Meh, let Zarathustra believe. He may even be right that tribal "natural" societies had no capital growth, and capitalism was a recent invention. He may even be right in saying that capitalism is a product of human collectivization,...
Congratulations! Finally you realize it, while other collectivists here still believe in division of laber to be something non-collectivist, anarchistic, by telling aristocratic fairytales.
... if by "collectivization" he simply means "humans willing to work and trade together." But so what?
Humans are
not willing to work and trade together. Humans are self-sufficient,
Citizens are not self-sufficient and are therefore
forced to work and trade with aliens and enemies. But a
Citizen is not a human; it is a cartoon of a human.
Things are a hell out a lot better now than they were when we were all stuck in forests. And there is no harm, or effect, of beliefs like his.
That's an anthropocentric, criminal, socialist-capitalist-collectivist world view, that the great extinction is
a lot better than an anarchist, sustainable, non-collectivist life beyond collectivism (business).
That shows how crazy, morderous and suicidal the capitalist religion in fact is.