No. Because TEK is a hybrid and HYP is a pure POS coin. They don't really directly compare in security. The POW network difficulty... welll, I'll just pull the json.
{
"proof-of-work" : 237857.13633377,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00006450,
"search-interval" : 1
}
As you know, I'm heavily into both of these coins, and I'm not going to badmouth either one. Honest comparisons are good, but on this one it's apples and oranges. I think HYP is the best secured and best functioning pure High PoS coin, but it's security is actually several orders of magnitude lower than TEK from a purely technical standpoint. Granted, it's harder to mount a 51% attack on HYP or any PoS coin that it would be on a pure PoW coin. But hybrids are the most secure of all, AND continue to function if something goes wrong with one of the proofs of work.
Both coins have strong merits and some problems. I have a strong position in both, and I consider them both worthy of it.
It was indeed TEK's luck of being a hybrid when we had the forking problem, while POS was "broken" could not handle the sudden surge of stacks staking, POW kept the chain alive.
And thanks Bio for the additional info.
The way I understand POS the TEK way and POS the HYP they are very different.
Anti inflation control measures are completely different and can not be compared.
Both having their plus and minus points depending on personal preference one might prefer only one of those.
I prefer both because of the diff POS schemes, both are additions to each other as such.
Or is it they complement each other ?
Besides from the obvious advantages of diversifying.
The coins are quite different. What I like about both is defined by those differences. HYP stakes quite quickly. On average it will stake three times for every one that TEK stakes. But TEK stakes much easier (at least so far). One TEK will stake fairly quickly. One HYP takes a LONG time.
Inflation control is radically different and has been demonstrated to work in both coins. HYP doesn't change the interest rate in the code, but it has the max subsidy at 1K HYP. There's no max subsidy in TEK, but if you hit when the diffculty is wrong, the code inherited from Novacoin lowers the rate of stake, and it can be substantial if the network difficulty is high. You retain control in both cases, as you can simply lock your wallet until you're confident the time in right.
Presstab thought his scheme was better than NVCS. I'm not convinced. I think it's different, and effective, but I think both systems have merit. I believe the coins complement each other. I'm not a believer in putting all my eggs in one basket. TEK is at a pretty low exchange rate right now, so I'm going to try to acquire more. I've gotten almost to my goal on HYP, and I'm behind on TEK, so that's where my next purchases will be. Hopefully the price stays down for a few days while I acquire some bitcoin
My third coin is HBN, and I am ahead of TEK in my holdings there, so I'm staking it for a while while I build up TEK. Then HBN will be the target.