Topic: The Ethereum Paradox - page 20. (Read 99876 times)
ETH is dead forever permanently. Don't buy now
Still that ETH teenage developer just schooled the entire DarkFlarb developing team "website designers/gambling sites/#waiting for my GUI".
If smooth wasn't in the discussion, then your statement is vacuous.
You forgot to quote when I said you talk too much about solving all these coins issues for two years now "probably more" yet we didn't find anything except a thread of what name should I name my awesome coin lol, you seem like a crazy person with very big ego issues.
P.S. Did Monero ever hired you for the 80K USD you asked for before? I remember seeing it here somewhere in this forum that you would work to help Monero development team if they can afford hiring you and you asked for 80k USD. Seeing how you are spamming this thread in their favor makes me thing you got paid to do a different role LOL.
Logic fail. What does my choice of priorities[1] have to do with Ethereum's flaws
Btw, who the fuck are you? What is your LinkedIn? Mine is:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/shelby-moore-iii-b31488b0
[1] One of which was for at least 4 years (actually an issue since 2006) an insoluble problem with my health that I been working on every day and waiting for the right combination of experiments to restore to my normal self.
Still that ETH teenage developer just schooled the entire DarkFlarb developing team "website designers/gambling sites/#waiting for my GUI".
If smooth wasn't in the discussion, then your statement is vacuous.
You forgot to quote when I said you talk too much about solving all these coins issues for two years now "probably more" yet we didn't find anything except a thread of what name should I name my awesome coin lol, you seem like a crazy person with very big ego issues.
P.S. Did Monero ever hired you for the 80K USD you asked for before? I remember seeing it here somewhere in this forum that you would work to help Monero development team if they can afford hiring you and you asked for 80k USD. Seeing how you are spamming this thread in their favor makes me thing you got paid to do a different role LOL.
Still that ETH teenage developer just schooled the entire Monero developing team "website designers/gambling sites/#waiting for my GUI". While you guys including TPTB_need_war who is also dreaming about creating he's coin that should as he indicates for like two years now that will solve every other coins problem yea big "LOL" crying so much in a bitcoin forum that filled with shills like you/ haters like you/ & just pure jealousy of people success. It is as if you wish that everyone who invested in any coin that you don't support is to just lose it ALL so your dirty souls can smile once in their life for once.
No wonder you guys are barely mentioned in a crytpo dedicated website because you are full of hot air.
No wonder you guys are barely mentioned in a crytpo dedicated website because you are full of hot air.
It's more like Eth, with the help of banker market manipulation, is attempting to hijack cryptocurrency with some non-functioning coin with no fundamentals. They literally pumped a turd to a billion dollars. It's detrimental for anyone who operates in this space to have that thing floating around up there.
Anyone who buys into this thing now is just shoveling money at people like Lloyd Blankfein. The coin has no way to be economically viable and they're trying to pawn it off on people for lol insane prices. The whole thing is just horrifying. It would be a lot better for the bankers to get left holding the bag on this fugazi than seeing them pawn it off on others for profit when the coin just doesn't have any way to work.
Finding a use case for an unpartitioned Eth with huge fees will be quite a monumental task, likely coming up with nothing.
Still that ETH teenage developer just schooled the entire DarkFlarb developing team "website designers/gambling sites/#waiting for my GUI".
If smooth wasn't in the discussion, then your statement is vacuous.
Still that ETH teenage developer just schooled the entire Monero developing team "website designers/gambling sites/#waiting for my GUI". While you guys including TPTB_need_war who is also dreaming about creating he's coin that should as he indicates for like two years now that will solve every other coins problem yea big "LOL" crying so much in a bitcoin forum that filled with shills like you/ haters like you/ & just pure jealousy of people success. It is as if you wish that everyone who invested in any coin that you don't support is to just lose it ALL so your dirty souls can smile once in their life for once.
No wonder you guys are barely mentioned in a crytpo dedicated website because you are full of hot air.
No wonder you guys are barely mentioned in a crytpo dedicated website because you are full of hot air.
Strange that partitioning is listed as scaling option #2 now and scaling option #1 is the exact same thing as Bitcoin ....
Quote from: butalik
Solution path 1: lightning networks /
state channels
(eg. Raiden)
●
Solution path 2:
sharding
(Ethereum 2.0)
state channels
(eg. Raiden)
●
Solution path 2:
sharding
(Ethereum 2.0)
And LN won't work without scaling because it has a huge periodic garbage collection spikes in block size headroom. So it is back to an insoluble problem for both Satoshi's design and Ethereum,
Strange that partitioning is listed as scaling option #2 now and scaling option #1 is the exact same thing as Bitcoin ....
Quote from: butalik
Solution path 1: lightning networks /
state channels
(eg. Raiden)
●
Solution path 2:
sharding
(Athereum 2.0)
state channels
(eg. Raiden)
●
Solution path 2:
sharding
(Athereum 2.0)
Ethereum.... Bitcoin....
April fools
April fools
ftfy (a little Unicode magic)
Athereum.... uᴉoɔʇᴉq....
April fools
"The slide show opens appropriately with an image of risk takers who are foolish enough to waste their finite time here on earth and risk walking on the side of a cliff ostensibly for an adrenalin fix and to claim it as some useless accomplishment (see the person down below without a handrail holding onto to a shrub)"
LMAO, hahahahahaha
April fools
"The slide show opens appropriately with an image of risk takers who are foolish enough to waste their finite time here on earth and risk walking on the side of a cliff ostensibly for an adrenalin fix and to claim it as some useless accomplishment (see the person down below without a handrail holding onto to a shrub)"
LMAO, hahahahahaha
Has any noticed this forum has a virus and is rendering Éthereum as Athereum?
The slide show opens appropriately with an image of risk takers who are foolish enough to waste their finite time here on earth and risk walking on the side of a cliff ostensibly for an adrenalin fix and to claim it as some useless accomplishment (see the person down below without a handrail holding onto to a shrub):
Vitalik didn't I presume tell the attendees that we already explained in the Athereum Paradox thread why most of the Dapps he listed won't work properly. Smooth and I butchered the AlarmClock for example.
The slide show opens appropriately with an image of risk takers who are foolish enough to waste their finite time here on earth and risk walking on the side of a cliff ostensibly for an adrenalin fix and to claim it as some useless accomplishment (see the person down below without a handrail holding onto to a shrub):
Vitalik didn't I presume tell the attendees that we already explained in the Athereum Paradox thread why most of the Dapps he listed won't work properly. Smooth and I butchered the AlarmClock for example.
TPTB needs publicity, not VB
Illogical. I need publicity within the crypto currency arena, like I need a hole in my head (and I already have one of those). The only way my project will succeed is by NOT mentioning there is any plan B to involve a crypto currency to the initial target audience. My project is not primarily about crypto currency. Rather it is about trying to make a unicorn startup in the social networking realm.
You need early adopters, (VB already has his), that was my point. I think your strategy to keep the crypto element on a 'need to know' basis is wise, Jo Six-pack doesn't care how his sausage is made, he just wants flavor
The deleted reply was moved to my project's thread.
Since your and other posts in this thread accusing me of preying on Vitalik's fame require my response. If the mod is not going to delete every such accusation in this thread, then I have the right to respond to the accusation. I have moved that response to my project's thread so as to not clutter this thread.
Consider re-calibrating your responses, my original post (below) was actually complimentary towards you, i.e. VB is smart to avoid debating you as you might be able to show him up, coz you have skills, and you're criticisms aren't easily dismissed.
VB is smart to avoid TPTB, he doesn't need to prove anything to users on this forum, or other crypto forums. His target market isn't reading forums, but TPTB has a right to challenge him all the same. One day I think he will respond when it suits him. TPTB needs publicity, not VB
The rest was neutral and merely states the facts. Ethereum has launched and has acquired early adopters, and his target market is not using this forum, whereas you still appear to be recruiting supporters (is that not the case?). A case of friendly fire.
My reply was not only targeted towards you but also to those who constantly attack my technological statements by attacking my motives instead of attacking the logic of the statements. It changes the topic from the technology issues of the CCs I am analyzing to an analysis of myself and my plans.
One of your points was asserting or positing that I need to win support from this forum, which I want to refute. My early adopters will not come from this forum. Even if I had no reputation and no presence on this forum, my plan would proceed outside this forum.
The main purpose of this forum for me has been to learn about the technology and what to not do for a CC project. And also it provided the contacts for the minimal angel funding that sustained me while I completed my learning process, worked on my health, and is sustaining my initial development work until I can get the project crowdfunded (not selling tokens).
I don't need P&D speculators in my coin. The long-term HODLers will be welcome if they can find a way to obtain tokens. I am not going out of my way to help them do so, other than needing to provide a decentralized exchange so that users can cash out their tokens for fiat if they want to. I will not do anything to get tokens listed on centralized exchanges. And I am not making any promotion or promises to investors. Nor am I am offering any tokens to investors. I can't control what other people do with their for-use designed tokens. So you could I guess argue that my reputation here will determine if some speculators go try to obtain the tokens in the free market, but I can argue that there will be many more investors finding out about my project from outside this forum due to the planned crowdfund and later Seedr fund raising for the shares of the software startup I am proposing to launch. We will just have to see if I get any success in my project. Again my greatest challenge is my health. If rangedriver is correct and I am cured from taking Oregano oil, then I can code a lot more myself, and not need to rely so heavily on another developer, although I will still try to add another developer or two, hopefully who are as talented or more so than myself. We will just have to see what transpires. I can't predict.
TPTB needs publicity, not VB
Illogical. I need publicity within the crypto currency arena, like I need a hole in my head (and I already have one of those). The only way my project will succeed is by NOT mentioning there is any plan B to involve a crypto currency to the initial target audience. My project is not primarily about crypto currency. Rather it is about trying to make a unicorn startup in the social networking realm.
You need early adopters, (VB already has his), that was my point. I think your strategy to keep the crypto element on a 'need to know' basis is wise, Jo Six-pack doesn't care how his sausage is made, he just wants flavor
The deleted reply was moved to my project's thread.
Since your and other posts in this thread accusing me of preying on Vitalik's fame require my response. If the mod is not going to delete every such accusation in this thread, then I have the right to respond to the accusation. I have moved that response to my project's thread so as to not clutter this thread.
Consider re-calibrating your responses, my original post (below) was actually complimentary towards you, i.e. VB is smart to avoid debating you as you might be able to show him up, coz you have skills, and you're criticisms aren't easily dismissed.
VB is smart to avoid TPTB, he doesn't need to prove anything to users on this forum, or other crypto forums. His target market isn't reading forums, but TPTB has a right to challenge him all the same. One day I think he will respond when it suits him. TPTB needs publicity, not VB
The rest was neutral and merely states the facts. Ethereum has launched and has acquired early adopters, and his target market is not using this forum, whereas you still appear to be recruiting supporters (is that not the case?). A case of friendly fire. In no way did I accuse you of 'preying on Vitalik's fame'
Sometimes there can be more than one elephant in the room you know 
It wouldn't require 5 minutes from me to articulate the basic tl;dr point of her conclusion, before going off to justify it.
Don't people understand that our time is finite and we can't expend the entire day listening to 5 minute videos just to know the conclusion being proved. For if we already agree with the conclusion, then no need to listen past the 30 second introduction if it concisely stated.
I just thought it was a fun watch while I enjoyed my coffee break...
Sometimes there can be more than one elephant in the room you know
It wouldn't require 5 minutes from me to articulate the basic tl;dr point of her conclusion, before going off to justify it.
Don't people understand that our time is finite and we can't expend the entire day listening to 5 minute videos just to know the conclusion being proved. For if we already agree with the conclusion, then no need to listen past the 30 second introduction if it concisely stated.
Many of her videos are questionable but this last one was spot on with ethereum -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_90Y8mw_HVY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_90Y8mw_HVY
Yeah agreed, some are a bit off the mark...that one was not
She cut her bangs to look like Spock (Leonard Nimoy) from Star Trek, to make you nb00bs lose your ability to pay attention to the nonsense she is speaking.
I already explained upthread why decentralized consensus can not be a Nash equilibrium if relying on a centralized data point (i.e. the feed of video count plays).
Erm....what video did you watch? The one I saw was pointing out just how cumbersome and potentially useless smart contracts are in the real world.....
The point of it being "Nash fulfilling" was not the topic of the video
I didn't listen past the 2 minute point, because her initial proposal for a smart contract wouldn't meet Nash equilibrium. I just wasted my time listing to the remaining 3 minutes. She not realizing that or at least not pointing that out, is an egregious omission because it enables detractors to attempt assail her other reasons for not liking smart contracts.
Sometimes there can be more than one elephant in the room you know
Many of her videos are questionable but this last one was spot on with ethereum -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_90Y8mw_HVY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_90Y8mw_HVY
Yeah agreed, some are a bit off the mark...that one was not
She cut her bangs to look like Spock (Leonard Nimoy) from Star Trek, to make you nb00bs lose your ability to pay attention to the nonsense she is speaking.
I already explained upthread why decentralized consensus can not be a Nash equilibrium if relying on a centralized data point (i.e. the feed of video count plays).
Erm....what video did you watch? The one I saw was pointing out just how cumbersome and potentially useless smart contracts are in the real world.....
The point of it being "Nash fulfilling" was not the topic of the video
I didn't listen past the 2 minute point, because her initial proposal for a smart contract wouldn't meet Nash equilibrium. I just wasted my time listening to the remaining 3 minutes. She not realizing that or at least not pointing that out, is an egregious omission because it enables detractors to attempt assail her other reasons for not liking smart contracts.
Many of her videos are questionable but this last one was spot on with ethereum -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_90Y8mw_HVY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_90Y8mw_HVY
Yeah agreed, some are a bit off the mark...that one was not
She cut her bangs to look like Spock (Leonard Nimoy) from Star Trek, to make you nb00bs lose your ability to pay attention to the nonsense she is speaking.
I already explained upthread why decentralized consensus can not be a Nash equilibrium if relying on a centralized data point (i.e. the feed of video count plays).
Erm....what video did you watch? The one I saw was pointing out just how cumbersome and potentially useless smart contracts are in the real world.....
The point of it being "Nash fulfilling" was not the topic of the video
My favorite part about that girl's videos is how she enunciates words completely random similar to George Bush in this 8 second video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdG1Hczh2Zg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdG1Hczh2Zg
Jump to: