I think it's a really cool idea and we should try to find a way to do it for this act too.
I don't think so. They will simply ignore any AI generated content, and all it does is water down genuine comments and complaints.
I'm pretty sure a lot of normal people are going to fall into a quagmire while trying to write a proper formal letter to a government entity. So do you really think something like the following would be ignored?
Dear Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department,
I am writing to express my concerns about the proposed regulations outlined in the PDF document titled "Gross Proceeds and Basis Reporting by Brokers and Determination of Amount Realized and Basis for Digital Asset Transactions." Specifically, I would like to address the topics of privacy and poorly defined terms.
Firstly, I am deeply concerned about the privacy and safety implications of allowing multiple third parties to have access to my sensitive financial data and social security number. The proposed regulations would require brokers, including digital asset trading platforms, digital asset payment processors, and certain digital asset hosted wallets, to file information returns and furnish payee statements on dispositions of digital assets. This would potentially expose my personal information to numerous entities, which raises significant privacy and security risks.
Furthermore, I find the definitions of certain terms in the proposed regulations to be poorly defined. For instance, terms such as "platform," "software," and "ledger" are left undefined, leaving room for multiple interpretations. Additionally, the definitions of terms like "wallet" and "validator" do not accurately describe their technical meanings, leading to potential confusion and inconsistent application of the regulations.
I believe it is crucial for regulations of this nature to provide clear and precise definitions to ensure consistency and understanding among all stakeholders. Vague and loosely defined terms can lead to misinterpretation and hinder compliance with the regulations.
In conclusion, I urge you to reconsider the implications on privacy and security that may arise from these proposed regulations. Additionally, I strongly recommend providing clearly defined terms to avoid confusion and promote consistent interpretation and application.
Thank you for considering my concerns. I trust that you will take these issues into account when finalizing the regulations.
Sincerely,
There doesn't seem to be anything wrong with this when I look at it from a first glance. Also it's not like it's serving the same letter to everybody, the sentences and vocabulary are slightly different for each.