from what I observed is like that, good IEO is only held by good exchanges, you must know Harmony or even the one that is finished is Cartesi, both of these projects have successfully launched IEO on Binance, yup because Binance is a big exchange it is easy to find investors , if Harmony and Cartesi are held in exchanges like p2pb2b or probit, I'm sure 90% will fail
I believe that Exchange is one part of the reason why a certain IEO is successful. On the given scenario that Harmony and Cartesi got a successful IEO is somehow because of the exchange, Binance is one of the most famous and reputated exchanges today and no wonder that they have a bunch of users than any other exchange which means more promotion to the IEO project. There are some successful IEO happened inside Binance and project devs would probably choose to initiate their IEO there to gain more trust in the investors. 
Topic: The success of IEO is Exchange - page 15. (Read 2794 times)
from what I observed is like that, good IEO is only held by good exchanges, you must know Harmony or even the one that is finished is Cartesi, both of these projects have successfully launched IEO on Binance, yup because Binance is a big exchange it is easy to find investors , if Harmony and Cartesi are held in exchanges like p2pb2b or probit, I'm sure 90% will fail
There is no need to doubt about IEO in Binance because most of it is always successful, even many investors who fight to get a lottery will be able to participate in IEO in Binance, meaning that large exchanges always provide benefits for their investors.But you see the KingCasino project did an IEO in the first round at a price of $ 0.5 and sold 25,000,000 KCT equivalent to more than $ 10M and was done at the p2pb2b and Latoken exchanges.
https://twitter.com/kingcasino888/status/1249986637804613632
from what I observed is like that, good IEO is only held by good exchanges, you must know Harmony or even the one that is finished is Cartesi, both of these projects have successfully launched IEO on Binance, yup because Binance is a big exchange it is easy to find investors , if Harmony and Cartesi are held in exchanges like p2pb2b or probit, I'm sure 90% will fail
For me personally, I only invest in top tier coins. For example my recent investment - Creditcoin, ,the reason i invested into it is because of the press release and the news about how coinbase invested into the project.
Are you kidding me? Creditcoin is the leading currency in this market? For me this is one of the shitcoin in this market. For years, this altcoin still could not function like their roadmap and did not have any updates, and it looks like it's going to die this year
Creditcoin didn't do an IEO and it was still successful because it was backed by Coinbase and Y combinator. The exchange is important but so are the investors behind the project.
You are correct, most of the successful ieo on the big exchanges are not better than those who have struggled to raise enough capital for the project, it's all down to how big the exchange is.
Agreed with you, this keep me wondering when things had changed so drastically since the arrival of this IEO. We have seen many projects huge source of funds within their project environment and these types always distinguishe themselves from the fake funds or compelling exchange participants to buy into unwanted projects just to hold their tokens. Big exchanges that conducted ieo have been seen successful due to their large users on their platforms. The more buggerj the exchanges the more funds they're likely to raise.
Ofcourse, what good is a project without an exchange? Not just any but a good one, This is why project needs to make exchange listing top priority, listing on the right exchange will certainly help the project during the ieo process, but unfortunately some project don't see it that way, rather, they will choose the cheapest of all neglecting the damage it might cause to the growth of the project, I think most serious project always put this into account which is very necessary.
Every project wants to hold their IEO in top exchange but the fees and the criteria are just too much or they are not qualified so their only chances are those exchanges where they have a good chance to qualified and offered a much-lowered fee, but holding your IEO on top exchanges like Binance and Kucoin can really help their cause.
Ofcourse, what good is a project without an exchange? Not just any but a good one, This is why project needs to make exchange listing top priority, listing on the right exchange will certainly help the project during the ieo process, but unfortunately some project don't see it that way, rather, they will choose the cheapest of all neglecting the damage it might cause to the growth of the project, I think most serious project always put this into account which is very necessary.
The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%
You are absolutely right. No matter how bright your roadmap and whitepaper looks, listing our IEO on shitty exchanges say Vindax, P2PB2B, Probit exchanges etc will mark the beginning of your downfall. This is because over time, no IEO listed in these exchanges perform well. So the importance of good exchanges in projects cannot be overemphasized.
For me personally, I only invest in top tier coins. For example my recent investment - Creditcoin, ,the reason i invested into it is because of the press release and the news about how coinbase invested into the project.
I agree with you, indeed the success of IEO is in the Exchange if you want IEO to be successful and the tokens have a long term, then it's better to choose a good and trusted exchange. indeed if we see lately many IOEs have chosen p2pb2b or vindax even though both exchanges have bad reputations.
I think you have to be careful when you want to participate in IEO which is held at the exchange place because many cases end up scamming and making cryptocurrency worse, like the case that is still a hit now is the BCNEX exchange place where at that time it was able to get a hardcap but currently exposed to a case and ends up a scam.Correct. indeed we need to be vigilant before participating in IEO held in exchanges that have a bad reputation. I think there needs to be an authority to prevent the exchange of scams that continue to roam in the crypto world so that others can avoid loss.
The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%
It could be a big factor also but one thing that could help and become productive as their goal to be is to have a working product. In fact, not all projects that are listed on the top exchanges will be given a chance to walk on the alley and take the lead over the others. Investors are much looking for a project that gives benefits to everyone because this is a reason to increase their market demand. It was the team engagement that could make the project fully succeed not the exchanges itself.
Yes,you are very much right about this. The goal of ico and ieo might be same but the process make it very much different form other. In icos people's check many things like team, partnership,any big names in team, MVP and many more things. But now in ieo culture if binance announce a ieo we all know it gonna be reached hardcap in minutes. But if a project come with great setup but ieo in a small exchanges theni ts not gonna win. But it's also true most of big ieos atleast not in scamming side. But most of the small or bad project have that problem.
The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%
It could be a big factor also but one thing that could help and become productive as their goal to be is to have a working product. In fact, not all projects that are listed on the top exchanges will be given a chance to walk on the alley and take the lead over the others. Investors are much looking for a project that gives benefits to everyone because this is a reason to increase their market demand. It was the team engagement that could make the project fully succeed not the exchanges itself. 
The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%
There will be no good project but choose shitexchanges like P2PB2B or Vindax or Latoken. Only junk or fraudulent projects choose to go to such exchanges. because they will make enough roadmap in the most economical way and then take all the remaining investment and exit. done!Only real projects choose the IEO of top exchanges for long-term development. They know that when there is a large community, their ideas will be more likely to become reality.
Large exchanges have a large community and reputation too, so making IEO done there can be easily successful, if only exchanging with fake volume will make the project die, like the exchange you said
What you have said is a simple truth. New projects that still want to remain in this space and valid should choose a top exchange to conduct their ieo. Otherwise that will be the beginning of their failure.
It's one of the factor but it's not the only one that can make the investors invest on the project, but it's factor other factor are project potential who are the people behind the project and what it will contribute to the community, if I don't see some of these I prefer not to participate in their IEO, in the end it's always the contribution of the project to the community.
What you have said is a simple truth. New projects that still want to remain in this space and valid should choose a top exchange to conduct their ieo. Otherwise that will be the beginning of their failure.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 4282
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%
There's an atom of truth in what you just said, which shouldn't be so since that'll only attract short term Investors looking for quick profit and would easily dump your project when such opportunities present itself without having second thoughts. IEO should have made crowdfunding more secure in the sense that the trusted exchange would be in charge of overseeing the sale and reduces the chances of getting scammed and that's just it.
But all that have been ignore as the exchange are just concerned about their profit instead of putting the interest of their customers first. Those project that go rushing after this big exchanges find it hard to continue recieving the hype they did recieve at first because just as they had their turns to recieve all the attention, other projects will also have theirs by taking the attention away from them.
The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%
Some shit exchange is pushing new projects to become scam project by IEO. After success any IEO, shit exchange is giving false news to the legit project. Top IEO token pump in gate.io exchange which was SERO. Top exchange has high demand which can't afford average project then this project go for low volume exchange. I think the best example will be Thorcoin but p2pb2b or vindax still hasn't any good project. Jump to: