Topic: The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings? - page 61. (Read 7706 times)
I think it all depends on the allocation given and the restrictions for participants who join if many participants are joining then you will produce a little coin but the participants are limited but big allocation then you will earn a lot of income
This is true, because the longer the participants take part. This means that each participant will distribute a small amount of reward. This is also not worth the time and effort. If ICO fails, it will be the worst.
I think the bounty usually depends on the number of participants, your rank, and your hard work. If you work hard, you can still earn a reward for your bounty.
If the grace gets less to receive the benefits given, it makes me no problem. Because then this crypto more and more people understand, and it will attract investors to disburse funds in all aspects of this crypto. The future is bright for digital currency.
If an ico sale makes a delay I think it's harming the participants, although I know the manager or the project team can be free to change the rules. But for me if the bounty campaign takes a long time it is very boring. There are two options out of the campaign and forget the stake that has been obtained or still waiting. The decision is in your hands
nope because the longer the bounty the more blessings to come if you joined in the first week and last till the end you will get more than youve think thats why the longer the bounty the more blessings to come for the bounty hunters.
I total agree with you, I don't like joining bounty that take a long time, if a bounty take a longer, the reward reduces because the longer the bounty waits, the more people join and the less the reward reduce, so the bounty I normal join these days, max is 8 weeks.
The ICO project initially allocated a certain amount or percentage of the collected funds. When there's occur delaying phase, i suggest that you should leave that bounty. Because of you will lost your time just to wait for the bounty to resume.
In my own experience since I started bounty campaign, it is true most times that the longer a bounty campaign is, the lesser the tokens or coins one will get . The reason for this is that when ICO is being extended beyond the normal time, it gives room to absorb more bounty participants which ofcourse will reduce the quantity of tokens to be given to individuals. If at the initial stage of a bounty campaign 1500 participants joined, but over time the ICO was extended and another 1000 participants were added to make it 2500 participants, definitely the allocated bounty tokens will no more be divided among the 1500 but among 2500 bounty participants except in some cases that the project has already placed limits to participants they are taken even if the ICO period is extended. So, if you think you can still bear it, you can stay to finish the project.
I think it depends on the bounty campaign itself, usually, they determine how much participants will get in the first time they started the bounty. sometimes, the rewards are big if we can stay for a long time after the bounty is finished, sometimes the short-term bounty can also give a big bounty. and it's our choice to join in whatever bounty campaign and I think we should know how much we will get that rewards and if we think that the rewards are not good enough for us, then we don't have to join.
I think it needs to look at its distribution mechanism. If it can distribute rewards every week, then it is acceptable for extended periods of time. If it continues to be extended without giving any rewards, then I will give up its mission!
the longer the bounty will be made a participant who joins a growing number and sure enough the revenue obtained will be less and less because of divided by the number of participants. not to mention if the bounty is extended but not plus allocation to the bounty. certainly, it would make the results of the bounty will be increasingly depleted.
NOPE, the thing that affects earnings is that the value of eth or tokens allocated to the bounty campaign is few or small, also if the participants participating are many , this will surely affect the equal staking or proportionate share in the reward
Not all rewards that last longer will reduce the number of COINS, depending on the supply of COINS and the number of participants. There is also the success of the project.
It depends on the bounty and the number of participants joined in the bounty,as far as I know the longer the bounty the higher earnings you get depending on the ranks and it depends also if the campaign has become successful you will get more higher earnings.
it all depends on the results of their ICO, regardless of the large number of participants does not guarantee a bigger income, many successful gifts despite making the campaign in a short time, it's just about marketing promotion. I'm not saying it's bad but long-standing campaigns often cut revenue allocations for their participants for unacceptable reasons.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
That is true. The tokens allocated for bounty remains the same wheras plenty bounty hunters join each day as the time for the bounty is prolonged. In the end, the same number of tokens will be shared amongst the numerous bounty hunters. Anyway, if the ICO goes on well and the coin performs well on the market, your rewarded tokens can fetch you some good amount of money.
If a bounty lasts for 3-4 months, then you don't have the freedom to participate in any other campaign during this period (at least for the signature bounties). A few months back, I was participating in a bounty and when it was about to end the campaign manager extended it by another 2 months. And he did all this without increasing the bounty pool.
Everything depends on the pool, how much the company is going to allocate, and on the number of participants, it happens that if the company is prolonged, then more money is added!
That's of course. The number of the reward that we can accept will depend on these terms. So, we cannot say that longer bounty, fewer earnings. For the signature campaign, a longer bounty may give much higher profits. So, it will really depend on the bounty campaign that we are participating, token allocation, participant numbers, and also the percentage.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Probably yes. Because the longer it is, the lesser tokens to be receive. Additional weeks means additional division of tokens. But if the allocation is high, it is actually good because you will earn additional tokens .
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Mehn!!! Since January?? Are you kidding me? #I'm sure I can't stay up to that in a bounty, that's a period for 2 or 3 bounties, my advice is to stay in it since you are already in it for such time, but if the project seems not to succeed you have to opt out of their bounty
Jump to: