Spare us all the hysteria bud. It's clear you know nothing about the vulnerabilty that was in the wallet. And if you think that wasn't a vulnerability you should probably be having someone else look after your dat files.
As for David not knowing about the fake ICO, he has said himself he knew about the fake BTC at Bter and said nothing. His posts in your thread show him lying for weeks about how much he got, when he got it, and what it was for.
As for your idea that pumpers should have "stayed involved" with SWIFT, get a clue. Pumpers are not long term care givers.That's not how they work. So dry your tears son.
As for coding, you don't know jack shit about my backround, so stop making a silly, whining fool of yourself. And the people who are "ruining crypto" ?
Sad, deluded fools such as yourself who believe blindly in your Great Leader despite overwhelming evidence of fraud and theft. You make these people possible.
But the point is, he knew about the fake ICO only while it was funding and not before. And I read the unmoderated thread, he was refusing to discuss details with trolls. But very few people at Blackcoin blame him... there was obviously more at stake than his own reputation. Like literally investors and BTER. What did you expect the guy to stop the project the second after it funded? The results would have been identical. In fact, the community outburst would have probably been worse!
I dont see how David was legally obligated to blow the whistle on BTER. And besides, he did come forward about it later.
Also there isnt any laws regulating cryptocurrency
And so you are saying that "pumpers" should not stay in the coin. OK sure. Except there is one fatal flaw in your logic. Bob and Ryan never pumped BitSwift or BitBay. They did an ICO which was taking coins directly from investors. And considering Bob got 500 BTC from his group, he didn't actually "pump" to get that 500 BTC because it wasn't his money to begin with.
So that is just outright theft. Because that 500 BTC should have gone back into the project since it was funded by legitimate investors.
If it was a "pump" then Bob and Ryan would have had to sacrifice their own BTC. But they clearly did not.
Bob and Paul most definitely did pump Swift. Look at the charts. The real reason it fell was 1) pump stopped 2) lots of promised tech / no actual tech. These two factors = wiley coyote suddenly way out in the air, nothing below.
As far as 500 "stolen" BTC. This is a phrase david came up with. Bob was hired to pump Bay for the price of 500 btc. That's why Bob was there. When it came time to pump, David pulled his drama queen act and refused to lock up his 10% of the supply of Bay. Making pump impossible.
So is that really "stolen BTC"? David knew damn well Bob was getting that 500 BTC. He could have mentioned that anytime during the previous three weeks of lying to you guys in the BC thread. But he did not. Because the pump was part of the plan. That's why Bob was in on the deal, and David knew it.
But if David stopped Bob from doing his job - how is that stolen BTC? it is the exact amount David went along with Bob getting.
it is just that now it suits David to call it "stolen BTC".
thx man! 
I still would always laugh at the idea. I'll trade in moving markets unless I know for sure the coins trash, then I'll find something else to trade.
