They would need to obey the rule because otherwise, no business, or fines, or court battles. It probably won't be prominent today or tomorrow, but once this is all enforced it will change the landscape. However, they can't control dexes, they can't control code. There will be routes to avoid these rules for for those who don't like them, that goes for both companies and individuals.
This is rediculous. So we know for a fact that they try to control exchanges because they know they can't control bitcoin fundamentally. Which means they know they can't shut it down and they try to control it using otherr techniques. Sounds like they are desperate. P2P exchanges for the win.
They are desperate. They're losing control over money, over the world, and after all, they've essentially been scammed by a system that can never be accurate enough to act one....imagine how much they spent funding or purchasing services from companies like chainanalysis, or on forensics that weren't accurate. So now they've just decided, fuck it, let's go back to censorship.
It's good and bad as said in my last post - those wise enough to stay p2p can win. Those who aren't wise enough will unfortunately get caught in the web.
We even saw that Kraken, a non US exchange, was demanded to provide user data to the IRS for auditing and after a court battle, Kraken lost.
Kraken is a US exchange, and its founder, Jesse Powell, is an American. It is notable for being not only one of the first and longest-standing US-based BTC exchanges, but for also holding out on over-reaching demands from the government, to the farthest extent possible. An example of this would be continuing to list XMR when most other US exchanges have delisted it out of fear of future regulation & compliance issues.
So, the US has power even outside of the US.
This part is still true.
Hey, I do apologize and thank you for correcting me. I had foolishly read and article which made a distinct point out of Kraken not being based in the US and hence being a good example of overreach by the IRS and the US.
I tried to find the article with no luck and this point has me a little confused. Maybe, it has made a point of being able to get the records of even non-US based users. I should have bookmarked the article.