Pages:
Author

Topic: The continuing decline of China's economy - what are the implications ? - page 3. (Read 854 times)

hero member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 891
Leading Crypto Sports Betting and Casino Platform
As we know and observe - in recent years, China's economy has not only experienced “difficult times” but has also gone from growth to decline. The reasons are many - from COVID19, which hit the economy hard, to the changing relationship with the West, resulting in the loss of markets, investment, access to technology and other things that China is heavily dependent on.
Destabilization in China is guaranteed to create a lot of economic difficulties in neighboring countries, as well as on the geopolitical map of the world, where everything is not good.

What happens next ?  I will assume this scenario:

1. Increased withdrawal of Western investment and Western industries from China (related primarily to political conjuncture)
(We are roughly here now)
2. Attempts of the Chinese government to “spare no expense” to keep the economy afloat, which will lead to the burnout of strategic reserves, and will allow to “come to the edge of the abyss”, where without huge Western infusions of money into the Chinese economy the problem will not be solved.
3. strict administrative measures and transfer of the economy under the control of the state, with the curtailment of economic freedoms, which will negatively affect both the efficiency and quality of the economy.

The question is what's next? Realization and acceptance of the problem and correction of mistakes, ceasing to pretend to be the “second pole of the world”, establishment of relations with the West, refusal from dubious “friends”, reintegration into the world economy ? Or ? There may be a path of totalitarianism and isolation, militarization of politics to distract the population from pressing problems and getting the right to total control over people and management of private business ...

Question - what options for the development of events can you assume in connection with this situation?


One consequence of a dying economy, and this has happened in the past with other state-nations as well, is the pursuit of other territories to exploit their natural resources and manpower for themselves, we're seeing this happen with China as they try to exert what little force they have against smaller countries like the Philippines, with the dispute between the West Philippine Sea as well as other oil reservoirs within the area being a large focal point of this issue, they also are trying to exert their force against countries which they don't even have business trying to invade in at the very least, like Indonesia and Malaysia for example.

So yeah, they're desperately trying to annex territories, but as long as efforts are being made to stave them off, they'll continue to bleed money and lose traction until they finally give out, by then, either a whimpering death or a massive nuclear war would commence, and we can only guess as to what would happen next.
hero member
Activity: 3150
Merit: 937
Quote
1. Increased withdrawal of Western investment and Western industries from China (related primarily to political conjuncture)
(We are roughly here now)
2. Attempts of the Chinese government to “spare no expense” to keep the economy afloat, which will lead to the burnout of strategic reserves, and will allow to “come to the edge of the abyss”, where without huge Western infusions of money into the Chinese economy the problem will not be solved.
3. strict administrative measures and transfer of the economy under the control of the state, with the curtailment of economic freedoms, which will negatively affect both the efficiency and quality of the economy.

I wouldn't call a 5.2 percent annual GDP growth(2023) a "decline". The level of 5-10% annual GDP growth might become a thing from the past for China, but the Chinese economy will keep growing with levels below 5% per year. The main reason is there is still lots of room for growth. China has over 1 billion people, that are living with a relatively low salaries. The Chinese economy will become less and less dependent on export and more focused on growing the domestic consumption. The housing bubble and big provincial debts are major problems, but they can be solved. I agree that the Communist Party is heading towards increased government control and less freedom for the business. This is a huge mistake, which might lead to a future decline.
hero member
Activity: 3080
Merit: 603
If there was no court order for Evergrande to be liquidated, they won't do it and will do the same thing as what US does and that's to hide that they are having a declining economy. OP has the right assumption of what's next. IIRC, China has acquired a lot of shares from the US and UK during the pandemic period. They've invested heavily on those stocks as they think it was the right time to do it. It won't be surprising if they start to dump all of those stocks and shares to pump their economy while obviously going to have that declining moment for the said two giants.
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 16
Looking for guilt best look first into a mirror

Everyone is entitled to their own view of a process.
But I have to correct your opinion a bit: at the initial stage, China guaranteed compliance with laws, rights of Western parent companies and investors' requirements, this fact is easy to check. The first “bells” started ringing after the “nationalization” of several high-tech companies. A “good” example would be the story of Cisco and Huawei. Cisco invested billions of dollars in the development of production in China - these are built factories, technologies, jobs. At a certain point, China, under cover of legislation, essentially took away these production facilities and transferred them to Huawei, which is under state control.

I agree on the entitlement of opinion, each it's own.

That you cannot trust a communist is not that new.
Those tricks are not new either. There have even been warnings. Greed is what made Manager close their eyes and open their pockets.
Managers are paid for performance they are hardly ever punished.

What do you believe is just not mentioned, the grey zone, where CEO got told and said nothing, just to save face.  

Do you know anyone who was punished for selling out from the cisco debacle?

 
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864

It's not greed, it's pragmatism - everyone is trying to reduce the cost of goods and services.
I beg to differ. Managers are not owners of a company, they benefit from the short term economical data.

An owner would not give up his development so readily to a country where you have little property protection, intellectual property that is.
The Western Manager Elite Sold out their economies, or made best use of elderly factory designs.

It's hard to believe that they did not know how China is protecting its own. 

Everyone is entitled to their own view of a process.
But I have to correct your opinion a bit: at the initial stage, China guaranteed compliance with laws, rights of Western parent companies and investors' requirements, this fact is easy to check. The first “bells” started ringing after the “nationalization” of several high-tech companies. A “good” example would be the story of Cisco and Huawei. Cisco invested billions of dollars in the development of production in China - these are built factories, technologies, jobs. At a certain point, China, under cover of legislation, essentially took away these production facilities and transferred them to Huawei, which is under state control. I assume that the Chinese leadership realized perfectly well that telecommunications in the 21st century is one of the pillars of the digital economy, and decided to “gently” expropriate other people's assets. This was, in fact, China's first step to violate its commitments and the first example of breach of contract.

If we go back to Western companies, the main driver of the process of transferring production to China was tax optimization, which is also a normal and common process. This is what many people do. Now the U.S. is returning high-tech production to its territory, because it has become logical - China is violating treaties and agreed rules of the game, plus it is imposing restrictions on technology supplies to China, plus it is good for the U.S. economy - jobs and taxes
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 16
Looking for guilt best look first into a mirror

It's not greed, it's pragmatism - everyone is trying to reduce the cost of goods and services.
I beg to differ. Managers are not owners of a company, they benefit from the short term economical data.

An owner would not give up his development so readily to a country where you have little property protection, intellectual property that is.
The Western Manager Elite Sold out their economies, or made best use of elderly factory designs.

It's hard to believe that they did not know how China is protecting its own. 
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
The West made a big mistake when they outsourced their production to China. Now the whole world depends on China. If China does well it is a problem because that means China will be the biggest economy. If China does poorly then it means the rest of the world will suffer from their problems.

Greed is a good motivator.
It turned out better for the World economy, trading chinese goods make up a huge part in the world's overall economy.

It's not greed, it's pragmatism - everyone is trying to reduce the cost of goods and services. And one of the ways is to move production to countries with lower taxes or tax exemptions and/or to countries where the necessary personnel is available, but the level of wages in the country is noticeably lower.
Otherwise we will have to consider any of our steps to find the same product or service at a lower price as greed and avarice, although, in fact, this is an absolutely normal process Smiley

And there is always a way out - the world is not homogeneous and there are countries that can offer the same conditions that China was able to offer to Western companies and investors almost 40 years ago. I recommend you to pay attention to India, as a global substitute for China, as well as countries like Vietnam - which choose the Western vector and integration with the world economy.

Another question is what will happen to China's economy, which will lose its market and solvent population? Yes, China is now colonizing the African continent, but let's be honest - there is no large layer of consumers with European or American incomes, which means they can not buy high quality goods with high added value. And this means that China's production will again shift to the production of cheap, low quality goods, and as a consequence the economy's income will shrink dramatically... I'm sure you understand how economics works, and you understand where this is going.
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 16
Looking for guilt best look first into a mirror
The West made a big mistake when they outsourced their production to China. Now the whole world depends on China. If China does well it is a problem because that means China will be the biggest economy. If China does poorly then it means the rest of the world will suffer from their problems.

Greed is a good motivator.
It turned out better for the World economy, trading chinese goods make up a huge part in the world's overall economy.
hero member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 787
Jack of all trades 💯
The West made a big mistake when they outsourced their production to China. Now the whole world depends on China. If China does well it is a problem because that means China will be the biggest economy. If China does poorly then it means the rest of the world will suffer from their problems.

You know what that means do you?

It means China is running the show now. Not the US.

Labor cost in China is so cheap and they have lots of people who can work in manufacturing firm that's why the west pass the production on big manufacturing firms in that country. Its just to bad that for continuous doing those decisions they didn't notice that everyone will get affected if there's economic problems will happen to China. But since India and other asian countries became good destination to other manufacturing firms then I think the world could able to cope up with those losses they made if China will totally collapsed since they have other alternative countries where they can insert those businesses and make everything goes alive again.

For now this is the one makes China became more stronger but there are lots of rumors that this country is struggling. Although we can't verify the real situation since Chinese government is so evasive when discussing about the real situation happened in their country.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
The West made a big mistake when they outsourced their production to China. Now the whole world depends on China. If China does well it is a problem because that means China will be the biggest economy. If China does poorly then it means the rest of the world will suffer from their problems.

You know what that means do you?

It means China is running the show now. Not the US.

Unfortunately the west is inherently wrong, because they treat all others as adequate and honest partners. China is not the only example. But, uh. the West is working on mistakes, and doing “corrective work”. China has become a “global factory”, but it is still dependent on Western technology, money, markets. Now the West has started a systematic process of migration of production to neighboring countries (India looks like a potential leader here), the West is withdrawing investments, the West is restricting access to technology and science. And as you can see, even at the initial stage, the Chinese government is already starting to beg for “good relations”, because they live not by propaganda but by reality, and they understand perfectly well what this threatens China.

The only question is whether China will be smart enough and honorable enough to admit its mistakes and return to the civilized world, or it will become another rogue/aggressor country.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
The West made a big mistake when they outsourced their production to China. Now the whole world depends on China. If China does well it is a problem because that means China will be the biggest economy. If China does poorly then it means the rest of the world will suffer from their problems.

You know what that means do you?

It means China is running the show now. Not the US.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
If the Chinese economy falls apart, the next thing that would fall apart is the Western economy specially the US economy that heavily depends on both importing hundreds of billions of dollars of goods from China and also heavily depends on Chinese work force since lots of their production takes place in China.

In order to limit the discussion of delusional theories, please, to youbpooya87 , bring here the following, ARGUMENTED, and verifiable data:
1. the balance of import exports between the US-China (this will show whose economy is more dependent on whom)
2. indicate the balance of investment of the countries in each other
3. show where China will be able to supply its goods if it loses the western market, while maintaining high added value of goods (hint - the wallets of US consumers are much thicker than those of African consumers, for example).

and we will come back to reality and see if your fantasy has a place in reality Smiley

legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1402
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
China was en route to become the #1 economy, surpassing the USA. Thankfully, that didn't happen and is now unlikely to happen. Honestly, I think the West is not being harsh enough with China, considering how China is behaving. The human rights situation there is terrible, especially when it comes to Uyghurs. Moreover, China is increasingly helping Russia out both softening the impact of Western sanctions and providing support for Russia's war against Ukraine. Considering that, unfortunately I believe that China is looking for further polarization and team-up of the world's worst countries that will help each other out and try to challenge the West.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
I read news of China's housing problems and other economic problems but when I look at the economic indicators, it doesn't look that bad. When I look at the indicators I see that it's exaggerated just as the economic problems of the US are exaggerated too. Don't get me wrong, I know there is a problem when you look at the monetary system you know it's a matter of time before something bad happens, but it's always reported as if the countries are crumbling.

Speaking of China, when you look at their GDP over the years you'll see that there is an increase. 2020 saw the lowest growth rate of 2% due to Covid obviously, but 2021 saw an 8% increase and it has been increasing ever since. In 2023 their GDP had a 5% increase. Now, all these considered, these are not bad numbers.
The same can be said about the inflation rate in China. The inflation rate is currently at 2% which is not that bad.
Per Capital income too has been growing (slowly) over the years and if the inflation rate is not too high and per capita income is growing that means people have more purchasing power.
The unemployment rate is at 5.2% as of July. It increased by 0.2% from the beginning of the year.
The Chinese Yuan is also relatively stable. After gaining on the dollar in 2023 to 6.78CHY it dropped to 7.20CHY this year and has maintained that range for a while now.

So yeah, I agree that all may not be well with the economy, but so is the rest of the world, but all things considered, I think they're doing okay.


The problem is that, like any totalitarian or semi-totalitarian state (government), China publishes only “correct” statistics, which will “shout” that ALL IS GOOD. Therefore, relying on China's official data is not a good way to really assess the situation. At the same time, there are a lot of secondary indicators that speak about systemic problems of the economy. 
Many people, for example, without understanding the situation and the role of China in the world economy, mistakenly consider it one of the foundations of the modern world economy. On the surface, it may look like this. But in reality, China's economy is dependent on the West, for example, consumer markets, technology, investment, and much more. As we all know by now, the Chinese government's attempt to impose its desires on the West has ended with investors leaving China at a rapid rate, production leaving, foreign exchange earnings shrinking, jobs shrinking, and access to scientific data and high quality Western education shrinking. Yes, I agree, the SIGNIFICANT negative manifestations in China's economy will not appear tomorrow, it is a matter of 3-5 years. But ... the process has already started, Xi Jinping-on has started, and he as the initiator of this problem, while he does not make steps to solve it, he only complicates the situation. Complicates the situation for China. China's unjustifiably inflated self-assessment of its influence on the world economy has played a bad trick on it ...
legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'
As we know and observe - in recent years, China's economy has not only experienced “difficult times” but has also gone from growth to decline. The reasons are many - from COVID19, which hit the economy hard, to the changing relationship with the West, resulting in the loss of markets, investment, access to technology and other things that China is heavily dependent on.
Destabilization in China is guaranteed to create a lot of economic difficulties in neighboring countries, as well as on the geopolitical map of the world, where everything is not good.

What happens next ?  I will assume this scenario:

1. Increased withdrawal of Western investment and Western industries from China (related primarily to political conjuncture)
(We are roughly here now)
2. Attempts of the Chinese government to “spare no expense” to keep the economy afloat, which will lead to the burnout of strategic reserves, and will allow to “come to the edge of the abyss”, where without huge Western infusions of money into the Chinese economy the problem will not be solved.
3. strict administrative measures and transfer of the economy under the control of the state, with the curtailment of economic freedoms, which will negatively affect both the efficiency and quality of the economy.

The question is what's next? Realization and acceptance of the problem and correction of mistakes, ceasing to pretend to be the “second pole of the world”, establishment of relations with the West, refusal from dubious “friends”, reintegration into the world economy ? Or ? There may be a path of totalitarianism and isolation, militarization of politics to distract the population from pressing problems and getting the right to total control over people and management of private business ...

Question - what options for the development of events can you assume in connection with this situation?

This is the inevitable outcome of Xi Jinping's way of doing politics. Before he cemented himself into power China was actually opening up and looking much more successful, they embraced the capitalist model albeit with restrictions. Since he has gained power though, lots of prior freedoms have evaporated and he is doing the usual authoritarian warmongering strategy of picking on Taiwan, closing up the economy in the process. He is trying to look strong by being confrontational and controlling, but in reality it scares off outside investment. Sure he is nurturing home grown talent, trying to do things like increasing car manufacturing exports, but this will be meant with claims of subsidization, abuse and blocking in the most profitable markets - because ultimately the CCP owns every company, it's a valid complaint.


his threats against Taiwan certainly caused the USA to build chip plants in the USA
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/08/tech/tsmc-arizona-chip-factory-investment/index.html
Biden to give Taiwan’s TSMC $6.6 billion to ramp up US chip production

intel and texas instruments to also build in the usa

from tom's hardware U.S. Semiconductor Renaissance: All the Upcoming Fabs
from Reuters:


Intel's $20 bln Ohio factory could become world's largest chip plant.


all because a moron in China seized power and broke the 8 year serve as leader tradition after which he threatened Taiwan.

So he single handedly fucked his whole country.
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
Quote
China's growth of 5.2% in 2023 exceeded the previous year's 3.0% but is still considered lagging by historical standards(9%)
even a "decline" is still 3-5% growth
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 16
Looking for guilt best look first into a mirror
1. Increased withdrawal of Western investment and Western industries from China (related primarily to political conjuncture)

I see that as a direct indication for war preparation.
It is kind of an insurance for the relation USA -China.
legendary
Activity: 3304
Merit: 1617
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
If China's economy continues to decline global implications could be significant. It could lead to reduced demand for imports which would really affect trade partners & global supply chains. A slowdown could also impact commodity prices because China is a major consumer. Increased unemployment & social unrest within China might arise potentially leading to political instability. Financial markets could react negatively which would result in decreased investor confidence. A declining Chinese economy could disrupt global economic growth, shift geopolitical dynamics & necessitate adaptations in international trade relationships.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1165
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
This type of thing happens to every nation, it is not really specific to China so there is nothing to worry about, it is not unexpected. If people assume that every nation could just grow without a limit and keep on growing forever then they have never studied history before, whereas in reality we are talking about something much more realistic because every nation drops.

They just need to make sure that they are not working for others, but working for themselves and push that more. They built their own car, their own phones, their own social media, basically everything of their own, and they just need to keep that going as much as possible. If they can continue to do that then they will not have any issues, because they will make much more money from that.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1192
As we know and observe - in recent years, China's economy has not only experienced “difficult times” but has also gone from growth to decline. The reasons are many - from COVID19, which hit the economy hard, to the changing relationship with the West, resulting in the loss of markets, investment, access to technology and other things that China is heavily dependent on.
Destabilization in China is guaranteed to create a lot of economic difficulties in neighboring countries, as well as on the geopolitical map of the world, where everything is not good.

What happens next ?  I will assume this scenario:

1. Increased withdrawal of Western investment and Western industries from China (related primarily to political conjuncture)
(We are roughly here now)
2. Attempts of the Chinese government to “spare no expense” to keep the economy afloat, which will lead to the burnout of strategic reserves, and will allow to “come to the edge of the abyss”, where without huge Western infusions of money into the Chinese economy the problem will not be solved.
3. strict administrative measures and transfer of the economy under the control of the state, with the curtailment of economic freedoms, which will negatively affect both the efficiency and quality of the economy.

The question is what's next? Realization and acceptance of the problem and correction of mistakes, ceasing to pretend to be the “second pole of the world”, establishment of relations with the West, refusal from dubious “friends”, reintegration into the world economy ? Or ? There may be a path of totalitarianism and isolation, militarization of politics to distract the population from pressing problems and getting the right to total control over people and management of private business ...

Question - what options for the development of events can you assume in connection with this situation?

This is the inevitable outcome of Xi Jinping's way of doing politics. Before he cemented himself into power China was actually opening up and looking much more successful, they embraced the capitalist model albeit with restrictions. Since he has gained power though, lots of prior freedoms have evaporated and he is doing the usual authoritarian warmongering strategy of picking on Taiwan, closing up the economy in the process. He is trying to look strong by being confrontational and controlling, but in reality it scares off outside investment. Sure he is nurturing home grown talent, trying to do things like increasing car manufacturing exports, but this will be meant with claims of subsidization, abuse and blocking in the most profitable markets - because ultimately the CCP owns every company, it's a valid complaint.
Pages:
Jump to: