Cobra was just make-believe imo.
Topic: The Hurricane Sandy False Flag - page 3. (Read 8218 times)
Uh oh. I think someone saw an episode of the GI Joe cartoon from the 80s and mistook it for a documentary
Cobra was just make-believe imo.
Cobra was just make-believe imo.
So, you're saying that if the US government had a hurricane machine, other governments would pick a fight with them?
No, I'm saying that if the US government had a hurricane machine, other countries would know it, and if US used it against its own citizens, other countries would have huge front-page headlines about how awful the US government is, and huw much better Russia/China/Iran/France/Whatever is.
I am not saying their is or is not a weather machine. But, why would you think automatically other governments would know it?
So, you're saying that if the US government had a hurricane machine, other governments would pick a fight with them?
No, I'm saying that if the US government had a hurricane machine, other countries would know it, and if US used it against its own citizens, other countries would have huge front-page headlines about how awful the US government is, and huw much better Russia/China/Iran/France/Whatever is.
What I am saying is if you are going to take on speculation like this, you need hard tangible evidence or all you have is a good story.
The prediction is interesting, but not in itself proof. After all, how many people make predictions every day that never come true? Finding one that did is like finding a few dice that came up six after dumping a couple hundred on the table. But saying that it's just a weather forecast is equally fallacious.
I said it "could" be.
What I am saying is if you are going to take on speculation like this, you need hard tangible evidence or all you have is a good story.
The prediction is interesting, but not in itself proof. After all, how many people make predictions every day that never come true? Finding one that did is like finding a few dice that came up six after dumping a couple hundred on the table. But saying that it's just a weather forecast is equally fallacious.
This could be a long-range weather forecast as well.
Like this one?
http://www.tropicalstormrisk.com/docs/TSRATLForecastAug2012.pdf
Quote
TSR continues to predict the 2012 Atlantic hurricane season will see activity close to the long-term
(1950-2011) norm. TSR reduces its forecast for US landfalling hurricane activity to 10% below-
norm. The precision of TSR’s early August outlooks for Atlantic hurricane activity
for the past decade is good.
(1950-2011) norm. TSR reduces its forecast for US landfalling hurricane activity to 10% below-
norm. The precision of TSR’s early August outlooks for Atlantic hurricane activity
for the past decade is good.
There may be even more accurate forecasts that are not disclosed publicly. What we should not do is get off on some tangent like this with pretty flimsy evidence. I agree the timely is quite interesting but if that is all we have, might as well move on. Too many dead-ends. Instead we should be talking about real issues that we can actually do something about.
So, your defense against allegations of a cover-up is... a possible cover-up.
I agree though that this is hacking at the branches.
No defense. What I am saying is if you are going to take on speculation like this, you need hard tangible evidence or all you have is a good story. That is why investigations are essential and archiving information & evidence as soon as it happens is crucial to build a case.
This could be a long-range weather forecast as well.
Like this one?
http://www.tropicalstormrisk.com/docs/TSRATLForecastAug2012.pdf
Quote
TSR continues to predict the 2012 Atlantic hurricane season will see activity close to the long-term
(1950-2011) norm. TSR reduces its forecast for US landfalling hurricane activity to 10% below-
norm. The precision of TSR’s early August outlooks for Atlantic hurricane activity
for the past decade is good.
(1950-2011) norm. TSR reduces its forecast for US landfalling hurricane activity to 10% below-
norm. The precision of TSR’s early August outlooks for Atlantic hurricane activity
for the past decade is good.
There may be even more accurate forecasts that are not disclosed publicly. What we should not do is get off on some tangent like this with pretty flimsy evidence. I agree the timely is quite interesting but if that is all we have, might as well move on. Too many dead-ends. Instead we should be talking about real issues that we can actually do something about.
So, your defense against allegations of a cover-up is... a possible cover-up.
I agree though that this is hacking at the branches.
This could be a long-range weather forecast as well.
Like this one?
http://www.tropicalstormrisk.com/docs/TSRATLForecastAug2012.pdf
Quote
TSR continues to predict the 2012 Atlantic hurricane season will see activity close to the long-term
(1950-2011) norm. TSR reduces its forecast for US landfalling hurricane activity to 10% below-
norm. The precision of TSR’s early August outlooks for Atlantic hurricane activity
for the past decade is good.
(1950-2011) norm. TSR reduces its forecast for US landfalling hurricane activity to 10% below-
norm. The precision of TSR’s early August outlooks for Atlantic hurricane activity
for the past decade is good.
There may be even more accurate forecasts that are not disclosed publicly. What we should not do is get off on some tangent like this with pretty flimsy evidence. I agree the timely is quite interesting but if that is all we have, might as well move on. Too many dead-ends. Instead we should be talking about real issues that we can actually do something about.
This could be a long-range weather forecast as well.
Like this one?
http://www.tropicalstormrisk.com/docs/TSRATLForecastAug2012.pdf
Quote
TSR continues to predict the 2012 Atlantic hurricane season will see activity close to the long-term
(1950-2011) norm. TSR reduces its forecast for US landfalling hurricane activity to 10% below-
norm. The precision of TSR’s early August outlooks for Atlantic hurricane activity
for the past decade is good.
(1950-2011) norm. TSR reduces its forecast for US landfalling hurricane activity to 10% below-
norm. The precision of TSR’s early August outlooks for Atlantic hurricane activity
for the past decade is good.
Zero evidence except a story written on reddit.
...written a month before the hurricane.
This could be a long-range weather forecast as well.
Do you know of any models capable of predicting accurately a week in advance, much less a month? Too many unknown variables.
Zero evidence except a story written on reddit.
...written a month before the hurricane.
This could be a long-range weather forecast as well.
I wonder if this is what Tesla had in mind when he worked on this technology.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26YLehuMydo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26YLehuMydo
Zero evidence except a story written on reddit.
...written a month before the hurricane.
Zero evidence except a story written on reddit. Silly.
Yes climate engineering (geo-engineering) is real and maybe they have been weaponized.
Yes climate engineering (geo-engineering) is real and maybe they have been weaponized.
So, you're saying that if the US government had a hurricane machine, other governments would pick a fight with them?
Well, when you put it that way...
But seriously, how many Russian citizens are actually in danger from a hurricane?
So, you're saying that if the US government had a hurricane machine, other governments would pick a fight with them?
Please always keep in mind that the US government is not the only government in the entire world, that the US government has many enemies, and that those enemies have a lot of spies and espionage programs around US (including foreign satellites and monitoring outposts). If anything like what you are claiming were to be true, you would be sure to hear about it from other countries who would try to use it to demonize the US even more.
Show me proof that someone can create a storm out of nothing, then direct the path and strength of it, and maybe I'll believe you.
http://www.infowars.com/the-father-of-weaponized-weather/
Cloud seeding is not too difficult. That's been going on for over 40 years.
I was in the area of this 'experimental' storm:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=south%20dakota%20cloud%20seeded%20storm&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CC0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ias.sdsmt.edu%2FPublications%2FRapidCityFlood-ASDennis.pdf&ei=zeuaUOT6BZG60AGB_IC4Cw&usg=AFQjCNHgSpsx_of3adMZwaiGEu0Ocd4BbQ
We had to seek shelter while camping, it was pretty bad.
Did you actually read the paper you linked? It's interesting, I recommend you do.
Quote
11. A Sobering Conclusion
The history recounted above shows that some controversies over scientific matters are settled with scant regard for the facts. Despite the fact that no one ever came up with any serious, quantitative hypothesis linking cloud seeding to the abnormal easterly flow of moist air into the Black Hills on the evening of June 9, the possibility that cloud seeding caused or augmented the 1972 flood on Rapid Creek is well embedded in the minds of many lay persons.
The history recounted above shows that some controversies over scientific matters are settled with scant regard for the facts. Despite the fact that no one ever came up with any serious, quantitative hypothesis linking cloud seeding to the abnormal easterly flow of moist air into the Black Hills on the evening of June 9, the possibility that cloud seeding caused or augmented the 1972 flood on Rapid Creek is well embedded in the minds of many lay persons.
you've earned it.
http://www.thenation.com/article/170918/hurricane-sandy-greek-tragedy
Quote
Sandy is short for Cassandra, the Greek mythological figure who epitomizes tragedy. The gods gave Cassandra the gift of prophecy; depending on which version of the story one prefers, she could either see or smell the future. But with this gift also came a curse: Cassandra’s warnings about future disasters were fated to be ignored.
Jump to: