Topic: The Kracken! - page 8. (Read 31037 times)

At least the Democrats and Republicans are finally on the same page about somethin (ted cruz & co. loletter...I know)

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/huge-trump-drops-bomb-phone-call-tells-raffensperger-vote-scammer-hustler-ruby-freeman-behind-18000-fraudulent-votes-suitcase-scandal-video/

I'm pretty sure it's illegal to rob a bank even if you start with a (made up, unsupported by any facts) premise that the money belongs to you.

Because this thread is about Georgia, I figured I'd post this here...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html


So apparently this is actually a big deal? I first read this and thought this sounds like what he basically tweets about in public, but this is blowing up. He asks the Georgia SoS to overturn the election results by finding 11k votes which is the margin he needs to win the state.

However, I'm not seeing where he requests anything illegal if the premise Trump starts with is that the election was rigged. If you think the vote tallies were not properly tabulated, you are under the belief that you are missing votes and those votes should be found. He has tweeted about this using different words.

Thanks for the picture of Spendy, or is that you?       

OK brown noser


Are we projecting here?

Agreed

it lacked bite, they knew it, and didnt bother


Yes it is, its why all this voter fraud nonsense came to nothing

There was conclusive public debunking.


Move to North Korea then.


See above

You are very observant




....

Hey Spendy!! Miss you bro!!

The Kraken is moving into operation. The Nashville rocket attack by the military against the CIA hub was a start. Here comes the declassification of Biden corruption and much, much more - https://thecommonsenseshow.com/activism-conspiracy-health/declassification-coming.

Pelosi awarding the house seat in Iowa to a democrat on January 3 would give cover to Republicans to vote for Trump on January 6. The GA special election is the day before, and if there are additional allegations of irregularities, there will be more cover for Republicans to vote for Trump.

Even objectively the idea my belief is that you should go down to the polls, ID in hand, and vote for whoever you want to vote for. I don't like the idea of mail in ballots, because it's one step away from online voting.

wouldn't it be fun if Rudy got to be AG for 3 weeks? He's actually qualified.

Try looking at it objectively, without any consideration for how it affects any political party.

I am for more voters that actually go down the polls and vote. Mail in ballots cause people who would never vote in the first place to vote based on what they saw on CNN. It's easy to coerce someone through mail in voting. 

The subpoenas included digital images of every mail in ballot which is obviously a violation of voters privacy.  So they are challenging the subpoena in court.


Seems like they were counting all the ballots, including the ones that didn't 'count' from the 'spoiled pile', because they wanted to know how many ballots there were total, accepted + rejected, in case they were later challenged.  Seems pretty normal for a recount.

You actually falling for all this stuff?

BREAKING: Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Refuses to Comply With Subpoenas to Turn Over Dominion Voting Machines for Audit (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-maricopa-county-board-supervisors-refuses-comply-subpoenas-turn-dominion-voting-machines-audit-video/
MI Sec of State Official Caught On Video Telling Volunteers To Count “Multiple Ballots with the very Same Signature” During “Audit” Of Votes In Antrim County
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/mi-sec-state-official-caught-video-telling-volunteers-count-multiple-ballots-signature-audit-votes-antrim-county/

Look into this.

The Constitution sets in place no courts other than common law courts. Other courts are considered to be inferior courts.

Any court that is an inferior court, has to have all parties agree that they accept it is such. Any party who wants a common law court of record MUST object to the inferior court, to get it changed to a common law court of record.

Common law courts are for people who want to contest other people. They are not for representation where somebody can be represented by his attorney, etc. If all the parties in a common law court agree to representation, only then can representation be done. But this takes it out of common law and into an inferior court setting.

In a common law court of record, the judge/magistrate has to be silent outside of being a simple referee so that the court has order. If he tries to insist on the parties following certain laws/rules outside of simple order (often according to Robert's Rules), he can be required to provide the "finding of facts and conclusions of law" that he bases his authority on to do this. Remember, the Constitution is basic in all of it.

A judge who can't or won't provide the "finding of facts and conclusions of law" that he bases his authority on, if he maintains his usurpation of the common law court of record, he can be fined for Contempt of Court. Note that if a judge is filed against, or added as the defendant on a suit in progress, he will be investigated by the government in his state, or the federal government, and may not continue as judge until after his "trial," and will lose his tenure if found guilty (and might lose it if not found innocent).

The point? If anybody doesn't want to get the election results thrown out, he has to file for damages in a common law court of record. Why? The Supreme Court MUST throw out all cases from inferior courts. The election process is a Constitution thing. So, the court must proceed under the common law to abide within the Constitution.

The important things pertaining to this are:
1. File at Federal District Court (as opposed to the United States District Court), with the United States District Court Clerk of the Court, at the filing office for the United States District Court;
2. Make sure your case cover letter stipulate that you are filing for adjudication at the common law court of record, and that any other court (inferior court) is a mistake (no matter who makes that mistake), and must be corrected by moving to a common law court of record;
3. Have a list of damages, and threats against your person, as the reason for filing. Remember, you are part of the Republic, and going against the Constitution by any group is threatening your security;
4. Only men/women may file against men/women in common law. So make sure that you have a list of humans who have done you wrong ("Wrong/wrongdoer" are the strongest words in a common law claim.), plus evidence and witnesses;
5. You must have 3 people filing together. All 3 of you must state within your claim that you file, that you ARE (NOT are acting as) the tribunal for this claim. All 3 of you must witness for each other. All three of you must sign it.

If you are smart, you will consult several knowledgeable attorneys and Constitutional lawyers (who will likely not know what you are doing until you point it out to them) about this. Why consult them, if they don't know? Because they will be able to give you pointers... but don't let their pointers drag you into an inferior court. Keep your wits about you.

If you have more than one major point (wrongdoing) for getting the election thrown out, file each one in a separate case. Why? If one case gets thrown out, you have others. They won't all go down together like they would if they were filed in one claim.

You must file for damages. Make it anything you feel is right, and stick by it... say, $10 billion, each of you.

When Al Gore took his case against Bush to the Supreme Court, Justice Scalia told them why the SC threw it out. The reason? Gore didn't bring even one man or woman into court who identified his vote, and said it was done wrong. You have to have one human, but having three filing as the Tribunal, in Federal District Court, using the right words, is powerful.

Why can't they use a blockchain? A transparent public ledger would solve all those trust issues.

The only way to trick a blockchain is issuing fake id's and that could be proved easily.

It is a more reliable way to do it imo.

But then, nobody is really interested in being honest anyway. If they were, they wouldn't have left the gold standard in the first place.

What a brilliant post.

Of course those in power seldom seek the truth or action what would be objectively fair.
People especially types that tend to end up with any significant power are able to rationalize their undeniable bias and unfair standards or double standards for their own or their friends advantage. The independently verifiable truths are often either ignored or rejected.

It will not matter which shall win in this scenario as only the illusion of choice on the real game changing matters exists. The inexorable outcome for the vast majority is the same.

The supreme court should have heard the case and then crushed it if it lacked bite.
That's the thing though transparent independently verifiable analysis is not welcome.
Now you'll have a scenario where many will believe what suits them which wouldn't be possible if there were to be a conclusive public debunking.

I start to favor a good dictatorship over this democratic charade. Of course depending on the dictator.
I see now that democracy in all forms is simply a way to remove any real accountability its like a malignant cancer that's impossible to isolate and remove. A dictator is more of a benign matter. Of course neither generally work out well for the general populace.
Optimal governance could be devised by AI  but privacy and free speech should be primary concerns.

I don't see this being overturned now. Which is bad because Trump was way less sickly and I feel free speech was something that would suffer slightly less. The grab them by the pussy rather than pretend you want to hear all their problems and are really interested in them on a personal level with a view to supporting them forever approach is a certain type of honesty that one can appreciate is not optimal but certainly an improvement over sly and devious game.

The kraken better get cracking time is all but at an end. I guess the result is irrelevant to most long term.

If you take all politics out the equation and agree that more voters = better representation = successful democracy then I think it really does come down to the ratio of [how many more people will vote] : [how many more fraudulent ballots will be cast]

It's not as simple as 'we shouldn't have universal mail in voting bc fraud'.  The fact that there will be millions fewer voters should weigh heavily when forming an opinion and it seems like most people don't even consider that because it's not like the people who would've voted by mail but couldn't and didn't vote in person for whatever reason will ever complain.  But their voices should count the same as yours  At least imo.

And all this is coming from a born and raised republican that has not even considered thinking like this till the past couple years.  I guess i'm a former Repulican really with how things are now.  Weird feeling.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/17/gop-legal-war-absentee-voting-georgia-runoffs-447266

For the record, I think mail in ballots is a joke, so yes, I am bias.

BUT - Republicans are pushing hard to limit mail in voting by filing lawsuits. I hope they are successful. If you are legitimately sick, in service overseas, then yes, you should be able to vote by mail. It's different by state, but I'm sure that's the case in Georgia.

COVID is not an excuse for universal mail in voting. If you can go to the grocery store, you can vote. If you can go to the liquor store, you can go vote.

In other news, a YouTube vid proves the earth is flat.
Also some new footage of Bigfoot.
And this just in.... aliens are planting monoliths all over the farm...

Oh wait....off topic.. my bad...

FEAR THE KRAKEN!  (or is it Kracken? I'm starting to mistrust these squiggly red lines...)