Topic: The success of IEO is Exchange - page 13. (Read 2768 times)
indeed all success depends on promotion from various ways such as giving bonuses when top up and something else, or can also provide trading fee discounts even free without fees when trading at the exchange but must be careful when participating in IEO because there are several places exchanges that work with IEO developers to manipulate or scam affected traders.
the success of a project either through ICO promotion or sales of IEO and it all depends on the project developer or the location where the token is registered at a large exchange. as we have seen today many IEOs fail because they are listed on shady exchanges, are rarely used by traders and often manipulate the volume of coins. like p2pb2b or probit
Exchanges like p2pb2b, vindax, latoken, are Fake Volume, buying IEO Launchpad Tokens on Exchange like that is a big loss in my opinion
I think we should also give a chance to new exchanges to prove themselve although i know there are complains and negative feedback but still we cannot accept monopoly from top 2 3 exchanges we need competition and for this we need to encourage new exchanges and give them a chance. These new exchanges should also learn to be responsible and take care of their users in all aspects of business.
Nice point but everything boils down to the fact that OP is right with his statement. IEO success greatly depends on chosen exchange, people feel secure with an exchange having high reputation than a new exchange with low trust ratings. Its true that its becoming a thing of monopoly for instance; most crypto enthusiasts won't want to participate in an IEO if it's not on Binance, which is not supposed to be that way. There are other fair exchanges with proven credibility, and success in IEO too.
I think we should also give a chance to new exchanges to prove themselve although i know there are complains and negative feedback but still we cannot accept monopoly from top 2 3 exchanges we need competition and for this we need to encourage new exchanges and give them a chance. These new exchanges should also learn to be responsible and take care of their users in all aspects of business.
None of the centralized exchanges can help a shitty project anymore, especially in this market with low liquidity. The solution would be creating use cases for the token, having a fair token distribution, generously rewarding long-term holders and making sure there is a lot of liquidity on the decentralized exchanges.
the use case must be cared for by the token holder, because when the token is on the exchange it cannot be controlled and they move according to the real use case. large exchanges might help to show in terms of sales management but for the future the token must run on its own, therefore real use takes precedence.
None of the centralized exchanges can help a shitty project anymore, especially in this market with low liquidity. The solution would be creating use cases for the token, having a fair token distribution, generously rewarding long-term holders and making sure there is a lot of liquidity on the decentralized exchanges.
The statement is right. It doesn't matter of project anymore it's about the exchange now. But there is another a exchange like binance mostly choose project with great team,and vision. People trust binance or any big exchange cause they have security and when they introduced a project it's hard to be scam. That's why people go for the big exchange ieos. There are exceptions there are many small projects that are also doing good but the success rate is less.
Exchanges play an important role, with their followers every announcement from them draws a lot of attention for any project. Can any project be successful without exchange!? I think the answer is yes, it's hard but it's not impossible! The team will need to do their best, to make more effort, and with good ideas and good decisions, anything is possible! As you said, there are exceptions and we need to know how to recognize them and make some good profit!
The statement is right. It doesn't matter of project anymore it's about the exchange now. But there is another a exchange like binance mostly choose project with great team,and vision. People trust binance or any big exchange cause they have security and when they introduced a project it's hard to be scam. That's why people go for the big exchange ieos. There are exceptions there are many small projects that are also doing good but the success rate is less.
This is so true. Exchange contribute largely to whether the IEO of a project will be success or not. Exchange with good track record and reputation tends to help project to sell out their token and ensure success of the IEO while exchange with existing bad reputation tends to affect the sales of token for a project conducting its IEO on such exchange
Yes, that's right, but a good exchange also doesn't arbitrarily accept IEO from unclear projects, because they also don't want the list of coins in their exchange to be filled with junk coins from projects with unclear origins.
This is so true. Exchange contribute largely to whether the IEO of a project will be success or not. Exchange with good track record and reputation tends to help project to sell out their token and ensure success of the IEO while exchange with existing bad reputation tends to affect the sales of token for a project conducting its IEO on such exchange
Yes, that's right, but a good exchange also doesn't arbitrarily accept IEO from unclear projects, because they also don't want the list of coins in their exchange to be filled with junk coins from projects with unclear origins. 
Well, under the current conditions, IEO, which is in good exchange, will get additional responses from investors like binance huobi bithumb, and the project will definitely be crowded too.
Since large exchanges are not listed carelessly for every project, they are selected first.
Since large exchanges are not listed carelessly for every project, they are selected first.
That's absolutely right, P2PB2B or vindax is bad exchange for IEO any good project can't get success in this type of exchange and this is true, but yes for IEO okex or binance is good option.
And to place IEO on Okex and Binance exchanges is also not easy, they will not immediately accept useless projects listed in their list, so from that the project prefers a bad exchange such as P2PB2B or vindax for IEO even though the project knows that is a bad exchange. You are absolutely telling the truth. But sadly many potential projects don't have this idea! They have everything good but in the end, they choose P2PB2B, Latoken or Vindax! I was looking for a better campaign, recently Yougene (Maybe Spelling not correct) campaign attracted me. But when I saw they chosen Latoken for IEO, I moved on! So, I think the same that IEO success depends on the top exchange, not in projects!
You are absolutely right. YouGene is a great project, and their choice of Latoken is an evidence of strong Latoken presence in the market. It’s not a fortuity but this exchange has a lot to offer for projects, primarily, an excellent infrastructure.
So your subjective view is just your subjective view. Fortunately, I fully support Yougene both in this choice and as the project in general and waiting for their remarkable development.
Highly liquid exchange does not guarantee profit if you invest on their IEO, and not all IEO in Binance were really successful and some just rise because of the hype, nothing has really showed it's stable success yet, so we can't conclude that.
The hype will attract many investors and like we had the ICO craze people are behind the IEO craze, one folded because majority of the projects that started collected millions and never fulfilled anything to reward the investors and people should really learn the lesson and even with so many scams people are investing in projects with trusted developers and the IEO craze will not survive for a long time either. Large exchanges provide a limited supply of coins, which creates a situation in which demand exceeds supply.
In addition, large exchanges use their own system of holding exchange tokens to get a chance to participate in the sale.
All this creates a price increase from the very start, due to significantly higher demand. On small and medium-sized exchanges, this is not the case; more often, on the contrary, supply exceeds demand.
In addition, large exchanges use their own system of holding exchange tokens to get a chance to participate in the sale.
All this creates a price increase from the very start, due to significantly higher demand. On small and medium-sized exchanges, this is not the case; more often, on the contrary, supply exceeds demand.
This is one of the reasons why an exchange has large contribution on the performance of IEO.
Though the reputation and status of the exchange has great influence on the IEO results, still it depends on how the project is marketed and built.
If the investors will see that the foundation of the project is not so good, I don't think they will easily buy their coin.
They also need an assurance that the project will have the capability to deliver their objectives.
And that is by checking the background, the technology, team, whitepaper, roadmap, or even their initial assets.
You are absolutely telling the truth. But sadly many potential projects don't have this idea! They have everything good but in the end, they choose P2PB2B, Latoken or Vindax! I was looking for a better campaign, recently Yougene (Maybe Spelling not correct) campaign attracted me. But when I saw they chosen Latoken for IEO, I moved on! So, I think the same that IEO success depends on the top exchange, not in projects!
usually the projects they offer are not very attractive indeed when the exchange has a platform that has a good reputation it will make a lot of people will be interested in the various offers that they provide. but it must be careful with the exchange that provides information about offers because there are some scam exchanges. 
You are absolutely telling the truth. But sadly many potential projects don't have this idea! They have everything good but in the end, they choose P2PB2B, Latoken or Vindax! I was looking for a better campaign, recently Yougene (Maybe Spelling not correct) campaign attracted me. But when I saw they chosen Latoken for IEO, I moved on! So, I think the same that IEO success depends on the top exchange, not in projects!
Some people claim that this is the time for IEO, especially if we see some projects having difficulty listing in certain exchanges for several months. IEO help it, and provide "guarantees" if the IEO in Binance or Okex.
The IEO projects above the two exchanges are not remarkable, I think that there is no really good project that chooses IEO on the bad exchanges. If the project is good they can successfully ICO, without having to pay for IEO on bad exchanges.
Jump to: