So you do basically admit...?
It's not against the rules to have an account that is posted on by many people, think of forum accounts for businesses and stuff.
Topic: TEMP: Investigation into scotaloo - page 12. (Read 13806 times)
It's not against the rules to have an account that is posted on by many people, think of forum accounts for businesses and stuff.
A 3 signature escrow? Of course, I could hold a key for that, which would be signed to release the escrow if your "hard evidence2 is found.
Yeah nice one, the person who wrongly accused trekin7 of being me and left me negative trust, like I trust you. I'm not wasting time discussing that here if Maged wants to discuss it again he can PM me as he has all this evidence.
Do you admit that this account is shared between multiple people? Yes / no.
Just to annoy you I refuse to answer that question even though you know the answer.
So you do basically admit...?
If you want, I can hold your "50 BTC" in escrow and let other people quote me, on terms that if "hard evidence" is found within 1 week, you lose the BTC.
Oh wait, you wouldn't "pay back everyone" anyway.
Oh wait, you wouldn't "pay back everyone" anyway.
I offered to put 50BTC into a 2 of 3 escrow, me with one key and two trusted members with keys. Each holder would then verify claims from victims, if it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt that I scammed the BTC would be released to them.
A 3 signature escrow? Of course, I could hold a key for that, which would be signed to release the escrow if your "hard evidence2 is found.
Do you admit that this account is shared between multiple people? Yes / no.
Just to annoy you I refuse to answer that question even though you know the answer.
Do you have access to the forum database? Do you have access to FAIRVIEW pipes? Do you have malware embeded on this "reputable" member?
Nope, like I said, I only know the person didn't use a proxy because they never do.
You have just edited out
Do you admit that this account is shared between multiple people? Yes / no.
Quote
and clearly written by another person who uses this account.
Do you admit that this account is shared between multiple people? Yes / no.
Don't ignore this.
If you want, I can hold your "50 BTC" in escrow and let other people quote me, on terms that if "hard evidence" is found within 1 week, you lose the BTC.
Oh wait, you wouldn't "pay back everyone" anyway.
Oh wait, you wouldn't "pay back everyone" anyway.
I offered to put 50BTC into a 2 of 3 escrow, me with one key and two trusted members with keys. Each holder would then verify claims from victims, if it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt that I scammed the BTC would be released to them.
Like I said, I data mine
Do you have access to the forum database? Do you have access to FAIRVIEW pipes? Do you have malware embeded on this "reputable" member?
Answer these questions after you respond yes/no to my previous comment.
^ What TF said, I saw that edit.
I OFFEREd to pay back everyone I allegedly scam if they can give hard evidence. I offred to put 50BTC into escrow, Maged won't let me.
If you want, I can hold your "50 BTC" in escrow and let other people quote me to witness it, on terms that if "hard evidence" is found within 1 week, you lose the BTC.
Oh wait, you wouldn't "pay back everyone" anyway.
Because he might (0.0001% chance) pay people back one day. He is marked as a scammer.
I OFFEREd to pay back everyone I allegedly scam if they can give hard evidence. I offred to put 50BTC into escrow, Maged won't let me.
If you want, I can hold your "50 BTC" in escrow and let other people quote me to witness it, on terms that if "hard evidence" is found within 1 week, you lose the BTC.
Oh wait, you wouldn't "pay back everyone" anyway.
You have just edited out
Do you admit that this account is shared between multiple people? Yes / no.
Quote
and clearly written by another person who uses this account.
Do you admit that this account is shared between multiple people? Yes / no.
How do you know this?
Like I said, I data mine, I know who created the account and I know they don't use proxies or make any attempt to cover up their identity.
Because he might (0.0001% chance) pay people back one day. He is marked as a scammer.
I OFFERED to pay back everyone I allegedly scammed if they can give hard evidence. I offered to put 50BTC into escrow and all to prove I'm not bullshitting, Maged won't let me, i'm dead serious lol I would risk 50BTC just to prove a point.
Do you admit to scamming?
No that was a joke and clearly written by another person who uses this account.
Next:
Quote
Also Admin please check the IP of who registered this bitcointalk account, it'll be shocking, its a reputable member here he didnt use a proxy
How do you know this?
Do you admit to scamming?
No that was a joke.
How about this, why isn't pirateat40 banned yet? His account is not banned yet.
Do you admit to scamming?
Quote
I am a scammer but the wrong one!!!!!
How about this, why isn't pirateat40 banned yet?
Because he might (0.0001% chance) pay people back one day. He is marked as a scammer.
Even though there is proof against you, that's a fallacy. If I go into court and plead guilty to a murder with little proof against me, does that mean the court will not punish me? No, they will punish me unless there is massive proof that I DIDN'T commit the murder.
I'm pleading not guilty here lol! I never entered a plea yet, me just saying yes could be a troll, in a court its legally binding.
You admit to being a scammer, what's the point of trying to have people think of you as a different type of scammer? Nothing, it's just fucking silly.
Quote
I am a scammer but the wrong one!!!!!
How about this, why isn't pirateat40 banned yet? His account is not banned yet.
Quote
I am a scammer but the wrong one!!!!!
Even though there is proof against you, that's a fallacy. If I go into court and plead guilty to a murder with little proof against me, does that mean the court will not punish me? No, they will punish me unless there is massive proof that I DIDN'T commit the murder.
I'm pleading not guilty here lol! I never entered a plea yet, me just saying yes could be a troll, in a court its legally binding.
Jump to: