Topic: The Hurricane Sandy False Flag - page 4. (Read 8246 times)
11 million less people voted in this election than 2008
i don't see how the storm helped Obama
Agreed. It actually hurt him in that area.
Show me proof that someone can create a storm out of nothing, then direct the path and strength of it, and maybe I'll believe you.
http://www.infowars.com/the-father-of-weaponized-weather/
Cloud seeding is not too difficult. That's been going on for over 40 years.
I was in the area of this 'experimental' storm:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=south%20dakota%20cloud%20seeded%20storm&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CC0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ias.sdsmt.edu%2FPublications%2FRapidCityFlood-ASDennis.pdf&ei=zeuaUOT6BZG60AGB_IC4Cw&usg=AFQjCNHgSpsx_of3adMZwaiGEu0Ocd4BbQ
We had to seek shelter while camping, it was pretty bad.
Show me proof that someone can create a storm out of nothing, then direct the path and strength of it, and maybe I'll believe you.
http://www.infowars.com/the-father-of-weaponized-weather/
Cloud seeding is not too difficult. That's been going on for over 40 years.
http://www.infowars.com/hurricane-aerosol-and-microphysics-program-the-dhs-research-project-on-hurricane-modification/
But I think the prevailing state-of-the-art would probably involve using something like HAARP to create low-pressure zones by heating the ionosphere, and using this to steer the jetstream.
This article gives a decent overview:
http://endthelie.com/books-and-reading-material/haarp-exposed/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect
Show me proof that someone can create a storm out of nothing, then direct the path and strength of it, and maybe I'll believe you.
I'm just going to leave this here....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program
Yes, I know it's not "proof", but still...
Show me proof that someone can create a storm out of nothing, then direct the path and strength of it, and maybe I'll believe you.
i don't see how the storm helped Obama
http://www.prisonplanet.com/chris-matthews-hails-hurricane-sandy-for-aiding-obama-re-election.html
Quote
MSNBC host Chris Matthews sunk to a new low last night when he hailed Hurricane Sandy for helping Obama win re-election, crassly remarking, “I’m so glad we had that storm last week.”
I'll get this info to someone with 10K followers
I'm just going to leave this here....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program
As for what this has to do with Bitcoin, well, that's a bit complicated. But the short story is that all of this, all of the military Keynesianism, the un-budgeted black-ops projects, the wars and destruction, are all funded by fiat money-printing.
It's not about prosperity, or "economy". It's about centralization, and control. If blowing up your house, or flooding your town, increases centralization and control, they will do it. And afterwards, they will print money to rebuild. The GDP and economic "efficiency" will rise, and most of us will be worse off.
But there will be lots of jobs. And lots of people dependent upon government. And lots of voters.
And that's all they care about.
It's not about prosperity, or "economy". It's about centralization, and control. If blowing up your house, or flooding your town, increases centralization and control, they will do it. And afterwards, they will print money to rebuild. The GDP and economic "efficiency" will rise, and most of us will be worse off.
But there will be lots of jobs. And lots of people dependent upon government. And lots of voters.
And that's all they care about.
This was posted to Reddit almost a month ago. I quoted the pertinent part, but there's a link to the original and a screenshot in case it is taken down.
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1107zp/hear_say_about_the_east_coast/
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e49/benjamindees/reddit.png
So, I don't know about you guys, but I don't really believe that the US government now has the ability to predict massive flooding a month in advance. They can't even seem to get the weather right one day in advance most of the time. And disclosing this is apparently treason? Doesn't sound right to me.
Because, DHS head (and FEMA boss) Janet Napolitano doesn't seem too concerned. She seems focused on cyber-security:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/seanlawson/2012/11/01/dhs-secretary-napolitano-uses-hurricane-sandy-to-hype-cyber-threat/
And economists are actually claiming that the hurricane will be good for the economy. The Federal Reserve is gearing up to print more money:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49625920
Obama is being praised by everyone, Republicans even, for the speed of his response.
Think maybe he had a head start?
P.S.-
I just happened to stumble upon this YouTube comment while researching this:
Fort McPherson is apparently a FEMA site as well as military. Several months back, the rumor was that soldiers from Ft. McPherson had dressed as local police and blew up the house of a local "prepper" who raised chickens. This rumor was corroborated by an interview of the local police chief, shortly after the explosion, saying that his officers were not on the scene at the time, which conflicted with eyewitness reports.
Also relevant:
http://www.infowars.com/national-guard-whistleblower-doomsday-preppers-will-be-treated-as-terrorists/
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1107zp/hear_say_about_the_east_coast/
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e49/benjamindees/reddit.png
Quote from: one month before hurricane Sandy
her daughter and son-in-law were called into a private meeting on base regarding a probable evacuation scenario of the East Coast. (Son-in-law is in the Special Forces, apparently high up. I think the base was Ft. McPhearson in Georgia).
From what she said, the daughter and SIL where brought in and made to sign a non-disclosure agreement saying they would tell no one, under the penalty of treason, what they were told during the meeting. They were told that in 4-6 weeks (this was around 9/20) the East Coast would experience some type of disaster that would cause it to be under water.
From what she said, the daughter and SIL where brought in and made to sign a non-disclosure agreement saying they would tell no one, under the penalty of treason, what they were told during the meeting. They were told that in 4-6 weeks (this was around 9/20) the East Coast would experience some type of disaster that would cause it to be under water.
So, I don't know about you guys, but I don't really believe that the US government now has the ability to predict massive flooding a month in advance. They can't even seem to get the weather right one day in advance most of the time. And disclosing this is apparently treason? Doesn't sound right to me.
Because, DHS head (and FEMA boss) Janet Napolitano doesn't seem too concerned. She seems focused on cyber-security:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/seanlawson/2012/11/01/dhs-secretary-napolitano-uses-hurricane-sandy-to-hype-cyber-threat/
And economists are actually claiming that the hurricane will be good for the economy. The Federal Reserve is gearing up to print more money:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49625920
Obama is being praised by everyone, Republicans even, for the speed of his response.
Think maybe he had a head start?
P.S.-
I just happened to stumble upon this YouTube comment while researching this:
Fort McPherson is apparently a FEMA site as well as military. Several months back, the rumor was that soldiers from Ft. McPherson had dressed as local police and blew up the house of a local "prepper" who raised chickens. This rumor was corroborated by an interview of the local police chief, shortly after the explosion, saying that his officers were not on the scene at the time, which conflicted with eyewitness reports.
Also relevant:
http://www.infowars.com/national-guard-whistleblower-doomsday-preppers-will-be-treated-as-terrorists/
Jump to: