.com/mitochondrial-eve-and-biblical-eve-are-looking-good-criticism-of-young-age-is-premature and https://answersingenesis.org/genetics/mitochondrial-genome-mutation-rate/. Mitochondria shows that all people who have had their mitochondria tested came from the same, one woman. It also shows that she lived 6,000 to 6,500 years ago.

Cool

EDIT: Why is it that you can't stay on topic? You should be talking about your stupid atheism that even you proclaim is flawed. Since you won't do this little thing, you essentially show that you have something to hide... that atheism is a religion, and that you hate it.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
April 18, 2017, 06:26:16 AM
Thanks, again, for helping to solidify the fact that atheism doesn't really exist,
by saying that you were talking about atheism in your post,
but by not showing much, if any, atheism in your post at all.

Cool

Oh Puddleduck...... you silly sausage.

Don't you see that you have not provided any evidence showing your God?

If you did, others would be using your evidence.

I guess they see you as the fool you are.

Did you ever think about taking a science night class, just so that you can learn enough about science law to see that you can't contradict it?

I don't expect that you would admit that science proves that God exists, even if you learned how to understand science. But at least you would know.

As for atheism, even you easily understand that it doesn't exist. How do you know this? Because you haven't checked out all the places on earth or in the universe just to see that God doesn't exist in one of them.

What you have is something that is like atheism, but isn't atheism. Probably what you have is just ignorance, or else it is downright lies. I like to give the benefit of the doubt wherever possible. But you express the things you express, so often that I think we all understand that you are simply a liar.

Cool

Did i say something which hurt Puddleduck?

You still havent shown any proof of your god.  How about you go back to your night school you are so familiar with and ask for a refund. You have failed in your ability to prove your god.

How about even showing someone who used your pathetic claims ....... then i will show you a fool.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
April 15, 2017, 05:04:00 PM
Do you still hold the view that atheism is a religion? But this is absurd. How can you believe in what, how, does not exist?

That is the big part of the point. Does God exist or not?

People believe in all kinds of things. Some of them seem absurd to other people. But where is the proof, either way?

Since the atheist knows that he knows that he doesn't have proof that God doesn't exist, that is...

... Since the atheist doesn't have any proof that God doesn't exist on Jupiter, how can the atheist KNOW that God doesn't exist on the planet Jupiter? The atheist realizes that he doesn't know. So, since he knows that he doesn't know, he is aware that God MIGHT exist on the planet Jupiter. Since he knows that God might exist on Jupiter, what is all this atheism talk about?

Atheism has to do with the BELIEF that God doesn't exist. That is what religion and cults are all about... belief.

If the atheist said that God might exist somewhere that he is unaware of, and that he simply doesn't know, the atheist would be right, and he also wouldn't be an atheist. Since the atheist tries to hide the whole idea that God might exist somewhere that he doesn't know about, what, really, is atheism to this kind of atheist? All adamant, forceful, determined atheists are like this.

Atheism is a blunt, disease, religion. At least the other religions admit that they don't have proof that their religion is the way it is, if they don't have proof.

Cool

If you care about the truth, you should not be believing in something for which there is no evidence

The most honest position is to say: "I don't know.  There is no evidence.  Next question."

Not to say: "I don't know how I know, but I'm going to believe it anyway because I feel like it (or because someone wrote it in a book).  Despite the fact that there is no evidence."


legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 17, 2017, 06:43:26 PM
Thanks, again, for helping to solidify the fact that atheism doesn't really exist,
by saying that you were talking about atheism in your post,
but by not showing much, if any, atheism in your post at all.

Cool

Oh Puddleduck...... you silly sausage.

Don't you see that you have not provided any evidence showing your God?

If you did, others would be using your evidence.

I guess they see you as the fool you are.

Did you ever think about taking a science night class, just so that you can learn enough about science law to see that you can't contradict it?

I don't expect that you would admit that science proves that God exists, even if you learned how to understand science. But at least you would know.

As for atheism, even you easily understand that it doesn't exist. How do you know this? Because you haven't checked out all the places on earth or in the universe just to see that God doesn't exist in one of them.

What you have is something that is like atheism, but isn't atheism. Probably what you have is just ignorance, or else it is downright lies. I like to give the benefit of the doubt wherever possible. But you express the things you express, so often that I think we all understand that you are simply a liar.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
April 17, 2017, 11:07:12 AM
Do you still hold the view that atheism is a religion? But this is absurd. How can you believe in what, how, does not exist?

That is the big part of the point. Does God exist or not?

People believe in all kinds of things. Some of them seem absurd to other people. But where is the proof, either way?

Since the atheist knows that he knows that he doesn't have proof that God doesn't exist, that is...

... Since the atheist doesn't have any proof that God doesn't exist on Jupiter, how can the atheist KNOW that God doesn't exist on the planet Jupiter? The atheist realizes that he doesn't know. So, since he knows that he doesn't know, he is aware that God MIGHT exist on the planet Jupiter. Since he knows that God might exist on Jupiter, what is all this atheism talk about?

Atheism has to do with the BELIEF that God doesn't exist. That is what religion and cults are all about... belief.

If the atheist said that God might exist somewhere that he is unaware of, and that he simply doesn't know, the atheist would be right, and he also wouldn't be an atheist. Since the atheist tries to hide the whole idea that God might exist somewhere that he doesn't know about, what, really, is atheism to this kind of atheist? All adamant, forceful, determined atheists are like this.

Atheism is a blunt, disease, religion. At least the other religions admit that they don't have proof that their religion is the way it is, if they don't have proof.

Cool

If you care about the truth, you should not be believing in something for which there is no evidence.  

The most honest position is to say: "I don't know.  There is no evidence.  Next question."

Not to say: "I don't know how I know, but I'm going to believe it anyway because I feel like it (or because someone wrote it in a book).  Despite the fact that there is no evidence."



Why then do you ever argue and spoil your nerves? Why should I, for example, have something to prove or discuss something about my faith. This is absurd. Faith is a state of mind, and not an exact science following the example of an axiom.

Because you make extraordinary claims.  Your faith is absurd.  Complete nonsense.  That is why if you want to talk about religion you better have something to back up your ridiculous views.

You sound like someone who says: "I am Napoleon.  I do not need to prove it.  It is absurd why someone would ask me to prove it."

We are talking about zombies in the sky or winged horses. You need to explain yourself, otherwise, stop talking about your religions, and stop having children.

If you want us to treat you as a sane person, you need to provide the proof for your extraordinary claims.  


This is exactly the point. The proof that God exists is spelled out here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

It isn't faith except that all science laws and everything else is understood by faith. And a person doesn't really exist except that he has faith that he does. But in the standard scientific understanding of what proof is, God exists according to the proof.

If a person is so faithful to his atheism religion that he wants to be blind to the proof, that is absolutely his choice. However, since atheism has been shown to be a religion/cult, above, faithful followers of it can't be expected to do anything other than deny/ignore the proof.

Perhaps the proof isn't spelled out as clearly as it could be. But until someone comes up with a step-by-step rebuttal of it, the proof has to stand... since it is scientific laws, not theories... and since atheism has been shown to be a religion/cult.

Cool

BADecker's evidence in a nutshell......

Link 1
Machine like nature of the universe.
Cause and effect
Nations looking for God?
BADecker believes that all machines are ultimately the result of a god.

Link 2
Cause and effect

Link 3
Cause and effect

Link 4
Cause and effect

Cause and effect rebuttal
If cause and effect is proof of a god, then who made god? Was it god's god? And who made god's god? was it god's god's god? This is a cycle of infinity. This is no proof.
BADecker simply applies an assumption that  this a god. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8  

Machines like nature of the universe rebuttal
BADecker believes that machines need a maker and that maker has to be a god. The reality of this is that evolution has caused the changes. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.html  

BADecker then claims that this is only theory. The reality is that science is disproving/proving all theories  we (humans) have believed for years. That is the nature of science. For it to be tested by others. People like BADecker will continually use their same argument of assumptions to state there is no proof that god does not exist. The reality is that history has shown that early Vikings believed  "lightning flashed whenever Thor threw his hammer". Science has proven this incorrect.

Nations looking for god rebuttal
BADecker claims that people are looking for how the universe was made. This is true. However, BADecker then claims that because the answers are still not found, the answer must be a god. WRONG.... this is not proof. This is an assumption again on BADecker's part. Science is unlocking secrets every day. Religion is being disproven daily and BADecker continues to hold on to his mindless views.


Why do you keep on posting this religious stuff?

It would be okay in this thread, if it was about atheism. But no. You post religious stuff about some other religion, and a little talk about science facts, as well. This is the atheism thread. Haven't you realized that yet?

The greatest science facts/laws show that God exists. Atheism has been totally rebutted by them, scientifically.

Cool

Actually it is about Atheism.

You tried to show proof of your god's existence..... and I showed how wrong your arguments are.

Your move Puddleduck!

Thanks, again, for helping to solidify the fact that atheism doesn't really exist,
by saying that you were talking about atheism in your post,
but by not showing much, if any, atheism in your post at all.

Cool

Oh Puddleduck...... you silly sausage.

Don't you see that you have not provided any evidence showing your God?

If you did, others would be using your evidence.

I guess they see you as the fool you are.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 17, 2017, 09:44:51 AM
Do you still hold the view that atheism is a religion? But this is absurd. How can you believe in what, how, does not exist?

That is the big part of the point. Does God exist or not?

People believe in all kinds of things. Some of them seem absurd to other people. But where is the proof, either way?

Since the atheist knows that he knows that he doesn't have proof that God doesn't exist, that is...

... Since the atheist doesn't have any proof that God doesn't exist on Jupiter, how can the atheist KNOW that God doesn't exist on the planet Jupiter? The atheist realizes that he doesn't know. So, since he knows that he doesn't know, he is aware that God MIGHT exist on the planet Jupiter. Since he knows that God might exist on Jupiter, what is all this atheism talk about?

Atheism has to do with the BELIEF that God doesn't exist. That is what religion and cults are all about... belief.

If the atheist said that God might exist somewhere that he is unaware of, and that he simply doesn't know, the atheist would be right, and he also wouldn't be an atheist. Since the atheist tries to hide the whole idea that God might exist somewhere that he doesn't know about, what, really, is atheism to this kind of atheist? All adamant, forceful, determined atheists are like this.

Atheism is a blunt, disease, religion. At least the other religions admit that they don't have proof that their religion is the way it is, if they don't have proof.

Cool

If you care about the truth, you should not be believing in something for which there is no evidence.  

The most honest position is to say: "I don't know.  There is no evidence.  Next question."

Not to say: "I don't know how I know, but I'm going to believe it anyway because I feel like it (or because someone wrote it in a book).  Despite the fact that there is no evidence."



Why then do you ever argue and spoil your nerves? Why should I, for example, have something to prove or discuss something about my faith. This is absurd. Faith is a state of mind, and not an exact science following the example of an axiom.

Because you make extraordinary claims.  Your faith is absurd.  Complete nonsense.  That is why if you want to talk about religion you better have something to back up your ridiculous views.

You sound like someone who says: "I am Napoleon.  I do not need to prove it.  It is absurd why someone would ask me to prove it."

We are talking about zombies in the sky or winged horses. You need to explain yourself, otherwise, stop talking about your religions, and stop having children.

If you want us to treat you as a sane person, you need to provide the proof for your extraordinary claims.  


This is exactly the point. The proof that God exists is spelled out here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

It isn't faith except that all science laws and everything else is understood by faith. And a person doesn't really exist except that he has faith that he does. But in the standard scientific understanding of what proof is, God exists according to the proof.

If a person is so faithful to his atheism religion that he wants to be blind to the proof, that is absolutely his choice. However, since atheism has been shown to be a religion/cult, above, faithful followers of it can't be expected to do anything other than deny/ignore the proof.

Perhaps the proof isn't spelled out as clearly as it could be. But until someone comes up with a step-by-step rebuttal of it, the proof has to stand... since it is scientific laws, not theories... and since atheism has been shown to be a religion/cult.

Cool

BADecker's evidence in a nutshell......

Link 1
Machine like nature of the universe.
Cause and effect
Nations looking for God?
BADecker believes that all machines are ultimately the result of a god.

Link 2
Cause and effect

Link 3
Cause and effect

Link 4
Cause and effect

Cause and effect rebuttal
If cause and effect is proof of a god, then who made god? Was it god's god? And who made god's god? was it god's god's god? This is a cycle of infinity. This is no proof.
BADecker simply applies an assumption that  this a god. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8  

Machines like nature of the universe rebuttal
BADecker believes that machines need a maker and that maker has to be a god. The reality of this is that evolution has caused the changes. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.html  

BADecker then claims that this is only theory. The reality is that science is disproving/proving all theories  we (humans) have believed for years. That is the nature of science. For it to be tested by others. People like BADecker will continually use their same argument of assumptions to state there is no proof that god does not exist. The reality is that history has shown that early Vikings believed  "lightning flashed whenever Thor threw his hammer". Science has proven this incorrect.

Nations looking for god rebuttal
BADecker claims that people are looking for how the universe was made. This is true. However, BADecker then claims that because the answers are still not found, the answer must be a god. WRONG.... this is not proof. This is an assumption again on BADecker's part. Science is unlocking secrets every day. Religion is being disproven daily and BADecker continues to hold on to his mindless views.


Why do you keep on posting this religious stuff?

It would be okay in this thread, if it was about atheism. But no. You post religious stuff about some other religion, and a little talk about science facts, as well. This is the atheism thread. Haven't you realized that yet?

The greatest science facts/laws show that God exists. Atheism has been totally rebutted by them, scientifically.

Cool

Actually it is about Atheism.

You tried to show proof of your god's existence..... and I showed how wrong your arguments are.

Your move Puddleduck!

Thanks, again, for helping to solidify the fact that atheism doesn't really exist,
by saying that you were talking about atheism in your post,
but by not showing much, if any, atheism in your post at all.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
April 17, 2017, 02:55:47 AM
Do you still hold the view that atheism is a religion? But this is absurd. How can you believe in what, how, does not exist?

That is the big part of the point. Does God exist or not?

People believe in all kinds of things. Some of them seem absurd to other people. But where is the proof, either way?

Since the atheist knows that he knows that he doesn't have proof that God doesn't exist, that is...

... Since the atheist doesn't have any proof that God doesn't exist on Jupiter, how can the atheist KNOW that God doesn't exist on the planet Jupiter? The atheist realizes that he doesn't know. So, since he knows that he doesn't know, he is aware that God MIGHT exist on the planet Jupiter. Since he knows that God might exist on Jupiter, what is all this atheism talk about?

Atheism has to do with the BELIEF that God doesn't exist. That is what religion and cults are all about... belief.

If the atheist said that God might exist somewhere that he is unaware of, and that he simply doesn't know, the atheist would be right, and he also wouldn't be an atheist. Since the atheist tries to hide the whole idea that God might exist somewhere that he doesn't know about, what, really, is atheism to this kind of atheist? All adamant, forceful, determined atheists are like this.

Atheism is a blunt, disease, religion. At least the other religions admit that they don't have proof that their religion is the way it is, if they don't have proof.

Cool

If you care about the truth, you should not be believing in something for which there is no evidence.  

The most honest position is to say: "I don't know.  There is no evidence.  Next question."

Not to say: "I don't know how I know, but I'm going to believe it anyway because I feel like it (or because someone wrote it in a book).  Despite the fact that there is no evidence."



Why then do you ever argue and spoil your nerves? Why should I, for example, have something to prove or discuss something about my faith. This is absurd. Faith is a state of mind, and not an exact science following the example of an axiom.

Because you make extraordinary claims.  Your faith is absurd.  Complete nonsense.  That is why if you want to talk about religion you better have something to back up your ridiculous views.

You sound like someone who says: "I am Napoleon.  I do not need to prove it.  It is absurd why someone would ask me to prove it."

We are talking about zombies in the sky or winged horses. You need to explain yourself, otherwise, stop talking about your religions, and stop having children.

If you want us to treat you as a sane person, you need to provide the proof for your extraordinary claims.  


This is exactly the point. The proof that God exists is spelled out here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

It isn't faith except that all science laws and everything else is understood by faith. And a person doesn't really exist except that he has faith that he does. But in the standard scientific understanding of what proof is, God exists according to the proof.

If a person is so faithful to his atheism religion that he wants to be blind to the proof, that is absolutely his choice. However, since atheism has been shown to be a religion/cult, above, faithful followers of it can't be expected to do anything other than deny/ignore the proof.

Perhaps the proof isn't spelled out as clearly as it could be. But until someone comes up with a step-by-step rebuttal of it, the proof has to stand... since it is scientific laws, not theories... and since atheism has been shown to be a religion/cult.

Cool

BADecker's evidence in a nutshell......

Link 1
Machine like nature of the universe.
Cause and effect
Nations looking for God?
BADecker believes that all machines are ultimately the result of a god.

Link 2
Cause and effect

Link 3
Cause and effect

Link 4
Cause and effect

Cause and effect rebuttal
If cause and effect is proof of a god, then who made god? Was it god's god? And who made god's god? was it god's god's god? This is a cycle of infinity. This is no proof.
BADecker simply applies an assumption that  this a god. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8  

Machines like nature of the universe rebuttal
BADecker believes that machines need a maker and that maker has to be a god. The reality of this is that evolution has caused the changes. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.html  

BADecker then claims that this is only theory. The reality is that science is disproving/proving all theories  we (humans) have believed for years. That is the nature of science. For it to be tested by others. People like BADecker will continually use their same argument of assumptions to state there is no proof that god does not exist. The reality is that history has shown that early Vikings believed  "lightning flashed whenever Thor threw his hammer". Science has proven this incorrect.

Nations looking for god rebuttal
BADecker claims that people are looking for how the universe was made. This is true. However, BADecker then claims that because the answers are still not found, the answer must be a god. WRONG.... this is not proof. This is an assumption again on BADecker's part. Science is unlocking secrets every day. Religion is being disproven daily and BADecker continues to hold on to his mindless views.


Why do you keep on posting this religious stuff?

It would be okay in this thread, if it was about atheism. But no. You post religious stuff about some other religion, and a little talk about science facts, as well. This is the atheism thread. Haven't you realized that yet?

The greatest science facts/laws show that God exists. Atheism has been totally rebutted by them, scientifically.

Cool

Actually it is about Atheism.

You tried to show proof of your god's existence..... and I showed how wrong your arguments are.

Your move Puddleduck!
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 16, 2017, 11:46:05 AM
Do you still hold the view that atheism is a religion? But this is absurd. How can you believe in what, how, does not exist?

That is the big part of the point. Does God exist or not?

People believe in all kinds of things. Some of them seem absurd to other people. But where is the proof, either way?

Since the atheist knows that he knows that he doesn't have proof that God doesn't exist, that is...

... Since the atheist doesn't have any proof that God doesn't exist on Jupiter, how can the atheist KNOW that God doesn't exist on the planet Jupiter? The atheist realizes that he doesn't know. So, since he knows that he doesn't know, he is aware that God MIGHT exist on the planet Jupiter. Since he knows that God might exist on Jupiter, what is all this atheism talk about?

Atheism has to do with the BELIEF that God doesn't exist. That is what religion and cults are all about... belief.

If the atheist said that God might exist somewhere that he is unaware of, and that he simply doesn't know, the atheist would be right, and he also wouldn't be an atheist. Since the atheist tries to hide the whole idea that God might exist somewhere that he doesn't know about, what, really, is atheism to this kind of atheist? All adamant, forceful, determined atheists are like this.

Atheism is a blunt, disease, religion. At least the other religions admit that they don't have proof that their religion is the way it is, if they don't have proof.

Cool

If you care about the truth, you should not be believing in something for which there is no evidence.  

The most honest position is to say: "I don't know.  There is no evidence.  Next question."

Not to say: "I don't know how I know, but I'm going to believe it anyway because I feel like it (or because someone wrote it in a book).  Despite the fact that there is no evidence."



Why then do you ever argue and spoil your nerves? Why should I, for example, have something to prove or discuss something about my faith. This is absurd. Faith is a state of mind, and not an exact science following the example of an axiom.

Because you make extraordinary claims.  Your faith is absurd.  Complete nonsense.  That is why if you want to talk about religion you better have something to back up your ridiculous views.

You sound like someone who says: "I am Napoleon.  I do not need to prove it.  It is absurd why someone would ask me to prove it."

We are talking about zombies in the sky or winged horses. You need to explain yourself, otherwise, stop talking about your religions, and stop having children.

If you want us to treat you as a sane person, you need to provide the proof for your extraordinary claims.  


This is exactly the point. The proof that God exists is spelled out here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

It isn't faith except that all science laws and everything else is understood by faith. And a person doesn't really exist except that he has faith that he does. But in the standard scientific understanding of what proof is, God exists according to the proof.

If a person is so faithful to his atheism religion that he wants to be blind to the proof, that is absolutely his choice. However, since atheism has been shown to be a religion/cult, above, faithful followers of it can't be expected to do anything other than deny/ignore the proof.

Perhaps the proof isn't spelled out as clearly as it could be. But until someone comes up with a step-by-step rebuttal of it, the proof has to stand... since it is scientific laws, not theories... and since atheism has been shown to be a religion/cult.

Cool

BADecker's evidence in a nutshell......

Link 1
Machine like nature of the universe.
Cause and effect
Nations looking for God?
BADecker believes that all machines are ultimately the result of a god.

Link 2
Cause and effect

Link 3
Cause and effect

Link 4
Cause and effect

Cause and effect rebuttal
If cause and effect is proof of a god, then who made god? Was it god's god? And who made god's god? was it god's god's god? This is a cycle of infinity. This is no proof.
BADecker simply applies an assumption that  this a god. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8  

Machines like nature of the universe rebuttal
BADecker believes that machines need a maker and that maker has to be a god. The reality of this is that evolution has caused the changes. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.html  

BADecker then claims that this is only theory. The reality is that science is disproving/proving all theories  we (humans) have believed for years. That is the nature of science. For it to be tested by others. People like BADecker will continually use their same argument of assumptions to state there is no proof that god does not exist. The reality is that history has shown that early Vikings believed  "lightning flashed whenever Thor threw his hammer". Science has proven this incorrect.

Nations looking for god rebuttal
BADecker claims that people are looking for how the universe was made. This is true. However, BADecker then claims that because the answers are still not found, the answer must be a god. WRONG.... this is not proof. This is an assumption again on BADecker's part. Science is unlocking secrets every day. Religion is being disproven daily and BADecker continues to hold on to his mindless views.


Why do you keep on posting this religious stuff?

It would be okay in this thread, if it was about atheism. But no. You post religious stuff about some other religion, and a little talk about science facts, as well. This is the atheism thread. Haven't you realized that yet?

The greatest science facts/laws show that God exists. Atheism has been totally rebutted by them, scientifically.

Cool
Pages:
Jump to: