The Numbers Don’t Lie: Data Scientists Break Down Voter Fraud in Arizona and It’s Shocking – 790,000 Laundered Votes Injected Into the System (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/numbers-dont-lie-data-scientists-break-voter-fraud-arizona-shocking-video/
Topic: The Kracken! - page 9. (Read 31037 times)
^^^ Trump really only needs one, firm, proven Dominion machine, election fraud to crack this whole thing wide open. If a judge certifies that there was election fraud, the dominoes could easily start falling against Biden.
There's already plenty of proof, the problem is over coming the power behind this coup. What good is having proof when the people won't even get to see it. When the judges will not accept it?
MI Democrat Sec Of State Benson REFUSES To Testify Before Legislative Oversight Committees
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/mi-democrat-sec-state-benson-refuses-testify-legislative-oversight-committees/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/mi-democrat-sec-state-benson-refuses-testify-legislative-oversight-committees/
From her response:
I have to comment on the very high error rates, like 68%, of Dominion machines. I believe those were caused by a bug, possibly triggered by operator's poor training.
I believe that "normal" fraud settings would be something like: switch 5% - 10% from Trump to Biden, which is much harder to detect.
There is also the issue of the actual ballots, just flipping votes would be eventually detected. Some of the real ballots for Trump could have been removed and sent to
shredding / burning, while fake ballots for Biden (possibly printed in China) could have been brought to replace them. So finding shredded ballots (which are supposed
to be preserved) is essential in proving that there was a vote switch.
I believe that "normal" fraud settings would be something like: switch 5% - 10% from Trump to Biden, which is much harder to detect.
There is also the issue of the actual ballots, just flipping votes would be eventually detected. Some of the real ballots for Trump could have been removed and sent to
shredding / burning, while fake ballots for Biden (possibly printed in China) could have been brought to replace them. So finding shredded ballots (which are supposed
to be preserved) is essential in proving that there was a vote switch.
nonsense^^^ Don't be so gullible.
Gotta respect the ability to so quickly audit people online with real information that is supported by facts.
No reason to walk into a literal ambush that would force yourself to be in the clown show. Why even do that to yourself?
Lawsuits has been used by Trump campaign / Republican officials and so on and it has brought nothing to the table as they have nothing backing them. It's over.
MI Democrat Sec Of State Benson REFUSES To Testify Before Legislative Oversight Committees
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/mi-democrat-sec-state-benson-refuses-testify-legislative-oversight-committees/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/mi-democrat-sec-state-benson-refuses-testify-legislative-oversight-committees/
From her response:
I have to comment on the very high error rates, like 68%, of Dominion machines. I believe those were caused by a bug, possibly triggered by operator's poor training.
I believe that "normal" fraud settings would be something like: switch 5% - 10% from Trump to Biden, which is much harder to detect.
There is also the issue of the actual ballots, just flipping votes would be eventually detected. Some of the real ballots for Trump could have been removed and sent to
shredding / burning, while fake ballots for Biden (possibly printed in China) could have been brought to replace them. So finding shredded ballots (which are supposed
to be preserved) is essential in proving that there was a vote switch.
I believe that "normal" fraud settings would be something like: switch 5% - 10% from Trump to Biden, which is much harder to detect.
There is also the issue of the actual ballots, just flipping votes would be eventually detected. Some of the real ballots for Trump could have been removed and sent to
shredding / burning, while fake ballots for Biden (possibly printed in China) could have been brought to replace them. So finding shredded ballots (which are supposed
to be preserved) is essential in proving that there was a vote switch.
nonsense^^^ Don't be so gullible.
MI Democrat Sec Of State Benson REFUSES To Testify Before Legislative Oversight Committees
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/mi-democrat-sec-state-benson-refuses-testify-legislative-oversight-committees/
I have to comment on the very high error rates, like 68%, of Dominion machines. I believe those were caused by a bug, possibly triggered by operator's poor training.
I believe that "normal" fraud settings would be something like: switch 5% - 10% from Trump to Biden, which is much harder to detect.
There is also the issue of the actual ballots, just flipping votes would be eventually detected. Some of the real ballots for Trump could have been removed and sent to
shredding / burning, while fake ballots for Biden (possibly printed in China) could have been brought to replace them. So finding shredded ballots (which are supposed
to be preserved) is essential in proving that there was a vote switch.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/mi-democrat-sec-state-benson-refuses-testify-legislative-oversight-committees/
I have to comment on the very high error rates, like 68%, of Dominion machines. I believe those were caused by a bug, possibly triggered by operator's poor training.
I believe that "normal" fraud settings would be something like: switch 5% - 10% from Trump to Biden, which is much harder to detect.
There is also the issue of the actual ballots, just flipping votes would be eventually detected. Some of the real ballots for Trump could have been removed and sent to
shredding / burning, while fake ballots for Biden (possibly printed in China) could have been brought to replace them. So finding shredded ballots (which are supposed
to be preserved) is essential in proving that there was a vote switch.
Getting more exciting by the minute.
Epic counterattack readied against “Cyber Pearl Harbor”
Epic counterattack readied against “Cyber Pearl Harbor”
Today’s Situation Update for Dec. 16th is embedded below. It runs about 87 minutes. Here are the highlights:
* Results of Dominion Voting Systems forensic audit concludes the machines are deliberately designed to alter votes through artificially high error rates followed by manual adjudication (fixing) of ballots.
* Dominion machines were set to a 68% error rate in Antrim County, and then a 70% error rate in Clark County, Nevada, now showing two counties involved in the criminal election rigging and theft.
* Trump knows this “Cyber Pearl Harbor” is bigger than 9/11.
* Mitch McConnell goes “full RINO” and tells other Senators to accept the Biden electoral votes on Jan. 6th.
* President Trump accuses Dominion machines of producing “fake election.”
* Sidney Powell calls for every Dominion voting machine to be seized and forensically audited.
* 57% of Republicans believe Trump victory still likely through court action.
* Wisconsin Supreme Court renders decision about voter ID on special ballots, effectively throwing 200,000 votes into dispute. (This is how Trump wins Wisconsin.)
* Trump accuses Michigan Secretary of State of criminal misconduct.
* Details about the SolarWinds hack and the CISA Emergency Directive 21-01.
* GOP Chairperson of AZ says GOP electoral votes are the “legally cast votes” for the state.
* How a Jan. 6th “contingent election” is likely to turn out.
* Prather says Trump will wait until the very last minute to invoke the Insurrection Act.
* Trump could nullify all U.S. national debt owed to China, over China’s use of biological weapons and cyber warfare against America.
* Lin Wood tells Americans to prepare, seemingly about getting ready for troops in the streets.
* The Fourteenth Amendment allows Trump to strip electors from public office if they violate their oaths of office and support rebellion or insurrection. This means Trump could instantly win the Jan. 6th electoral votes by simply invoking the Fourteenth Amendment before that day.
[more]
Notes from today’s Situation Update
* Results of Dominion Voting Systems forensic audit concludes the machines are deliberately designed to alter votes through artificially high error rates followed by manual adjudication (fixing) of ballots.
* Dominion machines were set to a 68% error rate in Antrim County, and then a 70% error rate in Clark County, Nevada, now showing two counties involved in the criminal election rigging and theft.
* Trump knows this “Cyber Pearl Harbor” is bigger than 9/11.
* Mitch McConnell goes “full RINO” and tells other Senators to accept the Biden electoral votes on Jan. 6th.
* President Trump accuses Dominion machines of producing “fake election.”
* Sidney Powell calls for every Dominion voting machine to be seized and forensically audited.
* 57% of Republicans believe Trump victory still likely through court action.
* Wisconsin Supreme Court renders decision about voter ID on special ballots, effectively throwing 200,000 votes into dispute. (This is how Trump wins Wisconsin.)
* Trump accuses Michigan Secretary of State of criminal misconduct.
* Details about the SolarWinds hack and the CISA Emergency Directive 21-01.
* GOP Chairperson of AZ says GOP electoral votes are the “legally cast votes” for the state.
* How a Jan. 6th “contingent election” is likely to turn out.
* Prather says Trump will wait until the very last minute to invoke the Insurrection Act.
* Trump could nullify all U.S. national debt owed to China, over China’s use of biological weapons and cyber warfare against America.
* Lin Wood tells Americans to prepare, seemingly about getting ready for troops in the streets.
* The Fourteenth Amendment allows Trump to strip electors from public office if they violate their oaths of office and support rebellion or insurrection. This means Trump could instantly win the Jan. 6th electoral votes by simply invoking the Fourteenth Amendment before that day.
[more]
Notes from today’s Situation Update
You're telling me that 'TheDonald.Win' isn't a reputable website that people use with reputable journalists? God, how could that be possible?
It's almost as reputable as NY Times, WSJ, Axios (my new personal favorite), and so on and so forth.
Would they? I thought electoral vote counting objections are voted on by each chamber separately via simple majority.
Looking into it more, I think that I was wrong and you're right about that. It seems that both chambers have to first agree to accept an objection, which the House won't do under Democratic control. (Or maybe Trump will promise Medicare for All to get some Dem defectors?
)There may still be some doubt. I heard an interview with an unbiased legal expert on C-SPAN a while ago who seemed uncertain what would happen if there were objections and eg. Pence started playing games in the joint session.
Pretty sure you were thinking of if no one got above 270 in the voting count meaning that every state would get one delegation sent based on who controls the state legislatures in their states. Republicans control the majority there, with 26(?) states. (Pretty sure)
But yeah, the process of this is simple majority in both chambers. A Republican in the House is going to need someone in the Republican in the Senate to back their proposal. Pretty sure Mo Brooks has not announced who his Republicans' senator is at this point, as he is already planning on bringing this up on the House floor once objections are asked for.
This shit is getting pretty old pretty quickly though, lol.
Pence started playing games in the joint session.
I think that's the only technically plausible loophole but it would break decades of precedent, would be constitutionally questionable, and there is an equally unprecedented option for dems to walk out, which may prevent the joint session from continuing since it requires both the Senate and the House to be present.
Would they? I thought electoral vote counting objections are voted on by each chamber separately via simple majority.
Looking into it more, I think that I was wrong and you're right about that. It seems that both chambers have to first agree to accept an objection, which the House won't do under Democratic control. (Or maybe Trump will promise Medicare for All to get some Dem defectors?
)There may still be some doubt. I heard an interview with an unbiased legal expert on C-SPAN a while ago who seemed uncertain what would happen if there were objections and eg. Pence started playing games in the joint session.
The House votes weirdly in this process, so the Republicans would control both chambers here.
Would they? I thought electoral vote counting objections are voted on by each chamber separately via simple majority.
“It’s a Real Simple Fact to Prove that There Was Massive Fraud in This Election” – Inventor of QR Code Can Prove It"
President Trump has the law and the US Constitution on his side.
Back on November 6th, only three days after the election, retired Intel Operative Tony Shaffer, said not to worry, the President has the Constitution on his side and will win the election.
Shaffer had tweeted the day before, that it was likely fraudulent ballots could be identified , and if so, they will prove that President Trump won the election.
Today we have astonishing support for Tony’s remarks.
(From the Donald.win website)
President Trump has the law and the US Constitution on his side.
Back on November 6th, only three days after the election, retired Intel Operative Tony Shaffer, said not to worry, the President has the Constitution on his side and will win the election.
Shaffer had tweeted the day before, that it was likely fraudulent ballots could be identified , and if so, they will prove that President Trump won the election.
Today we have astonishing support for Tony’s remarks.
(From the Donald.win website)
Quote
IT Expert Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, the inventor of platform known as ‘QR Code‘ which is on about 12 billion devices around the globe, believes ballots can be scanned to determine validity.
When I started looking at ballots… I realized that everybody was speaking geek…It’s a real simple fact to prove that there was massive fraud in this election.
…We can take the physical ballot, the image scan of the ballot in the machine, the CVR file in the machine, and I can even take a shredded bag of ballots and do what we do.
I want everybody to understand these physical ballots from the election, when they go into the machine, it basically makes a duplicate copy.
That’s your property as an American citizen. We own it for 22 months after the election.
And so when these courts started saying, well you can’t look at it, I realized it was all technical smoke and mirrors, to fool judges, to fool lawyers, to say oh we can’t really do it.
So let me tell you how easy it is…
When I started looking at ballots… I realized that everybody was speaking geek…It’s a real simple fact to prove that there was massive fraud in this election.
…We can take the physical ballot, the image scan of the ballot in the machine, the CVR file in the machine, and I can even take a shredded bag of ballots and do what we do.
I want everybody to understand these physical ballots from the election, when they go into the machine, it basically makes a duplicate copy.
That’s your property as an American citizen. We own it for 22 months after the election.
And so when these courts started saying, well you can’t look at it, I realized it was all technical smoke and mirrors, to fool judges, to fool lawyers, to say oh we can’t really do it.
So let me tell you how easy it is…
@Theymos
America is tasting its own poison.
The truth is whatever the stronger side makes it to be.
I don't remember anybody punishing the US for their war crimes against Japan or Syria.
Biden looks strong enough with all the propaganda and money power with MSM, social media, big pharma and Wallstreet behind him.
If they were interested in truth, twitter wouldn't be censoring their president's tweets.
Years ago most people believed smoking cigars was a healthy thing because TV told them.
America is tasting its own poison.
The truth is whatever the stronger side makes it to be.
I don't remember anybody punishing the US for their war crimes against Japan or Syria.
Biden looks strong enough with all the propaganda and money power with MSM, social media, big pharma and Wallstreet behind him.
If they were interested in truth, twitter wouldn't be censoring their president's tweets.
Years ago most people believed smoking cigars was a healthy thing because TV told them.
Theoretically, the Republicans could still take it on the 6th by throwing out some states as "irregular". The House votes weirdly in this process, so the Republicans would control both chambers here. They'd have to all stick together, though: only a few Republican defections could be tolerated. McConnell is apparently completely against the idea, so unless this reporting is wrong and even most centrist Republicans like Romney and Collins can be persuaded to pretty transparently steal this election, it seems dead in the water.
(I would love to see it, though. Can you imagine the utter chaos? I think that it'd hold up in court, too.)
Both sides are interested in winning, not in truth or the rule of law. In an amusingly parallel situation, in Iowa a Republican was certified as the winner by a narrow margin, and instead of going through the proper court appeals process under Iowa law, the Democratic challenger is going to the House to try to have it overturned. If anyone expects Pelosi's House to treat this fairly and objectively, especially when she has only a few-vote majority, then I have a bridge to sell you...
It's kind of disturbing that many Trump supporters actually believe that there was fraud on such a wide scale, or that many Democrats honestly believed that Trump was literally on Putin's payroll, etc. There are too many people out there living in their own bubbles instead of in reality.
(I would love to see it, though. Can you imagine the utter chaos? I think that it'd hold up in court, too.)
The lawsuits were a bit ridiculous and I think the extreme far right Trump base with the IQ of a peanut legitimately believes there was magnitudes of fraud that stretch hundreds of thousands of votes. Just isn't enough evidence. On the other hand, it was hilarious watching the far left (and the media) have a melt down over "democracy dying" when Trump literally followed the law in contesting the results by letting the legal process play out. For some weird reason, democrats seem more concerned about Trump and contested election results more so than a rabid media that managed to fool Americans that Trump is responsible for COVID, that he said it was a hoax, that he's a racist, that a vaccine at the end of the year was impossible, so on. But why be concerned when it helps, right?
Both sides are interested in winning, not in truth or the rule of law. In an amusingly parallel situation, in Iowa a Republican was certified as the winner by a narrow margin, and instead of going through the proper court appeals process under Iowa law, the Democratic challenger is going to the House to try to have it overturned. If anyone expects Pelosi's House to treat this fairly and objectively, especially when she has only a few-vote majority, then I have a bridge to sell you...
It's kind of disturbing that many Trump supporters actually believe that there was fraud on such a wide scale, or that many Democrats honestly believed that Trump was literally on Putin's payroll, etc. There are too many people out there living in their own bubbles instead of in reality.
The Kraken is starting in the USA. Watch the Twitter video.
SolarWinds HQ Raided in Austin -- More News Coming on CEO
SolarWinds HQ Raided in Austin -- More News Coming on CEO
Quote from: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-fbi-texas-rangers-us-marshals-raid-solarwinds-hq-austin/
Last night the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a rare Emergency Directive 21-01, in response to a KNOWN COMPROMISE involving SolarWinds Orion products.
This was only the fifth Emergency Directive issued by CISA under the authorities granted by Congress in the Cybersecurity Act of 2015.
CISA reported a breach of the SolarWinds Orion products.
This Emergency Directive called on all federal civilian agencies to review their networks for indicators of compromise and disconnect or power down SolarWinds Orion products immediately.
Dominion Voting Systems uses SolarWinds products.
It's right there on their website.
This afternoon a guest on Hannity told the popular conservative host the FBI, US Marshals and Texas Rangers were raiding SolarWinds headquarters in Austin Texas!
----------
Murray
🇺🇸
@Rothbard1776
BREAKING per guest on @seanhannity’s radio show: “The FBI, Texas Rangers & US Marshals are all at the SolarWinds HQ in Austin, TX” looking at their systems. Notes the Executive VP sold 57k shares [$1.2M] on 11/9. The CEO, Kevin Thompson, had sold 700k shares [$15M] 10 days later
TheSharpEdge
@TheSharpEdge1
About that Major SolarWinds CyberSecurity Threat...
This is a Must Listen.
SOUND ON:
https://radio.com/talk1370/listen
This was only the fifth Emergency Directive issued by CISA under the authorities granted by Congress in the Cybersecurity Act of 2015.
CISA reported a breach of the SolarWinds Orion products.
This Emergency Directive called on all federal civilian agencies to review their networks for indicators of compromise and disconnect or power down SolarWinds Orion products immediately.
Dominion Voting Systems uses SolarWinds products.
It's right there on their website.
This afternoon a guest on Hannity told the popular conservative host the FBI, US Marshals and Texas Rangers were raiding SolarWinds headquarters in Austin Texas!
----------
Murray
🇺🇸
@Rothbard1776
BREAKING per guest on @seanhannity’s radio show: “The FBI, Texas Rangers & US Marshals are all at the SolarWinds HQ in Austin, TX” looking at their systems. Notes the Executive VP sold 57k shares [$1.2M] on 11/9. The CEO, Kevin Thompson, had sold 700k shares [$15M] 10 days later
TheSharpEdge
@TheSharpEdge1
About that Major SolarWinds CyberSecurity Threat...
This is a Must Listen.
SOUND ON:
https://radio.com/talk1370/listen
Anything after Dec 14th when the Electoral College votes is irrelevant since you can't go back.
Not true. The Congress will decide on the 6th January which Electors are the correct ones. And in the meantime, Trump may win enough
lawsuits that the Congress will decide in his favor. It's a longshot, but not impossible, especially if foreign interference will be reported soon.
Kris Kobach: January 6 ‘May Very Well Be a Big Fight in Congress’ over Election
https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2020/12/15/kris-kobach-january-6-may-very-well-be-a-big-fight-in-congress-over-election/
^^^ If you are right, Biden will be the first President administering the Presidency from prison, or on death row for treason.
^^^ Trump really only needs one, firm, proven Dominion machine, election fraud to crack this whole thing wide open. If a judge certifies that there was election fraud, the dominoes could easily start falling against Biden.
they have already been found, but the extremist left and their agenda are so extremists they will try to overthrow everything.
The point is to get some judges to make rulings in favor of election fraud.
Since the whole election process is one based on decisions of the Electoral College, what does the vote of the people have to do with it? Essentially nothing! The most that the vote of the people could have to do with it is, their votes might influence the direction the delegates of the Electoral College vote.
Electoral College votes have been different than the popular vote of the people at times. I have seen in the past where EC delegates have been prosecuted for not voting the way the people wanted, but I have never followed up on the results of this prosecution. Can an EC delegate vote exactly the opposite of his district's popular vote and get away with it? I don't know. However...
If the final result of the Electoral College favors a Biden, the only way Trump might be able to overturn the vote is to question every EC delegate individually, to find out if he/she voted based on the popular vote. This would have to be a courtroom scenario. It would take a lot of questioning, a lot of indictments, a lot of judgments, lots of delegates brought into court to find out the reason why they voted as they did.
If the delegates who voted for Biden said in court that they had voted based on the popular vote of the people, then the election fraud would count for something. Of course, if the election fraud was done on the EC delegates directly, then there would be reason for an immediate investigation into the validity of the whole election process.
Trump has several difficult jobs to do. One of them is to determine if his 2018 Executive Order works only on the popular vote, or if it can include EC delegates being interfered with internationally. That's what the whole above part of this post is talking about.
In other words, is international interference in the election something that affected the Electoral College? If it isn't, and didn't, Trump might not have a leg to stand on regarding election fraud. However, he still might have the oath-of-office duty to apply the Insurrection Act because of the popular vote fraud. But if he doesn't get his second term, Biden (or whoever takes over when Biden fails) can reverse much of what Trump might do in this last month in office.
THE REALLY SCARY THING FOR ALL OF US IS THIS. If Trump initiates the Insurrection Act formally, and locks us down under something like martial law, and Biden takes over while we are still under martial law, what will Biden do to us under martial law with the state of mind he is in? Trump's martial law would only clean up America some. But Biden, already having the mindset of vote fraud, would be out there to increase criminality in the land. This might include slavery, especially for all former Trump supporters. The final results might be something similar to Stalin's purges.
So you see? Trump has some hard decisions to make. He has to be extremely sure that he doesn't make it worse for us by implementing something that Biden might use to destroy the Republic.
From the Antrim Michigan Forensics Report
This is the guy who signed the report:
Quote
The report is signed by Russell Ramsland of Allied Security Operations Group.
Ramsland, a cybersecurity analyst and former Republican congressional candidate, mistook voting jurisdictions in Minnesota for Michigan towns in one recent flawed analysis of voter turnout in the Nov. 3 election. In another, filed in support of a federal lawsuit filed in Michigan, he made wildly inaccurate claims about voter turnout in various Michigan municipalities claiming that Detroit, where turnout was 51%, had turnout of 139%, and that North Muskegon, which had turnout of 78%, had voter turnout of 782%.
https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/14/michigan-company-officials-dispute-report-antrim-county-voting/6538325002/Ramsland, a cybersecurity analyst and former Republican congressional candidate, mistook voting jurisdictions in Minnesota for Michigan towns in one recent flawed analysis of voter turnout in the Nov. 3 election. In another, filed in support of a federal lawsuit filed in Michigan, he made wildly inaccurate claims about voter turnout in various Michigan municipalities claiming that Detroit, where turnout was 51%, had turnout of 139%, and that North Muskegon, which had turnout of 78%, had voter turnout of 782%.
From the Michigan Elections Director:
Quote
The report makes a series of unsupported conclusions, ascribes motives of fraud and obfuscation to processes that are easily explained as routine election procedures or error corrections, and suggests without explanation that elements of election software not used in Michigan are somehow responsible for tabulation or reporting errors that are either nonexistent or easily explained.
From the Antrim Michigan Forensics Report
The purpose of this forensic audit is to test the integrity of Dominion Voting
System in how it performed in Antrim County, Michigan for the 2020 election.
We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully
designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election
results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot
errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional
errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and
no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we
conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We
further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.
The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that
the election night error (detailed above by the vote "flip" from Trump to Biden,
was the result of human error caused by the failure to update the Mancelona
Township tabulator prior to election night for a down ballot race. We disagree and
conclude that the vote flip occurred because of machine error built into the voting
software designed to create error.
The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission
guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of
68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election
integrity.
The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable. This is a result
of machine and/or software error, not human error.
The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County
from December 6, 2020consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or
68.05% of the events were recorded errors. These errors resulted in overall
tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves
the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal
election laws.
A staggering number of votes required adjudication. This was a 2020 issue not
seen in previous election cycles still stored on the server. This is caused by
intentional errors in the system. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of
ballots with no oversight, no transparency or audit trail. Our examination of the
server logs indicates that this high error rate was incongruent with patterns from
previous years. The statement attributing these issues to human error is not
consistent with the forensic evaluation, which points more correctly to systemic
machine and/or software errors. The systemic errors are intentionally designed to
create errors in order to push a high volume of ballots to bulk adjudication.
Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years;
but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing. The
adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack
of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous
absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the
same software. Removal of these files violates state law and prevents a
meaningful audit, even if the Secretary wanted to conduct an audit. We must
conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.
Likewise, all server security logs prior to 11:03 pm on November 4, 2020 are
missing. This means that all security logs for the day after the election, on
election day, and prior to election day are gone. Security logs are very important
to an audit trail, forensics, and for detecting advanced persistent threats and
outside attacks, especially on systems with outdated system files. These logs
would contain domain controls, authentication failures, error codes, times users
logged on and off, network connections to file servers between file accesses,
internet connections, times, and data transfers. Other server logs before
November 4, 2020 are present; therefore, there is no reasonable explanation for
the security logs to be missing.
The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate
evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the
election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals
were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020
and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which
violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion
Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated
movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State
website are false.
The election day outcomes were calculated using the original software
programming on November 3, 2020. On November 5, 2020 the township clerk
was asked to re-run the Central Lake Township ballots and was given no
explanation for this unusual request. On November 6, 2020 the Antrim County
Clerk, Sheryl Guy issued the second version of software to re-run the same
Central Lake Township ballots and oversaw the process. This resulted in greater
than a 60% change in voting results, inexplicably impacting every single election
contest in a township with less than 1500 voters. These errors far exceed the
ballot error rate standard of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%) as required by federal
election law.
The Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson's statement is false. Our findings show
that the tabulator tape totals were significantly altered by utilization of two
different program versions, and not just the Dominion Election Management
System. This is the opposite of the claim that the Office of the Secretary of
State made on its website. The fact that these significant errors were not caught
in ballot testing and not caught by the local county clerk shows that there are
major inherent built-in vulnerabilities and process flaws in the Dominion
Election Management System, and that other townships/precincts and the
entire election have been affected.
There were multiple Microsoft security updates as well as Microsoft SQL Server
updates which should have been deployed, however there is no evidence that
these security patches were ever installed. As described below, many of the
software packages were out of date and vulnerable to various methods of attack.
a) Computer initial configuration on 10/03/2018 13:08:11:911
b) Computer final configuration of server software on 4/10/2019
c) Hard Drive not Encrypted at Rest
d) Microsoft SQL Server Database not protected with password.
e) Democracy Suite Admin Passwords are reused and share passwords.
f) Antivirus is 4.5 years outdated
g) Windows updates are 3.86 years out of date.
h) When computer was last configured on 04/10/2019 the windows updates
were 2.11 years out of date.
i) User of computer uses a Super User Account.
Republicans in Key Battleground States Create ‘Alternate Slate of Electors’ to Keep Trump’s Legal Challenges Afloat
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/14/republicans-in-key-battleground-states-create-alternate-slate-of-electors-to-keep-trumps-legal-challenges-afloat/
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
The purpose of this forensic audit is to test the integrity of Dominion Voting
System in how it performed in Antrim County, Michigan for the 2020 election.
We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully
designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election
results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot
errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional
errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and
no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we
conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We
further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.
The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that
the election night error (detailed above by the vote "flip" from Trump to Biden,
was the result of human error caused by the failure to update the Mancelona
Township tabulator prior to election night for a down ballot race. We disagree and
conclude that the vote flip occurred because of machine error built into the voting
software designed to create error.
The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission
guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of
68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election
integrity.
The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable. This is a result
of machine and/or software error, not human error.
The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County
from December 6, 2020consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or
68.05% of the events were recorded errors. These errors resulted in overall
tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves
the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal
election laws.
A staggering number of votes required adjudication. This was a 2020 issue not
seen in previous election cycles still stored on the server. This is caused by
intentional errors in the system. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of
ballots with no oversight, no transparency or audit trail. Our examination of the
server logs indicates that this high error rate was incongruent with patterns from
previous years. The statement attributing these issues to human error is not
consistent with the forensic evaluation, which points more correctly to systemic
machine and/or software errors. The systemic errors are intentionally designed to
create errors in order to push a high volume of ballots to bulk adjudication.
Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years;
but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing. The
adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack
of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous
absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the
same software. Removal of these files violates state law and prevents a
meaningful audit, even if the Secretary wanted to conduct an audit. We must
conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.
Likewise, all server security logs prior to 11:03 pm on November 4, 2020 are
missing. This means that all security logs for the day after the election, on
election day, and prior to election day are gone. Security logs are very important
to an audit trail, forensics, and for detecting advanced persistent threats and
outside attacks, especially on systems with outdated system files. These logs
would contain domain controls, authentication failures, error codes, times users
logged on and off, network connections to file servers between file accesses,
internet connections, times, and data transfers. Other server logs before
November 4, 2020 are present; therefore, there is no reasonable explanation for
the security logs to be missing.
The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate
evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the
election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals
were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020
and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which
violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion
Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated
movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State
website are false.
The election day outcomes were calculated using the original software
programming on November 3, 2020. On November 5, 2020 the township clerk
was asked to re-run the Central Lake Township ballots and was given no
explanation for this unusual request. On November 6, 2020 the Antrim County
Clerk, Sheryl Guy issued the second version of software to re-run the same
Central Lake Township ballots and oversaw the process. This resulted in greater
than a 60% change in voting results, inexplicably impacting every single election
contest in a township with less than 1500 voters. These errors far exceed the
ballot error rate standard of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%) as required by federal
election law.
The Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson's statement is false. Our findings show
that the tabulator tape totals were significantly altered by utilization of two
different program versions, and not just the Dominion Election Management
System. This is the opposite of the claim that the Office of the Secretary of
State made on its website. The fact that these significant errors were not caught
in ballot testing and not caught by the local county clerk shows that there are
major inherent built-in vulnerabilities and process flaws in the Dominion
Election Management System, and that other townships/precincts and the
entire election have been affected.
There were multiple Microsoft security updates as well as Microsoft SQL Server
updates which should have been deployed, however there is no evidence that
these security patches were ever installed. As described below, many of the
software packages were out of date and vulnerable to various methods of attack.
a) Computer initial configuration on 10/03/2018 13:08:11:911
b) Computer final configuration of server software on 4/10/2019
c) Hard Drive not Encrypted at Rest
d) Microsoft SQL Server Database not protected with password.
e) Democracy Suite Admin Passwords are reused and share passwords.
f) Antivirus is 4.5 years outdated
g) Windows updates are 3.86 years out of date.
h) When computer was last configured on 04/10/2019 the windows updates
were 2.11 years out of date.
i) User of computer uses a Super User Account.
Republicans in Key Battleground States Create ‘Alternate Slate of Electors’ to Keep Trump’s Legal Challenges Afloat
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/14/republicans-in-key-battleground-states-create-alternate-slate-of-electors-to-keep-trumps-legal-challenges-afloat/
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
Jump to: