did you try contacting any Bittrex staff ?
@hiddensphinx
the majority of guys..
i have said all along, it does not matter who "scammer" or what "scam coin" ..if guys think it will make them a profit they scream, Take my money !
then this crap continues to implode because of that cancerous greedy vulture mentality..
Topic: THE BYTECENT DISASTER - page 6. (Read 19916 times)
33 BTC volume on Bittrex and market suspended...what sort of mad person would give IE their money so confused 
OK, one more time because I read the people at CoinBlab, some, besides the captcha-fillers, are still unclear about why BYTECENT is doomed unless it is relaunched or a refund option is issued:
1.- The offer stated clearly, very very clearly, that 3 million coins were offered AND that the one not sold would be destroyed by Bittrez prior to releasing the ICO funds to the developers. Is that clear? OK, here's the CHANGED REALITY:
IconicExpert, unilaterally and arbitrarily, decided that no mining was necessary and until block 3110 did not mine the 156,000 BYCs that had sold in the ICO (the other 3-0dd thousand he had mined before at the usual rate of 1 BYC by block. THEREFORE AND THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT, 2 million 8 hundred and 40 thousand coins, that would have been destroyed according to the original offer, remain having augmented the total number of coins to ever be in the coin that, after destroying those 2.84 million, would have been 31.16 million instead of 33 million as it is now.
2.- Also clearly stated in the offer was the assertion that NO MORE THAN A MAXIMUM OF 1440 BYC will be mined daily. No "ifs", no "buts". Clear as clear water. Here's the CHANGED REALITY:
Instead, in about 30 hours, a total of 40,000 -that is FORTY THOUSAND- ADDITIONAL coins have been mined... with many more to come in the next few days. Those 40,000 coins have already diluted ANY value BYC may have, by 25%. Most of those 40,000 coins, I should add, have been mined by people filling up capchas initially, meaning the price they have paid for those coins is ZERO or near zero -only the computers electricity costs-, therefore they will be DUMPED on the market immediately after opening for any price they can get is 100% profit, taking the price to the ground and, de facto, killing the coin.
All of that is without taking into consideration that the wallets weren't working and that most weren't able to mine -and some still aren't- which makes the launch beyond irreparably unfair, especially for people that had actually paid for theirt investment with cold, hard cash.
There are, I would repeat, several FAIR options that would benefit any chances of survival of the coin: Relaunch, issuance of refunds and a combination of both. Anything else is just unacceptable.
Now, IconicExpert has decided to put the decision theoretically to "the community" on CoinBlab... FACT is that there's no such a thing as a BYC community there: It is a censored place and many of us, investors in the coin, are banned by request of Iconic and, of course, we are unable to vote. But even if we were allowed, the voting is utterly absurd since most of the people voting and present there have to skin in the game, meaning they have not invested a single cent in the BYC ICO and they are only hanging by dear desperation to make their mined coins at ZERO cost worth anything is they simply support what the ego (and maybe other interest of the financial kind too) has already chosen to do.
Bittrex, please put and end to the madness of this guy and force him to do the right thing, which is issue refunds to those that feel deceived by the lies and false promises made by IconicExpert. There's simply no other way to end this disaster well.
1.- The offer stated clearly, very very clearly, that 3 million coins were offered AND that the one not sold would be destroyed by Bittrez prior to releasing the ICO funds to the developers. Is that clear? OK, here's the CHANGED REALITY:
IconicExpert, unilaterally and arbitrarily, decided that no mining was necessary and until block 3110 did not mine the 156,000 BYCs that had sold in the ICO (the other 3-0dd thousand he had mined before at the usual rate of 1 BYC by block. THEREFORE AND THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT, 2 million 8 hundred and 40 thousand coins, that would have been destroyed according to the original offer, remain having augmented the total number of coins to ever be in the coin that, after destroying those 2.84 million, would have been 31.16 million instead of 33 million as it is now.
2.- Also clearly stated in the offer was the assertion that NO MORE THAN A MAXIMUM OF 1440 BYC will be mined daily. No "ifs", no "buts". Clear as clear water. Here's the CHANGED REALITY:
Instead, in about 30 hours, a total of 40,000 -that is FORTY THOUSAND- ADDITIONAL coins have been mined... with many more to come in the next few days. Those 40,000 coins have already diluted ANY value BYC may have, by 25%. Most of those 40,000 coins, I should add, have been mined by people filling up capchas initially, meaning the price they have paid for those coins is ZERO or near zero -only the computers electricity costs-, therefore they will be DUMPED on the market immediately after opening for any price they can get is 100% profit, taking the price to the ground and, de facto, killing the coin.
All of that is without taking into consideration that the wallets weren't working and that most weren't able to mine -and some still aren't- which makes the launch beyond irreparably unfair, especially for people that had actually paid for theirt investment with cold, hard cash.
There are, I would repeat, several FAIR options that would benefit any chances of survival of the coin: Relaunch, issuance of refunds and a combination of both. Anything else is just unacceptable.
Now, IconicExpert has decided to put the decision theoretically to "the community" on CoinBlab... FACT is that there's no such a thing as a BYC community there: It is a censored place and many of us, investors in the coin, are banned by request of Iconic and, of course, we are unable to vote. But even if we were allowed, the voting is utterly absurd since most of the people voting and present there have to skin in the game, meaning they have not invested a single cent in the BYC ICO and they are only hanging by dear desperation to make their mined coins at ZERO cost worth anything is they simply support what the ego (and maybe other interest of the financial kind too) has already chosen to do.
Bittrex, please put and end to the madness of this guy and force him to do the right thing, which is issue refunds to those that feel deceived by the lies and false promises made by IconicExpert. There's simply no other way to end this disaster well.
I am not spelling it out for you yet again..
and ease up on the med's bullshit it links you to other accounts eh
oh and it's not true i don't take med's, never have, although i have had an assessment before and found to have perfect mental health
the only good conspiracies are mine !
this one is NOT Spoetnik approved.
the evidence i seen so far on here is pretty weak.. so my original point is your trying to make something out of nothing.
disaster ? really ?
you talk about med's so much it makes me wonder where you keep getting that idea from hmmmmm ?
and ease up on the med's bullshit it links you to other accounts eh
oh and it's not true i don't take med's, never have, although i have had an assessment before and found to have perfect mental health
the only good conspiracies are mine !
this one is NOT Spoetnik approved.
the evidence i seen so far on here is pretty weak.. so my original point is your trying to make something out of nothing.
disaster ? really ?
you talk about med's so much it makes me wonder where you keep getting that idea from hmmmmm ?
Are you implying I send you PMs? Or are you implying I am somehow supporting Blocknet?
It it weren't for the implication in the second of those two crooks, Metcalf and his PR South African guy, I would not be interested in that -or XC- at all. And knowing that those two are at the center of the controversy puts me somewhere on THE OTHER SIDE, get that, or the meds blurry your mind completely? In other words, I dont give a fuck about blocknet, ok?
And much, much less even about who the fuck could be so disturbed as to send you PMs. Alright?
It it weren't for the implication in the second of those two crooks, Metcalf and his PR South African guy, I would not be interested in that -or XC- at all. And knowing that those two are at the center of the controversy puts me somewhere on THE OTHER SIDE, get that, or the meds blurry your mind completely? In other words, I dont give a fuck about blocknet, ok?
And much, much less even about who the fuck could be so disturbed as to send you PMs. Alright?
hes trying to prevent biitrex from offering a refund by having a relaunch
Or trying to cause a diversion from Blocknet ?
Paranoia ?
Want to see my PM's showing endlessly diversion lure bait attempts since OCT 31st ?
funny these guys crying Troll and FUD are running around Trolling and lying and playing games non stop.
h y p o c r i t e s ..to the highest order !
Uh?!?!?! Blocknet??? This is a very, very small project with a total of 80 BTC raised and probably some of it coming from IE's pockets... how could it be any distraction from Blocknet which is the biggest ICO of the last few weeks and involves a lot of crypto-experts and 100s of investors, fudders, shills, trolls, etc?
Me thinks you should try to lay low on the meds at this stage...
was that intended to be smart ?
do i really have to explain ? wow i hope your playing dumb with me .. i really do
it could be a single cent but if it creates a diversion then they succeeded
want to see the diversion attempts i have got in the last week or two ? prob a good 50 PM's or so hahahha
go after this coin.. no go after that coin.. go get 'em !!!
noooooon stop
i never PM anyone ever but i have 100's of them and if people want to see them i will copy out every one of them and post them somewhere.
you can see ALL the massive amount of Trolling and diversion attempts and misc threats, from countless lawsuit threats to raising funds to hire a hitman to get me LOL
and who is sending them all ?
all you guys playing innocent little angel ?
i didn't send them to myself guys LOL
this is real iconic expert coin https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pre-anniec-iconicexpertcoin-trustworthy-fair-coin-whitepaper-released-710215
That is epic!
this is real iconic expert coin https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pre-anniec-iconicexpertcoin-trustworthy-fair-coin-whitepaper-released-710215
hes trying to prevent biitrex from offering a refund by having a relaunch
Or trying to cause a diversion from Blocknet ?
Paranoia ?
Want to see my PM's showing endlessly diversion lure bait attempts since OCT 31st ?
funny these guys crying Troll and FUD are running around Trolling and lying and playing games non stop.
h y p o c r i t e s ..to the highest order !
Uh?!?!?! Blocknet??? This is a very, very small project with a total of 80 BTC raised and probably some of it coming from IE's pockets... how could it be any distraction from Blocknet which is the biggest ICO of the last few weeks and involves a lot of crypto-experts and 100s of investors, fudders, shills, trolls, etc?
Me thinks you should try to lay low on the meds at this stage...
hes trying to prevent biitrex from offering a refund by having a relaunch
Or trying to cause a diversion from Blocknet ?
Paranoia ?
Want to see my PM's showing endlessly diversion lure bait attempts since OCT 31st ?
funny these guys crying Troll and FUD are running around Trolling and lying and playing games non stop.
h y p o c r i t e s ..to the highest order !
Except for the fact that some people have said it, what evidence do you have that would indicate that they are the same person.
I'm definitely against lying scammers like IE, and I'm not a big fan of barbaras either, but as long as lies and rumors are spread around here without regard to the evidence, nobody will know who to believe.
(don't know, don't care if true), but IE nickname is definitely burned this time and with "supporter" of bytecent saying things aren't ok, that also gives him also the possibility to let the coin die right away... Then Barabbas by denouncing the other nickname, the owner might just want to save this one, so it can use it to promote or create other scam coins.
Keep that in mind if a Barabbas IPO coin comes out
(or if he wants to create another IPO to save bytecent investors)Sadly, there are just no limits to the cynicism of crypto these days - I was wondering how IE could possibly be satisfied with a "mere" 80BTC when he was gunning for 1500BTC. Should've guessed he was aiming for another way to get those BTC if the ICO launch didnt work out as planned. Would not be surprised if he had what you describe above as a backup of a backup of his original plan.
Crypto "noobs" are catching on to all these whale games - it's why so many have left the altcoin markets.
I still believe he was trying to make his money mostly the old fashioned way: Earning it by investing (maybe part or all of those 80 BTC) nin the project, work on it, lead it and making in a success. I must be quite naive...
Not only that: I still think that is exactly what he'll do ... if he can put aside his disproportionate ego and concentrate on doing what is fair and right. I believe a relaunch is a very viable option and I believe that everyone that invested in the project will remain invested in it if he does it fairly and transparently. He may need another night to come to the inevitable conclusion though.
Then again, I am naive and believe most people are honest -except in crypto- by nature...
The vote is not a fair vote. There are plenty of people that have been banned from the site due to comments that have been labeled as trolling or fud. Some of those comments are neither yet we remain banned and unable to cast a vote.
It isn't intended to be fair. It is intended to validate the fleecing of the investors and the personal opinion of IconicExpert that, as usual, is willfully unaware that he's performing his crypto harakiri.
I once thought this guy was intelligent... boy was I wrong on that count...
Who runs Coinblab? IE?
I don't think so. But whoever does, is quick to fill his requests since this is to me knowledge the first ICO launched with ANN thread over there and not on BTCT, so it amounts to the same thing. Again to my knowledge, none of the people banned there has done anything other than very comprehensibly and understandably, protest what were obvious, outrageous violations of the statement made by the dev (IE) in it's ICO offer.
The vote is not a fair vote. There are plenty of people that have been banned from the site due to comments that have been labeled as trolling or fud. Some of those comments are neither yet we remain banned and unable to cast a vote.
It isn't intended to be fair. It is intended to validate the fleecing of the investors and the personal opinion of IconicExpert that, as usual, is willfully unaware that he's performing his crypto harakiri.
I once thought this guy was intelligent... boy was I wrong on that count...
Who runs Coinblab? IE?
Except for the fact that some people have said it, what evidence do you have that would indicate that they are the same person.
I'm definitely against lying scammers like IE, and I'm not a big fan of barbaras either, but as long as lies and rumors are spread around here without regard to the evidence, nobody will know who to believe.
(don't know, don't care if true), but IE nickname is definitely burned this time and with "supporter" of bytecent saying things aren't ok, that also gives him also the possibility to let the coin die right away... Then Barabbas by denouncing the other nickname, the owner might just want to save this one, so it can use it to promote or create other scam coins.
Keep that in mind if a Barabbas IPO coin comes out
(or if he wants to create another IPO to save bytecent investors)Sadly, there are just no limits to the cynicism of crypto these days - I was wondering how IE could possibly be satisfied with a "mere" 80BTC when he was gunning for 1500BTC. Should've guessed he was aiming for another way to get those BTC if the ICO launch didnt work out as planned. Would not be surprised if he had what you describe above as a backup of a backup of his original plan.
Crypto "noobs" are catching on to all these whale games - it's why so many have left the altcoin markets.
hes trying to prevent biitrex from offering a refund by having a relaunch
The vote is not a fair vote. There are plenty of people that have been banned from the site due to comments that have been labeled as trolling or fud. Some of those comments are neither yet we remain banned and unable to cast a vote.
It isn't intended to be fair. It is intended to validate the fleecing of the investors and the personal opinion of IconicExpert that, as usual, is willfully unaware that he's performing his crypto harakiri.
I once thought this guy was intelligent... boy was I wrong on that count...
The vote is not a fair vote. There are plenty of people that have been banned from the site due to comments that have been labeled as trolling or fud. Some of those comments are neither yet we remain banned and unable to cast a vote.
Clean this shit and do what you KNOW perfectly well is to do the right thing, or this project is DOA. Enough jerking off already.
Soon it's time for the money shot!
Another TERRIBLE mistake IE. And so predictable too: A vote? a vote, in order to be even remotely close to fair, would require that ONLY those community members who INVESTED in the ICO, voted. What are going to vote the captcha-fillers that haven't invested a rted cent in the project and now have several hundreds FREE coins, to relaunch? To issue a refund?
This is you, IconicExpert, pretending to validate your opinion with a vote that will be responded to, mainly, by people that have no investment whatsoever in the project... and that will dump their captcha-filled coins as soon as the market opens regardless of the price. It's a ridiculous charade, one more.
On a separate note, whose are those 2 wallets with 346 and 292 addresses respectively?
Clean this shit and do what you KNOW perfectly well is to do the right thing, or this project is DOA. Enough jerking off already.
And more lies IE: I just checked it and on average it mines 13 coins per minute, 30% MORE than what you just posted it is mining. This at 2:37 PM, Pacific
This is you, IconicExpert, pretending to validate your opinion with a vote that will be responded to, mainly, by people that have no investment whatsoever in the project... and that will dump their captcha-filled coins as soon as the market opens regardless of the price. It's a ridiculous charade, one more.
On a separate note, whose are those 2 wallets with 346 and 292 addresses respectively?
Clean this shit and do what you KNOW perfectly well is to do the right thing, or this project is DOA. Enough jerking off already.
And more lies IE: I just checked it and on average it mines 13 coins per minute, 30% MORE than what you just posted it is mining. This at 2:37 PM, Pacific
Jump to: