Prove me there are no unicorns.
Prove me there is no Big Foot.
...
and the list goes on and on.
Prove on the negative is NO PROOF AT ALL! You can't prove something that doesn't exist, doesn't exist. What you can prove is for what does exist.
Who says there is no Santa? You can look in many department stores all over the world during the Christmas season, and see Santa.
Since there are many paintings and drawings of unicorns, they just might exist... even flying ones.
People have pictures they claim that are of big foot. Why attempt to prove that it doesn't exist?
... and the list goes on and on.
This means that when you show the scientific proof that God exists, He exists, right. But when you can't understand the proof, you know that He might exist. the proof:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.
Atheism is a lie. For those who understand that they don't know for a fact that God doesn't exist, atheism is an intentional and malicious lie. For the ignorant who haven't realized that they can't prove that God doesn't exist, atheism is a lying religion.
What's there to talk about? True atheism is simply some people trying to eject God from their lives for some selfish reasons. Can't be done. Ultimately the atheist, if he reinforces his atheism in himself enough, will go nuts.
BADecker principle rule number 1:
"If a point of discussion does not meet criteria of one's own belief, then ignore the context and claim it is wrong".
Therefore, your proof is wrong, so please give me proof.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riCTEhezcYw Burden of proof lies with those who claim god exists can be found here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8 Answer to the first cause argument can be found here.
There you go again, opposing science law with some science theory, but mostly with only talk. Why don't you capitalize on your religion? Or is that what you have done in the past, and are only protecting your investment, now.
If you think the proof for the existence of God is not proof, why don't you post the step-by-step, irrefutable rebuttal to it? You can't, can you. All you can do is blab.
There you go again, blabbering about how others don't provide evidence.
Yet, the links you have posted have been rebutted time and time again, but you refuse to read them.
Therefore, I still stand by my post:
BADecker principle rule number 1:
"If a point of discussion does not meet criteria of one's own belief, then ignore the context and claim it is wrong".
Therefore, your proof is wrong, so please give me proof.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riCTEhezcYw Burden of proof lies with those who claim god exists can be found here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8 Answer to the first cause argument can be found here.
Anybody can go to my links and find the step-by-step explanation of how the laws of science prove God exists. Nobody has shown a step-by-step rebuttal of the laws or the proof. If you know of such a place, go get the step-by-step rebuttal and post it here in the forum, and not just some link to it. If you only post a link, you don't have a rebuttal, because nobody can tell if you understand for sure that you have a rebuttal. You probably don't even know yourself, for sure.
BADecker's evidence in a nutshell......
Link 1
Machine like nature of the universe.
Cause and effect
Nations looking for God?
BADecker believes that all machines are ultimately the result of a god.
Link 2
Cause and effect
Link 3
Cause and effect
Link 4
Cause and effect
Cause and effect rebuttal
If cause and effect is proof of a god, then who made god? Was it god's god? And who made god's god? was it god's god's god? This is a cycle of infinity. This is no proof.
BADecker simply applies an assumption that this a god.
Machines like nature of the universe rebuttal
BADecker believes that machines need a maker and that maker has to be a god. The reality of this is that evolution has caused the changes. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.html
BADecker then claims that this is only theory. The reality is that science is disproving/proving all theories we (humans) have believed for years. That is the nature of science. For it to be tested by others. People like BADecker will continually use their same argument of assumptions to state there is no proof that god does not exist. The reality is that history has shown that early Vikings believed "lightning flashed whenever Thor threw his hammer". Science has proven this incorrect.
Nations looking for god rebuttal
BADecker claims that people are looking for how the universe was made. This is true to a point, however, BADecker then claims that because the answers are still not found, the answer must be a god. WRONG.... this is not proof. This is an assumption again on BADecker's part. Science is unlocking secrets every day. Religion is being disproven daily and BADecker continues to hold on to his mindless views.
As you can see, BADecker's ideas are only theories and assumptions. They prove nothing.