Topic: The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings? - page 13. (Read 7705 times)
Most often it happens. Because of the long continuation of the company a lot of people join it. It takes a lot of time. And gives a small result
Practically yes, projects normally assign a fixed number of tokens for their bounty program despite the extension of the bounty span that may follow. When it happens like this, you need to work extra mile to earn more tokens as new bounty hunters get to join.
Not necessarily, you could get more stakes, but after all, it depends on the amount of participants and also your rank on the forum or on social media.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Your friend is probably right because higher ranks like Sr and hero member has a higher stakes that gets than Full member and below but it is not always like that. It will also depend on the number of participants. The fewer you are the higher the earnings.
For me it's not only the basis when some bounty campaign are running for a long time and you just got few earnings. But it is base on the participants that are truly participating, if it has have a huge bounty pool allocation so it means you can really get more rewards. While when it has a little bit of allocation so it is a disadvantages
The results of the gift based on the level of your account. If the higher level account you, of course, the result is also great. And as a result, the bounty the less because the longer the project makes a lot of people who are interested in joining. So this number of participants that can also affect the results of your rewards.
Yes, I agree that the longer the time goes the Bounty, the lower the earnings.
Well, logically, we can assume that the longer the bounty company goes, the more people will join it. Accordingly, if the pool is not increased, the participants will receive less. I really don't like it when extend the bounty, but it's not always bad.
I would advise you not to leave the bounty, and work on.
I would advise you not to leave the bounty, and work on.
I doubt that the length is so important, because many of the long campaigns have a high soft and hard cap and they need time to raise all the funds they need.
There is a disadvantage for a long campaign program for me as Jr. Member rank because it will be fewer the earnings it receive if the bounty is hard to reach the hardcap because it usually the high ranking will receive the most earning will it get during distribution time.
It is all about patience, bounty campaigns can take too long to complete as a lot of them are associated to the sales the ICO manages, which can take a lot of months to end.
Well, I think this difference is not affected , well in my experience it was , I participated in a long-term and short earnings has always been the same
Despite your rank, the number of coins will reduce because more bounty hunters will surely join that campaign. If you're a senior member, another Senior member will join again, and the allocated amount will then be divided by total number of participants in each specific campaign.
On the contrary, i think the main reason organisations approaches the crypto market to raise fund through ICO is simply because they want to complete and deploy a task they have at hand.
If you check very well; there is a percentage allotted to bounties.
This percentage is no doubt subject to the fund generated from ICO.
Why do Organisations extend ICO's?
To ensure the targeted funds needed for the project were raised.
The more the fund generated, the more it benefits bounties.
the only challenge is simply because the Bounty hunting excercise is now a well known art; attracting more participants and in the process reducing what was meant to accrue to participants if they were few
If you check very well; there is a percentage allotted to bounties.
This percentage is no doubt subject to the fund generated from ICO.
Why do Organisations extend ICO's?
To ensure the targeted funds needed for the project were raised.
The more the fund generated, the more it benefits bounties.
the only challenge is simply because the Bounty hunting excercise is now a well known art; attracting more participants and in the process reducing what was meant to accrue to participants if they were few
It also depends how many high ranked members join the bounty and how actively they are going to participate. When a "Full member" pulls in 3 stakes a "Senior member" could easily get 7+ stakes for signature campaign.
The longer the bounty, the more bountihunters, so the fewer earnins. Because budget of the bounty is limited.
I think the bounties longevity does not does not really affect the earning but rather the bounty pool allocated for it and also the number of participants in the campaign. When the bounty pool is big and the time is long at least everyone will get his or her shares.
This is right. For long-term bounties, the bounty pool must be bigger than short-term bounties. Otherwise, it is going to be more profitable to join 2 or maybe 3 bounties than to join only 1.
if ICO is postponed not for the first time, it is a bad sign, saying that the company can not collect the necessary amount. If more people join during this time, then of course the reward becomes smaller.
I think it is not necessary so early to give up, so the longer the period the fewer coins, then you need to choose projects that last for a shorter period of time)))
The more its delayed, the more it allows more people to reg and join the campaign which automatically makes it more people sharing the little tokens on offer. This itself is a big issue. I think there should be a rewarding scheme for those who have been on the campaign earlier or longer.
Jump to: